Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 05:15, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:11 PM,  p...@laptop.org wrote:
 now that it's been pointed out that most of the cat processes
 were from bootchart itself, i highly doubt there will be

 Heisenbug :-) even then, it does give you fairly good idea of what's
 up during boot.

 SoaS is meant to run on any hw out there, and a lot of the
 optimisations on the XO are because we _know_ what hw we have. Does it
 make sense to get skip all this hw poking if it looks like an XO
 patch upstream?

 In fact, this might be something that upstream wants to think about in
 a generic sense. All the boot-in-5s focus lately is a lot of fun (and
 great for end-users, I surely want _my_ boxes to boot in 5s), but
 depends in part on skipping a lot of poking and waiting for hardware.

 Anyone building a custom Fedora for a netbook will want the same thing
 we want: a way to declare a fast path for known hw. Specially on the
 netbook segment this can have a huge payoff. (Wonder if Ubuntu doing
 something like this?)

Mandriva has done this for the derivatives of their distro that
netbook makers ship.

Regards,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] aslo caching

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 07:44, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
 Are there any php experts around?

 I changed some .po files in activites.sl.o and then rebuilt the .mo files.

 After flushing memcache the changes were visible.  Now for some
 reason, the changes seem to have reverted.

 Is it possible that the old information is being cached somehow?

This happened to me until I restarted both memcached and apache.

Regards,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-05 Thread Costello, Rob R
Is this version with 'honey' or without?



Actually there a way to tell from the wiki what is on the image?

Eg e-toys? Scratch?



I downloaded the iso and booted from usb a couple of weeks ago  - (the
version with the cursor problem - feb 20?) and couldn't work out how to
do anything with pippy



Can someone point me in the right direction with say running a code
sample I can see all the examples on the LHS but the console at
bottom didn't accept cursor; eg couldn't try typing run or help, if
that's the idea



There is a database error at present when I try to access the moodle
course (http://schools.sugarlabs.org/course/view.php?id=17) which is
linked from  http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick ..

(i don't see moodle at all - just Error: Database connection failed.
)



Cheers



Rob





From: iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org
[mailto:iaep-boun...@lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Caroline Meeks
Sent: Thursday, 5 March 2009 2:42 PM
To: s...@sugarlabs.org
Cc: i...@lists.sugarlabs.org; Sugar Devel
Subject: Re: [IAEP] [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!



Boots for me! The first two activities I tried worked. Can't connect to
the wireless network but I think that might be a problem wiht my
wireless.  Not ready to call it a Sugar bug yet.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com
wrote:

Hi folks,

a new soas-2 snapshot is ready for you! Go and grab it NOW from here:

http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas-200903041854.iso

It's important for us to get as much feedback as possible now, since
with the recent release of Sugar 0.84, we're also approaching a release
of Sugar on a Stick. In fact, this can already happen at the end of this
week.

So please go ahead, give it a try and report any issues you come across.

It would be interesting to see, which activities work, which don't, and
whether language support such as localization is properly working for
you. Be also aware that this is based on F11 and that it might not work
at all!

New features include:

* base system updated to F11
* sugar itself has been updated to version 0.84
* almost all activities are up2date now, too

You might also want to head to the roadmap in our wiki here:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick/Roadmap

If you're a maintainer in Fedora and haven't updated your package yet to
the latest version, please do so TODAY to help us releasing all the cool
new stuff. ;)

Thanks a lot  happy testing!
   --Your SoaS Team
_




Important - This email and any attachments may be confidential. If received in 
error, please contact us and delete all copies. Before opening or using 
attachments check them for viruses and defects. Regardless of any loss, damage 
or consequence, whether caused by the negligence of the sender or not, 
resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files our 
liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments. Any 
representations or opinions expressed are those of the individual sender, and 
not necessarily those of the Department of Education and Early Childhood 
Development.
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] improving python on mobile devices

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
http://tetamap.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/mobiles-python-pypy-and-the-zone-vm/

When/If Nokia ships PyPy in Maemo, it should be pretty easy to get it
used in smaller platforms by Sugar. Or we could join them and speed up
things.

