Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 11:28:52PM -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
  All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
  idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
  stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
  ASLO for needs site).
 
 Hi Aleksey,
 
 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.
 
 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though.  E.g.
 we need better relationships between developers and users, more than
 we need a better form to fill in.  And that's really a job for the
 project leadership, mostly by introducing people and encouraging them
 to follow up.  Tomeu's recent visit to Laboratorio Tecnológico del
 Uruguay is a great example; if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.  I joined the sur list and use Google
 Translate to feel at least a little bit plugged in :)   Still, I
 occasionally send emails to deployments asking things like Are you
 guys using Typing Turtle? and What kinds of activities could you
 use? but rarely hear back.  I guess it's a problem when most of the
 developers speak one language, and most of the users speak one of many
 others.

Agree, I just think we can work in both directions, personal
contacts(not all developers could follow this way, especially casual
participants) and create convenient tool to treat users needs.

  I'm personally for lightweight collab.sl.o(to meet only mentioned above
  issues) and reusing existed development related resources like
  wiki/launchpad/mls for development process.
 
 What do you think about making this idea into an activity, instead of
 a website?  We could take my Report a Problem control panel and turn
 it into a Feedback activity.  I already have the log collector
 server set up on SL infrastructure - we could turn the feedback into a
 RSS feed for developers who could detect trends.  I'm not sure about
 the voting stuff - we hardly get any reviews on ASLO as it is, my
 Typing Turtle score is down to 3 stars because of one middle school
 kid :)

Good catch! I've added it to
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Collab_mockup#Possible_implementations

Of course it has disadvantage as well in case of running sugar and this
activity. It won't play good in case of casual contributor e.g. casual
designer who wants to contribute to some education project and has a
spare time to compose some peace of art.

But maybe this activity is worth trying, we at least can probe some
ideas.

 (BTW, there seems to not be much user representation in the discussion
 about 0.88 features, which may provide some motivation for this topic)
 
 -Wade
 

-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Gerald Ardito
Wade,

You said:
 if only we could put every Sugar developer
at a deployment for a week.

I am a teacher and doctoral student managing a deployment of 150 XOs/SOAS
and would love to have this happen!

Gerald

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
 wrote:
  All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
  idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
  stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
  ASLO for needs site).

 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though.  E.g.
 we need better relationships between developers and users, more than
 we need a better form to fill in.  And that's really a job for the
 project leadership, mostly by introducing people and encouraging them
 to follow up.  Tomeu's recent visit to Laboratorio Tecnológico del
 Uruguay is a great example; if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.  I joined the sur list and use Google
 Translate to feel at least a little bit plugged in :)   Still, I
 occasionally send emails to deployments asking things like Are you
 guys using Typing Turtle? and What kinds of activities could you
 use? but rarely hear back.  I guess it's a problem when most of the
 developers speak one language, and most of the users speak one of many
 others.

  I'm personally for lightweight collab.sl.o(to meet only mentioned above
  issues) and reusing existed development related resources like
  wiki/launchpad/mls for development process.

 What do you think about making this idea into an activity, instead of
 a website?  We could take my Report a Problem control panel and turn
 it into a Feedback activity.  I already have the log collector
 server set up on SL infrastructure - we could turn the feedback into a
 RSS feed for developers who could detect trends.  I'm not sure about
 the voting stuff - we hardly get any reviews on ASLO as it is, my
 Typing Turtle score is down to 3 stars because of one middle school
 kid :)

 (BTW, there seems to not be much user representation in the discussion
 about 0.88 features, which may provide some motivation for this topic)

 -Wade
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Walther Neuper
Hi Wade,

thanks for your initiative !

We would like to adjust (contribute?) to your efforts, since we just 
begin to try the same in a mini-environment: (student-)developers at our 
university + teacher students + teachers at Austrian schools.

Walther
PS: preliminary homepage www.ist.tugraz.at/projects/isac/rp

Wade Brainerd wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
   
 All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
 idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
 stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
 ASLO for needs site).
 

 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though. [...] 
-- 

Walther Neuper  Mailto: neu...@ist.tugraz.at
Institute for Software Technology  Tel: +43-(0)316/873-5728
University of Technology   Fax: +43-(0)316/873-5706
Graz, Austria Home: www.ist.tugraz.at/neuper


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Gerald Ardito
Wade,

You said:
 if only we could put every Sugar developer
at a deployment for a week.

