[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Conozco Ruanda-2
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4653 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28662/i_know_rwanda-2.xo Release notes: -New translations Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Conozco Sri Lanka-2
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4600 Sugar Platform: 0.82 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28663/i_know_sri_lanka-2.xo Release notes: -New translations Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] multi-homeview feature
I did a clean [1] up of Daniel Francis's Multi Home View feature [2] yesterday and in the process tried to address two issues: (1) The original code had many redundancies. The new version is reasonably tight (although I am certain to get push back in the review process). (2) There was some concern that this feature would cause confusion among our users (despite its being written in response to several requests from the field). To address #2, I made the number of home views configurable. By default, there is just one home view, as is currently the case. A gconf settting is used to add additional home views. (In gconf, I maintain a list of icons to use for the view toolbar and to use for marking favorites in the list view.) A view is generated for each icon in the list. I posit that this is a reasonable compromise: the default behavior does not change, but deployments that want to exploit this feature can use gconftool to set custom icons and views. (And since it is in user space, enterprising users can also customize the number of views.) Reactions? -walter [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/38 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: osbuild throws error in Python import statement
Weird. Are you fully updated? (apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade). On 20 June 2013 01:58, Marion Zepf marion.z...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When I try to build sugar with the osbuild command, I get: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 __init__.py types.py module.py importer.py pygtkcompat.py '/bigrepos/sugar-labs/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gi' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 68, in module import os File /usr/lib/python2.7/os.py, line 49, in module import posixpath as path File /usr/lib/python2.7/posixpath.py, line 17, in module import warnings File /usr/lib/python2.7/warnings.py, line 8, in module import types File ./types.py, line 27, in module from . import _gobject ValueError: Attempted relative import in non-package Further up it says: Command failed: make install I already tried cleaning everything with git clean -df git reset --hard ./osbuild clean but it did not help. I'm attaching the complete log (console output) and build/logs/main.log. Thanks in advance for your help! Marion ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: osbuild throws error in Python import statement
Oh you seem to have automake 1.13.2 installed. Ubuntu 13.04 has 1.11 though. Did you install it yourself somewhere on the path? On 21 June 2013 15:23, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Weird. Are you fully updated? (apt-get update, apt-get dist-upgrade). On 20 June 2013 01:58, Marion Zepf marion.z...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When I try to build sugar with the osbuild command, I get: /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 __init__.py types.py module.py importer.py pygtkcompat.py '/bigrepos/sugar-labs/sugar-build/build/out/install/lib/python2.7/site-packages/gi' Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 68, in module import os File /usr/lib/python2.7/os.py, line 49, in module import posixpath as path File /usr/lib/python2.7/posixpath.py, line 17, in module import warnings File /usr/lib/python2.7/warnings.py, line 8, in module import types File ./types.py, line 27, in module from . import _gobject ValueError: Attempted relative import in non-package Further up it says: Command failed: make install I already tried cleaning everything with git clean -df git reset --hard ./osbuild clean but it did not help. I'm attaching the complete log (console output) and build/logs/main.log. Thanks in advance for your help! Marion ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] draft language asking permission to relicense (was Re: Licensing of the javascript libraries)
martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com should work On 21 June 2013 17:32, Tony Sebro t...@sfconservancy.org wrote: Hi, all: FYI, I've sent out emails to the contributors on the list, CC'ing Walter and Daniel. On 06/20/2013 04:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Martin Abente mabe...@paraguayeduca.org Martin Abente's email bounced back. Do any of you have an up-to-date email address for him? Please advise. Thanks. -Tony -- Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy+1-212-461-3245 x11t...@sfconservancy.orgwww.sfconservancy.org -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] draft language asking permission to relicense (was Re: Licensing of the javascript libraries)
Sorry. Try t...@sugarlabs.org -walter On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Tony Sebro t...@sfconservancy.org wrote: Hi, all: FYI, I've sent out emails to the contributors on the list, CC'ing Walter and Daniel. On 06/20/2013 04:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote: Martin Abente mabe...@paraguayeduca.org Martin Abente's email bounced back. Do any of you have an up-to-date email address for him? Please advise. Thanks. -Tony -- Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy +1-212-461-3245 x11 t...@sfconservancy.org www.sfconservancy.org -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] can this be duplicated by FLOSS? is this similar to Sugar Network?
Hi OLPC SG and Sugar-Devel Folks, This[0] is an interesting situation that these Australian schools find themselves in. Many of the mentioned services found on the Wikipedia page sound like available technologies from FLOSS that need a bit of integration to provide a similar unified project. I don't know the full details and have not expierenced the Sugar Network or the XS in use but are those products partial solutions to this? (eg. Moodle, schooltools, etc.) Could one be developed to meet most of the Ultranet goals? If these folks had invested in FLOSS solutions funded by a government, it might have had an initial upfront cost that was more, and required maintaince but would not be a product that could cancelled in the way a 3rd party project like this was and would have allowed the users to export their existing metadata/data rather than lose valuable content and invested time. Not to mention the possible volunteer contribution and use by other school. -K [0] http://danielpocock.com/wrong-cloud-nec-ultranet-victoria ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Automatic activity updates
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Cool. I'd say it's in then... Added a feature page https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/9 Thanks for being open to this. The implementation is ready for review. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/11 https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/40 Daniel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Orphaned 0.100 features
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I think two of the features on the 0.100 roadmap are in practice orphaned. There has been disagreement on how the patches should be submitted and reviewed, which blocked development. Then despite trying several times I have not been able to get any feedback from the owner about his plans. Enhanced support for 3G modems https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/2 Multiple selection in the Journal https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/1 Working on cleaning this one up today :) Sorry. I misread this. I was working on Multiple home view, not Multiple selection. If someone else wants to pick this up, it would be great. -walter Is anyone interested to pick these up? I think we need a new owner here, otherwise the features should be punted from 0.100. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] multi-homeview feature
Hi Walter, On 21 Jun 2013, at 13:18, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: I did a clean [1] up of Daniel Francis's Multi Home View feature [2] yesterday and in the process tried to address two issues: (1) The original code had many redundancies. The new version is reasonably tight (although I am certain to get push back in the review process). (2) There was some concern that this feature would cause confusion among our users (despite its being written in response to several requests from the field). To address #2, I made the number of home views configurable. By default, there is just one home view, as is currently the case. A gconf settting is used to add additional home views. (In gconf, I maintain a list of icons to use for the view toolbar and to use for marking favorites in the list view.) A view is generated for each icon in the list. I posit that this is a reasonable compromise: the default behavior does not change, but deployments that want to exploit this feature can use gconftool to set custom icons and views. (And since it is in user space, enterprising users can also customize the number of views.) Reactions? Great – yes that sounds like a good compromise while still supporting requests from the field for this new feature. Regards, --Gary -walter [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/pull/38 [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Orphaned 0.100 features
I will work on Multiple operations on Journal feature. Gonzalo On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I think two of the features on the 0.100 roadmap are in practice orphaned. There has been disagreement on how the patches should be submitted and reviewed, which blocked development. Then despite trying several times I have not been able to get any feedback from the owner about his plans. Enhanced support for 3G modems https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/2 Multiple selection in the Journal https://github.com/sugarlabs/roadmap/issues/1 Working on cleaning this one up today :) Sorry. I misread this. I was working on Multiple home view, not Multiple selection. If someone else wants to pick this up, it would be great. -walter Is anyone interested to pick these up? I think we need a new owner here, otherwise the features should be punted from 0.100. -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
