Re: [freenet-support] max connections not chagning
I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java 1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my node and look at the open connections page, it says that 40 is still my max connections. Any suggestions? on win98 FRED (the freenet daemon you're running) limits the maximum connections it uses always down to a max of 40 because win98 is unable to have more than ~80 connections open at all. as i've got win98se too, i stopped trying and switched to a *real* operating system like .. (not starting a flamebait here ;) so either forget it or live with the 40 connections (or install yourself an OS) HTH ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 10:17:30PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: b) the failing file is an image. In that case it just disappears and you have to reload the page manually until you have all images. (alternatively, you can open a browser window/tab for every single image you want to have; IMHO this is no real solution either.) This is what IFRAME is for :) One iframe per image? IBTD. What's IBTD? I beg to differ? I thought it to be I beg to disagree, but that is quite the same... It works pretty well on the SSKvsCHK site :) One should not justify a dirty hack by it works pretty well since most dirty hacks will... Why is it a dirty hack? mihi -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] max connections not chagning
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 07:29:05PM -0700, ShoeyFighter wrote: I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java 1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my node and look at the open connections page, it says that 40 is still my max connections. Hmmm. We are limiting it to 40. Which is rather strange given that Win98 is supposed to support 100... Any suggestions? -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] max connections not chagning
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 10:15:08AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using the latest freenet client on win98se (don't say anything ;p) and Java 1.42, and I can't get the maximum connections to work properly. I set my max connections to 75, and my max threads to 200, but when I access my node and look at the open connections page, it says that 40 is still my max connections. Any suggestions? on win98 FRED (the freenet daemon you're running) limits the maximum connections it uses always down to a max of 40 because win98 is unable to have more than ~80 connections open at all. as i've got win98se too, i stopped trying and switched to a *real* operating system like .. (not starting a flamebait here ;) Uh, I thought win98's limit was 100 conns? If you know differently, please tell! so either forget it or live with the 40 connections (or install yourself an OS) HTH ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: [freenet-chat] where is the http:// in freenet where i can download all those trader's software
Uh, you want us to tell you where you can get WaReZ from on Freenet, right? That would almost certainly be illegal... and this IS an open list. Personally I try to avoid proprietary software, but that which I *DO* use (games) I pay for... On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:14:48PM +0800, currency fundamentalist wrote: can someone please share with me where i can find the, or more appropriately, an, http:// directory in the freenet, where i can download all those trader's software i've been looking for. such as the names found at: http://www.geocities.com/ta_soft/pro.htm http://www.geocities.com/ta_soft/new.htm thank you. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Automatic server retry of failing documents
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:33:22PM +0200, Michael Schierl wrote: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [putting every image into an iframe to work around Freenet's reloading bugs] It works pretty well on the SSKvsCHK site :) One should not justify a dirty hack by it works pretty well since most dirty hacks will... Why is it a dirty hack? Do you think it is usual behaviour to put images into IFRAMEs? I have only seen that on Freenet. And since it is more work (and needs more resources on most browsers) and is only done to work around another problem, I usually call thinks like this a dirty hack. So: - there is a usual solution (IMG tags for images). - it does not work in a specified environment (Freenet). - there is no interest to fix that solution in this environment, because - there is a simple way to work around that problem (IFRAME) - which uses techniques not appropriate for the problem (starting a whole HTML parser subinstance just for rendering an image) and - makes migration of existing work harder (mirroring a website into Freenet requires s/img/iframe/) == dirty hack. What is your definition of dirty hack? mihi ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
