[sumo-user] Duarouter Warning

[mehdi]

Dear All,

I am working on a large-scale simulation. After running "duarouter" I faced
a large number of these errors:
.
.
.

Warning: Mandatory edge '15453' not reachable by vehicle
'trip_prefix298061'.
Warning: The vehicle 'trip_prefix298061' has no valid route.
Warning: No connection between edge '7659' and edge '14120' found.
Warning: Mandatory edge '14120' not reachable by vehicle
'trip_prefix298221'.
Warning: The vehicle 'trip_prefix298221' has no valid route.

...
...
How important are these errors? because My network is extensive and I don't
know how I can fix these errors? I cant search for each error and find why
for example this vehicle has no valid edge. 

Thank you so much for your support.

Best regards
Mehdi




--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

[sumo-user] Route alternate file

[rony gracious]

When I try to create alternate routes file using duarouter I am only
getting one route in the distribution even though there are other alternate
routes possible, Only one route with probability 1.0 is formed. Why are
other routes not getting formed in route distribution?
duarouter -n network0.xml -r trips.xml -o Routes.Rou.xml -a vtypes.add.xml
--ignore-errors --alternatives-output Routes.Rou.alt.xml
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Loading state and simulation start speed

[Marcelo Andrade Rodrigues D Almeida]

Hi Jakob

Thank you for the information


One question though: Is there any way of forking the simulation itself?

I know Traci uses a TCP socket connection, so it would be necessary to
duplicate the server-side data so a dedicated connection can be established.

This would avoid the time to save/load the state and the time to redo all
the subscription

Thank you in advance


On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 5:28 AM Jakob Erdmann  wrote:

> You can speed up your runs by calling simulation.loadState instead of
> simulation.load
>
> Am Sa., 22. Mai 2021 um 17:15 Uhr schrieb Marcelo Andrade Rodrigues D
> Almeida :
>
>> Perhaps the actual problem is that the first connection tries always
>> fails (connection refused). As consequence, I need to wait 1 second every
>> time I try to start a simulation.
>>
>> I'm going to start using the "connect" function myself to reduce the
>> waitBetweenRetries
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Marcelo d'Almeida
>>
>> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:10 PM Marcelo Andrade Rodrigues D Almeida <
>> m...@id.uff.br> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Proyash
>>>
>>> Thank you for dedicating time to answer!
>>>
>>>
>>> In my experiment, I need to execute different possibilities of traffic
>>> light configurations.
>>>
>>> So in practice, the things I need to do are basically re-running the
>>> simulation steps several times before modifying the original one. That's
>>> the reason I resort to saving and loading the simulation state.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Marcelo d'Almeida
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 3:55 PM Proyash Podder  wrote:
>>>
 Hello Marcelo!
 Reading your statement, what thing first came into my mind is using
 TraCI.
 TraCI (https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI.html) provides you opportunity
 to halt simulation at each step (e.g., 1 second ) and do whatever thing you
 need to do and again, run the simulation from that halting point.

 You can read the documentation of TraCI and see if it fits for your
 work.

 -
 Proyash

 > On May 21, 2021, at 2:50 PM, Marcelo Andrade Rodrigues D Almeida <
 m...@id.uff.br> wrote:
 >
 > Hi everyone
 >
 > In my experiments, I need to save and load the simulation several
 times, and each time I do a loading, I start a new simulation.
 >
 > Generally speaking, starting a simulation does not take too long
 (e.g., 1 second)
 >
 > However, since I have to do it several times, most of the experiment
 time is about starting those. (I save the state in a time step and test it
 several possibilities from it)
 >
 >
 > 1.: Do I really need to start a new simulation to load a state? It
 does not sound like just loading a state should take so much time.
 >
 > 2.: if (1) is not viable, how can I just... like... fork a simulation
 so I could just copy data over (i.e., "duplicate a simulation") and start
 using it with no delay?
 >
 >
 > Sincerely,
 >
 > Marcelo d'Almeida
 > ___
 > sumo-user mailing list
 > sumo-user@eclipse.org
 > To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

 ___
 sumo-user mailing list
 sumo-user@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

>>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

[Radha Reddy]

Many thanks for your great help Jakob,

Regards
Radha

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:37 AM Jakob Erdmann  wrote:

> Download tomorrow at
> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version
>
> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>
>> Thanks very much Jakob,
>>
>> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right.
>>
>> Regards
>> Radha
>>
>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed (
>>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692)
>>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than
>>> the geometrical length.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>>>
 Hello Jakob,

 Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file.