Regards,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] updating gitorious

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all,

Bernie has suggested upgrading to a newer version of Gitorious. This
brings several interesting features but the updating process may be a
bit disruptive.

Bernie, which are the most important features we will win and which
are this risks and costs?

All, when is a good moment for you to do the switch?

Thanks,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:41, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
 On 03/04/09 10:45, Simon Schampijer wrote:
 this is the Final Release in our 0.84 development cycle [1]! Thanks to
 our testers the developers were able to bring in bug fixes to stabilize
 the platform. And the translators were busy to get all the strings
 translated. All the details what have changed from a user point of view
 will be handled in the detailed 0.84 release notes.

 Thanks everyone for your great contributions!

 Kudos!

 This release cycle was simply great, congratulations to everyone
 who worked so hard on it.

So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.

Regards,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
 could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.

Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?

Did we announce it on Freshmeat?  Slashdot?  LWN?  OLPCNews?

-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs   - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
 On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
 could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.
 
 Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?
 
 Did we announce it on Freshmeat?  Slashdot?  LWN?  OLPCNews?

The marketing team is already working on it. 2 things I think are left. 
Good release notes and a well enough working Soas for people to try out. 
Both will be available in the next days - at least that is the plan.

Cheers,
Simon

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] string changes for 0.84.1

2009-03-05 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi all,

chances are that some of the bugs we get to fix during 0.84.1 will
require string changes.

What do people think about bundling all those string changes together
in one single update in something like one or two weeks? Then
translators can translate those in one go before 0.84.1 is out.

Regards,

Tomeu
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] string changes for 0.84.1

2009-03-05 Thread Morgan Collett
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:53, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
 Hi all,

 chances are that some of the bugs we get to fix during 0.84.1 will
 require string changes.

 What do people think about bundling all those string changes together
 in one single update in something like one or two weeks? Then
 translators can translate those in one go before 0.84.1 is out.

Today is UserInterfaceFreeze for Ubuntu jaunty, which includes a
string freeze, so although the Ubuntu release is on April 23 we won't
be able to ship 0.84.1 if there are string changes.

The best approach for Ubuntu packaging in this case would be to apply
0.84.1 patches which fix bugs and which don't have string changes, to
the 0.84.0 packages.

Regards
Morgan
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Quick question - gtk focusing

2009-03-05 Thread Emiliano Pastorino

 If you return True, no other event handlers will be processed so keyboard
 navigation will be avoided.


Thank Wade! That did the job
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] New Soas-1 Image containing Sucrose 0.84.0

2009-03-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi,

we have another Soas-1 image (based on F10). It contains the latest 
Glucose and Fructose packages from the 0.84.0 release [1].

You can download the image at [2].

Give it a try and report bugs at [3].  Please use the Soas component for 
issues related to the image - like booting, not correct keyboard 
detected and use the Sugar and Activity components to report bugs 
regarding the UI.

Thanks,
Your Soas Team

[1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Releases/Sucrose/0.84.0
[2]
http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/1/Soas-200903051021.iso
[3] dev.sugarlabs.org

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on XO bootcharts

2009-03-05 Thread Wade Brainerd
I don't want weird bugs when I finally plug in my netbook to a IPv6
connection at some IT friend's house
Optimizing bootup based on known, manufactured, fixed hardware is a great
idea though.  The hardware that's built into the machine should easily be
enough to get you into a GUI.
Initializing dynamic hw like USB drives and the network should wait until
*after* booting though.  There's no need to have my pluggable USB key ready
before I can open a file manager or a shell to access it.

Ultimately though, this is a pretty deep issue in the Linux configuration
system.  Time honored systems like /etc/fstab (fixed mount points for
dynamic hardware? wtf!) and Xorg.conf (no pluggable input devices??) make
this a real challenge.  Udev is a step in the right direction, but takes
like 10 seconds itself to start up.

