[Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] About bug notation in commit headers
In the past, we used to add in the first line of the commit message the bug number, with the prefixes SL or OLPC, depending on if the ticket was in bugs.sugarlabs.org or in dev.laptop.org. The reference in the first line was useful to find the connection, by example when you do git log --oneline Many moons ago, olpc team moved all the work related to sugar and activities, to sugarlabs bug tracker, then right now the prefix is not needed anymore. Now, we have magic rules to close a ticket if the Fixes #number is found in the header. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/contributing.md#bugfixing The rule works in the first line too. Then I propose: * Continue using Fixes # without prefixes. * Use it in the first line of the header. * Modify documentation to request this. What you think? Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] About bug notation in commit headers
Yes, only need to mention OLPC prefix if bug is in dev.laptop.org. On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:36:09AM -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: In the past, we used to add in the first line of the commit message the bug number, with the prefixes SL or OLPC, depending on if the ticket was in bugs.sugarlabs.org or in dev.laptop.org. The reference in the first line was useful to find the connection, by example when you do git log --oneline Many moons ago, olpc team moved all the work related to sugar and activities, to sugarlabs bug tracker, then right now the prefix is not needed anymore. Now, we have magic rules to close a ticket if the Fixes #number is found in the header. https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/contributing.md#bugfixing The rule works in the first line too. Then I propose: * Continue using Fixes # without prefixes. * Use it in the first line of the header. * Modify documentation to request this. What you think? Gonzalo ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Write breaking the build
Pushed a change to not save the content if abiword version is 3.0 Please confirm me if that solves the problem in your env. Gonzalo On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: My understanding is that OLPC shipped a patched version of abiword. Now these patches landed upstream in 3.0, but they seem to be slightly different from what OLPC shipped. Peter upgraded F19/F20 to 3.0 recently, you probably remember the discussion about it on the list, then I added Write to sugar-build and we started to see the error. On 18 December 2013 16:54, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: This code has been here for a long time, do you know why is breaking now? Gonzalo On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: It is failing to stop http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/150/steps/shell_2/logs/smoketest It is caused by this abiword bug http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13585 Can we avoid setting fulltext in metadata until we have a fix for that please? -- Daniel Narvaez -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Gambiarra game
Bernie, Aleksey, Alan proposed work in this activity a month ago. The owner was notified, but didn't replied, can you give him access to the git repository? Thanks Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn alan...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi, I want to continue working with this game. It's interesting. Now, I have some changes: -add translations for other languages -add compatibility with new sugar versions -replace OLPCGames library for SugarGames Wich is the way to get permissions to original GIT: https://git.sugarlabs.org/gambiarra Regards! Alan ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Write breaking the build
Buildbot seems happy. Thanks!
On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Pushed a change to not save the content if abiword version is 3.0
Please confirm me if that solves the problem in your env.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
My understanding is that OLPC shipped a patched version of abiword. Now
these patches landed upstream in 3.0, but they seem to be slightly
different from what OLPC shipped. Peter upgraded F19/F20 to 3.0 recently,
you probably remember the discussion about it on the list, then I added
Write to sugar-build and we started to see the error.
On 18 December 2013 16:54, Gonzalo Odiard
gonz...@laptop.orgjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'gonz...@laptop.org');
wrote:
This code has been here for a long time, do you know why is breaking now?
Gonzalo
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez
dwnarv...@gmail.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dwnarv...@gmail.com');
wrote:
It is failing to stop
http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-master/builds/150/steps/shell_2/logs/smoketest
It is caused by this abiword bug
http://bugzilla.abisource.com/show_bug.cgi?id=13585
Can we avoid setting fulltext in metadata until we have a fix for that
please?
--
Daniel Narvaez
--
Daniel Narvaez
--
Daniel Narvaez
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
Same here. Maybe the infra team can help with this, it's pretty bad because often people are not getting answers because of this. On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.orgjavascript:; wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org javascript:; http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-web] do webkit frames run on different threads?
