Re: [sugar] Update.1. When What How and Why

2008-02-05 Thread Martin Dengler
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:41:43PM -0500, 'Caperton, Idit' wrote:
 I read Jim's list of To-Do's, see below, and then the casual comment in the
 open from Kim to Jim: I think this is way too much stuff for Update.1. 

This is good; as I think you imply (but am not sure). I don't think we
need to have a Jim vs. Kim watch and deconstruct anything.  It should
be possible to have exactly this kind of discussion on the list
without lots of people worrying that something's wrong.

 But, it doesn't mean that it cannot be well-managed with reasonable
 executable plans and dates attached to the plans (that could be revised by
 the community, if needed). 

I think the implication is because people are talking and discussing
things in the open, it's not well-managed with reasonable etc.  I
don't think I can opine on that since I'm not privy to all the in-situ
discussions in Cambridge, but I've seen nothing in the past few months
to make me have that concern.

 But I am not aware -- what does OLPC do to re-evaluate process and progress
 on an ongoing basis? and how does the olpc org learns how to optimize and do
 things better, and on schedule? How does the OLPC software development
 system learns to be deliverables-oriented, and how do we learn to lead these
 global processes more productively?

I'd rather OLPC didn't take the time to explain this explicitly.  I
can infer (over time) the observations you mention, and if people
don't have the abilities you mention, I don't think anyone's going to
be able to teach it.  I'd much rather those in charge spend time
doing what they can how they know best.

 FACT: From what we see so far, Update.1. has been delayed and delayed and
 delayed again. 

It's important we don't confuse delays with lack of progress.  I think
based on the software development going on progress is occurring.

 - Where is the Update.1 master plan? And what comes after and when?
 - Who keeps track and makes sure we are constantly re-evaluating it and
 documenting changes in decisions? 
 - Is it well-strategized and well-monitored against the strategy? 
 - How does s--t gets done and optimized in this messy open system? 
 - Even decentralized system needs organizational management - What did OLPC
 software team learned so far? 
 - Where are the pages with reflections on lessons learned? 
 - How are decisions about what's in or out being made? 
 - Where are the software-release-phases with dates for 2008? 
 - Is there a clear schedule and list of deliverables with dates for 2008?

Isn't all of this incredibly subjective (2, 3, 5, 6), on the wiki (1,
8, 9) or obvious to those who know what they're doing and read this
list (4, 7)?  I don't think we need to discuss the subjective stuff
(my point two sections above), discuss improving the wiki (interested
parties should just do it), or get in the way of the people actually
doing work.

On scheduling (since that seems to be the germ of your concern), I
don't think the project needs a fine-grained or top-down dictated
schedule. Any that exists will be blown away by deployment schedules,
which are dependent on policy/political issues outside the control of
the developers.

 But please remember that I am sending it in order to shake the existing
 system, as a serious call for change, to be provocative, and get you all to
 think about it positively.

I don't think this list is the best place to start bringing about the
type of change you want to bring about.  Many have opinions, few have
the time and exposure to the decision-makers to make a difference.
Talk to Kim  Jim offline if you want.  But I hope this thread won't
be a place for the peanut gallery to tell the people doing the real
work how to do it.

Martin


pgpqXI3wdq2TS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


Re: [sugar] What's left for Update.1

2008-02-05 Thread Sayamindu Dasgupta
On 2/4/08, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Feb 4, 2008 10:31 PM, C. Scott Ananian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Feb 4, 2008 11:50 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   2008/2/4 Kim Quirk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 ..snipped

 
   For translations, I would also probably push Mongolian in, along with
   Spanish. I am currently making those two sets of translations go
 
  I really believe that we will need an update.1.1 for Mongolia, so I
  (for one) would not be sad to see the Mongolian translations not make
  it for update.1.  By the time we can solve the networking issues for
  Mongolia, we should have translations well in hand as well.
 
  Mongolia will likely not get updated again until there is another
  opportunity to use the bulk multicast update technique again, so it
  doesn't make too much sense to rush the Mongolian translations.
   --scott

 In that case - Spanish it is :-).

Just wanted to mention  - this _does not_ mean that we are not
including the other languages. It is only that Spanish (and Mongolian)
has had some significant work going into them at later stages (after
the original deadline for Update 1 translations had passed, due to
various reasons), and since Mongolian and Spanish are used the most by
Sugar users - we will be picking up the new Spanish translations (and
later, Mongolian as well). Other languages will remain as they are.

Apologies if my previous mail created any misconceptions.

Thanks,
Sayamindu


-- 
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


[sugar] Files modified on USB drive

2008-02-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
When I put a photo on a flash drive, insert that into the XO and open  
the photo in Paint and close, then the file on the flash drive gets  
modified. I'd have expected the modified version to be put in the  
Journal instead - this is how activity installation works, for  
example. And when I unmount the USB drive before closing Paint, the  
modified image actually vanishes without a hint (not even an error in  
any log AFAICT).

This is in a fairly recent joyride (1618). Bug or feature?

- Bert -

___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


Re: [sugar] Files modified on USB drive

2008-02-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 12:34 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
 When I put a photo on a flash drive, insert that into the XO and open  
 the photo in Paint and close, then the file on the flash drive gets  
 modified. I'd have expected the modified version to be put in the  
 Journal instead - this is how activity installation works, for  
 example. And when I unmount the USB drive before closing Paint, the  
 modified image actually vanishes without a hint (not even an error in  
 any log AFAICT).
 
 This is in a fairly recent joyride (1618). Bug or feature?

Feature, but now is a good moment to discuss how we want this to behave
in the future. Eben?

Tomeu

___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


[sugar] how to take a screenshot?

2008-02-05 Thread Erik Blankinship
Can someone suggest how to take a screenshot from within a sugar activity?

Thanks!
___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


Re: [sugar] how to take a screenshot?

2008-02-05 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 13:51 -0500, Erik Blankinship wrote:
 Can someone suggest how to take a screenshot from within a sugar
 activity? 

Alt+1 , I believe

--Ben.

___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar


Re: [sugar] gtk experiment for an spreadsheet activity

2008-02-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
And btw, I won't have any more spare time to spend on this, so if
someone feels like pushing further, is more than welcome to fork it and
do whatever she/he feels like.

Tomeu

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 14:13 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 what can be done during a weekend without net access but with a copy of
 the pygtk tutorial? An spreadsheet!
 
 http://dev.laptop.org/~tomeu/Count-1.xo
 http://dev.laptop.org/~tomeu/count-screenshot.png
 
 Well, not quite.
 
 This can be seen more accurately as an experiment to see until which
 point the gtk.TreeView widget can carry us. These are the things that I
 haven't found how to do with the current gtk.TreeView:
 
 - Row headers.
 - Non-fixed number of columns.
 - Alignment of values inside the cells.
 - Automatically add rows as the user scrolls down.
 - Support big datasets efficiently.
 - A more standard way of starting cell edits.
 
 To fix these would probably take forking the upstream gtk.TreeView
 inside the activity bundle.
 
 This is NOT an attempt to replace the current efforts of porting
 SocialCalc and Gnumeric to Sugar. While these projects aim for full
 featured spreadsheets, gtk.TreeView will probably be only enough for a
 very limited spreadsheet that only support the most basic functionality,
 mainly manipulation of tabulated data and some simple functions.
 
 The basic infrastructure for supporting functions is there, but a parser
 and an evaluator still need to be implemented.
 
 I hope this can be useful:
 
 - as an example of a basic python activity, perhaps of some use to the
 sugarizing of SocialCalc and Gnumeric,
 - as a possible placeholder until we have a better spreadsheet if nor
 SocialCalc nor Gnumeric can be present in the Update.2 milestone.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Tomeu
 
 
 
 ___
 Sugar mailing list
 Sugar@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar

___
Sugar mailing list
Sugar@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/sugar