Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
Hi guys Yesterday I updated sugar and rebuilt after cleaning the install dir, the sugar now runs without my hack. Thanks Silbe. I dont know why it works, but it works. Hopefully, one day I will understand this. But for now, we will just believe in luck. I am working on integrating the debian packaging stuff directly into the sugar-jhbuild and will report back when I have sugar-base integration. thanks, mike ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 20:25, James Michael DuPontjames.michael.dup...@flossk.org wrote: Sascha, It build and installed all according to the instructions. I dont have this all here at the moment as I said. If you have any questions, you can see my build snapshot, that contains everything. I have put 2 days of work and finally got it running on ubuntu, you can see the patches. You can find many bug reports of sugar on ubuntu and others. I dont know of anyone who sugar works. Everyone who tried the packages complained of problems. How come this is so difficult? How come you guys dont test the packages yourself? Installing ubuntu takes about 30 minutes. You can run it it on a virtual machine. There was a team of people working on Sugar on Ubuntu, but they didn't had the needed resources and stalled before the 9.04 release. I don't know if getting something packaged for Ubuntu is very hard but Aleksey has packaged Sugar 0.84 for several distros by himself: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Packaging Could you update that table with your opinion on the Ubuntu status? Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? are there any success stories? By that table, all distros except Arch Linux and maybe Debian are working, but maybe we need people to actually try them out and update the Status column? I really cannot find anything on ubuntu except wiki pages that are out of date. Sorry, but this is very frustrating. It's also frustrating for me that my work is not available in such a popular distro as Ubuntu, but work won't get done until someone rolls up her/his sleeves. Regards, Tomeu thanks mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 05:43:38PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: The report is with jhbuild on debian jaunty. I built it from scratch. Started with jhbuild run I guess you mean Ubuntu Jaunty. How did you build? Can you give the exact commands you used to build and run, please? What does ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck say? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKUNK5AAoJELpz82VMF3DaLTEH/16qsq91tQXDkjEXqDZNyZ64 vtVfD/4qw2DYLQXrXyAnnTyng0JiS7jUGrktPeD2bh5K+pGWuMv+K7f9wEP1l8t8 lztCXwx/bquw/5h3N7my/ERPNa4pCyiflwLNuHSnnFNv39WEt49Jazfz3eGZFOJp 3g7dk+Aw1NVW32Sxk4obvy7ZzEBK78kuDdgd9pe8PcXkQ4js58GDjKWVgYeWu257 FNnrPsJQtCaPLamdmHmcznExO/NAJCBp1X9/fqDTcc6cQ5xGpbIxCEug0Op/qaM3 4/gp7CLPDVmV5uJdeycAO1J2CrpMCSqGZGhzclTcOixA0NbBXysg3u7ei67NMrI= =0g20 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: ... There was a team of people working on Sugar on Ubuntu, but they didn't had the needed resources and stalled before the 9.04 release. I don't know if getting something packaged for Ubuntu is very hard but Aleksey has packaged Sugar 0.84 for several distros by himself: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Packaging Could you update that table with your opinion on the Ubuntu status? Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? are there any success stories? By that table, all distros except Arch Linux and maybe Debian are working, but maybe we need people to actually try them out and update the Status column? ... See also http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Packaging_Team. --Fred ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:51:30PM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: more tomorrow, I look forward to working with you to make sugar run out of the box on ubuntu. Looking forward to that as well. For the record: we got it running by uninstalling the Ubuntu Sugar packages, removing ~/.sugar and rebuilding sugar-jhbuild (including removal of the install directory). So it seems like it was indeed a distro package that confused sugar-jhbuild. CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, James Michael DuPontjames.michael.dup...@flossk.org wrote: Sascha, It build and installed all according to the instructions. I dont have this all here at the moment as I said. If you have any questions, you can see my build snapshot, that contains everything. Where? I want to link to it from the http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Emulator_image_files page. I have put 2 days of work and finally got it running on ubuntu, you can see the patches. You can find many bug reports of sugar on ubuntu and others. I dont know of anyone who sugar works. Everyone who tried the packages complained of problems. How come this is so difficult? How come you guys dont test the packages yourself? It was some Ubuntu packager who failed to test Sugar for Jaunty as we would have expected. Installing ubuntu takes about 30 minutes. You can run it it on a virtual machine. Yes, I have done that for several distros. Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? Yes. I have Sugar working from packages on virtual images of Caixa Mágica and Fedora. I have seen it run in Debian and Ubuntu Intrepid. See http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems#Sucrose for links about various distros with instructions, bug notes, and contact information. are there any success stories? I really cannot find anything on ubuntu except wiki pages that are out of date. Sorry, but this is very frustrating. Indeed. thanks mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 05:43:38PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: The report is with jhbuild on debian jaunty. I built it from scratch. Started with jhbuild run I guess you mean Ubuntu Jaunty. How did you build? Can you give the exact commands you used to build and run, please? What does ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck say? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKUNK5AAoJELpz82VMF3DaLTEH/16qsq91tQXDkjEXqDZNyZ64 vtVfD/4qw2DYLQXrXyAnnTyng0JiS7jUGrktPeD2bh5K+pGWuMv+K7f9wEP1l8t8 lztCXwx/bquw/5h3N7my/ERPNa4pCyiflwLNuHSnnFNv39WEt49Jazfz3eGZFOJp 3g7dk+Aw1NVW32Sxk4obvy7ZzEBK78kuDdgd9pe8PcXkQ4js58GDjKWVgYeWu257 FNnrPsJQtCaPLamdmHmcznExO/NAJCBp1X9/fqDTcc6cQ5xGpbIxCEug0Op/qaM3 4/gp7CLPDVmV5uJdeycAO1J2CrpMCSqGZGhzclTcOixA0NbBXysg3u7ei67NMrI= =0g20 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Silent Thunder (默雷/धर्ममेघशब्दगर्ज/دھرممیگھشبدگر ج) is my name And Children are my nation. The Cosmos is my dwelling place, The Truth my destination. http://earthtreasury.org/worknet (Edward Mokurai Cherlin) ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 05:43:38PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: The report is with jhbuild on debian jaunty. I built it from scratch. Started with jhbuild run I guess you mean Ubuntu Jaunty. How did you build? Can you give the exact commands you used to build and run, please? What does ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck say? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
Sascha, It build and installed all according to the instructions. I dont have this all here at the moment as I said. If you have any questions, you can see my build snapshot, that contains everything. I have put 2 days of work and finally got it running on ubuntu, you can see the patches. You can find many bug reports of sugar on ubuntu and others. I dont know of anyone who sugar works. Everyone who tried the packages complained of problems. How come this is so difficult? How come you guys dont test the packages yourself? Installing ubuntu takes about 30 minutes. You can run it it on a virtual machine. Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? are there any success stories? I really cannot find anything on ubuntu except wiki pages that are out of date. Sorry, but this is very frustrating. thanks mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 05:43:38PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: The report is with jhbuild on debian jaunty. I built it from scratch. Started with jhbuild run I guess you mean Ubuntu Jaunty. How did you build? Can you give the exact commands you used to build and run, please? What does ./sugar-jhbuild depscheck say? CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKUNK5AAoJELpz82VMF3DaLTEH/16qsq91tQXDkjEXqDZNyZ64 vtVfD/4qw2DYLQXrXyAnnTyng0JiS7jUGrktPeD2bh5K+pGWuMv+K7f9wEP1l8t8 lztCXwx/bquw/5h3N7my/ERPNa4pCyiflwLNuHSnnFNv39WEt49Jazfz3eGZFOJp 3g7dk+Aw1NVW32Sxk4obvy7ZzEBK78kuDdgd9pe8PcXkQ4js58GDjKWVgYeWu257 FNnrPsJQtCaPLamdmHmcznExO/NAJCBp1X9/fqDTcc6cQ5xGpbIxCEug0Op/qaM3 4/gp7CLPDVmV5uJdeycAO1J2CrpMCSqGZGhzclTcOixA0NbBXysg3u7ei67NMrI= =0g20 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:25:16PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: Sascha, It build and installed all according to the instructions. Which instructions specifically? I dont have this all here at the moment as I said. If you have any questions, you can see my build snapshot, that contains everything. Unfortunately a build tree is a bit unwieldy to examine manually and also does not show the commands you used. I could at least verify you're using the right version of sugar-jhbuild, though. I have put 2 days of work and finally got it running on ubuntu, you can see the patches. That is _way_ too much. sugar-jhbuild should work exactly as described on [2] for any of the supported distros (Debian squeeze/sid, Ubuntu Intrepid/Jaunty, Fedora 10/11/12). I regularly check this myself, in addition to the buildbots [1] doing automatic builds. There's something seriously wrong with your installation, so please let's find the problem before you waste another day encountering bugs that are caused by the same root issue. I'll try to be on IRC (#sugar on irc.freenode.net) tomorrow, so maybe we can figure it out interactively. You can find many bug reports of sugar on ubuntu and others. I dont know of anyone who sugar works. Everyone who tried the packages complained of problems. Sorry, I'm confused now. Are you talking about sugar-jhbuild or about the Sugar packages included in Ubuntu? Those are two entirely separate things (and shouldn't be mixed). Is it possible you installed both in parallel? If you did that might very well be the reason for your problems. How come this is so difficult? How come you guys dont test the packages yourself? Installing ubuntu takes about 30 minutes. You can run it it on a virtual machine. I do test sugar-jhbuild on all of the supported distros. I even use sugar-jhbuild on Debian squeeze regularly myself (as a user). What I don't do is testing the distro-supplied packages as that's the respective distro maintainers job. Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? You might want to try Sugar on a Stick [3]. I really cannot find anything on ubuntu except wiki pages that are out of date. Where did you find those out of date pages? I tried to clean up all sugar-jhbuild related pages but have obviously overlooked some. [1] http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
Ok, I mean the ubunutu and fedora packages are broken. Jhbuild, we will have to go through this together when I am online. this latop cannot even begin to use jhbuild, it is an aspire one. 512 mb or ram and no space left. I am sorry to be so frustrated, but it is too much to ask normal users to use jhbuild. I hope to help clean up the packages and as soon as we figure out the problems, I will help patch the errors. It is just interesting that the errors with the icons are showing up on all systems, the errors are not seriously wrong, it is a simple patch. more tomorrow, I look forward to working with you to make sugar run out of the box on ubuntu. that will help get more users and will help the project in the long run. thanks, mike On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 08:25:16PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: Sascha, It build and installed all according to the instructions. Which instructions specifically? I dont have this all here at the moment as I said. If you have any questions, you can see my build snapshot, that contains everything. Unfortunately a build tree is a bit unwieldy to examine manually and also does not show the commands you used. I could at least verify you're using the right version of sugar-jhbuild, though. I have put 2 days of work and finally got it running on ubuntu, you can see the patches. That is _way_ too much. sugar-jhbuild should work exactly as described on [2] for any of the supported distros (Debian squeeze/sid, Ubuntu Intrepid/Jaunty, Fedora 10/11/12). I regularly check this myself, in addition to the buildbots [1] doing automatic builds. There's something seriously wrong with your installation, so please let's find the problem before you waste another day encountering bugs that are caused by the same root issue. I'll try to be on IRC (#sugar on irc.freenode.net) tomorrow, so maybe we can figure it out interactively. You can find many bug reports of sugar on ubuntu and others. I dont know of anyone who sugar works. Everyone who tried the packages complained of problems. Sorry, I'm confused now. Are you talking about sugar-jhbuild or about the Sugar packages included in Ubuntu? Those are two entirely separate things (and shouldn't be mixed). Is it possible you installed both in parallel? If you did that might very well be the reason for your problems. How come this is so difficult? How come you guys dont test the packages yourself? Installing ubuntu takes about 30 minutes. You can run it it on a virtual machine. I do test sugar-jhbuild on all of the supported distros. I even use sugar-jhbuild on Debian squeeze regularly myself (as a user). What I don't do is testing the distro-supplied packages as that's the respective distro maintainers job. Can you tell me of sugar working on any distro out of the box? You might want to try Sugar on a Stick [3]. I really cannot find anything on ubuntu except wiki pages that are out of date. Where did you find those out of date pages? I tried to clean up all sugar-jhbuild related pages but have obviously overlooked some. [1] http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/SoaS CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKUQVlAAoJELpz82VMF3Da/1IH/3C7up8MRNUyhvskaPYhGQMg cQoo5/QTyk5WGZH/Cp1MA6nO7S9V0gkXa54j/xI0iZ+waQJSMrP1Sw/Q9qU7XJbY APT12LF3FpsFPbk+ctRq078Nm4UarrkYbODUdkjX2SgWq9U4da/APB5/DtkvrWVq QtOQ7rA77fIq6xfUKDt0A/rgIZFi+DttHhwNwJfLZNkls3edcdYH+1JWRlw3SzY9 bfa4qoHvdGg5VpYZ7mD+PiGNPaWLKaxzJTZjNGuTCcyGYZcBeZPtVrHF0Zif7kIu AuoQFx9h5Z3X5cdwBaMOTXh7fzMCntGQWXQn9OQvWWgSvvXyEOtYCJwq5VIgj7A= =mMfq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 10:19:51PM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: Ok, I mean the ubunutu and fedora packages are broken. OK, cannot say anything about that as I've stopped using distro packages quite some time ago. 0.82 never really worked for me and 0.84 wasn't available as distro packages back then. AFAIK SoaS uses the distro packages from Fedora 11 so those should be working fine, though. Jhbuild, we will have to go through this together when I am online. this latop cannot even begin to use jhbuild, it is an aspire one. 512 mb or ram and no space left. None of the hosts I'm running sugar-jhbuild on has more than 512MB of RAM, whether physical (my non-XO Laptop) or simulated (for the virtual machines I use for testing). The XO (running sugar-jhbuild on Debian squeeze) even has only 256MB, a slow processor (AMD Geode) and is running from a 16GB SDHC card (the card itself is quite fast, but the SD interface in the XO is abysmally slow). The last rebuild that included xulrunner (we now use the distro package instead) took a full night. I am sorry to be so frustrated, but it is too much to ask normal users to use jhbuild. Ideally normal users would use the distro packages. That these are outdated and/or don't work is something that needs to be and AFAICT is in the process of being fixed, e.g. Sugar 0.84 has now entered Debian squeeze thanks to Jonas. OpenSuSE should have recent, working packages as well (thanks to David van Assche). more tomorrow, I look forward to working with you to make sugar run out of the box on ubuntu. Looking forward to that as well. CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:41:47AM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: http://ping.fm/vip4k http://ping.fm/66dXb http://ping.fm/b8s9t This looks like there's something gone wrong during startup and you're trying to fix the symptom, not the cause. Can you tell me what your environment is exactly? Sugar-jhbuild or distro packages? Which distro? How do you start sugar? ... CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
The problem with the icons, I have as well on my linpus. Fedora 8 that I start with sugar-emulator. There the one patch with starter is not needed. The report is with jhbuild on debian jaunty. I built it from scratch. Started with jhbuild run you can download my entire build snapshot with patch here: http://download.tuxfamily.org/flossk/fullpackage.tgz md5: 82ea297f4a8b683ba8778178cd88cd91 size: 367864811 I will be back in the office on Monday, then i can work on this more. It is behavior that I have seen on all ubuntu 9.04 standard package installs. obviously this is just a hack to get thing working, I would love to have the time to learn more about the system to help debug it. as soon as I have more time, I will look into it. thanks, mike On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:41:47AM +0200, James Michael DuPont wrote: http://ping.fm/vip4k http://ping.fm/66dXb http://ping.fm/b8s9t This looks like there's something gone wrong during startup and you're trying to fix the symptom, not the cause. Can you tell me what your environment is exactly? Sugar-jhbuild or distro packages? Which distro? How do you start sugar? ... CU Sascha -- http://sascha.silbe.org/ http://www.infra-silbe.de/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJKT0roAAoJELpz82VMF3DaJ7QIAJW8thRfqDFWYxdpiStJ/Avr RiVwjdhLYE08YOAAEBc2aWJQVueRos7gxvTbnvmlbc4lH4f08n7tYoiHbzBa+FvM 6/ST5Ploeus/haMl8SET2na3JZv1PUHivBnaC2Rb1/dCYTK9Q5o5j4DbKmwzMrff 2L66QjbQdzEKqHDbByzHOSfxeZc3XptkwVYvnwPGf/pwjbL9fWqaE949VTBpnpJS lZbawwUseaKYtPoEMqHrUXGUajge5n9z/AArBhj4DOg2Qvgq2zlF845fNtau+dU5 KjhQfCVIKN2a+q355x7i8QyzMYnQk+y4koDAatFSAa3he8LUn7czij3wAW7GQbY= =XgZl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
Hi all, We have recieved two XOs from greece for kosovo and we have started the translation process. I have finally gotten sugar running on jaunty and on my linpus, the problem is with the logo load paths and the start commands for xhepyr here are my hacks : Thanks to the nice guys on #sugar for thier help. http://ping.fm/vip4k http://ping.fm/66dXb http://ping.fm/b8s9t Here is our group page, with a link to the video proof :) http://sfk2009.ning.com/group/onelaptopperchildkosova We would like to take this chance to invite you all to come to Prishtina on aug. 29/30. Travel expenses for speakers are in the works, call for papers is here : http://docs.google.com/View?id=dg66p3sw_85ds8nbths Thanks, mike -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Jaunty up and running
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:41, James Michael DuPontjames.michael.dup...@flossk.org wrote: Hi all, We have recieved two XOs from greece for kosovo and we have started the translation process. I have finally gotten sugar running on jaunty and on my linpus, the problem is with the logo load paths and the start commands for xhepyr here are my hacks : Thanks to the nice guys on #sugar for thier help. http://ping.fm/vip4k http://ping.fm/66dXb http://ping.fm/b8s9t Here is our group page, with a link to the video proof :) http://sfk2009.ning.com/group/onelaptopperchildkosova That shows you aren't using the Sugar theme (which would explain as well why you needed to do the icon path hacks), have you discovered why GTK2_RC_FILES isn't set? Regards, Tomeu We would like to take this chance to invite you all to come to Prishtina on aug. 29/30. Travel expenses for speakers are in the works, call for papers is here : http://docs.google.com/View?id=dg66p3sw_85ds8nbths Thanks, mike -- James Michael DuPont Founding Board Member Free/Libre Open Source Software Kosova FLOSSK ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