I am a teacher and doctoral student managing a deployment of 150 XOs/SOAS
and would love to have this happen!

Gerald

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Walther Neuper neu...@ist.tugraz.at wrote:

 Hi Wade,

 thanks for your initiative !

 We would like to adjust (contribute?) to your efforts, since we just
 begin to try the same in a mini-environment: (student-)developers at our
 university + teacher students + teachers at Austrian schools.

 Walther
 PS: preliminary homepage www.ist.tugraz.at/projects/isac/rp

 Wade Brainerd wrote:
  On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
 wrote:
 
  All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
  idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
  stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
  ASLO for needs site).
 
 
  Hi Aleksey,
 
  We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
  (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
  appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.
 
  I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though. [...]
 --
 
 Walther Neuper  Mailto: neu...@ist.tugraz.at
 Institute for Software Technology  Tel: +43-(0)316/873-5728
 University of Technology   Fax: +43-(0)316/873-5706
 Graz, Austria Home: www.ist.tugraz.at/neuper
 

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 05:28, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
 All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
 idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
 stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
 ASLO for needs site).

 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though.  E.g.
 we need better relationships between developers and users, more than
 we need a better form to fill in.

This is certainly my opinion as well. The language problem is there,
but though I'm a native spanish speaker I rarely get a reply when
contacting someone from a deployment. Though if most people at SLs
spoke spanish, then we could work stronger in this area.

Any infrastructure we set up for feedback needs to take into account
that most of our users are not comfortable using english, and that's a
bit hard of a problem.

Regards,

Tomeu

 And that's really a job for the
 project leadership, mostly by introducing people and encouraging them
 to follow up.  Tomeu's recent visit to Laboratorio Tecnológico del
 Uruguay is a great example; if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.  I joined the sur list and use Google
 Translate to feel at least a little bit plugged in :)   Still, I
 occasionally send emails to deployments asking things like Are you
 guys using Typing Turtle? and What kinds of activities could you
 use? but rarely hear back.  I guess it's a problem when most of the
 developers speak one language, and most of the users speak one of many
 others.

 I'm personally for lightweight collab.sl.o(to meet only mentioned above
 issues) and reusing existed development related resources like
 wiki/launchpad/mls for development process.

 What do you think about making this idea into an activity, instead of
 a website?  We could take my Report a Problem control panel and turn
 it into a Feedback activity.  I already have the log collector
 server set up on SL infrastructure - we could turn the feedback into a
 RSS feed for developers who could detect trends.  I'm not sure about
 the voting stuff - we hardly get any reviews on ASLO as it is, my
 Typing Turtle score is down to 3 stars because of one middle school
 kid :)

 (BTW, there seems to not be much user representation in the discussion
 about 0.88 features, which may provide some motivation for this topic)

 -Wade
 ___
 IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
 i...@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep




-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:30, Gerald Ardito gma...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wade,

 You said:
  if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.

 I am a teacher and doctoral student managing a deployment of 150 XOs/SOAS
 and would love to have this happen!

Is your deployment in New York?

Regards,

Tomeu

 Gerald

 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
 wrote:
  All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
  idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
  stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
  ASLO for needs site).

 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though.  E.g.
 we need better relationships between developers and users, more than
 we need a better form to fill in.  And that's really a job for the
 project leadership, mostly by introducing people and encouraging them
 to follow up.  Tomeu's recent visit to Laboratorio Tecnológico del
 Uruguay is a great example; if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.  I joined the sur list and use Google
 Translate to feel at least a little bit plugged in :)   Still, I
 occasionally send emails to deployments asking things like Are you
 guys using Typing Turtle? and What kinds of activities could you
 use? but rarely hear back.  I guess it's a problem when most of the
 developers speak one language, and most of the users speak one of many
 others.

  I'm personally for lightweight collab.sl.o(to meet only mentioned above
  issues) and reusing existed development related resources like
  wiki/launchpad/mls for development process.

 What do you think about making this idea into an activity, instead of
 a website?  We could take my Report a Problem control panel and turn
 it into a Feedback activity.  I already have the log collector
 server set up on SL infrastructure - we could turn the feedback into a
 RSS feed for developers who could detect trends.  I'm not sure about
 the voting stuff - we hardly get any reviews on ASLO as it is, my
 Typing Turtle score is down to 3 stars because of one middle school
 kid :)

 (BTW, there seems to not be much user representation in the discussion
 about 0.88 features, which may provide some motivation for this topic)

 -Wade
 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel





-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:37, Walther Neuper neu...@ist.tugraz.at wrote:
 Hi Wade,

 thanks for your initiative !

 We would like to adjust (contribute?) to your efforts, since we just
 begin to try the same in a mini-environment: (student-)developers at our
 university + teacher students + teachers at Austrian schools.

That sounds great! Please keep us posted. If I can help in any way, we
could meet either in Graz or in Prague.

Regards,

Tomeu

 Walther
 PS: preliminary homepage www.ist.tugraz.at/projects/isac/rp

 Wade Brainerd wrote:
 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:

 All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
 idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
 stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
 ASLO for needs site).


 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though. [...]
 --
 
 Walther Neuper                          Mailto: neu...@ist.tugraz.at
 Institute for Software Technology          Tel: +43-(0)316/873-5728
 University of Technology                   Fax: +43-(0)316/873-5706
 Graz, Austria                             Home: www.ist.tugraz.at/neuper
 

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel




-- 
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
Farning
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Wade Brainerd
n Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Gerald Ardito gma...@gmail.com wrote:
 Wade,

 You said:
  if only we could put every Sugar developer
 at a deployment for a week.

 I am a teacher and doctoral student managing a deployment of 150 XOs/SOAS
 and would love to have this happen!

Hi Gerald,

Can I find more information about your deployment somewhere?

Best,
-Wade
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-08 Thread Wade Brainerd
Walther,

It's great to hear that people are doing the combined developer -
teacher - student approach.  It was just a rhetorical idea so it's
awesome to see it occurring in practice :)

ReckonPrimer looks quite cool btw.  I especially like how the
development has been tied to pedagogical efforts.  Do you think it
will be stable enough to post on activities.sugarlabs.org soon?

Best regards,
Wade

2010/1/8 Walther Neuper neu...@ist.tugraz.at:
 Hi Wade,

 thanks for your initiative !

 We would like to adjust (contribute?) to your efforts, since we just begin
 to try the same in a mini-environment: (student-)developers at our
 university + teacher students + teachers at Austrian schools.

 Walther
 PS: preliminary homepage www.ist.tugraz.at/projects/isac/rp

 Wade Brainerd wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org
 wrote:


 All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
 idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
 stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
 ASLO for needs site).


 Hi Aleksey,

 We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
 (deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
 appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

 I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though. [...]

 --
 
 Walther Neuper                          Mailto: neu...@ist.tugraz.at
 Institute for Software Technology          Tel: +43-(0)316/873-5728
 University of Technology                   Fax: +43-(0)316/873-5706
 Graz, Austria                             Home: www.ist.tugraz.at/neuper
 


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Mockup for collab.sugarlabs.org

2010-01-07 Thread Wade Brainerd
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote:
 All mentioned above could be(already) done in existed env. But the major
 idea of collab.sl.o proposal is bringing life to existed scheme by
 stimulating users to share their needs(due to having convenient
 ASLO for needs site).

Hi Aleksey,

We definitely need to improve our lines of communication with users
(deployments, teachers, students and casual).  As a programmer I
appreciate a good technical solution to this problem.

I think it's more a personal problem than a tech problem though.  E.g.
we need better relationships between developers and users, more than
we need a better form to fill in.  And that's really a job for the
project leadership, mostly by introducing people and encouraging them
to follow up.  Tomeu's recent visit to Laboratorio Tecnológico del
Uruguay is a great example; if only we could put every Sugar developer
at a deployment for a week.  I joined the sur list and use Google
Translate to feel at least a little bit plugged in :)   Still, I
occasionally send emails to deployments asking things like Are you
guys using Typing Turtle? and What kinds of activities could you
use? but rarely hear back.  I guess it's a problem when most of the
developers speak one language, and most of the users speak one of many
others.

 I'm personally for lightweight collab.sl.o(to meet only mentioned above
 issues) and reusing existed development related resources like
 wiki/launchpad/mls for development process.

What do you think about making this idea into an activity, instead of
a website?  We could take my Report a Problem control panel and turn
it into a Feedback activity.  I already have the log collector
server set up on SL infrastructure - we could turn the feedback into a
RSS feed for developers who could detect trends.  I'm not sure about
the voting stuff - we hardly get any reviews on ASLO as it is, my
Typing Turtle score is down to 3 stars because of one middle school
kid :)

(BTW, there seems to not be much user representation in the discussion
about 0.88 features, which may provide some motivation for this topic)

-Wade
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel