DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-24 16:33 ---
Applied patch to remove required for basic field types.
Uses are still free to place depends=required in their own
fields definitions.

Thanks !

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-22 11:57 ---
Ooops =:0)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12776 ***

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-22 12:04 ---
Actually, it looks like James applied a patch that makes required optional in the 
validator, 
which apparently resolves this ticket. See #13528. 


http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13528

Fixed in 20021017.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Status|CLOSED  |REOPENED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-22 18:46 ---
I appiled that patch,I am also [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and it didn't resolve this ticket. I will close this ticket
when it is fixed.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7351
This is when James applied a patch to allow 
'0' to be accepted as a valid input. It also had
the effect of not allowing blanks.

Suggestion: In the future, it would be good to document the expected behaviour
in the JavaDoc. If the behaviour changes then the JavaDoc needs
to be updated.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
 Resolution|DUPLICATE   |



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-22 03:53 ---
This is --not-- a duplicate of Bug 12276

-Rob

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-19 02:25 ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 12276 ***

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-16 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-16 15:39 ---
James,

  I am not ignoring this,
  the attached patch will create
  conditions where the JavaScript
  will fail like for the minValue.
  Not being a JavaScript programmer
  I am not sure what will happen and I haven't had time
  to do a test case to find out.

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13526] - validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests

2002-10-11 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13526

validator-rules.xml shouldn't have required as a depends of all the tests





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2002-10-11 07:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=3424)
Diff file to remove depends=

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]