Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. > > All activities exit with an error on pygobject_register_sinkfunc is > deprecated in the Log. > > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. > > Is there a known issue ? > > Is there any existing fix ? Recent (12.01) GCompris was uploaded to Sweets Distribution. It can be installed from sweets-gcompris and sweets-gcompris-administration packages [1]. [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/GCompris#Install -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:48:15AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > We have GCompris compiled to xo-1.75, > but we found problems with graphic operations not supported by the driver. > Jon Nettleton is working on the graphic part now. > Later we will need package as a activity. > > Btw, the Gcompris application have a --sugar option (but the fedora packages > was compiled without support to this). Anybody knows what provide this > option? http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/GCompris#Build_from_sources -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Yes, I am in the english list. Gonzalo 2012/3/9 Bastien > Hi all, > > does anyone from Sugar follows the Gcompris english mailing > list for developers? > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gcompris-devel > > I just subscribed to this list and to the french one, will > try to contact potential contributors to Gcompris/Sugar. > > HTH, > > -- > Bastien > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Hi all, does anyone from Sugar follows the Gcompris english mailing list for developers? https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gcompris-devel I just subscribed to this list and to the french one, will try to contact potential contributors to Gcompris/Sugar. HTH, -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
We have GCompris compiled to xo-1.75, but we found problems with graphic operations not supported by the driver. Jon Nettleton is working on the graphic part now. Later we will need package as a activity. Btw, the Gcompris application have a --sugar option (but the fedora packages was compiled without support to this). Anybody knows what provide this option? Gonzalo On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Rafael Ortiz wrote: > > > 2012/3/8 Aleksey Lim > >> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > >> > >> > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. >> > >> > All activities exit with an error on “pygobject_register_sinkfunc is >> > deprecated” in the Log. >> > >> > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. >> > >> > Is there a known issue ? >> > >> > Is there any existing fix ? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for your help. >> > >> > >> > >> > Best regards from France. >> >> Binary activities is painful thing. There is an ongoing work (Sugar >> Network) to make Sweets (not Sweets Distribution) useful for end users >> (that should make sitation more predictable). But it will be ready not >> too soon. >> >> Will try to add GC, and some other binary based activities, to >> Sweets Distribution this week. >> >> > About Gcompris it's also failing on the XO-1.75 :/. > > > >> -- >> Aleksey >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Walter Bender writes: >> I will contact Bruno and Adam and I'll keep the list updated. > > May as well get him an XO 1.75 at this point :) Maybe an XO 1.75 > touch. I would love to -- but I doubt Bruno will get involved in Sugar again, last time he said he could not. Maybe if there is a dedicated Sugar maintainer for Gcompris then we can but him in touch with Bruno? That way Bruno will just have to interact with the mentor (lowering the psychological threshold of "getting involved"). Just an idea. -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Bastien wrote: > Walter Bender writes: > >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Chris Leonard >> wrote: >>> Have we ever gotten an XO into the hands of Bruno Coudoin (GCompris >>> team leader)? He's been very cooperative on L10n issues and may be >>> willing to investigate one of his major distribution channels. >> >> Don't know about lately, but Bruno has gotten machines in the past, >> beginning with XO 1.0 > > Bruno declined our invitation for the #2 SugarCamp. He said he > was too busy and could not contribute to maintain Gcompris for > Sugar anymore (hoping that someone else was able to do this.) > > He doesn't have a XO 1.5. > > We are right now preparing a project in France that takes all our > XO 1.5 -- so we will not be able to hand him a XO 1.5 over, unless > we get another one. > > I will contact Bruno and Adam and I'll keep the list updated. May as well get him an XO 1.75 at this point :) Maybe an XO 1.75 touch. -walter > > -- > Bastien -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Walter Bender writes: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Chris Leonard > wrote: >> Have we ever gotten an XO into the hands of Bruno Coudoin (GCompris >> team leader)? He's been very cooperative on L10n issues and may be >> willing to investigate one of his major distribution channels. > > Don't know about lately, but Bruno has gotten machines in the past, > beginning with XO 1.0 Bruno declined our invitation for the #2 SugarCamp. He said he was too busy and could not contribute to maintain Gcompris for Sugar anymore (hoping that someone else was able to do this.) He doesn't have a XO 1.5. We are right now preparing a project in France that takes all our XO 1.5 -- so we will not be able to hand him a XO 1.5 over, unless we get another one. I will contact Bruno and Adam and I'll keep the list updated. -- Bastien ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Chris Leonard wrote: > Have we ever gotten an XO into the hands of Bruno Coudoin (GCompris > team leader)? He's been very cooperative on L10n issues and may be > willing to investigate one of his major distribution channels. Don't know about lately, but Bruno has gotten machines in the past, beginning with XO 1.0 -walter > > cjl > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Rafael Ortiz > wrote: >> >> >> 2012/3/8 Aleksey Lim >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. >>> > >>> > All activities exit with an error on “pygobject_register_sinkfunc is >>> > deprecated” in the Log. >>> > >>> > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. >>> > >>> > Is there a known issue ? >>> > >>> > Is there any existing fix ? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks for your help. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Best regards from France. >>> >>> Binary activities is painful thing. There is an ongoing work (Sugar >>> Network) to make Sweets (not Sweets Distribution) useful for end users >>> (that should make sitation more predictable). But it will be ready not >>> too soon. >>> >>> Will try to add GC, and some other binary based activities, to >>> Sweets Distribution this week. >>> >> >> About Gcompris it's also failing on the XO-1.75 :/. >> >> >>> >>> -- >>> Aleksey >>> ___ >>> Sugar-devel mailing list >>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Have we ever gotten an XO into the hands of Bruno Coudoin (GCompris team leader)? He's been very cooperative on L10n issues and may be willing to investigate one of his major distribution channels. cjl On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Rafael Ortiz wrote: > > > 2012/3/8 Aleksey Lim >> >> On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > >> > >> > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. >> > >> > All activities exit with an error on “pygobject_register_sinkfunc is >> > deprecated” in the Log. >> > >> > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. >> > >> > Is there a known issue ? >> > >> > Is there any existing fix ? >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks for your help. >> > >> > >> > >> > Best regards from France. >> >> Binary activities is painful thing. There is an ongoing work (Sugar >> Network) to make Sweets (not Sweets Distribution) useful for end users >> (that should make sitation more predictable). But it will be ready not >> too soon. >> >> Will try to add GC, and some other binary based activities, to >> Sweets Distribution this week. >> > > About Gcompris it's also failing on the XO-1.75 :/. > > >> >> -- >> Aleksey >> ___ >> Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
2012/3/8 Aleksey Lim > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. > > > > All activities exit with an error on “pygobject_register_sinkfunc is > > deprecated” in the Log. > > > > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. > > > > Is there a known issue ? > > > > Is there any existing fix ? > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > Best regards from France. > > Binary activities is painful thing. There is an ongoing work (Sugar > Network) to make Sweets (not Sweets Distribution) useful for end users > (that should make sitation more predictable). But it will be ready not > too soon. > > Will try to add GC, and some other binary based activities, to > Sweets Distribution this week. > > About Gcompris it's also failing on the XO-1.75 :/. > -- > Aleksey > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 09:32:54PM +0100, Lionel Laské wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. > > All activities exit with an error on pygobject_register_sinkfunc is > deprecated in the Log. > > On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. > > Is there a known issue ? > > Is there any existing fix ? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Best regards from France. Binary activities is painful thing. There is an ongoing work (Sugar Network) to make Sweets (not Sweets Distribution) useful for end users (that should make sitation more predictable). But it will be ready not too soon. Will try to add GC, and some other binary based activities, to Sweets Distribution this week. -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Hi Thomas, Youre right, the global GCompris activity works but individual activities (« GCompris Awele » or GCompris Memory for example) dont works. Lionel. De : Thomas C Gilliard [mailto:satel...@bendbroadband.com] Envoyé : vendredi 3 février 2012 21:54 À : Lionel Laské Cc : sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Objet : Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94 On 02/03/2012 12:32 PM, Lionel Laské wrote: Hi all, It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. All activities exit with an error on pygobject_register_sinkfunc is deprecated in the Log. On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. Is there a known issue ? Is there any existing fix ? Look at these tests: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Activity_Matrix#Most_Rec ent-Activity_Test_Results Gcompris.xo (17 and 15) starts in several distros in 0.94 - (Package of GCompris Programs -114 activities with music v9.3) > Trisquel 5 Toast (Ubuntu based sweets-distribution) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trisquel_On_A_Sugar_Toast > XO-1 and XO-1.5:http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/11.3.0 > sugar 0.95.1 (testing) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3757139 <http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3757139&name=Fedora-17-Ni ghtly-20120202.09-i686-Live-soas.iso> &name=Fedora-17-Nightly-20120202.09-i686-Live-soas.iso Gcompris_admin.xo fails in all versions: "Could not find the board menu or plug in, execution error " Thanks for your help. Best regards from France. Lionel. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
On 02/03/2012 12:32 PM, Lionel Laské wrote: Hi all, It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. All activities exit with an error on "pygobject_register_sinkfunc is deprecated" in the Log. On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. Is there a known issue ? Is there any existing fix ? Look at these tests: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Creation_Kit/sck/Activity_Matrix#Most_Recent-Activity_Test_Results Gcompris.xo (17 and 15) starts in several distros in 0.94 - (Package of GCompris Programs -114 activities with music v9.3) > Trisquel 5 Toast (Ubuntu based sweets-distribution) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trisquel_On_A_Sugar_Toast > XO-1 and XO-1.5:http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Release_notes/11.3.0 > sugar 0.95.1 (testing) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3757139&name=Fedora-17-Nightly-20120202.09-i686-Live-soas.iso Gcompris_admin.xo fails in all versions: "Could not find the board menu or plug in, execution error " Thanks for your help. Best regards from France. Lionel. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] GCompris on Sugar 0.94
Hi all, It seems that no GCompris activity works on 0.94. All activities exit with an error on pygobject_register_sinkfunc is deprecated in the Log. On the website, compatibility is mention from 0.82 to 0.90. Is there a known issue ? Is there any existing fix ? Thanks for your help. Best regards from France. Lionel. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
