Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 13:13:57) > I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar > activity. I appreciate your interest. > I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a > critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the > automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at the > beginning of a module. Please discuss Debian packaging at the dedicated mailinglist. Makes good sense to share here what you learn from following those activities in Debian, but taking details out of context is not helping. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Thanks for the reply. I subscribed to the list because there seemed to be a lot of sugar activity. I have been dismayed by the frequent threats to drop Sugar or a critical component. At one point, the messages suggested that the automated testing scripts could not even read the license text at the beginning of a module. Tony On 06/24/2016 12:03 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Hi Tony! First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar! Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07) Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar in one package? What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? Does this one package include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3? That warning - and your questions here - are specific to the Debian packaging of Sugar. Possibly https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar already answers your questions - else feel free to ask such questions at our mailinglist referenced at that wiki page. - Jonas P.S. If you received the warning email through some Sugarlabs list, then someone has subscribed that list to receive automated messages from Debian, which is bad: Don't tell robots to receive robot-generated messages aimed at human. ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Pkg-sugar-devel] sugar is marked for autoremoval from testing
Hi Tony! First of all: Thanks for your interest in Debian packaging of Sugar! Quoting Tony Anderson (2016-06-24 08:25:07) > Does anyone know what this is all about? How has Debian packaged Sugar > in one package? > What is the difference, if any, between 0.106 as released and 0.106.1-1? > Does this one package > include the essential activities? Does it include both sugar and sugar3? That warning - and your questions here - are specific to the Debian packaging of Sugar. Possibly https://wiki.debian.org/Sugar already answers your questions - else feel free to ask such questions at our mailinglist referenced at that wiki page. - Jonas P.S. If you received the warning email through some Sugarlabs list, then someone has subscribed that list to receive automated messages from Debian, which is bad: Don't tell robots to receive robot-generated messages aimed at human. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
