Re: [Sugar-devel] Plans for SoaS v9
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Martin Abente wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Peter Robinson > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Peter Robinson >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I'm trying to get a little bit more organised for this cycle than I >> > have been over the last couple. >> > >> > The plans for SoaS v9 are going to be somewhat simple. We're going to >> > stick with the 0.98.x release of Sugar and focusing on polish. >> > >> > I would like to see more people testing and using it during the dev >> > cycle so I don't get the "My Activity is broken" post release or five >> > minutes before release when we're generating final images and pushing >> > them out to the Fedora mirrors. >> > >> > I would also like to remove sugar-presence-service but that would mean >> > either dropping eToys or the developers stepping up to actually fix >> > the dependency that they've only been promising to do for 2 or so >> > years. >> > >> > Is there anything in particular that people would like to contribute >> > during this cycle? Anything I can help someone achieve? Does anyone >> > want to dig into the documentation on the web site to improve the >> > process? >> > >> > I'd also love marketing to get involved since we've not had any >> > publicity for a number of releases and after all Walter was telling me >> > some time back that it's the biggest single driver in the wiki. >> > >> > Finally there's a Test Compose for the alpha available in the >> > following link. I've used it briefly in a VM and it boots and seems to >> > mostly work. >> > >> > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC1/Live/ >> >> I forget to mention for this cycle we'll also produce SoaS images to >> run on a number of ARM platforms. The first test of these should >> arrive around F-19 Beta. >> > > +1 for Raspberry-Pi :) It won't be for Raspberry Pi. The armv5tel was dropped for Fedora 19. It will be supportable but that's through a different effort that I've not got the time to be involved with. It will worth with around 20 odd ARM devices including a new soon to be announced device that will cost almost the same as a RPi and be a lot more powerful. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Plans for SoaS v9
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'm trying to get a little bit more organised for this cycle than I > > have been over the last couple. > > > > The plans for SoaS v9 are going to be somewhat simple. We're going to > > stick with the 0.98.x release of Sugar and focusing on polish. > > > > I would like to see more people testing and using it during the dev > > cycle so I don't get the "My Activity is broken" post release or five > > minutes before release when we're generating final images and pushing > > them out to the Fedora mirrors. > > > > I would also like to remove sugar-presence-service but that would mean > > either dropping eToys or the developers stepping up to actually fix > > the dependency that they've only been promising to do for 2 or so > > years. > > > > Is there anything in particular that people would like to contribute > > during this cycle? Anything I can help someone achieve? Does anyone > > want to dig into the documentation on the web site to improve the > > process? > > > > I'd also love marketing to get involved since we've not had any > > publicity for a number of releases and after all Walter was telling me > > some time back that it's the biggest single driver in the wiki. > > > > Finally there's a Test Compose for the alpha available in the > > following link. I've used it briefly in a VM and it boots and seems to > > mostly work. > > > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC1/Live/ > > I forget to mention for this cycle we'll also produce SoaS images to > run on a number of ARM platforms. The first test of these should > arrive around F-19 Beta. > > +1 for Raspberry-Pi :) > Peter > ___ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Plans for SoaS v9
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying to get a little bit more organised for this cycle than I > have been over the last couple. > > The plans for SoaS v9 are going to be somewhat simple. We're going to > stick with the 0.98.x release of Sugar and focusing on polish. > > I would like to see more people testing and using it during the dev > cycle so I don't get the "My Activity is broken" post release or five > minutes before release when we're generating final images and pushing > them out to the Fedora mirrors. > > I would also like to remove sugar-presence-service but that would mean > either dropping eToys or the developers stepping up to actually fix > the dependency that they've only been promising to do for 2 or so > years. > > Is there anything in particular that people would like to contribute > during this cycle? Anything I can help someone achieve? Does anyone > want to dig into the documentation on the web site to improve the > process? > > I'd also love marketing to get involved since we've not had any > publicity for a number of releases and after all Walter was telling me > some time back that it's the biggest single driver in the wiki. > > Finally there's a Test Compose for the alpha available in the > following link. I've used it briefly in a VM and it boots and seems to > mostly work. > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC1/Live/ I forget to mention for this cycle we'll also produce SoaS images to run on a number of ARM platforms. The first test of these should arrive around F-19 Beta. Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
[Sugar-devel] Plans for SoaS v9
Hi All, I'm trying to get a little bit more organised for this cycle than I have been over the last couple. The plans for SoaS v9 are going to be somewhat simple. We're going to stick with the 0.98.x release of Sugar and focusing on polish. I would like to see more people testing and using it during the dev cycle so I don't get the "My Activity is broken" post release or five minutes before release when we're generating final images and pushing them out to the Fedora mirrors. I would also like to remove sugar-presence-service but that would mean either dropping eToys or the developers stepping up to actually fix the dependency that they've only been promising to do for 2 or so years. Is there anything in particular that people would like to contribute during this cycle? Anything I can help someone achieve? Does anyone want to dig into the documentation on the web site to improve the process? I'd also love marketing to get involved since we've not had any publicity for a number of releases and after all Walter was telling me some time back that it's the biggest single driver in the wiki. Finally there's a Test Compose for the alpha available in the following link. I've used it briefly in a VM and it boots and seems to mostly work. http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/19-Alpha-TC1/Live/ Regards, Peter ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