 Regards
 Radha

 On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann 
 wrote:

> Please post your input files.
>
> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving
>> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position
>> for detEntry*.
>>
>> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem?
>>
>> Regards
>> Radha
>>
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
 ___
 sumo-user mailing list
 sumo-user@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

>>> ___
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

[Jakob Erdmann]

Download tomorrow at
https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Downloads.php#sumo_-_latest_development_version

Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 10:33 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
radha.reddy@gmail.com>:

> Thanks very much Jakob,
>
> Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right.
>
> Regards
> Radha
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann 
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed (
>> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692)
>> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than the
>> geometrical length.
>>
>> regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello Jakob,
>>>
>>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Radha
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Please post your input files.

 Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
 radha.reddy@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving
> model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position
> for detEntry*.
>
> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem?
>
> Regards
> Radha
>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
 ___
 sumo-user mailing list
 sumo-user@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

>>> ___
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

[Radha Reddy]

Thanks very much Jakob,

Now I need to re-install the new SUMO version to make it work right.

Regards
Radha

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Jakob Erdmann  wrote:

> Thank you for reporting this netedit bug. It has now been fixed (
> https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8692)
> The problem is triggered by custom edge lengths which are longer than the
> geometrical length.
>
> regards,
> Jakob
>
> Am Do., 27. Mai 2021 um 09:10 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Jakob,
>>
>> Many thanks for your email. Please check the RR.rar file.
>>
>> Regards
>> Radha
>>
>> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 8:07 AM Jakob Erdmann 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please post your input files.
>>>
>>> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
>>> radha.reddy@gmail.com>:
>>>
 Hello,

 I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving
 model. But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position
 for detEntry*.

 Any suggestions? How to solve this problem?

 Regards
 Radha

 ___
 sumo-user mailing list
 sumo-user@eclipse.org
 To unsubscribe from this list, visit
 https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

>>> ___
>>> sumo-user mailing list
>>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>>
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Using vTypeDistribution

[Jakob Erdmann]

Using different flow counts will change the insertion times and thus the
results. Also, you are not making use of the defined vTypeDistribution.
The recommended way to use this is with




And then in your experiments vary between



and







Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 13:58 Uhr schrieb Bae, Jong In :

> Jakob,
>
> Please see the attached for the input files of the two experiments.
>
> I greatly appreciate your help.
> Please let me know if there's anything else I can provide.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> *From:* sumo-user  on behalf of Jakob
> Erdmann 
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 26, 2021 4:32 AM
> *To:* Sumo project User discussions 
> *Subject:* Re: [sumo-user] Using vTypeDistribution
>
> Please provide input files for both experiments.
>
> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 08:51 Uhr schrieb Bae, Jong In  >:
>
> Thanks Jakob for pointing out the error.
>
> I added the flows that use my vTypeDistribution. Also, I put both vehicle
> types under one vTypeDistribution as you suggested in the earlier email. My
> new rou.file screenshot is attached.
>
> However, I'm still seeing some differences (# of vehicles processed as
> well as average travel time of a particular vehicle group) between the
> experiment runs.
>
> Would there be anything else in my rou.file that may be creating the
> difference? The only thing I'm changing between the experiments is the
> proportion of the vehicle type in each direction (thru and exit) while
> keeping the total volume the same.
>
> Since the two vehicle types have identical properties, I'm expecting to
> see the same results across the experiments.
>
> Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated!
>
> --
> *From:* sumo-user  on behalf of Jakob
> Erdmann 
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 25, 2021 4:22 AM
> *To:* Sumo project User discussions 
> *Subject:* Re: [sumo-user] Using vTypeDistribution
>
> Your input is lacking any ,  or  defintions that use
> your vTypeDistribution.
>
> Am Fr., 21. Mai 2021 um 16:30 Uhr schrieb Bae, Jong In  >:
>
> Thank you Jakob for your suggestion!
>
> I have changed my rou.file so that I'm putting all vehicle types into one
> distribution as shown in the attached screenshot.
> However, it seems like the way I have set up my rou.file may be incorrect.
>
> My files are loaded into simulation successfully but the simulation
> doesn't run (simulation ends at -0.10).
> Since it's not returning any error message, I'm unable to figure out what
> the issue is.
>
> I attached a screenshot of the rou.file as well as the zipped files of my
> experiment.
> I would appreciate any guidance you can provide.
>
> Thank you.
> --
> *From:* sumo-user  on behalf of Jakob
> Erdmann 
> *Sent:* Friday, May 21, 2021 6:47 AM
> *To:* Sumo project User discussions 
> *Subject:* Re: [sumo-user] Using vTypeDistribution
>
> If you keep the number of vTypeDistributions constant, the number of
> random calls should be constant as well regardless of how many vehicles are
> sampled from each distribution.
> A common way to use them is to put all types into one distribution and
> them sample each vehicle type from that distribution.
> Random depart offset and vTypeDistributions use the same RNG so you won't
> get any advantage by using the former without fixing the latter.
>
> Am Fr., 21. Mai 2021 um 10:58 Uhr schrieb Bae, Jong In  >:
>
> Thank you for your explanation.
>
> Does this mean that every time a vehicle is deployed from one of the
> vTypeDistribution (each distribution only has one vehicle type in my set
> up), the random number generator's state changes? And if the number of
> vehicles change in each vTypeDistribution in the next experiment while
> maintaining the same lane volume (all vehicles have identical properties),
> the roadway condition still changes due to the randomness from the
> vTypeDistribution. Is this the correct way of understanding the issue?
>
> If I am trying to create an identical roadway conditions while changing
> the composition of vehicle types (all of them have identical properties),
> should I use flow instead of vTypeDistribution?
> According to the SUMO documentation, I can use --randomize-flows option to
> add randomness. Instead of using this option, can I use the seed value
> and the random-depart-offset value (defined in the .sumocfg file) to have
> the vehicle depart time the same?
>
> Thank you so much!
> --
> *From:* sumo-user  on behalf of Jakob
> Erdmann 
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 20, 2021 9:12 AM
> *To:* Sumo project User discussions 
> *Subject:* Re: [sumo-user] Using vTypeDistribution
>
> Whenever a type is sampled from a distribution, the state of one of the
> random number generators changes. This can have far-reaching effects on
> other parts of the simulation that use the same random number generator
> (i.e. speedFactor distribution).
>
> Am Do., 20. Mai 2021 um 14:08 Uhr schrieb Bae, Jong In  >:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have some questions about how 

Re: [sumo-user] Sumo screenshots

[Yasmina Jaafra]

Thank you Jakob.
Best regards,


Le jeu. 27 mai 2021 à 09:09, Jakob Erdmann  a écrit :

> you can use traci.gui.screenshot
>
> Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 21:17 Uhr schrieb Yasmina Jaafra <
> yasmina.jaa...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to apply a convolutional neural network to sumo. Is it
>> possible to get for each time step a scene image as input for my CNN?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> ___
>> sumo-user mailing list
>> sumo-user@eclipse.org
>> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Sumo screenshots

[Jakob Erdmann]

you can use traci.gui.screenshot

Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 21:17 Uhr schrieb Yasmina Jaafra <
yasmina.jaa...@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to apply a convolutional neural network to sumo. Is it
> possible to get for each time step a scene image as input for my CNN?
>
> Best regards,
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] Detectors on Left-hand Driving

[Jakob Erdmann]

Please post your input files.

Am Mi., 26. Mai 2021 um 15:45 Uhr schrieb Radha Reddy <
radha.reddy@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I am trying to insert detectors on edges in the left-hand driving model.
> But, it is not inserting and displaying an *invalid position for detEntry*
> .
>
> Any suggestions? How to solve this problem?
>
> Regards
> Radha
>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
> sumo-user@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user
>
___
sumo-user mailing list
sumo-user@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-user

Re: [sumo-user] right of way simulation & route removal

[Jakob Erdmann]

The problem was caused by an old network version.  You can fix this by
calling netconvert -s net.net.xml -o net.net.xml with any version of
netconvert after 1.7.

