Re: [Sugar-devel] ./osbuild shell not valid command

[Jerry Vonau]

> On November 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM James Cameron  wrote:
> 
> 
> I'd like to see *.spec.in and a debian equivalent hosted in the
> upstream repositories, along with README files that explain how to
> make packages from the repositories.
> 

Here here, total agreement from me.


> However, I don't see the need for COPR, automatic test suites, or
> other automata.  These automata obscure the process and lead to silos
> of expertise, and when people move on the remaining automata fall
> down.
> 

I'll agree that the automated testing can wait, but I'll disagree on COPR.
COPR is enabled by using "dnf enable SugarLabs/sugar-0.107"(doesn't exist
yet) as the equivalent in the Debian world to "deb [trusted=yes]
http://dev.laptop.org/pub/us trusty main" but without having to host the
buildsystem.

> I'd prefer to reduce complexity rather than increase it, giving more
> time for people to hack on the actual code.

Think we have the same goal, just trying to reduce the hoops for newer
developers and for easier public testing before release.

Jerry
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse Failed to Start

[Jerry Vonau]

It appears to be a error reading a gconf/gsettings, not sure which as there
is(was?) a compatibility hack in sugar that reads gconf if it exists. I
don't recall if browse worked on F23 SugarOnAStick or sugar-runner. Others
might be able to shed more light on config value that are(not) set in the
build environment.

Jerry

> On November 24, 2015 at 6:06 PM Free Dom 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> When attempting to open Browse on a Fedora 23 machine, I receive the
> error
> that "Browse Failed to Start"
> 
> I recently pulled and built the most updated sugar source, and it seems
> that some features, specifically network related features are outputting
> this error. Regardless, I am pasting the links below to the errors from
> logs.
> 
> org.laptop.WebActivity-1.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=PgnPptGA
> org.laptop.Log-1.log: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=4McEGjey
> 
> Thanks
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] 32bits dependencies error

[James Cameron]

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 01:36:14AM +, Diogo Figueira wrote:
> Hi there,
> i have some problems, on xubuntu 14.04 lts with the dependencies
> that don't get the files, i needed them to get and even the 64bits
> don't get the files, and even when i ty to install
> "olpc-ubuntu-sugar" for instalation that i need it gives me errors
> of dependencies. Is there something, i can use to fixe it??
> 
> BTW this is what i use as dependencies.
> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/numix/ppa/ubuntu trusty main
> # deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/numix/ppa/ubuntu trusty main
> 
> Hope this is ok, if not, can some one tell me??

Can you show the error?

Please check that "uname -i" shows x86_64 and not i686.

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel