RE: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:29 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/ For the first level of headers it might be doable. I suspect a recursive implementation would be more involved. But then again, maybe not. Care to prototype it? I can start from windows scripts, and then implement the identical algorithm in unix makefile. Farid.
Re: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:29 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/ For the first level of headers it might be doable. I suspect a recursive implementation would be more involved. But then again, maybe not. Care to prototype it? I can start from windows scripts, and then implement the identical algorithm in unix makefile. On second thought, this seems like a fairly low priority enhancement in comparison to some of the other features we've been talking about or have scheduled (such as the test suite cleanup and the expected failures/unexpected passes extension). I suggest to open a Jira for it and decide on the priority WRT the rest of our tasks. Martin
RE: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/
Farid Zaripov-2 wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:33 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: faridz Date: Wed Nov 21 07:23:43 2007 New Revision: 597111 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597111view=rev Log: 2007-11-21 Farid Zaripov [EMAIL PROTECTED] STDCXX-557 * terminate.h: New header file with a definition of the std::terminate(). * BAD_ALLOC_ASSIGNMENT.cpp (terminate): Function removed, #included terminate.h instead. Too bad we can't move the preprocessor logic to the header too... I think it's not so difficult to update the configure scripts to look into the #included headers. Farid. For the first level of headers it might be doable. I suspect a recursive implementation would be more involved. But then again, maybe not. Care to prototype it? Martin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r597111incubator-stdcxx-branches-4.2.x-etc-config-src--tf4851330.html#a13958130 Sent from the stdcxx-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: faridz Date: Wed Nov 21 07:23:43 2007 New Revision: 597111 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597111view=rev Log: 2007-11-21 Farid Zaripov [EMAIL PROTECTED] STDCXX-557 * terminate.h: New header file with a definition of the std::terminate(). * BAD_ALLOC_ASSIGNMENT.cpp (terminate): Function removed, #included terminate.h instead. Too bad we can't move the preprocessor logic to the header too... Martin
RE: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 6:33 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597111 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x/etc/config/src/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: faridz Date: Wed Nov 21 07:23:43 2007 New Revision: 597111 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=597111view=rev Log: 2007-11-21 Farid Zaripov [EMAIL PROTECTED] STDCXX-557 * terminate.h: New header file with a definition of the std::terminate(). * BAD_ALLOC_ASSIGNMENT.cpp (terminate): Function removed, #included terminate.h instead. Too bad we can't move the preprocessor logic to the header too... I think it's not so difficult to update the configure scripts to look into the #included headers. Farid.
