[SSSD] [sssd PR#628][comment] providers: drop ldap_{init, }groups_use_matching_rule_in_chain support

2018-08-13 Thread jhrozek
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/628
Title: #628: providers: drop ldap_{init,}groups_use_matching_rule_in_chain 
support

jhrozek commented:
"""
* master: 65bd6bf05d75c843e525f8bf89e9b75b02a2bfb7
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/628#issuecomment-412556072
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/message/DVC7OKGKWLJZQ4FHRDJAX7UHOSL2EKSV/


[SSSD] [sssd PR#628][comment] providers: drop ldap_{init, }groups_use_matching_rule_in_chain support

2018-08-07 Thread fidencio
  URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/628
Title: #628: providers: drop ldap_{init,}groups_use_matching_rule_in_chain 
support

fidencio commented:
"""
@jhrozek, I **know** your preference of moving the deleted code to a file as 
the first step and then removing the file in order to make the backport easy 
for whoever is interested on keeping it downstream. Before actually moving 
those, I'd like to double-check if the patch is removing the expected piece of 
code and once we agree on that I'll re-work it and follow your 
advice/preference.
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/628#issuecomment-411025608
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org/message/TJ2MF3IMCQ7ZF7N3VDTECWJBV3Q44DZH/