[SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?
Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called. This works fine for some numbers but not all. Is there a bigint string function as this would solve my problems? The numbers I am receiving are 14 digits long which s.int is returning as something completely different to what it should be. Thanks Lee ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure(2);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for Some Rate Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another rate
plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
} else {
xlog(No gateways found!);
Stagg
On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
like the gw_name.
- Reply message -
From: Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure(2);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for Some Rate Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another rate
plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
} else {
xlog(No gateways found!);
Stagg
On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Stagg,
While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry
in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP. I believe
with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.
This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am wondering
if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed because of
these look ups. Everything that I have read so far is that the gw_name is
just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it. Boo.
-graham
On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, GP Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
like the gw_name.
- Reply message -
From: Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure(2);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for Some Rate Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another rate
plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
} else {
xlog(No gateways found!);
Stagg
On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings
Hello, On 1/29/11 6:26 AM, Lee Archer wrote: Hi, is it possible to join strings? I'd like toprepend a number to a string prior to processing it to an int? using + with variables/values holding strings results in concatenation: $var(x) = 123; $var(y) = abc + $var(x); Then the $var(y) will be abc123; Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Well, ran into another wall I can’t seem to do the force_send_socket at
the point of when next_gw() is called in the failure route.
Is there anyway to clear and/or re-assign the data that is making it where I
can’t re-write the transaction to come from another IP addy?
On 1/29/11 11:01 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Stagg,
While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with an entry in
the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in question.
When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not the IP. I believe
with that, I can differentiate between the two... And when I see hostname of
blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and do the force_send_socket.
This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am wondering
if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be delayed because of
these look ups. Everything that I have read so far is that the gw_name is
just information, the module doesn’t actually have access to it. Boo.
-graham
On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, GP Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by something else,
like the gw_name.
- Reply message -
From: Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the different rate
plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be relevant.
if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure(2);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for Some Rate Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another rate
plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
} else {
xlog(No gateways found!);
Stagg
On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR, needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks with the
carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the same between
the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?
Lee, You will need to cast this to a string / varchar. Sincerely, Brandon Armstead On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Lee Archer lee.arc...@thebigword.comwrote: Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called. This works fine for some numbers but not all. Is there a bigint string function as this would solve my problems? The numbers I am receiving are 14 digits long which s.int is returning as something completely different to what it should be. Thanks Lee ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
I have the force send socket in the branch route too. So assume the
first attempt fails and the call makes it to the failure route that I
setup. Once it gets to the branch route then it executes the following
where you can perform your logic again.
branch_route[2] {
xlog(new branch at $ru\n);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for A Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
}
Stagg
On 1/29/11 12:32 PM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Well, ran into another wall I can’t seem to do the
force_send_socket at the point of when next_gw() is called in the
failure route.
Is there anyway to clear and/or re-assign the data that is making it
where I can’t re-write the transaction to come from another IP addy?
On 1/29/11 11:01 AM, Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Stagg,
While the Ips are the same, the suggestion to use “rd” along with
an entry in the “hostname” column appears to be what I want.
I assigned in my DNS some testing hostnames to the single IP in
question. When debugging, I see that rd contains the hostname, not
the IP. I believe with that, I can differentiate between the
two... And when I see hostname of blah.blah.tld, then go ahead and
do the force_send_socket.
This definitely solves the issue for the time being. However, I am
wondering if/when call volume increases if the call-setup time be
delayed because of these look ups. Everything that I have read so
far is that the gw_name is just information, the module doesn’t
actually have access to it. Boo.
-graham
On 1/29/11 8:36 AM, GP Wooden gra...@g-rock.net wrote:
Same destination IP for both rate decks, so I need to go by
something else, like the gw_name.
- Reply message -
From: Stagg Shelton st...@vocalcloud.com
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2011 8:27 am
Subject: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from
other IP address
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Do the provider gateways have the same IP address for the
different rate
plans? If the gateways are different then the following may be
relevant.
if (next_gw()) {
# prepare for lcr failover
t_on_failure(2);
if($rd==aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa)
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for Some Rate Plan);
force_send_socket(udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060);
}
else
{
xlog (L_INFO, This is a request for another rate
plan);
force_send_socket(udp:yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:5060);
};
route(2);
} else {
xlog(No gateways found!);
Stagg
On 1/29/11 9:10 AM, Graham Wooden wrote:
Hi there,
I have a requirement now that for one of my GW¹s in my LCR,
needs to be
sourced from another IP address (two different rate-decks
with the carrier).