Perhaps the solution is something like this:

Write totally custom initscripts for XO which initialize all the
manufactured hardware and launch into X.  Once X signals that it's up, udev
and NetworkManager are started to recognize all the dynamic stuff, do DHCP,
etc.

This could be accomplished by making an alternate '/etc/hwspec/xo-1/rc.d'
tree which parallels /etc/rc.d and contains all the optimized initscripts.
 The 'init' program would detect the XO's hardware signature (presence of
OFW seems typical), and then symlink /etc/hwpsec/xo-1/rc.d over the regular
/etc/rc.d.  If the hardware is unrecognized, /etc/hwspec/generic/rc.d is
symlinked into /etc/rc.d and the generic initscripts are booted.

This /etc/hwspec/... system could be packaged into its own RPM, so there
would be no need to convince upstream to adopt all our optimizations into
the generic initscripts.

Regards,
Wade

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:35 PM, p...@laptop.org wrote:

 martin wrote:
   In fact, this might be something that upstream wants to think about in
   a generic sense. All the boot-in-5s focus lately is a lot of fun (and
   great for end-users, I surely want _my_ boxes to boot in 5s), but
   depends in part on skipping a lot of poking and waiting for hardware.
  
   Anyone building a custom Fedora for a netbook will want the same thing
   we want: a way to declare a fast path for known hw. Specially on the
   netbook segment this can have a huge payoff. (Wonder if Ubuntu doing
   something like this?)

 i think the real win won't necessarily be declaring a fast path
 for known hw, but _remembering_ a fast path for _any_ hardware.
 i.e., if you've booted 10 times and never found ipv6, and always
 found the same 3 filesystems in the same partitions, maybe it's
 time to stop expecting anything else.  does udev remember anything
 from boot to boot?  seems like it should if it doesn't.

 but as you say, there are also a lot of simple cases:  most machines
 have just one network interface, and it runs dhcp -- so once that
 seems to be true, don't check for anything else.  most machines
 have one fixed disk, etc.

 paul
 =-
  paul fox, p...@laptop.org
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-05 Thread Sebastian Dziallas
Ton van Overbeek wrote:
 Generated the usb stick on Windows using liveusb-creator 3.2 with the '-x'
 option to get the boot/olpc.fth file. Edited the olpc.fth file to get
 rid of the extraneous
 backslashes (Luke already fixed this in git, but no updated windows version of
 liveusb-creator has been created yet).
 
 First tried to boot it on my Dell laptop (Precision M60, Pentium-M,
 1920x1200 res).
 Got the three bars to complete, but then a blank screen and no X
 windows. no Sugar.
 Could not get a text console (Ctrl-Alt-F[1-6] did not work).

Mh, this is interesting. We'll need to look into that, but sounds like 
an issue with F11 / Rawhide right now.

 Then reflashed the stick and tried to boot it on the XO.
 Got the nice graphical plymouth boot which took a loong time to 
 complete
 (much much longer than a SoaS-1 image). Again a blank screen and no X.
 Here I could get to the text consoles. Noticed there was a cursor which could
 be moved over the screen with the XO touchpad.
 dmesg did not show any obvious clues.
 Xorg.0.log showed at the end:
 -
 (II) GEODE: Driver for AMD Geode Chipsets: Geode LX, Geode GX
 (EE) No devices detected.
 
 Fatal server error:
 no screen found
 -
 The XO specific xorg.conf file was created in /etc/X11 and read
 by the X server..

Okay, this has recently been fixed and should work again on the XO by 
today. So we'll be publishing an updated snapshot later today...

 All in all not very successful.
 I hope you can use this info.
 
 Ton van Overbeek

Yeah! Thanks a lot for giving it a test drive... :)

--Sebastian
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Ed McNierney
Congratulations to everyone - very nice job!

- Ed


On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:

 Bernie Innocenti wrote:
 On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on,  
 we
 could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.

 Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?

 Did we announce it on Freshmeat?  Slashdot?  LWN?  OLPCNews?

 The marketing team is already working on it. 2 things I think are  
 left.
 Good release notes and a well enough working Soas for people to try  
 out.
 Both will be available in the next days - at least that is the plan.