Am Fr., 21. Mai 2021 um 13:51 Uhr schrieb Kevin Malena <
kevin.mal...@uni-paderborn.de>:

> Thanks for the answer, even if it seems to be a bug…
>
>
>
> When I find the time, I will implement and share the deletion since the
> “my” routes need to be calculated online.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
>
>
> M. Sc. Kevin Malena
>
>
> Regelungstechnik und Mechatronik
>
>
>
> Heinz Nixdorf Institut
> Universität Paderborn
>
> Fürstenallee 11
>
> 33102 Paderborn
>
> Telefon:  +49 (0) 52 51 / 60 6278
>
> Raum: F0.337
>
> Internet: http://www.hni.uni-paderborn.de/rtm
>
> _
>
>
>
> *Von:* sumo-user [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] *Im Auftrag von *Jakob
> Erdmann
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 13:03
> *An:* Sumo project User discussions 
> *Betreff:* Re: [sumo-user] right of way simulation & route removal
>
>
>
> Tracked at https://github.com/eclipse/sumo/issues/8670
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 21. Mai 2021 um 13:01 Uhr schrieb Jakob Erdmann <
> namdre.s...@gmail.com>:
>
> The intersection behavior looks indeed like a bug.
>
>
>
> Regarding route deletion: the effort should be small. If you load vehicles
> with embedded routes from xml, they will be deleted automatically, though.
>
>
>
> Am Fr., 21. Mai 2021 um 12:58 Uhr schrieb Kevin Malena <
> kevin.mal...@uni-paderborn.de>:
>
> Hey Giuliana and others,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick answer…
>
> The net-file and the trips were constructed to show my point and therefore
> the scenario has just this phase.
>
>
>
> And you are referring to the right junction (the big one on the left)! I
> want to model the behaviour in TLS-controlled intersections like this.
>
>
>
> If I change the phase to ‘rrrgGg’, as you suggest, the simulation
> doesn’t show any difference in the right of way-behaviour, meaning that the
> vehicles from the South doesn’t react to the prohibitions.
>
>
>
> Regarding the TraCi-command:
>
> I am creating lots of different routes in an ongoing simulation. Each new
> vehicle gets a new route. But if a vehicle leaves the simulation the namec
> be used again. The route cannot be removed and therefore the label cannot
> be used.
>
> I am thinking about a long lasting simulation where I can get problems
> with RAM and stuff.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
>
>
> M. Sc. Kevin Malena
>
>
> Regelungstechnik und Mechatronik
>
>
>
> Heinz Nixdorf Institut
> Universität Paderborn
>
> Fürstenallee 11
>
> 33102 Paderborn
>
> Telefon:  +49 (0) 52 51 / 60 6278
>
> Raum: F0.337
>
> Internet: http://www.hni.uni-paderborn.de/rtm
>
> _
>
>
>
> *Von:* sumo-user [mailto:sumo-user-boun...@eclipse.org] *Im Auftrag von *
> maria.armell...@dlr.de
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 12:27
> *An:* sumo-user@eclipse.org
> *Betreff:* Re: [sumo-user] right of way simulation & route removal
>
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
>
>
> what junction are you referring to? The first big junction in your
> net-file is defined as a traffic light, but with only one phase (may I ask
> why?). If you want to model priorities in traffic light, you can use the
> signal states G and g for this, see signal_state_definitions
> .
>
>
>
>
> Yes, you can change the route of a vehicle and also remove vehicles with
> TraCI. Check out Change_Vehicle_State
> 
> to see all TraCI commands you can use to change the state of a vehicle.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Giuliana
>
>
>
> *Von:* sumo-user  *Im Auftrag von *Kevin
> Malena
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 21. Mai 2021 12:10
> *An:* sumo-user@eclipse.org
> *Betreff:* [sumo-user] right of way simulation & route removal
>
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
>
>
> I have an issue with a right of way simulation and put together a min.
> example:
>
> https://uni-paderborn.sciebo.de/s/X1tIztrW8GVpczz
>
>
>
> The vehicles from the South have right of way towards the ones from North.
>
> In Netedit the permissions seem to be correct, but the vehicles don’t
> behave as expected.
>
>
>
> Another question concerns TraCI:
>
> Since there is no comparable command to delete routes such as for
> vehicles. How much effort does it take to implement it?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
>
> _
>
>
>
> M. Sc. Kevin Malena
>
>
> Regelungstechnik und Mechatronik
>
>
>
> Heinz Nixdorf Institut
> Universität Paderborn
>
> Fürstenallee 11
>
> 33102 Paderborn
>
> Telefon:  +49 (0) 52 51 / 60 6278
>
> Raum: F0.337
>
> Internet: http://www.hni.uni-paderborn.de/rtm
>
> _
>
>
>
> ___
> sumo-user mailing list
>