I know that webkitgtk is currently single web process, they are working to make it one process per web view, but not per frame afaik. In the blink announcement google mentioned they wanted to go one process per frame, which was not possible to do with webkit. I don't really know if single process is necessarily single thread here. Can you explain where multi thread would be an issue in our code? Why I'm thinking perhaps simplistically is that we are already dealing with the window.sugar stuff being available asyncronously. On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote: I've read the following, recently: [...] In Opera, every window has its own JavaScript thread. This includes windows in iframes. The consequence is that event handlers initiated from different frames might execute at the same time. If these simultaneous scripts modify shared data (like properties in the top window), we have the possibility of race conditions. [...] source: http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/timing-and-synchronization-in-javascript/ Because some pieces of sugar-web API ( for ex: env.js) relay on window.top props (and karma loads a context.html iframe and runs the specs within), I asked to myself if webkit frames may simultaneously run on different threads... I always think in a single-threaded model when programming javascript (async, of course, but not multithreading). Therefore, It seems to me like an Opera specific. After a little research, I wasn't able to find an concrete answer, so asked Roger to try out some tests. We made a long running function with busy waiting loops that mutates a shared porp at window.top and then we ran it twice (one per frame) in Opera. As the doc says, we 've been able to make a (racy) non-deterministic state of the shared prop.[?] Same tests on Chrome showed single-thread behavior... [?] So the thesis would be running those on webkit... but we haven't yet We had some unrelated issues and before keep digging I want ask you what do you think/know about... Thanks, Code -- Daniel Narvaez 328.png341.png___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
I didn't know I was such a spammer :) I apologize if I caused any inconvenience. I do not know why this is happening. I believe to have used only links from *.sugarlabs.org and *.github.com, which shouldn't be marked as spam. I have no special signature to my mails (except my name, which I add personally). I've used gmail's web interface to send the mails, not an MTA/SMTP client. Yet I find many mails from sugar-devel in my spam folder, as well. Emil Dudev On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Same here. Maybe the infra team can help with this, it's pretty bad because often people are not getting answers because of this. On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-web] do webkit frames run on different threads?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you explain where multi thread would be an issue in our code? Why I'm
thinking perhaps simplistically is that we are already dealing with the
window.sugar stuff being available asyncronously.
Yes, we dealt with this, already. But I didn't know that some browser may
run frames simultaneously.
Suppose the following scenario:
* order of execution is not guaranteed
* javascript from python runs on top frame
* env.js runs on an iframe
* different frames may run simultneously
js from python:
var environment = %s; --- phase 1
if (window.sugar === undefined) {
window.sugar = {};
}
window.sugar.environment = environment; --- phase 2
from getEnvironment:
if (window.top.sugar) {
sugar = window.top.sugar;
} else {
sugar = {}; --- phase 1
window.top.sugar = sugar; --- phase 2
}
In this case, they would be running for window.top.sugar and it may result
with {}
Our scenario is running js from python far earlier than getEnvironment
(but not guaranteed), therefore, even with multithreading, this is unlikely
to happen.
I just a thought, but I would like to hear what do you think
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
I don't think your mails are wrong, just wanted notify, because you could be wondering why didn't have a reply. While we found a solution, probably is better put the url of the link but without a html link.. Gonzalo On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Emil Dudev emildu...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know I was such a spammer :) I apologize if I caused any inconvenience. I do not know why this is happening. I believe to have used only links from *.sugarlabs.org and *.github.com, which shouldn't be marked as spam. I have no special signature to my mails (except my name, which I add personally). I've used gmail's web interface to send the mails, not an MTA/SMTP client. Yet I find many mails from sugar-devel in my spam folder, as well. Emil Dudev On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Same here. Maybe the infra team can help with this, it's pretty bad because often people are not getting answers because of this. On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
