Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header

2020-07-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,

maybe the R-URI (address in the first line) is coming with a local
domain/ip, and then strict routing is done, meaning that next route
header is moved to R-URI, from where it can be overwritten by other
config actions.

Anyhow, set debug=3 and what the messages printed by rr module and core
when executing loose_route(), it shoud show if the URI in the route or
R-URI is matching myself.

Be also, you don't have any remove_hf("Route") executed by mistake (you
can use debugger module with cfgtrace enabled to check what actions are
executed).

Cheers,
Daniel

On 27.07.20 12:12, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>  
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>  
>
> I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1
> domain listed and that’s local. I also toggled the register_myself
> parameter and it is still removing the none local CARRIER_IP.
>
>  
>
> The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag,
> apart from that it looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it
> locally.
>
>  
>
> I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing
> things in Azure and on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well,
> what other steps do you suggest if any?
>
>  
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>  
>
> Jon
>
>  
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows 10
>
>  
>
> *From: *Daniel-Constantin Mierla <mailto:mico...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *27 July 2020 09:04
> *To: *Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; Jonathan Hunter
> <mailto:hunter...@hotmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> <mailto:sr-us...@lists.sip-router.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header
>
>  
>
> Hello,
>
> that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global
> parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself
> modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>  
>
> Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
>
> kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
>
>  
>
> I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side
> back out to
>
> the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none
> local route-header is
>
> consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
>
>  
>
> ie Route:  
>
>  
>
> Is this normal or configuration related?
>
>  
>
> As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header
> which doesnt contain the local
>
> Proxy IP.
>
>  
>
> Please can someone advise?
>
>  
>
> Many thanks
>
>  
>
> Jon
>
>  
>
> Sent from Mail
> 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657967884=VDmyqv%2BAtQjg9pfS1GfCxkH1Z1KtDcKyiAGcDzykrBk%3D=0>
> for Windows 10
>
>  
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
>
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.kamailio.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsr-users=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=cJ0imbe44ne4H9qzwb61orfVg9Qbi0bVs9GPZXJ%2BX58%3D=0>
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asipto.com%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=Tcz4WnXWfZSau9kATS6O7mn2VgP9EfzI1R5wiXG9AvI%3D=0>
> www.twitter.com/miconda 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twitter.com%2Fmiconda=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=3TKqjKKsN2kPZPvrSgu8IpZ10vxKm9Ic5TkXcIhdNFM%3D=0>
>  -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda 
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmiconda=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873=9qYTiFuMwyyYjku8lBTulY4sOWSQ4X

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header

2020-07-27 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the reply.

I don’t see the CARRIER_IP listed as an alias, and I have only 1 domain listed 
and that’s local. I also toggled the register_myself parameter and it is still 
removing the none local CARRIER_IP.

The route header containing the CARRIER_IP doesn’t contain a from tag, apart 
from that it looks normal and I cant fine any reference to it locally.

I haven’t seen this before, however this is my first time implementing things 
in Azure and on centos 7. Its only on outbound calls as well, what other steps 
do you suggest if any?

Thanks for the reply.

Jon

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla<mailto:mico...@gmail.com>
Sent: 27 July 2020 09:04
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; 
Jonathan Hunter<mailto:hunter...@hotmail.com>; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing 
List<mailto:sr-us...@lists.sip-router.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header


Hello,

that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global parameter or 
inside the domain module records with register_myself modparam enabled. Can you 
chack if any of those cases happens?

Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,

Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.

I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local 
route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.

ie Route: 

Is this normal or configuration related?

As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt 
contain the local
Proxy IP.

Please can someone advise?

Many thanks

Jon

Sent from 
Mail<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgo.microsoft.com%2Ffwlink%2F%3FLinkId%3D550986=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657967884=VDmyqv%2BAtQjg9pfS1GfCxkH1Z1KtDcKyiAGcDzykrBk%3D=0>
 for Windows 10




___

Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>

https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.kamailio.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsr-users=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=cJ0imbe44ne4H9qzwb61orfVg9Qbi0bVs9GPZXJ%2BX58%3D=0>

--

Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- 
www.asipto.com<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.asipto.com%2F=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=Tcz4WnXWfZSau9kATS6O7mn2VgP9EfzI1R5wiXG9AvI%3D=0>

www.twitter.com/miconda<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.twitter.com%2Fmiconda=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657977879=3TKqjKKsN2kPZPvrSgu8IpZ10vxKm9Ic5TkXcIhdNFM%3D=0>
 -- 
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fmiconda=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873=9qYTiFuMwyyYjku8lBTulY4sOWSQ4XXrqdVKXlCvmPo%3D=0>

Funding: 
https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paypal.me%2Fdcmierla=02%7C01%7C%7C4a6c036f98e446ab86ec08d83203adb2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435%7C1%7C0%7C637314338657987873=jV%2FMxPitAEk0BUV9ZlCXQPHiDAdM3a64HuW%2F%2B6H4rek%3D=0>

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header

2020-07-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello,

that can happen if you have CARRIER_IP as value for alias global
parameter or inside the domain module records with register_myself
modparam enabled. Can you chack if any of those cases happens?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 24.07.20 12:58, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>
> Hi Guys,
>
>  
>
> Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
>
> kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.
>
>  
>
> I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back
> out to
>
> the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local
> route-header is
>
> consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.
>
>  
>
> ie Route: 
>
>  
>
> Is this normal or configuration related?
>
>  
>
> As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header
> which doesnt contain the local
>
> Proxy IP.
>
>  
>
> Please can someone advise?
>
>  
>
> Many thanks
>
>  
>
> Jon
>
>  
>
> Sent from Mail  for
> Windows 10
>
>  
>
>
> ___
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[SR-Users] kamailio 5.3.5 - none local route header

2020-07-24 Thread Jonathan Hunter
Hi Guys,

Sorry if this is too generic or silly a question but I am testing
kamailio 5.3.5 within Azure and its behind NAT.

I am having an issue with passing an ACK from our internal side back out to
the carrier side and it appears having run loose_route a none local 
route-header is
consistently being removed by kamailio at this point.

ie Route: 

Is this normal or configuration related?

As I am unsure within what scenario I would remove a route header which doesnt 
contain the local
Proxy IP.

Please can someone advise?

Many thanks

Jon

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

___
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users