Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.
Present at http://us.archive.trisquel.info/iso/trisquel-sugar_9.0_i686.iso ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.
On 19/11/2020, Ruben wrote: > The i386 image was produced at the same time as the amd64 one, and is > available at > https://cdimage.trisquel.info/trisquel-images/trisquel-sugar_9.0_i386.iso 404 Not Found and the 64-bit image has also disappeared. M ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.
On 20/11/2020, Martin Guy wrote: > On 19/11/2020, Ruben wrote: >> On 11/4/20 4:34 PM, Martin Guy wrote: >>> I have managed to get all the Activities in Etiona installed. >> Could you describe your overall build goal? > > I am hoping that the Trisquel 386 image achieves this goal and look > forward to testing it. P.S. Thanks for all those links to your solutions. If I do decide to go forward with Sugar Live Everything including more activities, that will save me a lot of time as well as probably giving better solutions than a lazy guy like me tends to opt for. Blessings M ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Sugar Trisquel image Ready for testing.
On 19/11/2020, Ruben wrote: > On 11/4/20 4:34 PM, Martin Guy wrote: >> I have managed to get all the Activities in Etiona installed. > Could you describe your overall build goal? My goal was a Sugar live system with lots of activities that works on 32-bit hardware, which is the cheapest for poor people (old laptops). Of the available live systems, none of them got anywhere near this, leaving Sugar Live Build as the only candidate, but it is a base system, not an end-user product. I am hoping that the Trisquel 386 image achieves this goal and look forward to testing it. Its only disadvantage compared to SLB is its relatively low visibility compared to, say, Fedora Sugar on a Stick, which has high visibility and is probably where most people would go first. Unfortunately its page is still trumpeting the F33 release, which simply does not work at all, leaving many people thinking "Oh. It doesn't work." and giving up there. Meanwhile I am still happy to maintain Sugar Live Build as its rough corners are few. M ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