 Cheers,
Simon

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 de...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Sean DALY
The media launch and multi-language press release has been scheduled
for March 16th, when release notes, the PR phone number, and the final
press mailing lists including the education publications will be
ready.

I will have Tuesday's marketing meeting topics  deliverables mail
ready sometime today, meanwhile:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/MarketingTeam/Meetings/03-03-2009

Please, don't spread the word without coordinating with the marketing
team, we don't even have the PR phone numbers set up and our impact
will be maximized if we can stay coordinated.

Thanks

Sean
Marketing Coordinator



On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
 Congratulations to everyone - very nice job!

        - Ed


 On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:

 Bernie Innocenti wrote:
 On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on,
 we
 could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.

 Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?

 Did we announce it on Freshmeat?  Slashdot?  LWN?  OLPCNews?

 The marketing team is already working on it. 2 things I think are
 left.
 Good release notes and a well enough working Soas for people to try
 out.
 Both will be available in the next days - at least that is the plan.

 Cheers,
    Simon

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 de...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] The Road to SoaS-2: A new Snapshot!

2009-03-05 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 04.03.2009, at 20:58, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:

 Hi folks,

 a new soas-2 snapshot is ready for you! Go and grab it NOW from here:

 http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/Soas-200903041854.iso

 It's important for us to get as much feedback as possible now, since
 with the recent release of Sugar 0.84, we're also approaching a  
 release
 of Sugar on a Stick. In fact, this can already happen at the end of  
 this
 week.

 So please go ahead, give it a try and report any issues you come  
 across.


Tried to run this in VMWare. It reports an error in the initramfs  
(losetup says there is no loop device) and stops.

For easier identification after download, could you rename the files  
to Soas2-...?

I also tried 1/Soas-200903051021.iso which worked fine as ever.

- Bert -


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 - Bugfix Release Schedule

2009-03-05 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi,

to get bug fixes in after our 0.84.0 release we have scheduled two more 
coordinated releases for the next 4 weeks [1].

Mar 20 Sucrose 0.84.1
Apr 3  Sucrose 0.84.2

Furthermore we will do weekly Glucose releases to keep the tarballs up 
to date. The dates were picked in coordination with the upcoming Fedora 
11 [2] and Ubuntu Jaunty [3] release.

We hope to stabilize our 0.84 Release like that. So the upcoming weeks, 
Testers, the BugSquad and Developers need to work together closely to 
polish everything up. Main testing environment will be Sugar on a Stick 
[4] and your distribution of choice.

Happy polishing everyone - we are getting close now!

Your Release Team


[1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/11/Schedule
[3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/JauntyReleaseSchedule
[4] http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Sean DALY
re spreading the word:

http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/marketing/2009-March/000419.html

Monday, March 16th, 9:00 AM EST

thanks
Sean


On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Sean DALY sdaly...@gmail.com wrote:
 The media launch and multi-language press release has been scheduled
 for March 16th, when release notes, the PR phone number, and the final
 press mailing lists including the education publications will be
 ready.

 I will have Tuesday's marketing meeting topics  deliverables mail
 ready sometime today, meanwhile:
 http://sugarlabs.org/go/MarketingTeam/Meetings/03-03-2009

 Please, don't spread the word without coordinating with the marketing
 team, we don't even have the PR phone numbers set up and our impact
 will be maximized if we can stay coordinated.

 Thanks

 Sean
 Marketing Coordinator



 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Ed McNierney e...@laptop.org wrote:
 Congratulations to everyone - very nice job!

        - Ed


 On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:

 Bernie Innocenti wrote:
 On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
 So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on,
 we
 could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.

 Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?

 Did we announce it on Freshmeat?  Slashdot?  LWN?  OLPCNews?

 The marketing team is already working on it. 2 things I think are
 left.
 Good release notes and a well enough working Soas for people to try
 out.
 Both will be available in the next days - at least that is the plan.

 Cheers,
    Simon

 ___
 Devel mailing list
 de...@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel