[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Sugar 0.117 unstable

2020-03-16 Thread James Cameron
Sugar 0.117 is released.

Thanks to contributors Martin Abente, Ibiam Chihurumnaya, Bas Hulsken,
Srevin Saju, Jonas Smedegaard, and Ryan Van.

A v0.117 tag has been pushed to each module repository.

It has been six months since the last release.  This release contains
some fixes.  Very little progress has been made on the regressions
following the Python 3 port.  A project is planned to continue work on
those regressions and to detect more of them.

Brief change log by module below.

sugar-artwork

* Don't override existing document-open icon (Martin Abente),
* Add --without-gtk2 option (Martin Abente),
* Fix empy discovery for Fedora (Srevin Saju),

sugar-toolkit-gtk3

* Demote speech module utterance logging,
* Fix replace broken locale ig (Jonas Smedegaard),
* Fix sugar-install-bundle,
* Reduce width of exception handler for linfo file,
* Fix RuntimeError: could not create signal for _closing, GTK 3.24.13,
* Port to Python 3.8 - Use of is with a literal (Srevin Saju),
* Check if speech schema is present (Martin Abente),
* Port to Six - fix sugar-install-bundle for Python 2 (Bas Hulsken),
* Fix icon size in ColorButton (Srevin Saju),
* Add --from-code parameter to xgettext (Ibiam Chihurumnaya),
* Build by default for python 3 ,
* Add RedoButton accelerator (Ryan Van),

sugar-datastore

* no changes,

sugar

* Fix Journal previews of filesystem objects,
* Fix source ID not found when ad hoc fails,
* Fix age picker back button,
* Restore cursor theme on exit (Srevin Saju),
* Port to Python 3 - Ad hoc SSID handling (Bas Hulsken),
* Port to Python 3.8 - Use of is with a literal,
* Fix empy discovery for Fedora (Srevin Saju),

sha256 checksums;

27a68d6c743101cfc5c60feed13a391d8b6edc25aac55dad46bd55d5ffa2351e  
sugar-artwork-0.117.tar.xz
eca4b113e30993b3ecc90a6be5eebc8104020c816e89c92938b375a33dc4ef4f  
sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.117.tar.xz
1b5c1d4c5f682941ee6553b38e170d40eebaaddc7ba4f92fcfd27184bfd20c7f  
sugar-datastore-0.117.tar.xz
e44619e4df2425671e840cf557cdb6449bf65574d4e16e6647eb2fef739d75aa  
sugar-0.117.tar.xz

http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/

-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge activity pack

2020-03-16 Thread prakash ujjwal
Thanks for the clarification.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 10:32 PM Lionel Laské  wrote:

>
>
> Le lun. 16 mars 2020 à 15:35, prakash ujjwal 
> a écrit :
>
>> Thanks Lionel.
>>
>> Regarding the second question,
>> If I am the child or user, I have my skills set of which some of are
>> validated by me and some skills are not.
>> So, I share the activity ,the users joining my activity instance, will
>> get all my skills set but can't edit those skills. ( Like exerciser
>> activity)
>> Also they can't see which activities are validated or not validated by
>> me.
>>
>
> You're wrong. They can see which activities are validated and even see
> proof of validation if there is some.
> Think to this feature like a way to show your school report card - with
> grade in each area - to other.
>
>
>
>> But if we talk about the use for sharing skills set feature.
>> Is it to,
>> 1) Let teachers see the skill set the child(one who is sharing the
>> activity) wants to acquire ,
>>
>
> And see the current skills the child already acquire.
>
>
>
>> 2) let other children use the same skill set as others for themselves
>> Am I right?
>>
>>
> Once again, it's just to see the current skill the child already acquire.
> The skill set will be shared by the teacher at the beginning of the year
> (*) so every child should already have the same skill set. So sharing the
> skill set using presence is not a way to retrieve the same skill set.
>
>
>> Are their any other uses?
>>
>>
> No other use case for the share feature.
>
>Lionel.
>
> (*) By publishing it on the shared journal for example. The activity will
> also propose some existing skill set (French Primary School, Montessori,
> ...) and the user should be able to retrieve a new skill set via an URL
> (like the feature Library/Add library in Video Viewer activity).
>
> Thanks
>>
>>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 7:29 PM Lionel Laské 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Prakash,
>>>
>>> 1) No need for validation. It's a self declarative skill.
>>>
>>> 2) The idea is for a children to shared the activity with other (teacher
>>> or children). In read-only mode.
>>>
>>> Hope it helps.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Lionel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Le dim. 15 mars 2020 à 17:00, 
>>> a écrit :
>>>

 Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:36:09 +0530
 From: prakash ujjwal 
 To: Sugar-dev Devel 
 Subject: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge
 activity pack
 Message-ID:
 >>> f...@mail.gmail.com>
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

 Hi,
 This is Prakash Ujjwal.
 I am participating in gsoc 2020.
 and I find sugarizer knowledge pack idea very interesting.
 I have some questions regarding the same.

 1) does the multimedia elements submitted by the children while
 validating
 the skill, needs to be validated or verified by other users or teachers?

 2) what does the line"it should be possible to share it's skills on the
 network" means exactly

 Thanks.
 -- next part --
 An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
 URL: <
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200315/d5033630/attachment-0001.htm
 >

 -

>>> ___
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Libreplanet talk in an hour

2020-03-16 Thread James Cameron
Well done.  Let us know when the videos are available?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 01:52:58PM +, devin@ulibarri.website wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> From the FSF:
> 
> Following O'Brien in the "Freedom" room of the conference were Devin
> Ulibarri and Walter Bender of Sugar Labs, who gave an overview of the
> project's developers, teachers, and students coming together to work on
> educational free software projects. Sugar Labs's application of this
> community effort is widely varied, ranging from hacking on introductory,
> visual programming languages to contributing to critical components of the
> Sugar OS distribution of the GNU/Linux operating system.
> 
> Full report
> 
> [1]https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/
> libreplanet-2020-online-second-day-of-the-conference-closes-on-a-high-note
> 
> Devin
> 
> On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 16:19 -0300, Martin Abente wrote:
> 
> No problem!
> 
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 4:18 PM  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Sorry, I just saw this.
> 
> Devin
> 
> On 2020-03-15 17:59, Martin Abente wrote:
> > Hi Devin,
> >
> > If you have the time, please mention
> > [2]https://flathub.org/apps/search/sugarlabs (making Sugar apps to
> work
> > in ALL Linux desktops)  It will be an important project for the
> > future of Sugar as well.
> >
> > You can read more about it here
> > [3]https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/
> linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/
> >
> > Regards,
> > Martin.
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/libreplanet-2020-online-second-day-of-the-conference-closes-on-a-high-note
> [2] https://flathub.org/apps/search/sugarlabs
> [3] 
> https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/

> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


-- 
James Cameron
http://quozl.netrek.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge activity pack

2020-03-16 Thread Lionel Laské
Le lun. 16 mars 2020 à 15:35, prakash ujjwal 
a écrit :

> Thanks Lionel.
>
> Regarding the second question,
> If I am the child or user, I have my skills set of which some of are
> validated by me and some skills are not.
> So, I share the activity ,the users joining my activity instance, will get
> all my skills set but can't edit those skills. ( Like exerciser activity)
> Also they can't see which activities are validated or not validated by me.
>

You're wrong. They can see which activities are validated and even see
proof of validation if there is some.
Think to this feature like a way to show your school report card - with
grade in each area - to other.



> But if we talk about the use for sharing skills set feature.
> Is it to,
> 1) Let teachers see the skill set the child(one who is sharing the
> activity) wants to acquire ,
>

And see the current skills the child already acquire.



