Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:32:57PM +0100, Timothée Jaussoin wrote: > Hi Guus, > > Thanks for the work on Bookmarks :) Indeed that was, I think, a mistake. > On my side I followed the structure of the 0048 > (https://github.com/movim/moxl/blob/master/src/Moxl/Stanza/Bookmark.php#L30) > which, I > think is more logical (the storage:bookmarks namespace is defined with this > wrapper). Like Timothée, in converse.js I also follow the structure of 0048. As Christian Schudt wrote, it seems that with 0048 the idea is to include all the bookmarks in one Pubsub item while with 0223 the assumption is that there'll be one bookmark per item. I interpret 0048's approach to mean that all bookmarks must be included when any changes are communicated. That's what converse.js does. JC > Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 12:03 +0100, Guus der Kinderen a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I'm working on migrating Bookmarks > > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0048.html) from Private XML Storage > > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/ > > xep-0049.html) to PEP (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0223.html). I'm was > > surprised to find a difference between the Pubsub node > > defined in 0048 example 3 (the published item root element is 'storage', > > that itself contains 'conference') and 0233's example 3 (the > > published item root element is 'conference' directly, without the wrapping > > 'storage'). I expected those two examples to have the same > > structure. What's going on there? > > > > Regards, > > > > Guus > > ___ > > Standards mailing list > > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > > ___ > ___ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > ___ ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy
Hi, although I can't give you a good answer here, this is probably related to the issue I mentioned during the Call for Experience. It's unclear if a single pubsub item should contain only one bookmark or multiple. The one bookmark per item appraoch seems to be favoured by XEP-223: "the history of all items published to the node provides a complete list of the user's bookmarks" It would explain the lack of the storage element. On the other side 0048 with 0049 uses the storage element with multiple bookmarks. I think they want us to use one pubsub item per bookmark and then aggregate a list of bookmarks when using the pubsub approach. And when using the 0049 approach we should use the "storage" wrapper element. Technically it's also possible to store all bookmarks in a single pubsub item, but I don't think that was the authors' intention. Nonetheless it's very confusing, how to properly store and aggregate a list of bookmarks. -- Christian Gesendet: Freitag, 16. März 2018 um 12:03 Uhr Von: "Guus der Kinderen" An: "XMPP Standards" Betreff: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy Hello, I'm working on migrating Bookmarks (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0048.html) from Private XML Storage (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0049.html) to PEP (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0223.html). I'm was surprised to find a difference between the Pubsub node defined in 0048 example 3 (the published item root element is 'storage', that itself contains 'conference') and 0233's example 3 (the published item root element is 'conference' directly, without the wrapping 'storage'). I expected those two examples to have the same structure. What's going on there? Regards, Guus ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___ ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
Re: [Standards] Private Data storage discrepancy
Hi Guus, Thanks for the work on Bookmarks :) Indeed that was, I think, a mistake. On my side I followed the structure of the 0048 (https://github.com/movim/moxl/blob/master/src/Moxl/Stanza/Bookmark.php#L30) which, I think is more logical (the storage:bookmarks namespace is defined with this wrapper). Regards, Tim Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 12:03 +0100, Guus der Kinderen a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm working on migrating Bookmarks > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0048.html) from Private XML Storage > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/ > xep-0049.html) to PEP (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0223.html). I'm was > surprised to find a difference between the Pubsub node > defined in 0048 example 3 (the published item root element is 'storage', that > itself contains 'conference') and 0233's example 3 (the > published item root element is 'conference' directly, without the wrapping > 'storage'). I expected those two examples to have the same > structure. What's going on there? > > Regards, > > Guus > ___ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > ___ ___ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org ___
