Re: [SR-Users] msilo clarification
On 13/03/15 12:55, mayamatakeshi wrote: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com mailto:mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, On 13/03/15 10:54, mayamatakeshi wrote: Hello, maybe this phrase in the msilo doc is misleading: /Every time when a user registers with Kamailio, the module is looking in database for offline messages intended for that user. All of them will be sent to contact address provided in REGISTER request./ http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/msilo.html The above seems to imply that msilo would send the call directly to the contact address. But this doesn't seem to be the case based on what is mentioned in several threads in the mailing list and in what I saw in the msilo.c code. If so, is there a reason to be a such? Would it be a problem to allow msilo m_dump to get the values of contact, received and path and use them when calling t_request? IIRC, the MESSAGE requests are sent to the From address that sent the message. That's typically the AoR, meaning that the request is sent to the server of that user which should do lookup location to resolve the destination. There is an option to send some notification back to origin when the destination is offline, controlled by: - http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/msilo.html#msilo.p.use_contact But that should not be related to relaying the instant messages when the user becomes online. If the destination user is on same kamailio, be sure you don't authenticate requests coming from the same box (ie, skip authentication if src_ip==myself). Daniel, thanks for the explanation. I am doing as you described. Everything is running fine. I was just intrigued about having to loop the request if my own server is the registrar. The loop is local so there is no much impact. When msilo was developed (iirc, like 2003) there was not much inter-module API and this was the solution to go. Now probably msilo can be bound to usrloc and use the internal exported API, but it is more like some effort for no real big benefits. The existing behaviour still needs to be kept because msilo can be on a different instance that location server. Of course a patch will be accepted, but at least for me there are other higher priority features to work on for the moment. A benefit of current behavior is more control of what to do with dumped messages in request_route when receiving it via local loop. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value
Hello,
but the INVITE request goes out with 2 Record Route headers, if you get
them in the 200ok.
Not sure how it is going to work overall, you will have to manually set
local sockets for requests within dialog, because you are doing also
trasport layer gatewaying (tcp-udp).
Anyhow, as a solution, maybe you should just not be using record_route()
function and just add the header with insert_hf() for the invite, remove
the Record-Route header for 200ok with remove_hf() and insert a new one
again with insert_hf()
If you know the local address (IP/port/transport) you want to put in the
Record-Route, you can build the header as:
insert_hf(Record-Route:
sip:_LOCAL_IP_:_LOCAL_PORT_;transport=_LOCAL_TRANSPORT_;lr=on;ftag=$ft;nat=yes\r\n);
Requests within the dialog can be handled with loose_route(), but again,
you have to do more in config for selecting the local socket to send to
next hop.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 13:35, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I want do clean up on routes from first SUBSCRIBE, that when traffic
goes to public side of kamailio will be only public route and when
traffic is internal the Record-Route will stay internal only. In SDP
I see like this.
I tired double routes set 0 in rr, but didn't clean enough.
--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
192.168.88.252:5062;received=client_pub_ipbranch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062
Record-Route: sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes
On public side remote this Record-Route
Record-Route:
sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5084;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes
On private side remote this Record-Route
From: Slava Bendersky sips:10...@networklab.ca;tag=a185d974ec
To: sips:10...@networklab.ca;tag=as00757d3e
Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83
CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE
Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1)
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY,
INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE
Supported: replaces, timer
Expires: 3600
Contact: sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060;expires=3600
Content-Length: 0
Slava.
*From: *Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com
*To: *sr-users sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Monday, March 16, 2015 7:01:54 AM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value
Hello,
can you give an example of incoming header and how you want to be
after modification?
It is not clear for me what end result you want/expect.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/03/15 06:41, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma.
