Re: [Sugar-devel] Error building jhbuild
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 20:22, Daniel Castelo dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I get this error when I try to run the build command. Thanks make[4]: se ingresa al directorio `/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/source/sugar-artwork/icons/scalable/device' make[4]: *** No hay ninguna regla para construir el objetivo `network-adhoc-1-connected.svg', necesario para `all-am'. Alto. That file should be there, so you may have a messed up sugar-artwork. Try removing that dir (if you don't have any changes you want to keep) and clone it again. Regards, Tomeu make[4]: se sale del directorio `/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/source/sugar-artwork/icons/scalable/device' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: se sale del directorio `/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/source/sugar-artwork/icons/scalable' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: se sale del directorio `/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/source/sugar-artwork/icons' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: se sale del directorio `/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/source/sugar-artwork' make: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error during phase build of sugar-artwork: ## Error running make *** [13/28] -- Ing. Daniel Castelo Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica Avda. Italia 6201 Montevideo - Uruguay. Tel.: 601.57.73 Interno 2228 E-mail : dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 20:15, Daniel Castelo dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a dependency between jhbuild and gtk. should Jhbuild work over f11? ___ checking for METACITY_MESSAGE... configure: error: Package requirements (gtk+-2.0 = 2.20.0) were not met: Requested 'gtk+-2.0 = 2.20.0' but version of GTK+ is 2.16.6 We should be downloading a tarball instead of cloning metacity's git repo. 2.28.1 seems to be the right version. We need to modify config/modulesets/glucose-external.modules and instead of a autotools tag we need tarball for metacity. Can you submit a patch for this? Regards, Tomeu Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables METACITY_MESSAGE_CFLAGS and METACITY_MESSAGE_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. *** Error during phase configure of metacity: ## Error running ./autogen.sh --prefix /home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/install --libdir '/home/latu/sugar-jhbuild_13_Jul/install/lib' *** [6/28] -- Ing. Daniel Castelo Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica Avda. Italia 6201 Montevideo - Uruguay. Tel.: 601.57.73 Interno 2228 E-mail : dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Don't break if we may not own NetworkManagerUserSettings
User settings will be removed from NetworkManager in the future. Also the user
might not have privileges to handle user settings - e.g. because of logging in
remotely (LTSP-style setups).
Signed-off-by: Sascha Silbe sascha-...@silbe.org
---
src/jarabe/model/network.py | 18 +++---
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/jarabe/model/network.py b/src/jarabe/model/network.py
index 3a949da..623abca 100644
--- a/src/jarabe/model/network.py
+++ b/src/jarabe/model/network.py
@@ -566,11 +566,19 @@ def get_settings():
_nm_settings = NMSettings()
except dbus.DBusException:
logging.exception('Cannot create the UserSettings service.')
-load_connections()
+_nm_settings = 'unavailable'
+else:
+ load_connections()
+if _nm_settings == 'unavailable':
+return None
return _nm_settings
def find_connection_by_ssid(ssid):
-connections = get_settings().connections
+settings = get_settings()
+if settings is None:
+return None
+
+connections = settings.connections
for conn_index in connections:
connection = connections[conn_index]
@@ -700,7 +708,11 @@ def load_connections():
load_gsm_connection()
def find_gsm_connection():
-connections = get_settings().connections
+settings = get_settings()
+if settings is None:
+return None
+
+connections = settings.connections
for connection in connections.values():
if connection.get_settings().connection.type == NM_CONNECTION_TYPE_GSM:
--
tg: (8aa387d..) t/fix-no-nm-user-settings (depends on: upstream/master)
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a dependency between jhbuild and gtk. should Jhbuild work over f11? F11 has reached its end of life some weeks ago [1]. I'm rather reluctant on supporting and spending effort on something that doesn't even receive security updates anymore. Quite on the contrary, I'm glad F11 has finally reached EOL so I can clean up sugar-jhbuild a bit. sugar-jhbuild is meant for Sugar core hacking. If you just want to run Sugar (including developing activities), please use native distribution packages instead. Sascha [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-June/002830.html -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Error building jhbuild
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:22:26 + 2010: I get this error when I try to run the build command. Please always post error messages in english. The following should do the trick: export LC_ALL=C make[4]: *** No hay ninguna regla para construir el objetivo `network-adhoc-1-connected.svg', necesario para `all-am'. Alto. Looks like SL#2102 [1]. Sascha [1] https://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2102 -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-artwork-0.89.2
Hi, the last tarball was botched, so here is a (hopefully) good one. Sorry about the trouble. == Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.89.2.tar.bz2 == News == * Remove mention of files in Makefile.am that aren't committed ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a dependency between jhbuild and gtk. should Jhbuild work over f11? F11 has reached its end of life some weeks ago [1]. I'm rather reluctant on supporting and spending effort on something that doesn't even receive security updates anymore. Quite on the contrary, I'm glad F11 has finally reached EOL so I can clean up sugar-jhbuild a bit. Ok, we have to move to a next version. With tomeu's suggestion (download metacity 2.28.1 tarball) jhbuild works fine. This is just a workaround for F11 or we should submit a patch with this? Thanks sugar-jhbuild is meant for Sugar core hacking. If you just want to run Sugar (including developing activities), please use native distribution packages instead. Sascha [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-June/002830.html -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Ing. Daniel Castelo Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica Avda. Italia 6201 Montevideo - Uruguay. Tel.: 601.57.73 Interno 2228 E-mail : dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 15:56, Daniel Castelo dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Wed Jul 14 18:15:01 + 2010: I think that we talked about this problem before, I want to install jhbuild on fedora 11 and I get this error message. Seems like the problem is a dependency between jhbuild and gtk. should Jhbuild work over f11? F11 has reached its end of life some weeks ago [1]. I'm rather reluctant on supporting and spending effort on something that doesn't even receive security updates anymore. Quite on the contrary, I'm glad F11 has finally reached EOL so I can clean up sugar-jhbuild a bit. Ok, we have to move to a next version. With tomeu's suggestion (download metacity 2.28.1 tarball) jhbuild works fine. This is just a workaround for F11 or we should submit a patch with this? Sascha is the sugar-jhbuild maintainer, so if he says that we should drop F11 and you want to keep using it, then either you make a deal with him or you will have to maintain your own fork of it. Regards, Tomeu Thanks sugar-jhbuild is meant for Sugar core hacking. If you just want to run Sugar (including developing activities), please use native distribution packages instead. Sascha [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-June/002830.html -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Ing. Daniel Castelo Plan Ceibal - Área Técnica Avda. Italia 6201 Montevideo - Uruguay. Tel.: 601.57.73 Interno 2228 E-mail : dcast...@plan.ceibal.edu.uy ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem with Jhbuild and Fedora 11
Excerpts from Daniel Castelo's message of Thu Jul 15 13:56:03 + 2010: This is just a workaround for F11 or we should submit a patch with this? This is specific to distributions shipping an old version of GTK (Ubuntu 9.04 and Fedora 12 apparently have the same issue - I didn't notice because metacity has failed for various reasons for quite some time). It probably was a conscious choice of the metacity developers, so a patch is unlikely to get accepted upstream. Sascha signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] SoaS-4 Feature Freeze approaching
Hi All, Just a reminder that SoaS-4 feature freeze is rapidly approaching. The feature freeze is July 27th. So we're a little under 2 weeks away from feature freeze so please get your features in. If you need help or have queries regarding the process please email the soas list. Regards, Peter BTW the first release of sugar 0.89 will be in tomorrow's nightly SoaS build... get it first here [1] :-) [1] http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/soas/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
Hi, On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more normal keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should function, under sugar and GNOME. The technicalities are in http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10213 and here is a picture of the keyboard: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Spanish_Non-membrane_Keyboard Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). This matches behaviour of normal laptops, including the Dell that I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the volume down key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching what is printed on the keyboard. We want all of the unmodified F-keys to send the normal F-key events (we don't want to map them especially). This is for maximum compatibility with non-sugar environments. For Sugar we have an open question. The F1-F4 keys have the zoom levels printed on them, and pressing the keys unmodified will cause the zoom levels to change (because this is how Sugar is already coded, it responds to the literal F1 keypress). The other keys are: - F5: search/journal - F6: frame - F9: brightness down - F10: brightness up - F11: volume down - F12: volume up For these other keys, when using Sugar, should the user have to press the Fn modifier while pressing the key in order to reach the named function? The advantage of not having to press Fn (i.e. the keys would work unmodified) is that sugar works the way it always has on XO (we retain consistency with XO-1). As for the other option, the advantage of requiring Fn is that we gain consistency between Sugar and GNOME, and between the XO HS and normal laptops (where Fn *is* necessary to reach those alternate functions). (but we do end up with some confusion with the zoom level keys,which will continue to work unmodified) If we decide to make the keys available unmodified in Sugar we would have to change sugar (worldwide, not interested in downstream forked patches) so that F5 on any system opens the journal, F6 on any system opens the frame, etc. How would people feel about that? cheers, Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). This matches behaviour of normal laptops, including the Dell that I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the volume down key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching what is printed on the keyboard. This convention appears to be changing. My very recent HP notebook requires th Fn button to be pushed to reach the function keys. Everything is reversed. While I don't have the empirical evidence to support a claim that users prefer to have quick access to volume brightness, I think this could be an argument to say that whatever the path of least resistance (in terms of developer cycles) is fine. Tim ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
On 15 Jul 2010, at 23:59, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote: On 16 July 2010 10:50, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). This matches behaviour of normal laptops, including the Dell that I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the volume down key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching what is printed on the keyboard. This convention appears to be changing. My very recent HP notebook requires th Fn button to be pushed to reach the function keys. Everything is reversed. +1 on Tim's observation, all three Apple laptops I've owned have brightness/volume/exposé/dashboard/etc mapped by default to a single key press, if you want an Fn key you need to hold the Fn button down. There is a system preference to toggle this behaviour, but the majority of Mac applications avoid the use of function keys (same as most Sugar Activities do). Regards, --Gary While I don't have the empirical evidence to support a claim that users prefer to have quick access to volume brightness, I think this could be an argument to say that whatever the path of least resistance (in terms of developer cycles) is fine. Tim ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys to enlarge or reduce the brush, the fonts,etc. If we need F5 and F6 to the journal and the frame we can use F7 and F8 to change sizes but will be different in the actual keyboards and the HS keyboard. You will have other problem with the actual keyboard definition.Pressing fn with any slider key gives no event at all. Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important in my experience. regards. -walter Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more normal keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should function, under sugar and GNOME. The technicalities are in http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10213 and here is a picture of the keyboard: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Spanish_Non-membrane_Keyboard Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). This matches behaviour of normal laptops, including the Dell that I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the volume down key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching what is printed on the keyboard. We want all of the unmodified F-keys to send the normal F-key events (we don't want to map them especially). This is for maximum compatibility with non-sugar environments. For Sugar we have an open question. The F1-F4 keys have the zoom levels printed on them, and pressing the keys unmodified will cause the zoom levels to change (because this is how Sugar is already coded, it responds to the literal F1 keypress). The other keys are: - F5: search/journal - F6: frame - F9: brightness down - F10: brightness up - F11: volume down - F12: volume up For these other keys, when using Sugar, should the user have to press the Fn modifier while pressing the key in order to reach the named function? The advantage of not having to press Fn (i.e. the keys would work unmodified) is that sugar works the way it always has on XO (we retain consistency with XO-1). As for the other option, the advantage of requiring Fn is that we gain consistency between Sugar and GNOME, and between the XO HS and normal laptops (where Fn *is* necessary to reach those alternate functions). (but we do end up with some confusion with the zoom level keys,which will continue to work unmodified) If we decide to make the keys available unmodified in Sugar we would have to change sugar (worldwide, not interested in downstream forked patches) so that F5 on any system opens the journal, F6 on any system opens the frame, etc. How would people feel about that? cheers, Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Gonzalo Odiard godi...@gmail.com wrote: May be it's too late, but i was modifying Paint to use the slider keys (F5,F6,F7,F8) to change the size of the brush. I know there aren't other uses of slider in Sugar, but I think it's useful and expressive to have keys to enlarge or reduce the brush, the fonts,etc. If we need F5 and F6 to the journal and the frame we can use F7 and F8 to change sizes but will be different in the actual keyboards and the HS keyboard. You will have other problem with the actual keyboard definition.Pressing fn with any slider key gives no event at all. This is a regression. It used to (2007) return keycodes. -walter Gonzalo On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Hi, On the XO HS (highschool edition, the one with a more normal keyboard) we're facing some questions about how the F keys should function, under sugar and GNOME. The technicalities are in http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/10213 and here is a picture of the keyboard: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Spanish_Non-membrane_Keyboard Under non-sugar environments (e.g. GNOME), myself and Paul are in agreement that in order to change brightness and volume, you should press e.g. Fn+F9 (to decrease brightness). This matches behaviour of normal laptops, including the Dell that I'm writing on. Linux already has mechanisms (once through hal, now through udev) so that when I press Fn+F8 on my Dell, X receives the volume down key press (instead of the Fn+F8 key press), matching what is printed on the keyboard. We want all of the unmodified F-keys to send the normal F-key events (we don't want to map them especially). This is for maximum compatibility with non-sugar environments. For Sugar we have an open question. The F1-F4 keys have the zoom levels printed on them, and pressing the keys unmodified will cause the zoom levels to change (because this is how Sugar is already coded, it responds to the literal F1 keypress). The other keys are: - F5: search/journal - F6: frame - F9: brightness down - F10: brightness up - F11: volume down - F12: volume up For these other keys, when using Sugar, should the user have to press the Fn modifier while pressing the key in order to reach the named function? The advantage of not having to press Fn (i.e. the keys would work unmodified) is that sugar works the way it always has on XO (we retain consistency with XO-1). As for the other option, the advantage of requiring Fn is that we gain consistency between Sugar and GNOME, and between the XO HS and normal laptops (where Fn *is* necessary to reach those alternate functions). (but we do end up with some confusion with the zoom level keys,which will continue to work unmodified) If we decide to make the keys available unmodified in Sugar we would have to change sugar (worldwide, not interested in downstream forked patches) so that F5 on any system opens the journal, F6 on any system opens the frame, etc. How would people feel about that? cheers, Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] behaviour of F-keys on XO HS
On 15 July 2010 18:26, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: Presumably there is a way to detect which keyboard is installed in the machine? While I love Gonzalo's use of the F5-F8 keys, the need for Frame and Journal keys on the non-membrane keyboards is more important in my experience. Yes, let's limit this discussion to the non-membrane keyboard. Not planning any changes in the membrane keyboard (without separate discussion). Walter, what's your opinion? Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36
Tested fine on XO-1 os301. What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36
Hi, Tested fine on XO-1 os301. Thanks for testing! What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) Are you referring to these commits ;-) remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/46bcc0f0cb327955c4f9f33617229a8ed20d0b66 minor example fixes following review http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/35d15b1c43514f5918b89a4c47a9f689d83626dc adapt pippy examples to screen dimensions, dev.laptop.org #9260 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/4a50004aa8f2109e6cff4a082a10581dfee0d540 -- Anish On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:34 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Tested fine on XO-1 os301. What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Pippy-36
These will be included in Pippy-37 remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/46bcc0f0cb327955c4f9f33617229a8ed20d0b66 minor example fixes following review http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/35d15b1c43514f5918b89a4c47a9f689d83626dc adapt pippy examples to screen dimensions, dev.laptop.org #9260 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/4a50004aa8f2109e6cff4a082a10581dfee0d540 -- Anish On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Anish Mangal anishmangal2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Tested fine on XO-1 os301. Thanks for testing! What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) Are you referring to these commits ;-) remove broken slideshow until it is fixed #2054 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/46bcc0f0cb327955c4f9f33617229a8ed20d0b66 minor example fixes following review http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/35d15b1c43514f5918b89a4c47a9f689d83626dc adapt pippy examples to screen dimensions, dev.laptop.org #9260 http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/pippy/repos/mainline/commits/4a50004aa8f2109e6cff4a082a10581dfee0d540 -- Anish On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 8:34 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: Tested fine on XO-1 os301. What happened to my fixes to the examples? I can't remember where that was up to. ;-) -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
