Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread J. Tallman
Hello All,

Do we know anything about this sundial? It is featured on the cover of this 
company's product literature:


http://www.trenwyth.com/


Notice the small banner underneath the mullion that serves as the style...it 
is a nice detail, I thought, an inexpensive way to shape the shadow and 
indicate which one to use.

Happy New Years, everyone!


Jim Tallman
www.artisanindustrials.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread John Carmichael

Hi Jim:

I have never seen this sundial (term applied losely).  I assume it's a
south vertical dial since 12 noon is directly below the origin of the
gnomon.  I agree at first glance that the concept of using the mullion and a
banner is interesting, and I like the color scheme, but I can't get over the
fact that this dial is flawed in so many ways.  Let's start with the the
gnomon.  I assume that the style is where the hourlines seem to converge if
extended. It's hard to tell if it is supposed to be the top of the banner or
the mullion.  It certainly can't be the curved bottom of the banner.  There
is a gap between the bottom of the mullion and the top of the banner.  What
are we supposed to look at to tell the time?  The shadow of the mullion, the
projected light through gap, or the shadow of top of the banner?  In any
case, all three of them are wrong because they are produced from objects
that are perpendicular to the dial face.  The style should point downwards
and be parallel to the polar axis. This is such a common mistake made with
many south vertical wall dials made by incompetent designers.  That flawed
dial in Kansas City I mentioned yesterday also suffers from this.

Then what's going on with those hour numerals? They are evenly spaced when
then should be closer together at midday.

Why don't you write them to find out who designed it and where it's located.
I wonder if it's at their corporate headquarters.  I might write them
myself.  I'm curious.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. Tallman
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:47 AM
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
Subject: Skylight Dial

Hello All,

Do we know anything about this sundial? It is featured on the cover of this 
company's product literature:


http://www.trenwyth.com/


Notice the small banner underneath the mullion that serves as the style...it

is a nice detail, I thought, an inexpensive way to shape the shadow and 
indicate which one to use.

Happy New Years, everyone!


Jim Tallman
www.artisanindustrials.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Carl Barbara Sabanski
Sunny Day!

I have looked at the photo of this sundial and it could actually be a
functional sundial.  It is New Years Eve and I could be a little hammered so
I guess I could be wrong.  Please let me know if I am.

I have attached a photo of the sundial with the hour lines extended.  They
appear to join at an origin located at the top edge of the banner making
this top edge the style.  Looking closely at the vertical corner where the
yellow and blue walls join it can be seen that the glass roof actually
slopes down slightly.  This would make the top edge of the banner, the
style, slope down slightly.  This slight slope would indicate that the
building is probably located at lower latitude making the gnomon's height of
a vertical sundial approach the vertical.  This in turn would make the hour
line angles almost equiangular or close enough to make them appear to be in
such a photo.  Also noon does not appear to be directly below the origin
indicating that the hour lines have been corrected for longitude.

But then again the thing could be just messed up.  Then I would be wrong.  I
need another drink in that case!

Happy Dialling!

Carl Sabanski
www.mysundial.ca
Get Hooked on Gnomonics!



RE: Skylight Dial
John Carmichael
Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:06:23 -0800
Hi Jim:

I have never seen this sundial (term applied losely).  I assume it's a
south vertical dial since 12 noon is directly below the origin of the
gnomon.  I agree at first glance that the concept of using the mullion and a
banner is interesting, and I like the color scheme, but I can't get over the
fact that this dial is flawed in so many ways.  Let's start with the the
gnomon.  I assume that the style is where the hourlines seem to converge if
extended. It's hard to tell if it is supposed to be the top of the banner or
the mullion.  It certainly can't be the curved bottom of the banner.  There
is a gap between the bottom of the mullion and the top of the banner.  What
are we supposed to look at to tell the time?  The shadow of the mullion, the
projected light through gap, or the shadow of top of the banner?  In any
case, all three of them are wrong because they are produced from objects
that are perpendicular to the dial face.  The style should point downwards
and be parallel to the polar axis. This is such a common mistake made with
many south vertical wall dials made by incompetent designers.  That flawed
dial in Kansas City I mentioned yesterday also suffers from this.

Then what's going on with those hour numerals? They are evenly spaced when
then should be closer together at midday.

Why don't you write them to find out who designed it and where it's located.
I wonder if it's at their corporate headquarters.  I might write them
myself.  I'm curious.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. Tallman
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:47 AM
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
Subject: Skylight Dial

Hello All,

Do we know anything about this sundial? It is featured on the cover of this
company's product literature:


http://www.trenwyth.com/


Notice the small banner underneath the mullion that serves as the style...it

is a nice detail, I thought, an inexpensive way to shape the shadow and
indicate which one to use.

Happy New Years, everyone!


Jim Tallman
www.artisanindustrials.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
attachment: vert_sundial.jpg---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread John Carmichael
Well, maybe you're right Carl But it is impossible to tell from their
website where this is located. I just assumed it was in the US at their home
office.  Their operation that is furthest south is in Phoenix at 33.5
degrees lat, and their other operations are even further north in Illinois
and Pennsylvania.  That skylight mullion can't be sloping more than 10
degrees down from horizontal. So that would put this in the tropics near the
equator. If this is in the US then it is flawed.

John 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Carl  Barbara Sabanski
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Sundial Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Skylight Dial

Sunny Day!

I have looked at the photo of this sundial and it could actually be a
functional sundial.  It is New Years Eve and I could be a little hammered so
I guess I could be wrong.  Please let me know if I am.

I have attached a photo of the sundial with the hour lines extended.  They
appear to join at an origin located at the top edge of the banner making
this top edge the style.  Looking closely at the vertical corner where the
yellow and blue walls join it can be seen that the glass roof actually
slopes down slightly.  This would make the top edge of the banner, the
style, slope down slightly.  This slight slope would indicate that the
building is probably located at lower latitude making the gnomon's height of
a vertical sundial approach the vertical.  This in turn would make the hour
line angles almost equiangular or close enough to make them appear to be in
such a photo.  Also noon does not appear to be directly below the origin
indicating that the hour lines have been corrected for longitude.

But then again the thing could be just messed up.  Then I would be wrong.  I
need another drink in that case!

Happy Dialling!

Carl Sabanski
www.mysundial.ca
Get Hooked on Gnomonics!



RE: Skylight Dial
John Carmichael
Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:06:23 -0800
Hi Jim:

I have never seen this sundial (term applied losely).  I assume it's a
south vertical dial since 12 noon is directly below the origin of the
gnomon.  I agree at first glance that the concept of using the mullion and a
banner is interesting, and I like the color scheme, but I can't get over the
fact that this dial is flawed in so many ways.  Let's start with the the
gnomon.  I assume that the style is where the hourlines seem to converge if
extended. It's hard to tell if it is supposed to be the top of the banner or
the mullion.  It certainly can't be the curved bottom of the banner.  There
is a gap between the bottom of the mullion and the top of the banner.  What
are we supposed to look at to tell the time?  The shadow of the mullion, the
projected light through gap, or the shadow of top of the banner?  In any
case, all three of them are wrong because they are produced from objects
that are perpendicular to the dial face.  The style should point downwards
and be parallel to the polar axis. This is such a common mistake made with
many south vertical wall dials made by incompetent designers.  That flawed
dial in Kansas City I mentioned yesterday also suffers from this.

Then what's going on with those hour numerals? They are evenly spaced when
then should be closer together at midday.

Why don't you write them to find out who designed it and where it's located.
I wonder if it's at their corporate headquarters.  I might write them
myself.  I'm curious.

