Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
Hi! On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:33:07PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for my late reply I was out of town most of last week. The newest build seems to have fix the problem with it almost always being overloaded, but it still is getting overloaded by this by a lot. It will get overloaded stay that way for about 5 mins then fall below the threshold and start accepting connections again for about 5 mins till it shoots back up and is overloaded again and restarts the cycle. What's your outputBandwidth set to? It's possible this is simply a matter of link saturation? Its been up for 10.5 hours, I had to copy the info out piece by piece to get it so sorry if it looks different (the firewall here doesn't like port so I have to use a telnet prompt to get to my machine and dump the info with a program I wrote...) Current routingTime: 0ms Current messageSendTimeRequest: 4741ms Pooled threads running jobs: 71 (47.3%) Pooled threads which are idle:14 Reason for refusing connections: avgMessageSendTimeRequest(4741.311) successfulSendTimeCutoff(3000.000) Current estimated load for QueryReject purposes: 47% Current estimated load for rate limiting: 237% Reason for load: Load due to thread limit:47.3% Load due to routingTime: 3.3% = 100ms / 3000ms = overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest: 237% = 4741ms / 2000ms overloadLow (100%) Load due to expected inbound transfers: 3.4% because 143028.4384083343 req/hr * 0.001058914944006 (pTransfer) * 291384.0 bytes = 44131549 bytes/hr maxInputBytes/minute = 19509360 (max observed bytes per minute) * 60 * 1.1 = 1287617760 bytes/hr target Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load): 0.499004276735748 Current estimated requests per hour (based on last 10 mins): 42216.705203521495 Current global quota (requests per hour): 40460.32455491089 Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute: 19509360 Current outgoing request rate:143028.4384083343 Current probability of a request succeeding: 0.4% Current target (best case single node) probability of a request succeeding: 6.5% -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 5:59 PM To: Findley, Matthew; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest Importance: Low On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 01:13:01PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? Okay, this is wierd. You running stable, I assume? Can you send me the output of your General infolet? http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/performance/general How long has the node been running? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship of Web sites
My reply is on tech. That is the more appropriate forum. Or perhaps even chat. On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 07:00:01PM +0200, Nomen Nescio wrote: First they came for the child porn sites ... http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1232422,00.html Discussion on http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/06/06/132200.shtml Blocking connections to Freenet nodes will be only a matter of time, so what should we do to prevent them from getting on the blacklists? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] RE: trouble getting any information
Disregard this message - I figured it out. -Original Message- From: Jeff Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 12:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: trouble getting any information I recently downloaded freenet. I have a firewall and set the ipaddress in the config file to the address my ISP gave the firewall/router. I also set it up to forward the listeningPort to my PC running freenet. I am a programmer that writes networking software so these things aren't exactly tough for me. Still I keep getting this message - The request couldn't even make it off of your node. Try again, perhaps with the GPL to help your node learn about others. The publicly available seed nodes have been very busy lately. If possible try to get a friend to give you a reference to their node instead. Any ideas? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] node not evolving
dear freenet, for some reason, whenever I try to access anything using freenet, I always get 0 unreachable, 0 restarted, 0 cleanly rejected for anything, even the README file. My freenet Node Data Store is 5 gigs, i've enabled port forwarding on my router for port 45728 as indicated by the listenPort environment variable in the freenet.ini file. Also, I'm set up as a permanent node transient=false, enabled announcing doannounce=yes and on my firewall (using Outpost firewall 2.1) I've allowed all outgoing connections. Also, my maximum output bandwidth is 7 and my ipAddress is specified as zer0mass.homelinux.net (using DynDNS). At this time, my current probability of request succeeding is 0.4% and best case single node is 4.9%. I would think that with the above setup and running the program for over 2 hours, the figures should be better if I'm understanding them properly. Any ideas? Thanks for your time. rav __ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] British Telecom starting mass censorship ofWebsites
== [EMAIL PROTECTED] == wrote2004-06-07 10:28: Fuck the brits, free speach is what you make of it. Europe doesn't know what free speach is. In my opinion, this idea will be forced upon the europeans by time. I think you're wrong, but then what do I know, I'm a stupid brit apparently. If anything, speech is more free in Europe than in America, but that said I still take offence at your blanket fuckage of brits and europeans. I think that free speach in the legally/theorethical context is more free in USA (First amendment etc.), but in practice more free in Europe if You look at what can be said and published. Thomas -- -- Mundus Vult Decipi -- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] trouble getting any information
How long has the node been up? Go to advanced mode on the web interface. What is the error message now? It will be more detailed. How many incoming connections do you have? Show me the top few lines of the following page: http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodestatus/nodestatus.html As the warning on the homepage and the download page says, freenet cannot deliver instant gratification, because of the way it learns about the network... but if you give me some of the above info I may be able to help you. On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 12:52:10PM -0500, Jeff Gibson wrote: I recently downloaded freenet. I have a firewall and set the ipaddress in the config file to the address my ISP gave the firewall/router. I also set it up to forward the listeningPort to my PC running freenet. I am a programmer that writes networking software so these things aren't exactly tough for me. Still I keep getting this message - The request couldn't even make it off of your node. Try again, perhaps with the GPL to help your node learn about others. The publicly available seed nodes have been very busy lately. If possible try to get a friend to give you a reference to their node instead. Any ideas? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest
H for some reason I didn't think it showed the domain in the email address (else I might have used hotmail), though looking back I'm not quite sure where I got that idea from.. I personally work at the US Attorneys Office which does the prosecution rather then the investigation, and while the USAO would head up any investigation into arresting individuals it would be the FBI that would actually do the work to identify the users. So I'm just looking into freenet to satisfy my own personal interest. Also now while I can't comment (for obvious reasons) on possible investigations the office might be conducting, I can give you my personal opinion. I believe that freenet is still relatively safe from the recent crackdown on P2P child porn. Not because it can't be done, but simply because its just not as easy to ID offenders as on other networks. Networks like gnutella and kazza will literally give you a list of people committing a crime where as freenet would make you work for it. Its a simple cost benefit analysis. In the time it would take to prepare a case against a freenet user one could charge many times more kazza users (with the added benefit of not having to explain complex traffic analysis to a jury hehe). Right now, I think the most likely people to be snooping on freenet is @nsa.gov Again, this is just my personal opinion and does not reflect in anyway the US Attorneys Office. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [freenet-support] messageSendTimeRequest Importance: Low Out of curiosity, is the U.S. Department of Justice interested in freenet? When I see from @usdoj.gov in an email address, it really makes me wonder. Might the DOJ be interested in going after people for use of freenet or something? Considering the level of anonymity and such, I don't think anything would happen. But maybe just scoping things out? I could be completely wrong and perhaps someone at the DOJ is using freenet personally and using his government work email address for the mailing list, although I would tend to think that is somewhat irregular though who knows. Though I can think of more scary domains to be getting mail from... @cia.gov, @fbi.gov. Just an element of curiosity on my part. Any comments anyone? On May 28, 2004, at 10:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My node is almost constantly overloaded because messageSendTimeRequest exceeds successfulSendTimeCutoff by a significant amount. The messageSendTimeRequest likes to hang around 4000ms. Now I've observed that the messageSendTimeRequest seems to be tied the amount of data waiting to be transferred so I've tried to tweak the settings to reduce the amount of data that is going out of my node. Reducing the number of max connections, reducing the chance of cache, and other little things. But they don't seem to be able to bring it down. The only thing I can figure is that my node just looks too good to pass up (I have a really good upstream), and the other nodes just really like to request from my node and end up overloading me. So is there anything I can do to reduce the load? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Access the web interface from remote machines.
Hi there, I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the remote machine: fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine Is that all I need to do? It didn't work for me... : -- Best regards, Weiliang Zhang Department of Computing Imperial College London, UK ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Access the web interface from remote machines.
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:26, Weiliang Zhang wrote: Hi there, I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the remote machine: fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine Is that all I need to do? It didn't work for me... : That line is only for FCP (port 8481 standard). try mainport.allowedHosts=... good byte pgpYF3xWFdDnn.pgp Description: signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Access the web interface from remote machines.
Martin Scheffler wrote: On Wednesday 09 June 2004 01:26, Weiliang Zhang wrote: Hi there, I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the remote machine: fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine Is that all I need to do? It didn't work for me... : That line is only for FCP (port 8481 standard). try mainport.allowedHosts=... good byte Hi, I tried (I have the same problem) but nothing : I have a document contains no data with my browser (mozilla). Thanks for your help. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Access the web interface from remote machines.
Martin Scheffler wrote: I'm trying to access running on a remote machine through the web interface, so I modified the following line in the freenet.conf on the remote machine: fcpHosts=127.0.0.1,ip_address_of_my_machine Is that all I need to do? It didn't work for me... : That line is only for FCP (port 8481 standard). try mainport.allowedHosts=... I tried (I have the same problem) but nothing : I have a document contains no data with my browser (mozilla). 1. Edit the mentioned line in freenet.conf/freenet.ini, for example: mainport.allowedHosts=127.0.0.0/8,192.168.33.0/24 (don't forget to remove the % mark!) 2. Restart the node I forgot to remove '%' !! (What a shame :-) ) Thanks !!! good byte You too. Thanks again. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Bad request URI???
Hi, I have just tried to insert a file into the network, running stable build 5084. After the successful insertion, I used the URI: freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to request the file just inserted on the main web interface page, but it reported that this was a 'bad URI'. Have I done anything wrong?? Thanks. -- Best regards, Weiliang ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Bad request URI???
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Weiliang Zhang wrote: Hi, I have just tried to insert a file into the network, running stable build 5084. After the successful insertion, I used the URI: freenet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] to request the file just inserted on the main web interface page, but it reported that this was a 'bad URI'. Have I done anything wrong?? Yes. The CHK format uses CHK@hash,decrypt key. The hash is not the whole file hash but a rolling hash using an algorithm I could look up.. and it's the hash of the encrypted content for privacy reasons. The decryption key is related to the hash of the original content... -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