This ratedeck will always be at least 2nd inline ...
I was thinking something along the sorts ... Some pseudo code:
failure_route [2] {
.
.
if (next_gw()) {
if ( name = 'gw_name') {
force_send_socket(udp:ip.address.of.certain.ip:5060);
} else {
# just dummy, as we will send out our default IP for everyone
else.
}
t_on_failure(2);
route(19);
}
.
.
.
}
What variable will have the value that's in the gw_name
column? I can't go
by the IP address in $ru because the destination IP is the
same between the
two ratedecks.
Overall, Is that the best way to handle this requirement?
Thanks all,
-graham
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP
Re: [SR-Users] LCR next_gw() - certain GW, source from other IP address
Also, I don't believe force_send_socket() accepts PVs as arguments. But $fs accomplishes the same end, and is a mutable PV. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio?
Thanks for the help. I decided to cut the number down further instead. Regards Lee From: Brandon Armstead [mailto:bran...@cryy.com] Sent: Sat 29/01/2011 17:32 To: Lee Archer Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Can you use a bigint with Kamailio? Lee, You will need to cast this to a string / varchar. Sincerely, Brandon Armstead On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Lee Archer lee.arc...@thebigword.com wrote: Hi, I am trying to run dispatcher based on the inbound number called. This works fine for some numbers but not all. Is there a bigint string function as this would solve my problems? The numbers I am receiving are 14 digits long which s.int http://s.int/ is returning as something completely different to what it should be. Thanks Lee ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings
Thanks for the help. I thought I had tried this way but I will try again. Regards Lee From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Sat 29/01/2011 17:16 To: Lee Archer Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Joining strings Hello, On 1/29/11 6:26 AM, Lee Archer wrote: Hi, is it possible to join strings? I'd like to prepend a number to a string prior to processing it to an int? using + with variables/values holding strings results in concatenation: $var(x) = 123; $var(y) = abc + $var(x); Then the $var(y) will be abc123; Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com http://www.asipto.com/ ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] planning release of v3.1.2
Hi, whats about: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=detailstask_id=108 I think that some users are trying to register to an asterisk system. Or does somebody have a solution for that? A new release would be nice!!! Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bernhard - Original Message - From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] To: kamailio [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org], sr-dev [mailto:sr-...@lists.sip-router.org] Sent: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:15:50 +0100 Subject: [sr-dev] planning release of v3.1.2 Hello, I think it is time to release v3.1.2, first date that comes in my mind is next Thursday if everyone feels it is enough time to take care of backporting any fix he/she did and it is not yet there. That will provide us a fresh release for the FOSDEM event. If not, then maybe the other week, Tuesday, so the participants at the Kamailio Devel training in Barcelona can practice on it. Soon after we should plan also a release for previous stable, branch 3.0. Anyone having other options? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com ___ sr-dev mailing list sr-...@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route
Hi,
is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I mean,
within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route[NAT]. Is this also
possible for this special routes? If this is possible, is it also allowed to
call a route which will normally called from the main route { ... }
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bernhard
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route
Hi,
that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)
One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the
request was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?
Best regards,
Bernhard
- Original Message -
From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com]
To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.sutt...@winet.ch]
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org]
Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route
Yes.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
260 Peachtree Street NW
Suite 2200
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Bernhard Suttner bernhard.sutt...@winet.ch
wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I
mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route
[NAT]. Is this also possible for this special routes? If this is
possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally
called from the main route { ... }
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bernhard
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] xlogl and pseudo variables
Hi, I am using xlogl for debugging and logging the most important actions within the kamailio script. Does it take much resources if I use the pseudo variables with the xlogl statements? Example: xlogl(L_NOTICE, Route $rm to destination! F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si \n); I´m planning to do this in all the xlogl statements to be able to debug / see whats going on on the system. Thanks in advance. Best regard, Bernhard ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
