Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] yet another corrected screenshot image!

2009-03-12 Thread Wade Brainerd
Hey all,

I'd like to take the opportunity to (as usual) plug my alternate home
view design.

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Wade/Ideas/Activity_Management

If people feel that it would be worth exploring I'd be happy to flesh
the design out further.

Unfortunately it's unlikely that I'll be able to make the Saturday
chat, but I can try if there is real interest.

Regards,
Wade

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think it would be a good idea to call a design meeting to hash out
 the pros and cons of both views, freeform and ring (ring working only
 in conjunction with favorites, which we know is it's current
 limitation).

 We could also discuss a possible third view, but then I believe it is
 important that it feels related to the UI design as a whole (both
 freeform and ring do, bearing similarity to the organization in
 neighborhood and groups). Maybe there are solutions to make ring more
 scalable, as Sean was suggesting?

 Unfortunately Eben is traveling this weekend, so let's shoot for the 
 following.

 Are all interested parties able to convene on #sugar-meeting at 10am
 EST/13.00 UTC on Saturday March 21 for an initial discussion where we
 discuss the benefits of either view and will attempt to make a
 decision? Please come prepared with your thoughts, and as much
 research as you are able to obtain from actual observations with
 children!


 Christian


 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I haven't studied it in any scientific way, but I have never seen
 anyone use freeform in the field. I can also make a strong case for
 its inappropriateness in the classroom and the additional support
 overhead. For simplicity-sake, if for no other reason, we should drop
 it.

 That said, I cannot argue with your observation that an overloaded
 ring is problematic as well. For 0.86, we should consider some of
 spiral options, such as the sunflower, which are much more space
 efficient. At the same time, I think the real answer lies in better
 use the idea that groups of activities can be selected for the ring: a
 teacher might say to the child, this week, I want everyone to put
 Browse, Write, and Turrtle Art on their desktops. At home, a different
 collection might be available. So maybe we can explore the notion of
 collections rather than layouts?

 -walter

 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
 christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I fully understand your confusion, this issue has been going back and
 forth for too long.

 We should probably talk this over more thoroughly before deciding
 either way. Nicholas had (and I'm assuming still has) very strong
 reservations about the ring, which caused us to reconsider it, but at
 the time it was too late to change and it made it into the build. As
 you know I was initially in favor of the ring (which I think has a
 strong iconic presence), but when I began seeing screenshots of
 overloaded rings it seemed like the favorites model perhaps wasn't
 working as well as we had hoped.

 This is a case where it would really help to do observations and see
 how children are using the Home view, and which of the two views they
 prefer using... Or do we have any findings and observations we can
 already draw from?

 For now, the question remains which view (freeform/ring) we use to
 represent Sugar. Or perhaps at least in the interim it would make
 sense to avoid Home altogether and use the Neighborhood view as the
 signature shot?

 I agree that we would ideally keep either the ring or freeform, but
 not both, for simplicity...

 More discussion ahead, I sense.


 Christian


 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
 christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Sean


 We are currently debating moving to freeform view as the default
 (maybe even the only) view in Home. To be on the safe side, should we
 use that view here instead, seeing as it already exists in the UI?
 CC'ing Walter for his thoughts as well...


 Boy am I ever confused. I thought (and hoped) that we were going to
 get rid of the freeform view, not the ring view.

 -walter

 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org




 --
 anyth...@christianmarcschmidt.com

 http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com

 917/ 575 0013




 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org




 --
 anyth...@christianmarcschmidt.com

 http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com

 917/ 575 0013
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] yet another corrected screenshot image!

2009-03-12 Thread Christian Marc Schmidt
Hi Wade--your proposal looks very interesting. Let's discuss on the
call on March 21st, if you are able to join us then (at 10am EST).


Christian

On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey all,

 I'd like to take the opportunity to (as usual) plug my alternate home
 view design.

 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Wade/Ideas/Activity_Management

 If people feel that it would be worth exploring I'd be happy to flesh
 the design out further.

 Unfortunately it's unlikely that I'll be able to make the Saturday
 chat, but I can try if there is real interest.

 Regards,
 Wade

 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
 christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I think it would be a good idea to call a design meeting to hash out
 the pros and cons of both views, freeform and ring (ring working only
 in conjunction with favorites, which we know is it's current
 limitation).

 We could also discuss a possible third view, but then I believe it is
 important that it feels related to the UI design as a whole (both
 freeform and ring do, bearing similarity to the organization in
 neighborhood and groups). Maybe there are solutions to make ring more
 scalable, as Sean was suggesting?

 Unfortunately Eben is traveling this weekend, so let's shoot for the 
 following.

 Are all interested parties able to convene on #sugar-meeting at 10am
 EST/13.00 UTC on Saturday March 21 for an initial discussion where we
 discuss the benefits of either view and will attempt to make a
 decision? Please come prepared with your thoughts, and as much
 research as you are able to obtain from actual observations with
 children!


 Christian


 On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 I haven't studied it in any scientific way, but I have never seen
 anyone use freeform in the field. I can also make a strong case for
 its inappropriateness in the classroom and the additional support
 overhead. For simplicity-sake, if for no other reason, we should drop
 it.

 That said, I cannot argue with your observation that an overloaded
 ring is problematic as well. For 0.86, we should consider some of
 spiral options, such as the sunflower, which are much more space
 efficient. At the same time, I think the real answer lies in better
 use the idea that groups of activities can be selected for the ring: a
 teacher might say to the child, this week, I want everyone to put
 Browse, Write, and Turrtle Art on their desktops. At home, a different
 collection might be available. So maybe we can explore the notion of
 collections rather than layouts?

 -walter

 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
 christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 I fully understand your confusion, this issue has been going back and
 forth for too long.

 We should probably talk this over more thoroughly before deciding
 either way. Nicholas had (and I'm assuming still has) very strong
 reservations about the ring, which caused us to reconsider it, but at
 the time it was too late to change and it made it into the build. As
 you know I was initially in favor of the ring (which I think has a
 strong iconic presence), but when I began seeing screenshots of
 overloaded rings it seemed like the favorites model perhaps wasn't
 working as well as we had hoped.

 This is a case where it would really help to do observations and see
 how children are using the Home view, and which of the two views they
 prefer using... Or do we have any findings and observations we can
 already draw from?

 For now, the question remains which view (freeform/ring) we use to
 represent Sugar. Or perhaps at least in the interim it would make
 sense to avoid Home altogether and use the Neighborhood view as the
 signature shot?

 I agree that we would ideally keep either the ring or freeform, but
 not both, for simplicity...

 More discussion ahead, I sense.


 Christian


 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Christian Marc Schmidt
 christianm...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Sean


 We are currently debating moving to freeform view as the default
 (maybe even the only) view in Home. To be on the safe side, should we
 use that view here instead, seeing as it already exists in the UI?
 CC'ing Walter for his thoughts as well...


 Boy am I ever confused. I thought (and hoped) that we were going to
 get rid of the freeform view, not the ring view.

 -walter

 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org




 --
 anyth...@christianmarcschmidt.com

 http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com

 917/ 575 0013




 --
 Walter Bender
 Sugar Labs
 http://www.sugarlabs.org




 --
 anyth...@christianmarcschmidt.com

 http://www.christianmarcschmidt.com

 917/ 575 0013
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep





--