My log shows
Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO:
script: [SUBSCRIBE], Inbound connection from Client Public IP
Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: ERROR:
script: null
Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO:
script: [SUBSCRIBE], Route for removal: 'null'
route snippet.
route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] {
# Getting record routes
if(is_present_hf(Route)) {
xlog(L_INFO, [$rm], Inbound connection from
$si\n);
if(is_method(SUBSCRIBE)) {
if(is_ip_rfc1918($si)) {
xlog($sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[-1]));
xlog(L_INFO, [$rm], Route for
removal: '$sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[-1])'\n);
remove_hf_value(Record-Route[-1]);
} else {
xlog($sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[1]));
xlog(L_INFO, [$rm], Route for
removal: '$sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n);
remove_hf_value(Record-Route[1]);
}
}
}
return;
}
Slava,
*From: *Slava Bendersky volga...@networklab.ca
*To: *sr-users sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
*Sent: *Friday, March 13, 2015 1:00:44 PM
*Subject: *[SR-Users] remove_hf_value
Hello Everyone,
I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value
And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG);
route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] {
# Getting record routes
if(is_present_hf(Record-Route)) {
if(is_method(SUBSCRIBE)) {
xlog($sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[1]));
xlog(L_INFO, [$rm], Route for removal:
'$sel(@hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n);
remove_hf_value(Record-Route[1]);
}
}
Re: [SR-Users] Redirect server for load balancing and HA
On 13/03/15 16:39, Markus wrote: [...] I think this is something specific for your environment. Kamailio doesn't have any issues sending redirect replies. A proxy might be required in case of natted endpoints when they cannot communicate each other. But otherwise, if you don't want the new INVITE to pass again via LB, then you can send 3xx. Other than communication between natted endpoints you don't see any disadvantage of using Kamailio for LB+HA as Redirect server instead as proxy server? From Kamailio point of view, there is nothing. When doing redirect, the accounting for new calls (resulted from redirect) is no longer possible on the sip server, but I guess that is not something you look for in this scenario. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
I will see if I can get this version somewhere and test. So far we
mainly deployed to debian wheezy that has php 5.4.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/15 11:39, Boris Ivanov wrote:
php -v
PHP 5.6.6 (cli) (built: Mar 5 2015 21:22:52)
Copyright (c) 1997-2015 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.6.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2015 Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v7.0.4-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2015, by Zend
Technologies
uname -a
FreeBSD score10 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Fri Jan
17 01:46:25 UTC 2014
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
mysql -v
Server version: 5.6.23 Source distribution
Kamailio installed with pkg install kamailio
Siremis installed from source (it was many permissions problem for
temporary files)
10452721 Feb 2 09:16 siremis-4.2.0.tgz.
*From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
Behalf Of *Daniel-Constantin Mierla
*Sent:* Donnerstag, 12. März 2015 11:34
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Boris Ivanov
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
Hello,
what is the version of PHP you have installed?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 18:34, Boris Ivanov wrote:
Hi
Hope this is right place to post my question.
I have installed siremis under FreeBSD 10
It went through well. DB created with /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create.
Problem happen when I trying to login as admin.
[{target:ERROR,content:
*\n[2015-03-11 17:31:37 (GMT)] An exception occurred while
executing this script:
\nError message: **#8192, Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be called statically,
assuming $this from incompatible context\/font
\nScript name and line number of
error:\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php:268\/font
\n*
*function:\/b errorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/sysheader.inc 117\n
function:\/b userErrorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
268\n
function:\/b setQuoteIdentifiers ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
177\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj.php
37\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php
166\n
function:\/b constructObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php
56\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\, 0 ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizSystem.php 252\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
92\n
function:\/b authDBUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
66\n
function:\/b authenticateUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/user\/form\/LoginForm.php
92\n
function:\/b Login ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
310\n
function:\/b invoke ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
110\n
function:\/b dispatchRequest ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
32\n
function:\/b include_once (
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php\
) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/bin\/controller.php
6\/div\n*
*
*
*Please ask system administrator for help...\/div\n}]*
Anyone knows how to fix?
Boris
This message and any attachments contain confidential information and
must not be disclosed to a third party without the prior written
consent of
setcom. If you have received it erroneously, please discard it and
contact
us by return.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
Some modules use local variables to store some values to be used later
when an action is done.
In this specific case, the add_rr_param(), which should be used
internally by dialog, is checking to see if the Record-Route header was
added. If yes, then the parameter is added to it. If not, it is kept in
the local variable and record_route() will check that variable to see if
there is anything else to be added to the header.
When suspending and resuming, practically the request handling moves to
another and the local variable is lost.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/03/15 23:15, Shane Harrison wrote:
Yes that worked. Thanks. Can you explain why the text ops for adding the
parameter aren't transparent to the suspend/resume process. Would be useful
to better understand so I can avoid similar issues in the future.
Cheers and thanks
Shane
-Original Message-
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 10:32 a.m.
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
Can you try moving the record_route() before execution of the ims_charging
function?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/03/15 22:21, Shane Harrison wrote:
Weird - just listening to your voice on youtube video of talk on async
in kamailio and get your email response. Sort of all senses
response :-)
Yes have record_route and it is in the route[LOCATION] block. This is
called
from the CHARGING_CCR_REPLY block i.e. after the ims_charging function is
called.
Cheers
Shane
-Original Message-
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On
Behalf Of Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March 2015 10:16 a.m.
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
Do you have record_route() in your code? Where is it relative to the
ims_charging function?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/03/15 20:58, Shane Harrison wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
From the request_route block I call the ims_charging module function
Ro_CCR(). This is non-blocking and one of the parameters in the call
is the route block to be called ( e.g. CHARGING_CCR_REPLY ) when the
response to the charging request is obtained. Looking at the code,
the Ro_CCR() function does a t_suspend() and then the ims_charging
module does a
t_continue() when the response is received. Then the specified
routing block is called and processing of the INVITE continues.
route[CHARGING_CCR_REPLY] {
xlog(L_DBG,cca_return code is $avp(s:cca_return_code)\n);
switch ($avp(s:cca_return_code)) {
case 1: #success
route(LOCATION);
route(RELAY);
break;
.
}
It appears that the RR parameter that is added during the
request_route
processing (via dialog tracking) is no longer there when the INVITE
continues being processed in the CHARGING_CCR_REPLY route block. Is
that what you would expect? Any pointers to solutions?
Hope that answers your question.
Cheers
Shane
From: sr-users [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 March 2015 00:24
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
In what callback do you need it?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 3/17/15, Shane Harrison shane.harri...@imgtec.com wrote:
Thanks Daniel. Yes I am using the ims_charging module hence the
need for the dialoguing module.
I have confirmed that the dialog_id (DID) is added if I t_relay()
the INVITE in the request_route. Hence dialog_ng is adding the
parameter to the record_route when it creates a new_dialog. It is
however lost once I exit from request_route.
How do I ensure the RR parameter gets added when I resume
processing the INVITE in the callback route block?
Cheers and thanks
Shane
From: sr-users [sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] on behalf of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 March 2015 19:34
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dialogs not deleted on BYE
Hello,
dialog_ng is more or less tailored for IMS modules, dialog module
is still in use and very actual.
If you are not using IMS module, you should try the dialog module.
I haven't seen any issues for it lately and if there are, they will
get fixed.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 17/03/15 03:28, Shane Harrison wrote:
Hi all,
Have found a few threads on this before which have clarified my
understanding a little but not yet presented me with a solution.
I am using dialog_ng. dlg_manage() is deprecated and as per the
documentation, I am simply setting a dialog flag early in the
request_route.
Kamctl dialog show does indeed show the dialogs are tracked, but
they are not destroyed on the receipt of the BYE. Dialog ref
count remains at 2 and in
Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
OK. What is the php version you have now? Just to compare and focus on
the version that needs to be checked?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/03/15 11:41, Boris Ivanov wrote:
Thanks Daniel
Meanwhile I installed it on Ubuntu precise. Works very good.
BR/Boris
*From:*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Mittwoch, 18. März 2015 09:28
*To:* Boris Ivanov; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
I will see if I can get this version somewhere and test. So far we
mainly deployed to debian wheezy that has php 5.4.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/15 11:39, Boris Ivanov wrote:
php -v
PHP 5.6.6 (cli) (built: Mar 5 2015 21:22:52)
Copyright (c) 1997-2015 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.6.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2015 Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v7.0.4-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2015, by Zend
Technologies
uname -a
FreeBSD score10 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Fri
Jan 17 01:46:25 UTC 2014
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
mailto:r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
mysql -v
Server version: 5.6.23 Source distribution
Kamailio installed with pkg install kamailio
Siremis installed from source (it was many permissions problem for
temporary files)
10452721 Feb 2 09:16 siremis-4.2.0.tgz.
*From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
Behalf Of *Daniel-Constantin Mierla
*Sent:* Donnerstag, 12. März 2015 11:34
*To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Boris Ivanov
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
Hello,
what is the version of PHP you have installed?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 18:34, Boris Ivanov wrote:
Hi
Hope this is right place to post my question.
I have installed siremis under FreeBSD 10
It went through well. DB created with /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl
create.
Problem happen when I trying to login as admin.
[{target:ERROR,content:
*\n[2015-03-11 17:31:37 (GMT)] An exception occurred while
executing this script:
\nError message: **#8192, Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be called statically,
assuming $this from incompatible context\/font
\nScript name and line number of
error:\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php:268\/font
\n*
*function:\/b errorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/sysheader.inc
117\n
function:\/b userErrorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
268\n
function:\/b setQuoteIdentifiers ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
177\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj.php
37\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php
166\n
function:\/b constructObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php
56\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\, 0 ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizSystem.php
252\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
92\n
function:\/b authDBUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
66\n
function:\/b authenticateUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/user\/form\/LoginForm.php
92\n
function:\/b Login ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
310\n
function:\/b invoke ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
110\n
function:\/b dispatchRequest ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php
32\n
Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
Thanks Daniel
Meanwhile I installed it on Ubuntu precise. Works very good.
BR/Boris
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 18. März 2015 09:28
To: Boris Ivanov; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
I will see if I can get this version somewhere and test. So far we mainly
deployed to debian wheezy that has php 5.4.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12/03/15 11:39, Boris Ivanov wrote:
php -v
PHP 5.6.6 (cli) (built: Mar 5 2015 21:22:52)
Copyright (c) 1997-2015 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v2.6.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2015 Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v7.0.4-dev, Copyright (c) 1999-2015, by Zend Technologies
uname -a
FreeBSD score10 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #0 r260789: Fri Jan 17
01:46:25 UTC 2014 r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
mysql -v
Server version: 5.6.23 Source distribution
Kamailio installed with pkg install kamailio
Siremis installed from source (it was many permissions problem for temporary
files)
10452721 Feb 2 09:16 siremis-4.2.0.tgz.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Donnerstag, 12. März 2015 11:34
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Boris Ivanov
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] siremis login issue
Hello,
what is the version of PHP you have installed?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 18:34, Boris Ivanov wrote:
Hi
Hope this is right place to post my question.
I have installed siremis under FreeBSD 10
It went through well. DB created with /usr/local/sbin/kamdbctl create.
Problem happen when I trying to login as admin.
