Re: [SR-Users] Some clarifications needed on async_task_route

2018-03-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,

no actions are executed in the same route block after the line with
async_task_route("NICE_TO_HAVE") -- see the readme of the async module
at the documentation for this function.

If you want to continue executing the actions after pushing a task for
another process, you can try to combine mqueue+rtimer, but in your
example won't work, because the rtimer won't have the current sip
message in order to get the dialog for it.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 19.03.18 16:41, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been exploring the async module a little, and async_task_route()
> more specifically. I have async_workers set, and the async module loaded.
>
> However, whenever this async function is involved in SIP processing,
> kamailio returns a 500 error to the UAC. I was hoping that someone
> could confirm that this function is suitable for my needs, I'm not
> sure I understand the docs very well on this one.
>
> So the plan is to have some of the processing of the transaction
> performed asynchronously, as it is not required for routing etc.
> Here's an example of what I'm trying to achieve, it's not really
> critical if NICE_TO_HAVE route functions fail etc, I just need
> request_route processing to continue normally without waiting
> for async_task_route("NICE_TO_HAVE") to finish whatever it's going to
> be doing:
>
> request_route() {
>
> ...
>
> SIP_PROCESSING_A
>
> ...
>
> async_task_route("NICE_TO_HAVE")
>
> ...
>
> SIP_PROCESSING_B
>
> t_relay();
>
> }
>
> route(NICE_TO_HAVE) {
>
> dlg_var(sth) = something_derived_from_global_vars();
>
> }
>
> Is this possible, or am I completely out of scope here? Thanks!
>
> BR,
> George
>
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - April 16-18, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] Some clarifications needed on async_task_route

2018-03-19 Thread George Diamantopoulos
Hello all,

I've been exploring the async module a little, and async_task_route() more
specifically. I have async_workers set, and the async module loaded.

However, whenever this async function is involved in SIP processing,
kamailio returns a 500 error to the UAC. I was hoping that someone could
confirm that this function is suitable for my needs, I'm not sure I
understand the docs very well on this one.

So the plan is to have some of the processing of the transaction performed
asynchronously, as it is not required for routing etc. Here's an example of
what I'm trying to achieve, it's not really critical if NICE_TO_HAVE route
functions fail etc, I just need request_route processing to continue
normally without waiting for async_task_route("NICE_TO_HAVE") to finish
whatever it's going to be doing:

request_route() {

...

SIP_PROCESSING_A

...

async_task_route("NICE_TO_HAVE")

...

SIP_PROCESSING_B

t_relay();

}

route(NICE_TO_HAVE) {

dlg_var(sth) = something_derived_from_global_vars();

}

Is this possible, or am I completely out of scope here? Thanks!

BR,
George
___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users