John

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Tallman
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:47 AM
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
Subject: Skylight Dial

Hello All,

Do we know anything about this sundial? It is featured on the cover of this
company's product literature:


http://www.trenwyth.com/


Notice the small banner underneath the mullion that serves as the style...it

is a nice detail, I thought, an inexpensive way to shape the shadow and
indicate which one to use.

Happy New Years, everyone!


Jim Tallman
www.artisanindustrials.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Dave Bell
Carl  Barbara Sabanski wrote:
 I have attached a photo of the sundial with the hour lines extended.  They
 appear to join at an origin located at the top edge of the banner making
 this top edge the style.  Looking closely at the vertical corner where the
 yellow and blue walls join it can be seen that the glass roof actually
 slopes down slightly. 

It also looks to me as if the banner is not quite parallel to the
mullion, but slopes a little more steeply.
Hard to tell for sure, but I'm looking at the blue-sky gap...

  This would make the top edge of the banner, the
 style, slope down slightly.  This slight slope would indicate that the
 building is probably located at lower latitude making the gnomon's height of
 a vertical sundial approach the vertical. 

One of Trenwyth's facilities is in Phoenix, AZ, so fairly far South.

  This in turn would make the hour
 line angles almost equiangular or close enough to make them appear to be in
 such a photo.  Also noon does not appear to be directly below the origin
 indicating that the hour lines have been corrected for longitude.

   

 


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Dave Bell
Carl  Barbara Sabanski wrote:
  Looking closely at the vertical corner where the
 yellow and blue walls join it can be seen that the glass roof actually
 slopes down slightly.

I was taking a closer look at this, before I closed the image viewer.
Looking at the blue tiled wall, it's clear that the slope is actually
fairly significant.

The angle of the photo makes it hard to be certain, as it distorts the
tiles, but I would estimate the tiles to be pretty close to a 3:1 aspect
ration (say 2x6 inches, etc.)
Given that, and judging the nearly straight section where the roof
intersects the wall, I count a rise of 5 1/2 tiles over a run of 3 tiles.

5.5 / (3*3) gives the tangent of 31.4 degrees, so puts the roof and
style at 58.6 degrees from perpendicular to the dial face.
Now, 31.4 *is* a couple of degrees south of Phoenix, into Sonora, MX,
but if the banner slopes 2 degrees below the roof, it would be very hard
to see in the photo.
And the angle derived from the tile dimensions could hardly be called exact!

(Hmm, what would be the effect of including the grout spacing?)
OK, Excel to the rescue:
Estimating tiles at 2x6, I threw in 1/4 grout line, and stuffed the
formulas into Excel.

The intention was to use Goal Seek to adjust the assumed grout thickness
to get 33.4 degrees, and see if that was anything liek reasonable.
With no tweaking, the 1/4 spacing yielded 33.24 degrees, just a couple
miles south of central Phoenix!

Dave



---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Claude Hartman
As one who has an interest in skylight sundials,  I complain
that this is NOT one!

For me, a skylight sundial must have the dial face
ON THE SKYLIGHT.

However, what this shows is the marvelous opportunities
for providing interior sundials on an opaque surface rather
than on windows. There are many such walls in daylighting
shafts and sun rooms.

Dave Bell has shown that the angle of  the banner gnomon
could be right for Phoenix.  At least its top edge could
be adjusted to be so.

John has pointed out that something is wrong with the
12 mark.  Unless the wall is reclining I would expect a vertical
down from the banner parallel to the bricks.  That should put the
middle of the 12 and the noon mark more towards the center of
the brick.  More like the 1 of the numeral 12.

Then there is the spacing of the hour marks . . .

Nice discovery!

Claude Hartman

see my skylight sundial, dial 18 :
http://www.advanceassociates.com/Sundials/Stained_Glass/sundials_EGP.html
although outdoors above a patio, the dial face is on the shade cloth 
skylight
I have since moved from that location but a recent visit showed the current
owners maintain this Tove's Nest.


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Claude Hartman
I found more details of this indoor wall dial.  Go to:
http://www.trenwyth.com/photo_gallery.asp?intPID=1startrec=73endrec=84

Image 82 of their Astra-Glaze photo gallery shows this to be located
at Little Village Academy, Chicago, Illinois.   This kind of defeats our
guess at the latitude!

The architects show many striking designs at their site, 
www.rbjarchitects.com

I have sent an inquiry about the sundial.

Happy New Year to all!


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread John Carmichael
Thanks for that link to a still picture Claude.  It was hard to see the
photo on their Home page because it kept switching to a different photos in
their slide show. Since it's in Chicago at about lat 52 degrees, then the
gnomon should slope downwards from perpendicular (horizontal) by the same
amount.   It sure looks like it slants down much less than 52 degrees to me.
Please let us know if they answer your inquiry. I still think it's flawed,
but like everyone else, I love the concept of an interior wall dial
illuminated by a skylight.

John 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Claude Hartman
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 5:05 PM
To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
Subject: Re: Skylight Dial

I found more details of this indoor wall dial.  Go to:
http://www.trenwyth.com/photo_gallery.asp?intPID=1startrec=73endrec=84

Image 82 of their Astra-Glaze photo gallery shows this to be located
at Little Village Academy, Chicago, Illinois.   This kind of defeats our
guess at the latitude!

The architects show many striking designs at their site, 
www.rbjarchitects.com

I have sent an inquiry about the sundial.

Happy New Year to all!


---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Simon [illustratingshadows
so - I agree it is wrong. Simple quiz - with the dial plate asis and the style 
some 20 degrees in error - what is the maximum error.

Happy New Year to one and all.

Simon

John Carmichael wrote: 
 Thanks for that link to a still picture Claude.  It was hard to see the
 photo on their Home page because it kept switching to a different photos in
 their slide show. Since it's in Chicago at about lat 52 degrees, then the
 gnomon should slope downwards from perpendicular (horizontal) by the same
 amount.   It sure looks like it slants down much less than 52 degrees to me.
 Please let us know if they answer your inquiry. I still think it's flawed,
 but like everyone else, I love the concept of an interior wall dial
 illuminated by a skylight.
 John 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Claude Hartman
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 5:05 PM
 To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
 Subject: Re: Skylight Dial
 I found more details of this indoor wall dial.  Go to:
 http://www.trenwyth.com/photo_gallery.asp?intPID=1startrec=73endrec=84
 Image 82 of their Astra-Glaze photo gallery shows this to be located
 at Little Village Academy, Chicago, Illinois.   This kind of defeats our
 guess at the latitude!
 The architects show many striking designs at their site, 
 www.rbjarchitects.com
 I have sent an inquiry about the sundial.
 Happy New Year to all!
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



RE: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Carl Barbara Sabanski
Sunny Day!

I would not be so hasty.  This sundial is located in a 3 storey tower so the
photograph may not necessarily depict it accurately.  The second paragraph
of the following page would indicate that some thought was given to the
design of this sundial.

http://www.aiachicago.org/special_features/1997_Design_Awards/DBA/Awards/Win
ners/DBA_172.html

Carl

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon
[illustratingshadows
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: sundial@uni-koeln.de
Subject: RE: Skylight Dial


so - I agree it is wrong. Simple quiz - with the dial plate asis and the
style some 20 degrees in error - what is the maximum error.

Happy New Year to one and all.

Simon

John Carmichael wrote:
 Thanks for that link to a still picture Claude.  It was hard to see the
 photo on their Home page because it kept switching to a different photos
in
 their slide show. Since it's in Chicago at about lat 52 degrees, then the
 gnomon should slope downwards from perpendicular (horizontal) by the same
 amount.   It sure looks like it slants down much less than 52 degrees to
me.
 Please let us know if they answer your inquiry. I still think it's flawed,
 but like everyone else, I love the concept of an interior wall dial
 illuminated by a skylight.
 John
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Claude Hartman
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 5:05 PM
 To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
 Subject: Re: Skylight Dial
 I found more details of this indoor wall dial.  Go to:
 http://www.trenwyth.com/photo_gallery.asp?intPID=1startrec=73endrec=84
 Image 82 of their Astra-Glaze photo gallery shows this to be located
 at Little Village Academy, Chicago, Illinois.   This kind of defeats our
 guess at the latitude!
 The architects show many striking designs at their site,
 www.rbjarchitects.com
 I have sent an inquiry about the sundial.
 Happy New Year to all!
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial



Re: Skylight Dial

2007-12-31 Thread Roger Bailey
It is now the end of a good year. It has been turbulent and eventful but 
life goes on. As I read these notes on the Skylight Dial I am somewhat 
bemused. Are we rushing to judgment on this design? Has anyone made the 
effort to unscrambled the perspective distortion in the picture?  I am sure 
it can be done given time and the proper tools, both of which I lack. The 
tiles of a constant size on the wall will assist with the decoding. Don't 
speculate, calculate. I have no opinion as I have no facts and done nothing 
to determine the truth. If this firm did a simple proper design of a south 
facing declining dial to merit the awards, well good for them. If this 
feature on the cover of their design manual is a sham, do not trust the load 
bearing capacity of the structures they design. The true is determinable.

This causes me to think of the old watch on my dresser. It may be like this 
sundial. The batteries are dead, but the watch still shows the correct time 
a couple of time a day. Even the date window is correct once a year. If I 
take it apart I am amazed at the simple complexity that has evolved to 
produce this watch. Silicon from ordinary sand has been structured into 
logic gates that fulfill the mechanical complexity of gears and wheels in 
the old style watch. An amazing design, how can it be. All it need is a 
soul, a tiny 1.2 volt battery, to demonstrate what a wonderful creation it 
is.

Happy New Year,

Roger Bailey

- Original Message - 
From: John Carmichael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'J. Tallman' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sundial@uni-koeln.de
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Skylight Dial



 Hi Jim:

 I have never seen this sundial (term applied losely).  I assume it's a
 south vertical dial since 12 noon is directly below the origin of the
 gnomon.  I agree at first glance that the concept of using the mullion and 
 a
 banner is interesting, and I like the color scheme, but I can't get over 
 the
 fact that this dial is flawed in so many ways.  Let's start with the the
 gnomon.  I assume that the style is where the hourlines seem to converge 
 if
 extended. It's hard to tell if it is supposed to be the top of the banner 
 or
 the mullion.  It certainly can't be the curved bottom of the banner. 
 There
 is a gap between the bottom of the mullion and the top of the banner. 
 What
 are we supposed to look at to tell the time?  The shadow of the mullion, 
 the
 projected light through gap, or the shadow of top of the banner?  In any
 case, all three of them are wrong because they are produced from objects
 that are perpendicular to the dial face.  The style should point downwards
 and be parallel to the polar axis. This is such a common mistake made with
 many south vertical wall dials made by incompetent designers.  That flawed
 dial in Kansas City I mentioned yesterday also suffers from this.

 Then what's going on with those hour numerals? They are evenly spaced when
 then should be closer together at midday.

 Why don't you write them to find out who designed it and where it's 
 located.
 I wonder if it's at their corporate headquarters.  I might write them
 myself.  I'm curious.

 John

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On
 Behalf Of J. Tallman
 Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 9:47 AM
 To: sundial@uni-koeln.de
 Subject: Skylight Dial

 Hello All,

 Do we know anything about this sundial? It is featured on the cover of 
 this
 company's product literature:


 http://www.trenwyth.com/


 Notice the small banner underneath the mullion that serves as the 
 style...it

 is a nice detail, I thought, an inexpensive way to shape the shadow and
 indicate which one to use.

 Happy New Years, everyone!


 Jim Tallman
 www.artisanindustrials.com
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial
 ---
 https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

 
---
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial