Bug report for Struts [2003/12/07]
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned| | | OPN=ReopenedVER=Verified(Skipped Closed/Resolved) | | | +-+ | | | Severity: BLK=Blocker CRI=CriticalMAJ=Major | | | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal ENH=Enhancement | | | | +-+ | | | | Date Posted | | | | | +--+ | | | | | Description | | | | | | | | 866|New|Enh|2001-03-06|Clean Way to Add Parameters to Redirecting Forward| | 3202|Opn|Enh|2001-08-21|OptionsTag.doEndTag - calls method to populate se| | 5395|Opn|Enh|2001-12-12|ActionContext class | | 5566|New|Enh|2001-12-21|html:link bug | | 5739|Opn|Enh|2002-01-08|Struts fails silently in too many places | | 5937|New|Enh|2002-01-21|html:form trims all extensions| | 6686|New|Enh|2002-02-26|make action attribute of html:form tag optional | | 6847|Opn|Enh|2002-03-04|Multiple file upload not possible due to MultiPart| | 7062|Opn|Enh|2002-03-12|nested:iterate and logic:iterate -- add odd/even a| | 7892|Opn|Enh|2002-04-09|Using Multiple Resource Bundles for an Application| | 7902|Opn|Enh|2002-04-10|The exception handling declaration in the DTD does| | 9088|Opn|Enh|2002-05-15|FormTag.getActionMappingURL() assumes 1 servlet ma| | 9616|New|Enh|2002-06-05|Some more Struts docs | | 9748|New|Enh|2002-06-10|attribute labelKeyProperty for Options tag| | 9949|Opn|Enh|2002-06-18|Suggest, a 'multiple' attribute for the logic:pre| |10550|New|Enh|2002-07-08|Delegate path-management to ActionForwards| |10551|Opn|Enh|2002-07-08|Allow a struts-config element to extend another | |10552|New|Enh|2002-07-08|create helper objects in struts-config| |10867|Opn|Enh|2002-07-16|Add indexedProperty attribute in html taglibs | |11154|Opn|Enh|2002-07-25|html:link tag extension for multiple parameters | |11402|Opn|Enh|2002-08-02|Add enhanced support for multiple parameters to th| |11733|Opn|Enh|2002-08-15|Make error keys more specific | |12170|Opn|Enh|2002-08-29|Added functionality when extending another definit| |12301|Opn|Enh|2002-09-04|nested:messages Tag does not work as expected | |12313|Opn|Enh|2002-09-04|Chaining of RequestProcessors--contribution | |12342|Ass|Enh|2002-09-05|Add default exception handler attribute to global| |12600|New|Enh|2002-09-12|html:form tag always prepends context path to acti| |13125|Opn|Enh|2002-09-30|Lack of character-set while using html:html ta| |13521|New|Enh|2002-10-11|CombinedDispatchAction| |13544|Opn|Enh|2002-10-11|[exception] support contextRelative paths | |13565|Opn|Enh|2002-10-12|To errors, add prefix, suffix, header, footer at| |13638|Opn|Enh|2002-10-15|add Config Factory| |13809|Opn|Enh|2002-10-21|Struts configuration is not validated after use | |14068|Opn|Enh|2002-10-29|Why can't I use forwards with exception elements i| |14071|Opn|Enh|2002-10-29|Need clear info on which Struts attributes produce| |14183|New|Enh|2002-11-01|html:img does not support forward attribute | |14471|Opn|Nor|2002-11-12|validator-rules.xml JavaScript fails when field no| |14749|Opn|Enh|2002-11-21|Action input not starting with '/' and not a val| |15023|Opn|Enh|2002-12-03|Use attribute 'id' instead of 'name' in html:form-| |15188|Opn|Enh|2002-12-09|roles attribute of tags and definitions only allow| |15422|Opn|Enh|2002-12-17|Form Tag exportFormName attribute| |15805|Opn|Enh|2003-01-05|Enhance ModuleException to allow getting chained E| |15912|Opn|Enh|2003-01-09|Client-side validation fails if not all form-field| |15921|Opn|Enh|2003-01-09|Allow relative actions in struts-config.xml | |16074|New|Enh|2003-01-14|html:form uses 'action' not 'input' to select mapp| |16401|New|Enh|2003-01-24|ActionValidatorUtil | |16603|Opn|Enh|2003-01-30|controller forwardPattern should support differe| |16634|New|Enh|2003-01-31|reuiredif ignores missing property| |16708|New|Enh|2003-02-03|I18N on ActionForwards| |16792|Ass|Enh|2003-02-05|Migrate to commons-resources for message resources| |16804|New|Enh|2003-02-05|html:text tag has no filter attribute |
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java
dgraham 2003/12/07 09:34:51 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java Log: Made HTML_* constants protected for PR# 24517. Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +14 -6 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/JavascriptValidatorTag.java Index: JavascriptValidatorTag.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/JavascriptValidatorTag.java,v retrieving revision 1.41 retrieving revision 1.42 diff -u -r1.41 -r1.42 --- JavascriptValidatorTag.java 2 Dec 2003 05:06:34 - 1.41 +++ JavascriptValidatorTag.java 7 Dec 2003 17:34:51 - 1.42 @@ -128,9 +128,17 @@ } }; -private static final String HTML_BEGIN_COMMENT = \n!-- Begin \n; +/** + * The start of the HTML comment hiding JavaScript from old browsers. + * @since Struts 1.2 + */ +protected static final String HTML_BEGIN_COMMENT = \n!-- Begin \n; -private static final String HTML_END_COMMENT = //End -- \n; +/** + * The end of the HTML comment hiding JavaScript from old browsers. + * @since Struts 1.2 + */ +protected static final String HTML_END_COMMENT = //End -- \n; // --- Properties - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24517] - Extending JavascriptValidatorTag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24517 Extending JavascriptValidatorTag [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 17:35 --- The constants are now protected. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Attachment to bug 866
The problem was that the bug was assigned to Ted and [EMAIL PROTECTED] wasn't added to the CC list. I've fixed this so we get emails when this bug is updated. David --- Hubert Rabago [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last night I uploaded an attachment to bug 866 (Clean Way to Add Parameters to Redirecting Forward). It allows Action objects to add redirects like these: ActionRedirect redirect = new ActionRedirect(mapping.findForward(doRedirect)); redirect.addParameter(param1,value1); redirect.addParameter(param2,2); redirect.addParameter(param3,3.0); return redirect; I'm sending this message because that notice seemed to have been skipped by bugzilla (probably because that particular item doesn't have an associated milestone target), and I thought you guys might like to know. There's also an attachment for testing ActionRedirect. Hubert Rabago __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25159] - html:form does not validate with http://validator.w3.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25159. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25159 html:form does not validate with http://validator.w3.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 17:44 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15023 *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15023] - Use attribute 'id' instead of 'name' in html:form-Tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15023 Use attribute 'id' instead of 'name' in html:form-Tag --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 17:44 --- *** Bug 25159 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22283] - html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283 html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 17:56 --- According to the XHTML 1.0-Strict DTD available here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd lang is a valid attribute of the html element. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25267] - Mavenise cactus tests
Is that a proposal I hear? ;-) Steve -Original Message- From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 6, 2003 10:00 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25267] - Mavenise cactus tests On Sat, 7 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not complaining, but wouldn't this be easier if Joe could committ these himself? (hint hint ;) DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25267. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25267 Mavenise cactus tests --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 04:59 --- Created an attachment (id=9429) patch to maven.xml to prepare Cactus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- James Mitchell Software Developer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9949] - Suggest, a 'multiple' attribute for the logic:present tag.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9949. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9949 Suggest, a 'multiple' attribute for the logic:present tag. [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 18:48 --- Closing as both Craig's and Ted's suggestions are better than changing the logic:present tag. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19346] - Errors and Messages should be easier to manage
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19346. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19346 Errors and Messages should be easier to manage --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 18:54 --- We should probably look more at this when we change to using commons-resources for messaging. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24487] - add selected attribute to html:option tag
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24487. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24487 add selected attribute to html:option tag [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Component|Unknown |Custom Tags Resolution||WONTFIX Version|1.0 Final |1.1 Final --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 19:00 --- The combination of html:option and html:select is only useful if you allow the tags to choose which option is selected for you. If you're writing: html:option selected=selected value=1some text/html:option you may as well just use straight HTML instead of the tag: option value=1 selected=selectedsome text/option - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21408] - html:errors in redirect mode
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21408. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21408 html:errors in redirect mode [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 19:03 --- This has already been fixed by adding an isAccessed() method to ActionMessages and code to RequestProcessor to remove ActionMessages from the session if isAccessed returns true. This allows messages stored in the session to only be displayed once and cleanly removed on the next request. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions LookupDispatchAction.java
dgraham 2003/12/07 11:11:10 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions LookupDispatchAction.java Log: Use method instead of action in javadoc example for PR# 23348. Revision ChangesPath 1.19 +7 -8 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/LookupDispatchAction.java Index: LookupDispatchAction.java === RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/LookupDispatchAction.java,v retrieving revision 1.18 retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.18 -r1.19 --- LookupDispatchAction.java 27 Nov 2003 19:20:31 - 1.18 +++ LookupDispatchAction.java 7 Dec 2003 19:11:10 - 1.19 @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ /** * p - * * An abstract strongAction/strong that dispatches to the subclass mapped * codeexecute/code method. This is useful in * cases where an HTML form has multiple submit buttons with the same name. The @@ -92,10 +91,10 @@ * name=MyForm * scope=request * input=/test.jsp - * parameter=action/gt; + * parameter=method/gt; * /pre p * - * which will use the value of the request parameter named action to locate + * which will use the value of the request parameter named method to locate * the corresponding key in ApplicationResources. For example, you might have * the following ApplicationResources.properties:/p pre *button.add=Add Record @@ -104,10 +103,10 @@ * * And your JSP would have the following format for submit buttons:/p pre * lt;html:form action=/testgt; - *lt;html:submit property=actiongt; + *lt;html:submit property=methodgt; * lt;bean:message key=button.add/gt; *lt;/html:submitgt; - *lt;html:submit property=actiongt; + *lt;html:submit property=methodgt; * lt;bean:message key=button.delete/gt; *lt;/html:submitgt; * lt;/html:formgt; - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23348] - Use of example action parameter in LookupDispatchAction causes JavaScript problems
