[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release TurtleBlocks3D-209.1
Activity Homepage: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4757 Sugar Platform: 0.96 - 0.102 Download Now: http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/29066/turtleblocks3d-209.1.xo Release notes: 209.1 * Expose OBJ import/export in Sugar version (w/Ignacio Rodriguez) Sugar Labs Activities http://activities.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] PROPOSAL TO DO TRIAGE METTING
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:39:52AM -0800, Ryan Cunningham wrote: The message you have sent appears to be spam: Only from an automated perspective. Ifeanyi Peter Matthew is a student from Nigeria who is contributing to Sugar through Google Code-in. Welcome. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case
Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping instead of a blanket I'll report you. On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham rvskmbr...@gmail.com wrote: The message you have sent appears to be spam: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of: * 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6 Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be shouting also. * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit * (ifeanyi peter ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com ) * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in * digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com) 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses. * 1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with the use of Dear... but together with the above ratings puts this email over the required=3.5 threshold. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sunjammer.sugarlabs.org http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/ I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on the Sugar Labs development mailing list. Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit. That is easy to fix by the sender. Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just a request for a meeting. If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what amounts to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats of the FBI being involved. On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter ifeanyipete...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Sir, A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below: 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release and the end of GCI 2) To block off a 3-hour window Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely. kind regards, Ifeanyi Matthew Just my 2 cents, Jerry ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case
I am sorry for trying to threaten a user who, as it turns out, sent a message that was not of an unsolicited nature. Such threat will now be reversed. Thank you for the patience to tell me about this issue. On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping instead of a blanket I'll report you. On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham rvskmbr...@gmail.com wrote: The message you have sent appears to be spam: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of: * 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6 Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be shouting also. * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit * (ifeanyi peter ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com ) * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in * digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com) 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses. * 1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with the use of Dear... but together with the above ratings puts this email over the required=3.5 threshold. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sunjammer.sugarlabs.org http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/ I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on the Sugar Labs development mailing list. Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit. That is easy to fix by the sender. Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just a request for a meeting. If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what amounts to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats of the FBI being involved. On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter ifeanyipete...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Sir, A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below: 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release and the end of GCI 2) To block off a 3-hour window Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely. kind regards, Ifeanyi Matthew Just my 2 cents, Jerry ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] subject changed from upper case
Back to the topic of the email, would Friday work for a triage meeting? Maybe late morning on the US East Coast so not to be too late in Europe/Africa? -walter On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Cunningham rvskmbr...@gmail.com wrote: I am sorry for trying to threaten a user who, as it turns out, sent a message that was not of an unsolicited nature. Such threat will now be reversed. Thank you for the patience to tell me about this issue. On Jan 11, 2015, at 11:51 AM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote: Let's analyze why this email was flagged as spam with an eye to helping instead of a blanket I'll report you. On January 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM Ryan Cunningham rvskmbr...@gmail.com wrote: The message you have sent appears to be spam: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, So the total is above the threshold, which is made up of: * 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals Using ALL CAPS in the subject line, 1.6 Please use proper case here, the use of ALL CAPS is considered to be shouting also. * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit * (ifeanyi peter ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com ) * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in * digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com) 0.4 for having digits in the email addresses. * 1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' I'm not sure if I agree with such a high rating for being polite with the use of Dear... but together with the above ratings puts this email over the required=3.5 threshold. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sunjammer.sugarlabs.org http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/ I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on the Sugar Labs development mailing list. Think the subject line is what put this email over the spam limit. That is easy to fix by the sender. Nothing below I would consider as spam, no html, url links, ads, just a request for a meeting. If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. Some of the new developers may not have much experience with what amounts to business correspondence and may need a bit of guidance in the best practices. What a great way to scare off eager new developers, threats of the FBI being involved. On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter ifeanyipete...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Sir, A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below: 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release and the end of GCI 2) To block off a 3-hour window Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely. kind regards, Ifeanyi Matthew Just my 2 cents, Jerry ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] PROPOSAL TO DO TRIAGE METTING
The message you have sent appears to be spam: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.9 required=3.5 tests=DEAR_SOMETHING, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_PASS, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [98.138.91.254 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 0.2 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT Reply-To freemail username ends in digit * (ifeanyi peter ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com ) * 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in * digit (ifeanyipeter42[at]yahoo.com) * 1.7 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)' * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on sunjammer.sugarlabs.org http://sunjammer.sugarlabs.org/ I’m sorry to tell you this, but junk mail messages are not accepted on the Sugar Labs development mailing list. If you continue posting to this mailing list, you may be reported to the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National White Collar Crime Center. On Jan 9, 2015, at 6:45 AM, Ifeanyi Peter ifeanyipete...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear Sir, A proposal to do a triage meeting with suggestions below: 1) Wrapping up loose ends before the sugar 104 release and the end of GCI 2) To block off a 3-hour window Thank you as my proposal is considerable granted timely. kind regards, Ifeanyi Matthew ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