This happened to me as well. I simply marked all those emails as not spam in gmail for about 3 days and now its all solved. - Juan On 12/19/2013 10:37 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: I don't think your mails are wrong, just wanted notify, because you could be wondering why didn't have a reply. While we found a solution, probably is better put the url of the link but without a html link.. Gonzalo On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Emil Dudev emildu...@gmail.com mailto:emildu...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know I was such a spammer :) I apologize if I caused any inconvenience. I do not know why this is happening. I believe to have used only links from *.sugarlabs.org http://sugarlabs.org and *.github.com http://github.com, which shouldn't be marked as spam. I have no special signature to my mails (except my name, which I add personally). I've used gmail's web interface to send the mails, not an MTA/SMTP client. Yet I find many mails from sugar-devel in my spam folder, as well. Emil Dudev On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com mailto:dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Same here. Maybe the infra team can help with this, it's pretty bad because often people are not getting answers because of this. On Thursday, 19 December 2013, Peter Robinson wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Mails caught as spam
Same here -- sugar-devel, IAEP and server-devel. Taught my gmail some manners. thanks for the heads up, m On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Gonzalo Odiard gonz...@laptop.org wrote: Today I have found almost 10 mails from sugar-devel caught as spam by my gmail account. Half of them from Emil Dudev, and a few from a announce to a triage meeting. In all the cases, the mails have links. Anybody knows why these mails are marked in this way? If we have a clear reason, we can make suggestions to avoid this problem. I discovered a number of sugar mails in my gmail spam recently although I couldn't see any pattern in my collection. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release XO Help-17
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4051 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28850/help-17.xo Release notes: This is a important release, with the content and screenshots updated to follow the development changes in Sugar 0.100 version and all the activities included to the last version available. This was possible thanks to the work of Iain Brown Douglas and Kalpa Welivitigoda, who contributed almost 70 patches in the last 7 months. Other important features: * Supports the i18n of the content. * View Source show the rst sources. * Support for the feature http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Activity_Help is included. * A new section How to contribute to this manual was added. A new page was created in the wiki to help new contributors http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Help/Contribute Thanks Iain and Kalpa, good work! Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble saving Write 94 in Fedora 20
Hi Iain, Could you test Write from git https://git.sugarlabs.org/write and confirm if is working for you? Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 21:18 +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 25 November 2013 20:11, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:35 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Looks like a crash in abiword when try to open the saved file. Could you attach the document saved in the Journal, I guess my OP did not make it clear that I have never succeeded in saving *anything* in Write on this install. Write will perform as expected until I attempt to rename a file. Actually closing Write, with original file-name Write Activity is as expected, except that resume opens as an empty page. It has been intermittent whether an empty Write Activity is seen in the Journal. This is reproducable in sugar-build too now. Can you open a ticket about it please? OK, done, reference, Moderated Submission #407 Iain ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [web-activity] functional tests and env.isStandalone's current implementation
All sugar-web's tests are running into activityweb container, using sugar-web-test activity, all url requests which they do, have http scheme, and our current implementation of isStandanlone makes check on the current scheme of the request given (isStandalone methodhttps://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/blob/master/env.js#L40), then... functional tests believe are in standalone mode when they use isStandalone method. Mocking this method on unit tests is ok... but we think is not good idea mocking this on functional tests... or yes??? Thoughts: think alternative implementation for this method? hacking the scheme from sugar-web-test? What do you think? Best regards! -- Roger Activity Central http://activitycentral.com/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-web] do webkit frames run on different threads?
On 19 December 2013 17:14, Code Raguet irag...@activitycentral.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote:
Can you explain where multi thread would be an issue in our code? Why I'm
thinking perhaps simplistically is that we are already dealing with the
window.sugar stuff being available asyncronously.
Yes, we dealt with this, already. But I didn't know that some browser may
run frames simultaneously.
Suppose the following scenario:
* order of execution is not guaranteed
* javascript from python runs on top frame
* env.js runs on an iframe
* different frames may run simultneously
js from python:
var environment = %s; --- phase 1
if (window.sugar === undefined) {
window.sugar = {};
}
window.sugar.environment = environment; --- phase 2
from getEnvironment:
if (window.top.sugar) {
sugar = window.top.sugar;
} else {
sugar = {}; --- phase 1
window.top.sugar = sugar; --- phase 2
}
This code in getEnvironment is wrong, just a thinko by me.
We should not set window.top.sugar = {} from the javascript side. Instead
we should if isStandalone callback({}).
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [web-activity] functional tests and env.isStandalone's current implementation
On 19 December 2013 21:48, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: All sugar-web's tests are running into activityweb container, using sugar-web-test activity, all url requests which they do, have http scheme, and our current implementation of isStandanlone makes check on the current scheme of the request given (isStandalone methodhttps://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/blob/master/env.js#L40), then... You mean activity scheme right? functional tests believe are in standalone mode when they use isStandalone method. Mocking this method on unit tests is ok... but we think is not good idea mocking this on functional tests... or yes??? Can you explain what you mean with functional tests? (perhaps just lacking terminology on my side). ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Pippy-54
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4041 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.100 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28851/pippy-54.xo Release notes: 54 ENHANCEMENTS: * Add confirmation alert before loading new projects (Emil Dudev) * Use open palette instead of treeview (Ignacio Rodriguez) * Show/Hide terminal widget (svineet) * Added new examples (math/pi, math/stern-brocot) * Added i18n support for examples (Jorge Alberto Gómez López) * Added tutorials (Jorge Alberto Gómez López) * Added busy cursor when making bundles BUG FIXES: * Re-enable copy/paste (Ignacio Rodriguez) * Fix problems with sound library * Using elements package from Physics Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Trouble saving Write 94 in Fedora 20
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 15:59 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Hi Iain, Could you test Write from git https://git.sugarlabs.org/write and confirm if is working for you? Hi Gonzalo, Thank you for asking me to test. I tested it within Fedora20 TC5 - Write did Save correctly :), but now there is no collaboration (id est, no other avatars seen in F1). I do not perceive where the collaboration error came from. Iain Gonzalo On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 21:18 +0100, Daniel Narvaez wrote: On 25 November 2013 20:11, Iain Brown Douglas i...@browndouglas.plus.com wrote: On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 16:35 -0200, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: Looks like a crash in abiword when try to open the saved file. Could you attach the document saved in the Journal, I guess my OP did not make it clear that I have never succeeded in saving *anything* in Write on this install. Write will perform as expected until I attempt to rename a file. Actually closing Write, with original file-name Write Activity is as expected, except that resume opens as an empty page. It has been intermittent whether an empty Write Activity is seen in the Journal. This is reproducable in sugar-build too now. Can you open a ticket about it please? OK, done, reference, Moderated Submission #407 Iain ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [web-activity] functional tests and env.isStandalone's current implementation
2013/12/19 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com On 19 December 2013 21:48, Rogelio Mita rogeliom...@activitycentral.comwrote: All sugar-web's tests are running into activityweb container, using sugar-web-test activity, all url requests which they do, have http scheme, and our current implementation of isStandanlone makes check on the current scheme of the request given (isStandalone methodhttps://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-web/blob/master/env.js#L40), then... You mean activity scheme right? yes! When run karma tests, the scheme is http, is not activity functional tests believe are in standalone mode when they use isStandalone method. Mocking this method on unit tests is ok... but we think is not good idea mocking this on functional tests... or yes??? Can you explain what you mean with functional tests? (perhaps just lacking terminology on my side). I mean integration tests http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_testing =) -- Roger Activity Central http://activitycentral.com/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugar-web] do webkit frames run on different threads?
2013/12/19 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com
This code in getEnvironment is wrong, just a thinko by me.
We should not set window.top.sugar = {} from the javascript side. Instead
we should if isStandalone callback({}).
This is related with [web-activity] functional tests and
env.isStandalone's current implementation email, we were trying to do
this, and we find with this questions...
--
Roger
Activity Central http://activitycentral.com/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Sugarizer, a taste of Sugar on any device
Hi all, I'm proud to announce the second version of my prototype of Sugar as a web page. This version now include the list view of the home, datastore handling, popup menu on activities, and journal view. I've decided to name it Sugarizer and package it as a dedicated web site: http://sugarizer.org You could access to Sugarizer from the web site or download the Android. To remind you the concept, Sugarizer reproduce main features of Sugar in HTML5/JavaScript. Sugarizer also expose these features to allow running of Sugar web activities wrote for Sugar 0.100. So all activities included in the Sugarizer package work in the same way on Sugar 0.100. Hope you'll enjoy it, it's my Christmas gift to the Sugar community :-) Best regards from France. Lionel. P.S.: Source code is available on https://github.com/llaske/Sugarizer ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [support-gang] Sugarizer, a taste of Sugar on any device
Tested on XO-4 with Android 4.3.1 using the built-in browser. I see the activity view but without any activities. The search text box can typed into, but it does nothing. The ring and list icons are present, and do respond to touch by highlighting, but the body of the page contains nothing. Any idea what is causing this? -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