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23348 Use of example action parameter in LookupDispatchAction causes JavaScript problems [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 19:11 --- Fixed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22283] - html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283 html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-07 20:09 --- already in the document you cite, it is only there for backwards compatibility. langlanguage code (backwards compatible) xml:langlanguage code (as per XML 1.0 spec) Also, wouldn't XHTML version 1.1 be more relevant than it's superseeded predecessor version 1.0? Anyway, if you plan to stick with the old xhtml, please add a little note to the documentation on html:html as per the above URL. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cactus tests (Re: Maven test run)
Joe, Thanks for the patches. I should be able to take a look at them tomorrow. I'd be happy to bounce some ideas around with you as soon as I have any :-) Steve -Original Message- From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 6, 2003 7:41 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Cactus tests (Re: Maven test run) On Dec 1, 2003, at 10:53 AM, Steve Raeburn wrote: 2. Run the Cactus tests OK, since the TLDs are out of the way (Thanks Tim, Steve!), I got started on this one this morning. I've gotten decently far along but have to quit now. If anyone else is interested in working on this bit, let me know so we can cooperate; otherwise, I'll try to get further before posting to Bugzilla. I've gotten most of the preliminary config/setup done and Cactus is just getting started and now it wants a copy of tools.jar (for JSP compilation). I'm not quite sure how to hit that one, since Apple bundles tools.jar with the core java classes, which Tomcat won't allow in WEB-INF/lib I guess I'll just have to get my own standalone copy of tools.jar. (Is it 100% java, or am I going to have to repackage Apple's classes.jar?) Anyway, just wanted to let people know I was working on this, in case others were also interested... Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com We want beef in dessert if we can get it there. -- Betty Hogan, Director of New Product Development, National Cattlemen's Beef Association - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
+1 I thought he already was one :) Don On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
+1 Joe has, refreshingly, backed up suggestions with working code :-). David --- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. -- Martin Cooper __ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Don Brown wrote: +1 I thought he already was one :) Yea, he certainly should be. +1 Don On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, Martin Cooper wrote: Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- James Mitchell Software Developer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22283] - html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22283 html:html xhtml=true does not validate with http://validator.w3.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-12-08 04:09 --- As documented here: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/dev_html.html Struts conforms to XHTML 1.0 not 1.1. Current browsers don't even handle XHTML 1.0 properly so moving to 1.1 isn't workable. As documented here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/changes.html#a_changes the lang attribute has indeed been removed in XHTML 1.1. While it would be easy to change the html:html tag to not output lang so it would work in XHTML 1.1, it would open us up to backwards compatibility problems and trying to support more than just the HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0 standards. My suggestion for you is to simply use the html:xhtml tag to put Struts tags in XHTML 1.0 mode and render the html tag by hand. You're not missing anything by not using html:html. In the past, the tag set a Locale object in the user's session but this has been deprecated and will be removed as it's now handled by the RequestProcessor. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
Martin Cooper wrote: Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. Here is my +1, I had emailed Joe 2 months ago about being a Committer because of his Maven expertise but he demurred at the time, and wanted to prove himself first. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer
+1 (He has to do all the Maven stuff, right ;-)) Steve -Original Message- From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: December 7, 2003 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Joe Germuska as a Struts Committer Joe has been involved in the Struts community for some time now, and has been a great contributor on the -dev and -user lists, as well as in the bug database. I believe Joe would be a great asset to the team, and that it's time we invited him to join us as a Struts committer. Here's my +1. -- Martin Cooper - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
