Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 17:50 +, Martin Dengler wrote: > Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on > F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest) > for XO-1 builds? Stabilizing a new Fedora release on the XO-1 is likely to take more time than I can dedicate to it. If someone would like to champion an F12 effort, I'd be glad to help out. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:43:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > >From today's #sugar-meeting: > > bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there > are no xo images > bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good > bernie: and then create a repo > bernie: maybe mtd is interested in that, too > > Ok, I'll create some custom F11-XO1 builds with the latest Sugar > packages retrofitted for testing purposes. Sorry if it's been answered already: I wonder why you prefer 0.88 on F11 for XO-1 builds, rather than 0.88 (or latest) on F12 (or latest) for XO-1 builds? Martin pgpdHWaKFoFs5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1
(re-adding the lists) On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 06:55 -0600, Mikus Grinbergs wrote: > But this thread is about F11-on-XO1. Meaning that yum ought to be > defaulting to accessing the F11 repositories. I just now enabled the > 'rawhide' repository for my F12-based XO1, and explicitly pulled down > sugar-0.87.5-1.fc14.noarch.rpm from there. > > My point is that the Sugar dependencies may have been upstreamed -- but > those not in the inner circle don't know WHERE (choose: in releases F12 > or F13 or F14; in repos fedora or rawhide or update or update-testing). Luckily, all the dependencies mentioned in the 0.88 Roadmap were already available in F-11, but I've found a few more which weren't documented: python-decorator (in F11, but not in F11-XO1) python-dateutil (in F11, but not in F11-XO1) python-xklavier (not in F11, needs backporting) I'll build a public yum repo with the sugar packages and missing dependencies as soon as I find some time. Meanwhile, I've convinced rpm into installing the rawhide packages on Fedora 11. In this configuration the Metacity window manager crashes on startup for reasons yet to be determined. After restarting Metacity from the console, Sugar 0.88 showed up and appeared to work normally. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar 0.88 in F11-XO1
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:43:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote: > >From today's #sugar-meeting: > > bernie: I think a big problem to recruit 0.88 testers, is that there > are no xo images > bernie: scratch builds, like tomeu said, sounds good > bernie: and then create a repo > bernie: maybe mtd is interested in that, too > > Ok, I'll create some custom F11-XO1 builds with the latest Sugar > packages retrofitted for testing purposes. Who would like to help me > out? I'm also creating karmic ppa for 0.88, not sure if I will manage to create 0installed sugar for 0.88 testing. -- Aleksey ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
