Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)
Unfortunately, Freenet requires Java 1.4.x JVM, because it relies on nio (non-blocking input/output) API only available in 1.4.x. For the same reason, Freenet can't be run under open-source JVMs - Classpath's nio implementation is buggy (this _should_ change in the near future). Also, 1.4.0 had some known nio problems, so its not recommended as well. Regards, Victor Denisov. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 4:23 AM Subject: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version) Hi. I recently got my broadband connection, and of course I want to run Freenet, but I ran into some problems. Summary: I have/run NetBSD 1.6. There is a sun-java 1.4 package, but it will only install under NetBSD-current. Freenet doesn't seem to like 1.3.1.10. Sun java detected. 1.3.1_10 Old version of java detected. Please install a 1.4.x JVM. So, it seems my options are: 1. Upgrade to NetBSD-current (but I really prefer the release versions) 2. Wait for NetBSD 2.0 (any time now..) and hope 1.4* will work. 3. Try to get 1.4 to install on NetBSD-1.6 (Lots of work, probably) ..unless Freenet can run on a 1.3 JVM. Can it? The project main webpage says We have experienced best results with Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and later), which would seem to indicate that Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and later) is not an absolute requirement. But I doubt I'd be *that* lucky.. Any help appreciated. Magnus ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on NetBSD 1.6 (old java version)
A 1.4 JVM is an absolute requirement, because we use NIO. Sorry. Kaffe or GCJ might run on NetBSD, however, right now the NIO doesn't work on that either (bugs, being worked on, but can't give you a schedule). On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I recently got my broadband connection, and of course I want to run Freenet, but I ran into some problems. Summary: I have/run NetBSD 1.6. There is a sun-java 1.4 package, but it will only install under NetBSD-current. Freenet doesn't seem to like 1.3.1.10. Sun java detected. 1.3.1_10 Old version of java detected. Please install a 1.4.x JVM. So, it seems my options are: 1. Upgrade to NetBSD-current (but I really prefer the release versions) 2. Wait for NetBSD 2.0 (any time now..) and hope 1.4* will work. 3. Try to get 1.4 to install on NetBSD-1.6 (Lots of work, probably) ..unless Freenet can run on a 1.3 JVM. Can it? The project main webpage says We have experienced best results with Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and later), which would seem to indicate that Sun's Java Runtime Environment (versions 1.4.1 and later) is not an absolute requirement. But I doubt I'd be *that* lucky.. Any help appreciated. Magnus ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] freenet on Mac OS X 10.3.3
Does it start anyway? On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:12:49AM +, Paul wrote: Hi. I have successfully run freenet on Mac OS X for some time. I have downloaded installed the latest stable, but when I attempt to start freenet, here is the result: iMac:~/freenet paul$ sh ./start-freenet.sh Detected freenet-ext.jar Detected freenet.jar Sun java detected. Starting Freenet now: Command line: java -Xmx128m -XX:MaxDirectMemorySize=128m freenet.node.Main Done iMac:~/freenet paul$ Unrecognized VM option 'MaxDirectMemorySize=128m' Could not create the Java virtual machine. iMac:~/freenet paul$ If it helps, here is the result of: java -version: iMac:~/freenet paul$ java -version java version 1.4.2_03 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_03-117.1) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-34, mixed mode) Could anyone shed light on the problem? Thanks! ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Okay, this is wierd. You running stable, I assume? Can you send me the output of your General infolet? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general How long has the node been running? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Traffic usage?
That's either not that speed, or not DSL! ADSL is 1Mbit up, 8Mbit down; SDSL is a little faster for upload, but slower for download (up=down)... Even a dedicated T1 is not that fast, around 50Mbps! Thomas Guyot Dave wrote: You want to move to Japan instead. 100Mbits up, 100Mbits down DSL, for ~$70 a month. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: messageSendTimeRequest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. ... So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Forgive me if this is too obvious, but I had the same problem until I sent the outputbandwidth to an appropriate level. In your freenet.ini file: outputBandwidthLimit=12000 where 12000 is bytes per second and should not be your whole bandwidth capacity! ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
