[freenet-support] node references
I had a node reference until I had to reformat my hard drive. Can anyone post a node reference link for stable? --- Robert Greenage --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- EarthLink: It's your Internet. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on FreeBSD
'linux_enable="YES"' is enabled on the server. Like I said, it runs for a while and dies with one or two processes hogging all the avalible cpu time. What version of freebsd are you using? I did get it running by pointing the freenet scripts to the java vm loc. Anyway, I'm going to wait and see if newer versions of freenet will work with it. Otherwise I'm gonna wait for my hosting company to get a linux server :-P ~Paul On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:51:15 -0500, S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:48:37 -0400 > Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The binary on the server at the moment is a 1.3 vm. To get the 1.4 vm > > working you have to download the source and some binaries from sun's > > site, apply a patch from the bsd team, and then compile it. (all > > because of sun's lisense) Sounds simple enough execpt compiling it > > requires a java vm. > > ~Paul > > Fuck that noise. If you can support Linux binary compatibility (try > linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf), you can use the Linux binary > version of Java instead of jumping through hoops to compile a native > recent version on FreeBSD. > > # fetch "http://java.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=9719"; > # mv AutoDL\?BundleId\=9719 j2re1.4.2_05 > # chmod 755 j2re1.4.2_05 > # ./j2re1.4.2_05 > > [press Enter a lot, then agree to the license] > > Finally, edit your start-freenet.sh to point to the copy of Java that > you installed. > > This is how I run Freenet under FreeBSD ... with the Linux distribution. > It's a shame that Dolphin is no longer participating here, he was a > FreeBSD user who had managed to compile his own local native copy of > Java. I could never get it to work, so I went with emulating the Linux > version. > > -s > ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] 5091 not doing well?
Other reports say it is working okay... Do you get RNFs? On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 02:29:43PM +0200, Troed S?ngberg wrote: > Hi, > > I'm usually the last person to complain, but I'm a bit puzzled as to how > my 5091 node is feeling atm. > > Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my > local datastore, but some content is definitely coming in, albeit slowly. > > Frost: Nothing. No new posts. This one is what puzzles me the most. > > Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 159 (85/74/200) > Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 86 (38/48) > Data waiting to be transferred36 Bytes > Total amount of data transferred 4,327 MiB > > Uptime: 2 days, 3 hours, 41 minutes > Current routingTime: 51ms. > Pooled threads running jobs: 86 (43%) > Pooled threads which are idle: 48 > Current estimated load for rate limiting: 124.5%. > Load due to thread limit = 42.5% > Load due to routingTime = 5.1% = 51ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) > Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 15.9% = 79ms / 500ms <= overloadLow > (100%) > Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 124.5% because outputBytes(979339) > >limit (786432.012 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit > (16384) * 60 > Load due to expected inbound transfers: 14.3% because: 3747.815059482813 > req/hr * 0.0224529164599 (pTransfer) * 440356.0 bytes = 37055683 > bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = > 3932160 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = > 259522560 bytes/hr target > Load due to expected outbound transfers: 40% because: 1339.59755877746 > req/hr * 0.028(972 0s, 28 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 440356.0 bytes = > 16517195 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but > maxOutputBytes/minute = 688128 * 60 = 41287680 bytes/hr target > Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 43%. > > Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to > load):0.0 > Current estimated requests per hour: 1649.974073708626 > Current global quota (requests per hour): 1577.4477016206645 > Current global quota limit from bandwidth (requests per > hour):4465.339383780985 > Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute: 1819342 > Current outgoing request rate 3693.494192374193 > Current probability of a request succeeding by routing7.9% > Current probability of an inbound request causing a transfer outwards 3% > Current target (best case single node) probability of a request > succeeding5.7% > > > ... from the above I would say my node is doing pretty ok (although not as > good as 5084 or thereabouts) - so is this strictly a problem of me > accessing the node locally? > > regards, > Troed > > -- > http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] EstimateFormatException: No point 0 ? (build 5091)
There is nothing fatal in that log. What happens when you try to use Freenet? On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Bart van der Ouderaa wrote: > Hi, > > I can't get freenet to work. The log says the following: > > 11-aug-2004 17:13:20 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Starting > Freenet (Fred) 0.5 node, build #5091 on JVM "Apple Computer, Inc.":Java > HotSpot(TM) Client VM:1.4.2-38 > 11-aug-2004 17:13:23 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading node > keys: node > 11-aug-2004 17:13:23 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Creating node > keys: node > 11-aug-2004 17:13:24 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): starting > filesystem > 11-aug-2004 17:13:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading data > store > 11-aug-2004 17:13:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading routing > table > 11-aug-2004 17:13:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): From output: > 49152.0 > 11-aug-2004 17:13:26 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Setting default > initTransferRate to 49152.0 > 11-aug-2004 17:13:27 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Created new NGRT > 11-aug-2004 17:13:28 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded stats > 11-aug-2004 17:13:28 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loading temp > bucket factory > 11-aug-2004 17:13:28 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): loaded temp > bucket factory > 11-aug-2004 17:13:28 (freenet.node.Main, main, NORMAL): Loaded bucket > factory > 11-aug-2004 17:14:13 (freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimator, main, > NORMAL): Caught freenet.node.rt.EstimatorFormatException: No point 0 > reading tcp/davidgrant.ca:8181, sessions=1, presentations=3, > ID=DSA(0c05 a0f9 bbe3 8eb7 4a5e 4760 6207 24ea 2196 0cc9), > version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5090 from FieldSet :( > freenet.node.rt.EstimatorFormatException: No point 0 > at > freenet.node.rt.SlidingBucketsKeyspaceEstimator.