[{target:ERROR,content:
\n[2015-03-11 17:31:37 (GMT)] An exception occurred while executing this script:
\nError message: #8192, Non-static method BizSystem::getConfiguration() should
not be called statically, assuming $this from incompatible context\/font
\nScript name and line number of
error:\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php:268\/font
\n
function:\/b errorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/sysheader.inc 117\n
function:\/b userErrorHandler ( 8192, \Non-static method
BizSystem::getConfiguration() should not be ca...\,
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstrac...\,
268, Array(0) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
268\n
function:\/b setQuoteIdentifiers ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj_Abstract.php
177\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/data\/BizDataObj.php 37\n
function:\/b __construct ( Array(1) ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php 166\n
function:\/b constructObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/ObjectFactory.php 56\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\, 0 ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizSystem.php 252\n
function:\/b getObject ( \system.do.UserDO\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
92\n
function:\/b authDBUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/service\/authService.php
66\n
function:\/b authenticateUser ( \admin\, \admin\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/modules\/user\/form\/LoginForm.php
92\n
function:\/b Login ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 310\n
function:\/b invoke ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 110\n
function:\/b dispatchRequest ( ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php 32\n
function:\/b include_once (
\\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/openbiz\/bin\/BizController.php\ ) @
\/usr\/local\/www\/apache24\/data\/siremis\/bin\/controller.php 6\/div\n
_
Please ask system administrator for help...\/div\n}]
Anyone knows how to fix?
Boris
This message and any attachments contain confidential information and
must not be disclosed to a third party without the prior written consent of
setcom. If you have received it erroneously, please discard it and contact
us by return.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
[SR-Users] Kamailio and Busy Lamp Fields (BLF)
Hello, a bit of time ago I played with Kamailio and BLF, therefore I published kind of getting started configuration file for this feature. It is available at: - http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf The plan was to add more to the tutorial, some guidelines for configuring the phones, but the time didn't allow it so far. Keep an eye on it for some new content. Contributions are also welcome, send them to me or take the content and publish it with new additions on another place. Hopefully is going to be useful for some people out there. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] SQLOPS bug
Hi Gents,
Please consider applying this patch:
--- ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c.orig 2015-03-18 16:33:56.994320505 +0100
+++ ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c 2015-03-18 16:34:11.254419341 +0100
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
LM_ERR(row index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, i, res-nrows);
goto error;
}
- if(i=res-ncols)
+ if(j=res-ncols)
{
LM_ERR(column index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, j,
res-ncols);
goto error;
Regards,
Misi
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
Confirmed. Thanks, Mickael On 18 במרץ 2015, at 18:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, can't check the code right now, but to confirm, if you use t_on_failure() before suspending the transaction, isn't executed? Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 15:56, Mickael Marrache wrote: Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] SQLOPS bug
Hello,
what version are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/03/15 16:51, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Gents,
Please consider applying this patch:
--- ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c.orig 2015-03-18 16:33:56.994320505 +0100
+++ ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c 2015-03-18 16:34:11.254419341 +0100
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
LM_ERR(row index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, i, res-nrows);
goto error;
}
- if(i=res-ncols)
+ if(j=res-ncols)
{
LM_ERR(column index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, j,
res-ncols);
goto error;
Regards,
Misi
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] SQLOPS bug
Hi Daniel,
The patch was created on 4.1.4, sorry for that, but the bug still exists
at 4.2.3 (d76f8e3) and df86f2a as well.
Cheers,
Misi
On 03/18/15 17:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
what version are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/03/15 16:51, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Gents,
Please consider applying this patch:
--- ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c.orig 2015-03-18 16:33:56.994320505 +0100
+++ ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c 2015-03-18 16:34:11.254419341 +0100
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
LM_ERR(row index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, i, res-nrows);
goto error;
}
- if(i=res-ncols)
+ if(j=res-ncols)
{
LM_ERR(column index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, j,
res-ncols);
goto error;
Regards,
Misi
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
Hello, can't check the code right now, but to confirm, if you use t_on_failure() before suspending the transaction, isn't executed? Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 15:56, Mickael Marrache wrote: Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] What is the best SIP trunk authentication strategy
Been struggling with this for awhile now.
So far I am finding it rather difficult to come up with way to
authenticate SIP trunks taking into account all possible scenarios. My
setup is Kamailio combined with Asterisk realtime. Everything is in a
MySQL database. All authentication is done by Kamailio. Kamailio
handles SIP extension (user) authentication quite well but seems poorly
equipped for SIP trunk (peer) authentication. The biggest problem I
have run into so far is that SIP trunks typically use DNS names and
Kamailio is not at all designed to used DNS names. Also SIP trunks do
not use named realms whereas that is a key part of Kamailio
authentication.