> 2) let other children use the same skill set as others for themselves
> Am I right?
>
>
Once again, it's just to see the current skill the child already acquire.
The skill set will be shared by the teacher at the beginning of the year
(*) so every child should already have the same skill set. So sharing the
skill set using presence is not a way to retrieve the same skill set.


> Are their any other uses?
>
>
No other use case for the share feature.

   Lionel.

(*) By publishing it on the shared journal for example. The activity will
also propose some existing skill set (French Primary School, Montessori,
...) and the user should be able to retrieve a new skill set via an URL
(like the feature Library/Add library in Video Viewer activity).

Thanks
>
>

>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 7:29 PM Lionel Laské  wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Prakash,
>>
>> 1) No need for validation. It's a self declarative skill.
>>
>> 2) The idea is for a children to shared the activity with other (teacher
>> or children). In read-only mode.
>>
>> Hope it helps.
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Lionel.
>>
>>
>> Le dim. 15 mars 2020 à 17:00, 
>> a écrit :
>>
>>>
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:36:09 +0530
>>> From: prakash ujjwal 
>>> To: Sugar-dev Devel 
>>> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge
>>> activity pack
>>> Message-ID:
>>> >> f...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> This is Prakash Ujjwal.
>>> I am participating in gsoc 2020.
>>> and I find sugarizer knowledge pack idea very interesting.
>>> I have some questions regarding the same.
>>>
>>> 1) does the multimedia elements submitted by the children while
>>> validating
>>> the skill, needs to be validated or verified by other users or teachers?
>>>
>>> 2) what does the line"it should be possible to share it's skills on the
>>> network" means exactly
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> -- next part --
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200315/d5033630/attachment-0001.htm
>>> >
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge activity pack

2020-03-16 Thread prakash ujjwal
Thanks Lionel.

Regarding the second question,
If I am the child or user, I have my skills set of which some of are
validated by me and some skills are not.
So, I share the activity ,the users joining my activity instance, will get
all my skills set but can't edit those skills. ( Like exerciser activity)
Also they can't see which activities are validated or not validated by me.

But if we talk about the use for sharing skills set feature.
Is it to,
1) Let teachers see the skill set the child(one who is sharing the
activity) wants to acquire ,

2) let other children use the same skill set as others for themselves
Am I right?

Are their any other uses?

Thanks



On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 7:29 PM Lionel Laské  wrote:

>
> Hi Prakash,
>
> 1) No need for validation. It's a self declarative skill.
>
> 2) The idea is for a children to shared the activity with other (teacher
> or children). In read-only mode.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Regards.
>
> Lionel.
>
>
> Le dim. 15 mars 2020 à 17:00,  a
> écrit :
>
>>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:36:09 +0530
>> From: prakash ujjwal 
>> To: Sugar-dev Devel 
>> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge
>> activity pack
>> Message-ID:
>> > f...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> Hi,
>> This is Prakash Ujjwal.
>> I am participating in gsoc 2020.
>> and I find sugarizer knowledge pack idea very interesting.
>> I have some questions regarding the same.
>>
>> 1) does the multimedia elements submitted by the children while validating
>> the skill, needs to be validated or verified by other users or teachers?
>>
>> 2) what does the line"it should be possible to share it's skills on the
>> network" means exactly
>>
>> Thanks.
>> -- next part --
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200315/d5033630/attachment-0001.htm
>> >
>>
>> -
>>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge activity pack

2020-03-16 Thread Lionel Laské
Hi Prakash,

1) No need for validation. It's a self declarative skill.

2) The idea is for a children to shared the activity with other (teacher or
children). In read-only mode.

Hope it helps.

Regards.

Lionel.


