Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-users] Weight based routing
Alex Balashov wrote: Simplest thing to do would be to use 'dispatcher' with round-robin strategy and enter the servers in the table or list file in duplicate, in proportion to the weight allocation they have. On 07/27/2010 01:55 AM, Chandrakant Solanki wrote: Hello Also the carrierroute module has this capability. Cheers Marius Hello, I have setup 3 SIP server. It should be Kamailio, Asterisk or Any SIP Server. I have setup 3 server say Server A, Server B and Server C and each has weight like 50, 30, 20 in percentage. And I taken 10 calls and try to forward call based on weight. Is this possible in kamailio's module.. and if yes then which module will help me? Any Idea.. -- Regards, Chandrakant Solanki ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-users] Weight based routing
On 7/27/10 9:43 AM, marius zbihlei wrote: Alex Balashov wrote: Simplest thing to do would be to use 'dispatcher' with round-robin strategy and enter the servers in the table or list file in duplicate, in proportion to the weight allocation they have. just to note here that the devel version of dispatcher has dedicated weight-based load balancing algorithm - of course, will be available as stable with next major release - 3.1.0. Cheers, Daniel On 07/27/2010 01:55 AM, Chandrakant Solanki wrote: Hello Also the carrierroute module has this capability. Cheers Marius Hello, I have setup 3 SIP server. It should be Kamailio, Asterisk or Any SIP Server. I have setup 3 server say Server A, Server B and Server C and each has weight like 50, 30, 20 in percentage. And I taken 10 calls and try to forward call based on weight. Is this possible in kamailio's module.. and if yes then which module will help me? Any Idea.. -- Regards, Chandrakant Solanki ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/ ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Transformation Assignment to an AVP
Hello,
interesting, when I troubleshooted before your previous report, I used
this piece of cfg:
xlog(==\n);
$var(b) =
v=0\r\n
o=- 5 2 IN IP4 192.168.3.100\r\n
s=CounterPath Bria\r\n
c=IN IP4 174.37.XX.XXX\r\n
t=0 0\r\n
m=audio 64192 RTP/AVP 107 0 8 18 101\r\n
a=sendrecv\r\n
a=rtpmap:107 BV32/16000\r\n
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000\r\n
a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes\r\n
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000\r\n
a=fmtp:101 0-15\r\n
a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n;
$var(c) = $(var(b){re.subst,|.*m=audio [0-9]+ RTP/AVP ([0-9 ]+).+|\1|s});
xlog(==: [$var(c)]\n);
And the xlog printed properly the value of $var(c) - meaning that it was
assigned the right value. I will test with avps next time I have a chance.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/26/10 9:11 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Hello,
I have the following transformation on the SDP Body:
$(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio ([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP ([0-9
]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s})
However when I assign this to an AVP, i.e.
$avp(s:sdp-payloads) = $(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio ([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP
([0-9 ]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s});
I receive back a NULL result / transformation regex does not match
is what I receive with high verbose syslog on kamailio.
HOWEVER.
When I do something like this:
xlog(L_INFO, Payloads Available: $(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio
([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP ([0-9 ]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s}));
It executes properly -- transformation regex matches and the payloads
are displayed as expected.
If anyone can provide any insight as to what I may be doing wrong it
would be greatly appreciated.
P.S. Kamailio SVN Revision # 2:5906M (1.5.2-notls).
Also I CC'ed devel list (as I do believe this may be a bug).
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0.2 mysql create table domain definition
On Monday 26 July 2010, Stagg Shelton wrote: The script in the source scripts/mysql/my_create.sql uses the the following definition CREATE TABLE domain ( did VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL, [..] ); The script in the source utils/kamctl/mysql/domain-create.sql uses the following definition CREATE TABLE domain ( id INT(10) UNSIGNED AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, [..] ) ENGINE=MyISAM; Which table definition is the correct definition to be used. Hi Stagg, the first one is the version for the domain module from sr (modules_s), the latter is the one for the kamailio (modules_k) domain module. Cheers, Henning ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] multiple instances on different ports
Hi, As it is stated on the documentation, force_send_socket() can only take a listening interface as an argument. Try adding listen=udp:192.168.1.111:5060 Cheers, Uriel On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Alex rsm alex-...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for your response: When using the function you suggested: listen=udp:192.168.1.111:5061 listen=udp:192.168.1.111:5062 . force_send_socket(192.168.1.111:5060); ... I am getting the following error message: Jul 27 09:45:07 lab-openser01 /usr/sbin/openser[8861]: ERROR:core:fix_actions: bad force_send_socket argument: 209.16.123.111:5060 (ser doesn't listen on it) Jul 27 09:45:07 lab-openser01 /usr/sbin/openser[8861]: ERROR:core:fix_actions: fixing failed (code=-476) at cfg line 332 Jul 27 09:45:07 lab-openser01 /usr/sbin/openser[8861]: ERROR:core:main: failed to fix configuration with err code -476 As I mentioned I am trying to run multiple instances of openser with diff ports and proxy all traffic coming from diff ports to a fix port 5060. Domains are set within a perl script. PS: I am using openser 1.3 release within ubuntu OS. Thanks, R Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:55:54 -0300 From: uriel.rozenb...@gmail.com To: rob1...@gmail.com CC: us...@lists.kamailio.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] multiple instances on different ports Hi, try using force_send_socket but you'll have to declare the socket with 5060 as well http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.0.x#force_send_socket Cheers, Uriel On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Robert R rob1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to run multiple different instances of openser on the same server using different ports. Regardless of receiving INVITE on any of the ports (5061, 5062, ...) I want openser always to proxy the message to port 5060. invite:5061 --- openser -- invite:5060 invite:5062 --- openser -- invite:5060 By adding two listen ports as follow, openser sends the traffic to the same outgoing port as the incoming port: listen=udp:209.16.123.160:5061 listen=udp:209.16.123.160:5062 Is there a way to hard code the outgoing port? or I should overwrite the port? Thanks, R ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. Learn more. ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0 cann't access the RTPProxy
Hi Daniel, I use the rtpproxy 1.2.1. And seems loopback interface cann't be caputred on Solaris. I have tried the rtpproxy on other interface and tried the caputre, however didn't see anything on port 7722. One more thing like to mention is that I got some error like below: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-std=gnu99 -Wall -Wno-uninitialized -g -O2 -MT rtpp_notify.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/rtpp_notify.Tpo -c -o rtpp_notify.o rtpp_notify.c; \ then mv -f .deps/rtpp_notify.Tpo .deps/rtpp_notify.Po; else rm -f .deps/rtpp_notify.Tpo; exit 1; fi rtpp_notify.c: In function `reconnect_timeout_handler': rtpp_notify.c:240: error: `AF_LOCAL' undeclared (first use in this function) rtpp_notify.c:240: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once rtpp_notify.c:240: error: for each function it appears in.) gmake[1]: *** [rtpp_notify.o] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/opt/csw/src/rtpproxy' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 I search on internet and added the following in the beginnng of the rtpp_notify.c, and the make gets through. Not sure if this change has any issue. #ifndef AF_LOCAL #define AF_LOCAL AF_UNIX #endif Thanks, Kevin Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:53:21 +0200 From: mico...@gmail.com To: kevin@hotmail.com CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0 cann't access the RTPProxy Hello, can you sniff the loopback interface for communication on port 7722 (i.e., using ngrep/wireshark, etc...)? What is the version of rtppproxy do you have? Cheers, Daniel On 7/27/10 3:58 AM, JinKevin wrote: Guys, Anyone has some feedback on this? Thanks, Kevin Hi All, I have the kamailio configed as below on Solaris 10 (Sparc): # - nathelper - #!ifdef WITH_NAT modparam(nathelper, rtpproxy_sock, udp:127.0.0.1:7722) modparam(nathelper, natping_interval, 30) modparam(nathelper, ping_nated_only, 1) modparam(nathelper, sipping_bflag, 7) modparam(nathelper, sipping_from, sip:pin...