For IP authentication about the only solution I have found is to DNS
lookup and save all returned IP addresses in the ip_addr mysql table.
Then I do:
#!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH
if((!is_method(REGISTER)) allow_source_address() $au == ) {
# source IP allowed
return;
}
I can run a cron job every hour to DNS lookup and update the ip_addr
table as needed so I think this is a satisfactory solution for IP
authentication.
SIP trunk user/pass authentication is the one I am now struggling with.
This standard Kamailio authentication section does not work for SIP trunks.
if (is_method(REGISTER|INVITE) || from_uri==myself)
{
# authenticate requests
#if (!auth_check($fd, subscriber, 1)) {
if (!auth_check($fd, subscriber, 0)) {
auth_challenge($fd, 0);
exit;
}
# user authenticated - remove auth header
if(!is_method(REGISTER|PUBLISH))
consume_credentials();
This is a multidomain setup and therefore:
modparam(auth_db, use_domain, 1)
So the authentication section will try authenticate the realm of the
trunk which will always be an IP address. However the SIP trunk realm
will usually be saved in the subscriber database as the FQDN. There
is no mechanism for auth_check() to directly or indirectly check against
FQDN. The other problem is that even if I used the ip_addr table
somehow it will only try use the user/pass of the first instance of a
matching IP address. For SIP trunks it is possible I could have
multiple subaccounts and therefore multiple instances of the same IP
with different user/pass. So auth_check() is not designed for being
used this way as far as I can tell.
Seems to me like there should almost be a special kamailio module just
for SIP trunks. I had a look a carrierroute module it's not designed
for this either.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] SQLOPS bug
Hello,
thanks, patch pushed to master, 4.2 and 4.1 branches.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/03/15 18:00, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Daniel,
The patch was created on 4.1.4, sorry for that, but the bug still exists
at 4.2.3 (d76f8e3) and df86f2a as well.
Cheers,
Misi
On 03/18/15 17:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
what version are you using?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18/03/15 16:51, Mihaly Zachar wrote:
Hi Gents,
Please consider applying this patch:
--- ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c.orig 2015-03-18 16:33:56.994320505 +0100
+++ ./modules/sqlops/sql_api.c 2015-03-18 16:34:11.254419341 +0100
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@
LM_ERR(row index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, i, res-nrows);
goto error;
}
- if(i=res-ncols)
+ if(j=res-ncols)
{
LM_ERR(column index out of bounds [%d/%d]\n, j,
res-ncols);
goto error;
Regards,
Misi
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
Can you try with the patch from the next commit? - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6484b199fb48acc2c55f318812f2c968b845ca80 Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 17:09, Mickael Marrache wrote: Confirmed. Thanks, Mickael On 18 במרץ 2015, at 18:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com mailto:mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, can't check the code right now, but to confirm, if you use t_on_failure() before suspending the transaction, isn't executed? Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 15:56, Mickael Marrache wrote: Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
[SR-Users] missing BYE when 2 redundant kamailio servers share the same database
Hi, all
I'm trying to set up 2 kamailio servers for active-active redundancy. The two
kamailio severs share the the same database with db_mode=3, and no registration
replication. Use pjsua2 as SIP client for testing. The test setup is as follows:
kamailio server 1(k1): 10.0.1.30:5061 http://10.0.1.30:5061/
kamailio server 2(k2): 10.0.1.32:5061 http://10.0.1.32:5061/
sip client c1: sip:16317@10.0.1.30 mailto:sip%3A16317@10.0.1.30, client ip:
10.0.1.254
sip client c2: sip:72316@10.0.1.30 mailto:sip%3A72316@10.0.1.30, client ip:
10.0.1.254
c1 is registered with k1.
c2 is registered with k2.
When c1 calls c2, the call flow is as follows:
INVITE:
c1--k1--k2--c2
200 OK:
c1--k1--k2--c2
So far, the INVITE works. c1 and c2 can establish a call. However, when c2
hangs up and sends BYE, the BYE is forwarded all the way to k1, and then k1
gives a 500 server error.
The log on k1 seems to indicate k1 was attempting to create a TLS connection to
itself instead of using the existing TLS connection to c1 to forward the BYE.
BYE:
c1 X k1--k2--c2
|
|---Connection refused/500
Here is the kamailio log on k1:
Mar 16 10:34:21 kamailio.sip.com http://kamailio.sip.com/
/usr/sbin/kamailio[13396]: ERROR: core [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send():
connect 10.0.1.30:55999 http://10.0.1.30:55999/ failed (RST) Connection
refused
Mar 16 10:34:21 kamailio.sip.com http://kamailio.sip.com/
/usr/sbin/kamailio[13396]: ERROR: core [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send():
10.0.1.30:55999 http://10.0.1.30:55999/: connect send for 0x7fc96a68a1a0
failed: Connection refused (111)
This is the routing logic for BYE in kamailio.cfg:
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
if (is_method(BYE)) {
xlog(L_DBG, =BYE $ru from $fu $si:$sp to
$du=\n);
dlg_manage();
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ...
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the
transaction fails
}
else if ( is_method(ACK) ) {
# ACK is forwarded statelessy
route(NATMANAGE);
}
else if ( is_method(NOTIFY) ) {
# Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per
RFC 6665.
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {..
If I add location based routing for BYE from peer kamailio, then the BYE seems
to be forwarded correctly:
if (loose_route()) {
route(DLGURI);
if (is_method(BYE)) {
xlog(L_DBG, =BYE $ru from $fu $si:$sp to
$du=\n);
dlg_manage();
setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ...
setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the
transaction fails
# If BYE coming from Kamailio peer, route BYE
by location
$var(peerlist)=$sel(cfg_get.trusted.peers);
$var(i) = 0;
while($var(i)$(var(peerlist){param.count})) {
xlog(L_DBG,
=$(var(peerlist){param.count})=$(var(peerlist){param.valueat,$var(i)})=\n);
if(src_ip==$(var(peerlist){param.valueat,$var(i)})) {
lookup(location);
xlog(L_DBG, =BYE from
$fu $si:$sp to $du=\n);
break;
}
$var(i) = $var(i) + 1;
}
}
else if ( is_method(ACK) ) {
# ACK is forwarded statelessy
route(NATMANAGE);
}
else if ( is_method(NOTIFY) ) {
# Add Record-Route for in-dialog NOTIFY as per
RFC 6665.
record_route();
}
route(RELAY);
exit;
} else {..
My first question is why k1 loose_route sends the BYE to itself instead of the
client. Is this a bug?
My next question is whether the above location routing for BYE from peer
kamailio a good/safe approach.
The SIP traces will be sent later to avoid exceeding email size limit.
Thanks
[SR-Users] missing BYE when 2 redundant kamailio servers share the same database
This is the SIP log when using location routing for BYE from peer server. pjsua2_good.log Description: Binary data ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Re: [SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route
Thanks Daniel! Your patch seems to have fixed it… Mickael From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:54 PM To: Mickael Marrache; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Timeout after t_suspend and failure route Can you try with the patch from the next commit? - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/6484b199fb48acc2c55f318812f2c968b845ca80 Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 17:09, Mickael Marrache wrote: Confirmed. Thanks, Mickael On 18 áîøõ 2015, at 18:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla mico...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, can't check the code right now, but to confirm, if you use t_on_failure() before suspending the transaction, isn't executed? Cheers, Daniel On 18/03/15 15:56, Mickael Marrache wrote: Hi, When receiving an INVITE, I arm a failure route and set the fr_timer to 30 seconds. After the fr_timer expires, I need to do some operations however I see the failure route is not executed. I guess it is related to the fact the INVITE has not been forwarded? If yes, how can I execute code when a transaction times out after calling t_suspend? Thanks, Mickael ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
