Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
2013/3/29 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough implementation. I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100. Yes, and the others too. So the general plan of adding this almost implemented features after review, and also html5 research is good in my opinion. Let's be agile in repatching and reviewing, and we'll have a great Sugar 0.100 . ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
Let me know if there is something I can do to help. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org wrote: 2013/3/29 Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com: This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough implementation. I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100. Yes, and the others too. So the general plan of adding this almost implemented features after review, and also html5 research is good in my opinion. Let's be agile in repatching and reviewing, and we'll have a great Sugar 0.100 . ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
This sounds like a pretty cool feature with a simple enough implementation. I'd say it's a good idea for 0.100. On 28 March 2013 23:37, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com wrote: I have my feature :) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember? 2013/3/28 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the ground. It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more enjoyable to it's users. - multi-homeview - webservices - comment field in journal detail view We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to expand its capabilities without writing-from-scratch everything. So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image [1] - multi-homeview [2] - webservices [3] - comment field in journal detail view [4] [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view [2] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views [3] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Web_services [4] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Comment_box_in_journal_detail_view -walter So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the ground. It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more enjoyable to it's users. - multi-homeview - webservices - comment field in journal detail view We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to expand its capabilities without writing-from-scratch everything. So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
I have my feature :) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember? 2013/3/28 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the ground. It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more enjoyable to it's users. - multi-homeview - webservices - comment field in journal detail view We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to expand its capabilities without writing-from-scratch everything. So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com wrote: I have my feature :) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember? OK. Can you point me to the code in git? -walter 2013/3/28 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the ground. It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more enjoyable to it's users. - multi-homeview - webservices - comment field in journal detail view We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to expand its capabilities without writing-from-scratch everything. So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Features for 0.100
Walter, you have the *.zip in your mail :P (Remember?) 2013/3/28 Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Ignacio Rodríguez nachoe...@gmail.com wrote: I have my feature :) http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change PD: Walter I need the *.patch ¿Remember? OK. Can you point me to the code in git? -walter 2013/3/28 Martin Abente martin.abente.lah...@gmail.com On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Daniel Narvaez dwnarv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, we already had a bit of discussion on what 0.100 should focus on in the schedule thread. I'll try to summarize it here. IMPORTANT: the consensus seems to be that we should be having the discussion about features early this cycle, to try and narrow the scope of the release as much as possible. So here is your chance to propose features, there won't be a feature acceptance deadline later. * Simon proposed that we make html5 activities the main focus of the release and people responded favorably (do you think that's a bad idea? Please speak up!). We need to articulate better what this involves exactly, which new glucose components will have to be developed, which activities. There as been some experimentation but there is more left to do, the initial part of the cycle will involve research. * Ajay proposed a couple of features which has been delayed from previous cycles. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection There is some concern that it might be too big of a change. We should probably decide on the base of the patches that Ajay will be sending out soon. I hope everyone considers that the journal-multi-selection feature has passed through several iterations of design and code review already. This a great improvement to journal's usability and is already being used in the ground. It was a joint effort between many SL community members since EduJAM 2011, so I think there should be a consensus towards accepting it. http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support It seems to be ready to go in. * Walter proposed a few other features which went already through several reviews (do we have feature pages for these perhaps?) - homeview background image I know, at first hand, that Caacupe (Paraguay) kids will be more than happy with this ^. We should support also features that makes Sugar more enjoyable to it's users. - multi-homeview - webservices - comment field in journal detail view We should also keep in mind that webservices can offer a lot of utilities for deployments in the near future, and it will give Sugar a another way to expand its capabilities without writing-from-scratch everything. So 0.100 seems to be shaping up as a release devoted mainly to html5 activities, while landing a few features which are almost ready. What does everyone think about that? -- Daniel Narvaez ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