Le dim. 15 mars 2020 à 17:00,  a
écrit :

>
> Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:36:09 +0530
> From: prakash ujjwal 
> To: Sugar-dev Devel 
> Subject: [Sugar-devel] Discussing GSOC project sugarizer knowledge
> activity pack
> Message-ID:
>  f...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
> This is Prakash Ujjwal.
> I am participating in gsoc 2020.
> and I find sugarizer knowledge pack idea very interesting.
> I have some questions regarding the same.
>
> 1) does the multimedia elements submitted by the children while validating
> the skill, needs to be validated or verified by other users or teachers?
>
> 2) what does the line"it should be possible to share it's skills on the
> network" means exactly
>
> Thanks.
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200315/d5033630/attachment-0001.htm
> >
>
> -
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Libreplanet talk in an hour

2020-03-16 Thread devin
Hi, 

>From the FSF: 

> Following O'Brien in the "Freedom" room of the conference were Devin Ulibarri 
> and Walter Bender of Sugar Labs, who gave an overview of the project's 
> developers, teachers, and students coming together to work on educational 
> free software projects. Sugar Labs's application of this community effort is 
> widely varied, ranging from hacking on introductory, visual programming 
> languages to contributing to critical components of the Sugar OS distribution 
> of the GNU/Linux operating system.

Full report 

https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/libreplanet-2020-online-second-day-of-the-conference-closes-on-a-high-note


Devin 

On Sun, 2020-03-15 at 16:19 -0300, Martin Abente wrote: 

> No problem! 
> 
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 4:18 PM  wrote: 
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sorry, I just saw this.
>> 
>> Devin
>> 
>> On 2020-03-15 17:59, Martin Abente wrote:
>>> Hi Devin,
>>> 
>>> If you have the time, please mention
>>> https://flathub.org/apps/search/sugarlabs (making Sugar apps to work
>>> in ALL Linux desktops)  It will be an important project for the
>>> future of Sugar as well.
>>> 
>>> You can read more about it here
>>> https://blogs.gnome.org/tchx84/2019/11/22/linux-app-summit-2019-and-sugar-learning-tools/
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Martin.___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem starting working with browse-activity

2020-03-16 Thread Hitesh Shejwani
Thanks, James.

I will try this and let you know.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 12:23 PM James Cameron  wrote:

> As you want to develop on the Python 3 or master branch of Browse, you
> must have Sugar 0.116 installed for Python 3.  You can tell when that
> is complete by running "python3 -c 'import sugar3'" without error.
>
> You can do this with Ubuntu 18.04, but not with the user instructions
> you referenced.  Those instructions are for using Sugar 0.112 with
> Ubuntu, which is the only version Ubuntu have packaged, in turn
> because Sugar 0.112 was the version packaged by Debian just prior to
> the Ubuntu 18.04 freeze back in early 2018.  You will find that
> "python2 -c 'import sugar3'" works without error.
>
> Instead, you should use developer instructions.
>
>
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/development-environment.md
> are the developer instructions we maintain.  There are three sections.
> The section "Packaged Sugar" will not work for you with Ubuntu 18.04,
> as explained above.  So your choices are either "Sugar Live Build" or
> "Native Sugar".
>
> The former involves running another virtual machine.
>
> The latter involves invasive changes to your Ubuntu 18.04 VM.  You're
> welcome to follow those instructions, but if you are inexperienced in
> any of the tools used there is a risk your VM won't be usable
> afterward.
>
> An alternative I've been working on recently is a set of packages to
> add to the Ubuntu 20.04 operating system, which is yet to be
> released.  The packages are available now, and I test them daily.
>
> See my prior post on "Sugar for Ubuntu 20.04"
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2020-February/057763.html
>
> Of the three choices above, I don't know you well enough to suggest
> any in particular.  Please review them all.
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:25:51PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> > I am not sure how to install sugar 0.116 in Ubuntu 18.04. I installed
> Sugar
> > according to the info given here ([1]
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/
> > master/docs/ubuntu.md)
> >
> > But as you pointed out, it is an older version of Sugar. How do I fix
> that?
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:36 AM James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > The Download button does not do anything until a download begins;
> > you'll see that in the source code.
> >
> > Work with the Python 3 branch by using the master branch, combined
> > with Sugar 0.116.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:35:16PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> > > Thanks for the response James.
> > >
> > > I saw that when I clicked on the Download button in the browser, it
> > didn't do
> > > anything. So I thought to add something to it.
> > >
> > > How do I work with the Python 3 branch?
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 1:00 PM James Cameron <[1][3]
> qu...@laptop.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Welcome Hitesh.
> > >
> > > urllib.request is a Python 3 module.
> > >
> > > Browse master branch has been ported to Python 3, and requires
> Sugar
> > > 0.116, which in turn includes sugar-activity3.  Browse file
> > > activity/[2][4]activity.info specifies sugar-activity3.
> > >
> > > If you wish to use the Python 2 version of Browse, use the
> branch
> > > python2.
> > >
> > > Work on Browse is best done on the master branch unless you
> have a
> > > good reason to work on Python 2.  I don't know why you are
> trying to
> > > work on Browse, so I can't deduce your needs.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:40:09PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani
> wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to work on the browse-activity. I cloned the
> repo on my
> > VM
> > > and
> > > > installed sugar for Ubuntu. When I try to start the activity
> with
> > > > sugar-activity browser.py, it throws an error with traceback
> > > >
> > > > import urllib.request
> > > > ImportError: No module named request
> > > >
> > > > I am using Ubuntu 18.04. I tried using sugar-activity3 but
> it was
> > not
> > > found.
> > >
> > > > ___
> > > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > > [3][5]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > > [4][6]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > >
> > > --
> > > James Cameron
> > > [5][7]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> > >
> > > References:
> > >
> > > [1] mailto:[8]qu...@laptop.org
> > > [2] [9]http://activity.info/
> > > [3] mailto:[10]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > [4] [11]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > > [5] [12]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > [13]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] 

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem starting working with browse-activity

2020-03-16 Thread James Cameron
As you want to develop on the Python 3 or master branch of Browse, you
must have Sugar 0.116 installed for Python 3.  You can tell when that
is complete by running "python3 -c 'import sugar3'" without error.

You can do this with Ubuntu 18.04, but not with the user instructions
you referenced.  Those instructions are for using Sugar 0.112 with
Ubuntu, which is the only version Ubuntu have packaged, in turn
because Sugar 0.112 was the version packaged by Debian just prior to
the Ubuntu 18.04 freeze back in early 2018.  You will find that
"python2 -c 'import sugar3'" works without error.

Instead, you should use developer instructions.

https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/development-environment.md
are the developer instructions we maintain.  There are three sections.
The section "Packaged Sugar" will not work for you with Ubuntu 18.04,
as explained above.  So your choices are either "Sugar Live Build" or
"Native Sugar".

The former involves running another virtual machine.

The latter involves invasive changes to your Ubuntu 18.04 VM.  You're
welcome to follow those instructions, but if you are inexperienced in
any of the tools used there is a risk your VM won't be usable
afterward.

An alternative I've been working on recently is a set of packages to
add to the Ubuntu 20.04 operating system, which is yet to be
released.  The packages are available now, and I test them daily.

See my prior post on "Sugar for Ubuntu 20.04"
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2020-February/057763.html

Of the three choices above, I don't know you well enough to suggest
any in particular.  Please review them all.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:25:51PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> I am not sure how to install sugar 0.116 in Ubuntu 18.04. I installed Sugar
> according to the info given here ([1]https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/
> master/docs/ubuntu.md)
> 
> But as you pointed out, it is an older version of Sugar. How do I fix that?
> 
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:36 AM James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> 
> The Download button does not do anything until a download begins;
> you'll see that in the source code.
> 
> Work with the Python 3 branch by using the master branch, combined
> with Sugar 0.116.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:35:16PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> > Thanks for the response James. 
> >
> > I saw that when I clicked on the Download button in the browser, it
> didn't do
> > anything. So I thought to add something to it. 
> >
> > How do I work with the Python 3 branch? 
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 1:00 PM James Cameron <[1][3]qu...@laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >     Welcome Hitesh.
> >
> >     urllib.request is a Python 3 module.
> >
> >     Browse master branch has been ported to Python 3, and requires Sugar
> >     0.116, which in turn includes sugar-activity3.  Browse file
> >     activity/[2][4]activity.info specifies sugar-activity3.
> >
> >     If you wish to use the Python 2 version of Browse, use the branch
> >     python2.
> >
> >     Work on Browse is best done on the master branch unless you have a
> >     good reason to work on Python 2.  I don't know why you are trying to
> >     work on Browse, so I can't deduce your needs.
> >
> >     On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:40:09PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> >     > Hello,
> >     >
> >     > I am trying to work on the browse-activity. I cloned the repo on 
> my
> VM
> >     and
> >     > installed sugar for Ubuntu. When I try to start the activity with
> >     > sugar-activity browser.py, it throws an error with traceback
> >     >
> >     > import urllib.request
> >     > ImportError: No module named request
> >     >
> >     > I am using Ubuntu 18.04. I tried using sugar-activity3 but it was
> not
> >     found.
> >
> >     > ___
> >     > Sugar-devel mailing list
> >     > [3][5]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> >     > [4][6]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >     --
> >     James Cameron
> >     [5][7]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:[8]qu...@laptop.org
> > [2] [9]http://activity.info/
> > [3] mailto:[10]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [4] [11]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > [5] [12]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> 
> --
> James Cameron
> [13]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> 
> References:
> 
> [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/ubuntu.md
> [2] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> [3] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> [4] http://activity.info/
> [5] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> [6] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> [7] http://quozl.netrek.org/
> [8] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> [9] http://activity.info/
> [10] 

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem starting working with browse-activity

2020-03-16 Thread Hitesh Shejwani
I am not sure how to install sugar 0.116 in Ubuntu 18.04. I installed Sugar
according to the info given here (
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/blob/master/docs/ubuntu.md)

But as you pointed out, it is an older version of Sugar. How do I fix that?


On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 2:36 AM James Cameron  wrote:

> The Download button does not do anything until a download begins;
> you'll see that in the source code.
>
> Work with the Python 3 branch by using the master branch, combined
> with Sugar 0.116.
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 05:35:16PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> > Thanks for the response James.
> >
> > I saw that when I clicked on the Download button in the browser, it
> didn't do
> > anything. So I thought to add something to it.
> >
> > How do I work with the Python 3 branch?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020, 1:00 PM James Cameron <[1]qu...@laptop.org> wrote:
> >
> > Welcome Hitesh.
> >
> > urllib.request is a Python 3 module.
> >
> > Browse master branch has been ported to Python 3, and requires Sugar
> > 0.116, which in turn includes sugar-activity3.  Browse file
> > activity/[2]activity.info specifies sugar-activity3.
> >
> > If you wish to use the Python 2 version of Browse, use the branch
> > python2.
> >
> > Work on Browse is best done on the master branch unless you have a
> > good reason to work on Python 2.  I don't know why you are trying to
> > work on Browse, so I can't deduce your needs.
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 12:40:09PM +0530, Hitesh Shejwani wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am trying to work on the browse-activity. I cloned the repo on
> my VM
> > and
> > > installed sugar for Ubuntu. When I try to start the activity with
> > > sugar-activity browser.py, it throws an error with traceback
> > >
> > > import urllib.request
> > > ImportError: No module named request
> > >
> > > I am using Ubuntu 18.04. I tried using sugar-activity3 but it was
> not
> > found.
> >
> > > ___
> > > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > > [3]Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > > [4]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > [5]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:qu...@laptop.org
> > [2] http://activity.info/
> > [3] mailto:Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [4] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > [5] http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel