Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 1/3] adding svg mimetype SL#1772
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Sascha Silbe si...@activitycentral.comwrote: Excerpts from Rafael Ortiz's message of Fri May 20 22:32:59 +0200 2011: Adding support for svg mimetype on browse activity Pushed (with a different description) as 7964449 [1], thanks! Sascha [1] http://git.sugarlabs.org/browse/mainline/commit/7964449b0be7f941a533013b558a404db7873398 Thanks Sasha!. -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] adding support for Tuquito GNU/Linux distribution
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Sorry for taking so long to review your patch. I've recently moved and my server has faulty hardware (perfect timing, as usual), so things are a bit crazy right now. Thanks, Don't worry about the time, I'm learning all this so if you can have patience me too :D Thanks for catching the two missing dependencies (python-lxml and python-beautifulsoup, both of which are used by Read). I've added them to the generic Debian (and Fedora) files. Since the Tuquito files are now identical to the Ubuntu ones I replaced them with symlinks. Ok. Now I want to make deb packages of the stable version of sugar tu put in our ppa (https://launchpad.net/~paquetes-tuquito). And I have a question. Were I can download the sources of the last stable release to make this packages (I'm learning to doit so i think that it will take a time to me make this, but i have to try) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] adding support for Tuquito GNU/Linux distribution
On 22.05.2011, at 18:37, Alvar Maciel wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: Sorry for taking so long to review your patch. I've recently moved and my server has faulty hardware (perfect timing, as usual), so things are a bit crazy right now. Thanks, Don't worry about the time, I'm learning all this so if you can have patience me too :D Thanks for catching the two missing dependencies (python-lxml and python-beautifulsoup, both of which are used by Read). I've added them to the generic Debian (and Fedora) files. Since the Tuquito files are now identical to the Ubuntu ones I replaced them with symlinks. Ok. Now I want to make deb packages of the stable version of sugar tu put in our ppa (https://launchpad.net/~paquetes-tuquito). And I have a question. Were I can download the sources of the last stable release to make this packages (I'm learning to doit so i think that it will take a time to me make this, but i have to try) http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/ - Bert - ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] meeting next Sunday, 29 May?
We are overdue for another design meeting. Does next Sunday work? Gary and Christian, since you two are at the extremes of timezones, do you want to propose a meeting time? Sascha would like to discuss some UI changes to the Neighborhood View to address some issues concerning access points (The current model (1:1 AP-network mapping) isn't powerful enough for real-life scenarios (hidden SSIDs etc.).) -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] adding support for Tuquito GNU/Linux distribution
Excerpts from Alvar Maciel's message of Sun May 22 18:37:02 +0200 2011: Ok. Now I want to make deb packages of the stable version of sugar tu put in our ppa (https://launchpad.net/~paquetes-tuquito). And I have a question. Were I can download the sources of the last stable release to make this packages (I'm learning to doit so i think that it will take a time to me make this, but i have to try) I'd suggest to start off with the Debian (project, not format) packages [1,2]. They are well maintained in general, though 0.92 hasn't been packaged yet. However the difference between 0.90 and 0.92 is minimal (mostly bug fixes). The packages are maintained on alioth.debian.org (that's getting replaced by new hardware right now, so please try again later if something isn't working). You can check the location of the upstream tarballs in debian/rules (DEB_UPSTREAM_URL) and debian/watch. Please subscribe to the debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list. Despite the name it's about packaging Sugar for Debian and derivatives. XO hardware specific packages are maintained by Andres Salomon (I don't know whether he's on the list, too). Sascha [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar [2] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-olpc-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] adding support for Tuquito GNU/Linux distribution
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I'd suggest to start off with the Debian (project, not format) packages [1,2]. They are well maintained in general, though 0.92 hasn't been packaged yet. However the difference between 0.90 and 0.92 is minimal (mostly bug fixes). goo advise I will check this subject and doi it in the proper way ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] adding support for Tuquito GNU/Linux distribution
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/tuquito has some older info Alvar Maciel wrote: On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Sascha Silbe si...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I'd suggest to start off with the Debian (project, not format) packages [1,2]. They are well maintained in general, though 0.92 hasn't been packaged yet. However the difference between 0.90 and 0.92 is minimal (mostly bug fixes). goo advise I will check this subject and doi it in the proper way ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Accept only good licensed activities
Hi all, To start rounding off licenses case on ASLO, there is an implementation on http://activities-testing.sugarlabs.org/ that looks to newly uploaded activities bundle to see what licenses it contain in activity.info. If licenses are not in the approved list, ASLO will reject uploading. The initial version of Licensing Policy is: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy/Licensing Implementation details: - The license is being shown only after the first upload to the new ASLO - License is shown in the activity details grid - To change license, just upload new version Please test. -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] TurtleArt problems in Ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/turtleart/+bug/731133 TurtleArt 98.1, as packaged for Ubuntu, is missing essential files and cannot start. Who is responsible for this package? -- Edward Mokurai (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) Cherlin Silent Thunder is my name, and Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, the Truth my destination. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] TurtleArt problems in Ubuntu
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:27:12PM -0400, Edward Cherlin wrote: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/turtleart/+bug/731133 TurtleArt 98.1, as packaged for Ubuntu, is missing essential files and cannot start. Who is responsible for this package? http://packages.ubuntu.com/turtleart ... http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/turtleart ... shows that the maintainer is Ubuntu MOTU Developers (Mail Archive) ubuntu-m...@lists.ubuntu.com apt-cache show turtleart shows that the maintainer is Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com with original maintainer Matthew Gallagher mattv...@gmail.com The Debian package also has a maintainer of Luke Faraone. http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/t/turtleart/turtleart_98-1/changelog -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] copy files to/from server
On 21 May 2011 03:49, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:12 AM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote: why not use Moodle or Sharepoint or Blackboard? Yeah - there's an easy-installation Moodle package. That's what I'd go with. Sadly, we can't use Moodle. One state here in Australia doesn't like it, to the point where we're going to have to disable or remove it. That makes things interesting :( Ideally we want to be able to use a resource that is present in the school, rather than requiring a round-trip across the Internet to a server somewhere else. Sridhar ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] copy files to/from server
On 19 May 2011 04:15, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: For file management, I very strongly recommend using WebDAV. It is a bit less efficient than real network file system protocols, but the benefits are many: - more flexibilty - closer to you and me in the stack - you can easily find WebDAV toolkits in HLLs that allow you to expose your data as files and directories over WebDAV, as well as client implementations - it deals reasonably gracefully with intermittent connectivity (SMB/CIFS, NFS, etc get you nasty system freezes if the server disappears) - wide range of (fairly well behaved) client and server implementations - a good test suite for the server side - On the XS side... Moodle has a WebDAV implementation and Apache has one too. Interesting. Does WebDAV work as a normal mount, like CIFS or NFS? What would be the best way to get this working on Sugar? Thanks, Sridhar ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