@kamailio.org) modparam(registrar|nathelper, received_avp, $avp(i:80)) modparam(usrloc, nat_bflag, 6) #!endif and rtpproxy is started as AppSer01:ipunity@/opt/ipunity$ ps -ef |grep rtp ipunity 4687 1 0 12:58:20 ? 0:00 /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l 210.xx.xx.xx -s udp:localhost:7722 AppSer01:ipunity@/opt/ipunity$ netstat -an |grep 7722 127.0.0.1.7722Idle 127.0.0.1.41509 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41510 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41511 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41512 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41513 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41514 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41515 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41516 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41517 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41518 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected 127.0.0.1.41519 127.0.0.1.7722 Connected However, kamailio is not able to connect the rtpporxy, Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 788202 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2457]: can't send command to a RTP proxy Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 844113 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2492]: proxy udp:127.0.0.1:7722 does not respond, disable it Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 582370 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:3144]: no available proxies Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 788202 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2457]: can't send command to a RTP proxy Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 844113 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2492]: proxy udp:127.0.0.1:7722 does not respond, disable it Jul 24 12:58:59 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22867]: [ID 582370 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:3144]: no available proxies Jul 24 12:59:04 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22870]: [ID 582370 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2627]: no available proxies Jul 24 12:59:04 AppSer01 /usr/local/kamailio-3.0/sbin/kamailio[22870]: [ID 582370 local0.error] ERROR: nathelper [nathelper.c:2627]: no available proxies Any helps are appreciated. Thanks, Kevin 聊天+搜索+邮箱 想要轻松出游,手机MSN帮你搞定! 立刻下载！ 使用新一代 Windows Live Messenger 轻松交流和共享！ 立刻下载！ ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/ _ MSN十年回馈，每位用户可免费获得价值25元的卡巴斯基反病毒软件2010激活码，快来领取！ http://kaba.msn.com.cn/?k=1___ SIP
Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Transformation Assignment to an AVP
Daniel,
I've also tried with script vars. I think it has something to do with the
actual dynamic psuedo variable $rb. Var assignment and mangling does not work
for me either. I.e. Keep everything the same except $var(test) = $rb and so
on. Let me know if this makes sense.
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
*Forgot to reply to ALL (resending)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:50:36
To: Brandon Armsteadbran...@cryy.com
Cc: us...@lists.kamailio.org; de...@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Transformation Assignment to an AVP
Hello,
interesting, when I troubleshooted before your previous report, I used
this piece of cfg:
xlog(==\n);
$var(b) =
v=0\r\n
o=- 5 2 IN IP4 192.168.3.100\r\n
s=CounterPath Bria\r\n
c=IN IP4 174.37.XX.XXX\r\n
t=0 0\r\n
m=audio 64192 RTP/AVP 107 0 8 18 101\r\n
a=sendrecv\r\n
a=rtpmap:107 BV32/16000\r\n
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000\r\n
a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes\r\n
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000\r\n
a=fmtp:101 0-15\r\n
a=nortpproxy:yes\r\n;
$var(c) = $(var(b){re.subst,|.*m=audio [0-9]+ RTP/AVP ([0-9 ]+).+|\1|s});
xlog(==: [$var(c)]\n);
And the xlog printed properly the value of $var(c) - meaning that it was
assigned the right value. I will test with avps next time I have a chance.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 7/26/10 9:11 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Hello,
I have the following transformation on the SDP Body:
$(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio ([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP ([0-9
]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s})
However when I assign this to an AVP, i.e.
$avp(s:sdp-payloads) = $(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio ([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP
([0-9 ]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s});
I receive back a NULL result / transformation regex does not match
is what I receive with high verbose syslog on kamailio.
HOWEVER.
When I do something like this:
xlog(L_INFO, Payloads Available: $(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)m=audio
([0-9]+) RTP\/AVP ([0-9 ]+)\015\012(.*)$/\3/s}));
It executes properly -- transformation regex matches and the payloads
are displayed as expected.
If anyone can provide any insight as to what I may be doing wrong it
would be greatly appreciated.
P.S. Kamailio SVN Revision # 2:5906M (1.5.2-notls).
Also I CC'ed devel list (as I do believe this may be a bug).
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