(SlidingBucketsKey > spaceEstimator.java:212) > at > freenet.node.rt.OptimizingSlidingBucketsKeyspaceEstimator.(Optimiz > ingSlidingBucketsKeyspaceEstimator.java:31) > at > freenet.node.rt.OptimizingSlidingBucketsKeyspaceEstimatorFactory.createT > ime(OptimizingSlidingBucketsKeyspaceEstimatorFactory.java:120) > at > freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimator.(StandardNodeEstimator.java: > 685) > at > freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimatorFactory.create(StandardNodeEstimato > rFactory.java:116) > at > freenet.node.rt.StandardNodeEstimatorFactory.create(StandardNodeEstimato > rFactory.java:180) > at freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable.reference(NGRoutingTable.java:509) > at > freenet.node.rt.FilterRoutingTable.reference(FilterRoutingTable.java: > 53) > at freenet.node.Main.seed(Main.java:1247) > at freenet.node.Main.spawnNode(Main.java:1015) > at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:920) > (the exception log message repeats after this) > > What am I doing wrong? > > gr. Bart > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours)
Fix for the NPE will be in the next versions of stable and unstable. On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 04:35:23AM +, Sam wrote: > Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Any error messages in the log? I recommend that you upgrade your node to > > a v5091.. Which solves an issue wrt merging a new seednodes file > > (reseeding). > > > > Cheers > > /N > > > > When I try to reply to Niklas' post, Gmane tells me I'm "top posting". So I'll > write down here. > > I installed 5091, still no connections, no action, no nada. > Exited and restarted freenet. Freenet.log shows null pointer exceptions: > > INFO: Native CPUID library > 'freenet/support/CPUInformation/jcpuid-x86-windows.dll' loaded from resource > INFO: Optimized native BigInteger library > 'net/i2p/util/jbigi-windows-pentium4.dll' loaded from resource > Aug 11, 2004 10:01:36 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, YThread-4, > ERROR): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses: > java.lang.NullPointerException > java.lang.NullPointerException > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint > (IPAddressDetector.java:171) > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint > freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.checkpoint(Checkpoint.java:54) > at freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.received > (Checkpoint.java:47) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:177) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:61) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.run > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:332) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer. > received > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:285) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.access$100 > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:204) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:96) > at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:323) > at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) > Aug 11, 2004 10:09:27 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance. > Checkpoint, YThread-4, > ERROR): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses: > java.lang.NullPointerException > java.lang.NullPointerException > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint > (IPAddressDetector.java:171) > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint > freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.checkpoint > (Checkpoint.java:54) > at freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.received > (Checkpoint.java:47) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:177) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:61) > at > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.run > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:332) > at > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.received > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:285) > at > freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.access$100 > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:204) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:96) > at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:323) > at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run > (YThreadFactory.java:285) > Aug 11, 2004 10:58:38 PM (freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint, YThread-0, > ERROR): unhandled throwable in Checkpoint: Autodetection of IP addresses: > java.lang.NullPointerException > java.lang.NullPointerException > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint(IPAddressDetector.java:171) > at freenet.node.IPAddressDetector.checkpoint(IPAddressDetector.java:87) > at freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.checkpoint > (Checkpoint.java:54) > at freenet.node.states.maintenance.Checkpoint.received > (Checkpoint.java:47) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:177) > at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:61) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.run > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:332) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.received > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:285) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler$ChainContainer.access$100 > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:204) > at freenet.node.StateChainManagingMessageHandler.handle > (StateChainManagingMessageHandler.java:96) > at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:323) > at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:285) > > > Any help would be appreciated. > Sam > > ___ > Support mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
[freenet-support] Re: My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours) -- Never mind!
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hopefully someone can point out something dumb I've done that can be > easily undone. OK. I just checked "Get Default Node Refs" in the Configure panel, and after sucking down a chunk of bandwidth, I'm up and running again. Thanks, Niklas. Sam ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours)
On Friday 13 August 2004 15:16, Sam wrote: > ... and in case I write again, how do I write on top of a previous > post, instead of down here where it get's lost? Top posting is considered rude. The proper way of replying to an email is bottom posting. It's very nice that gmane is forcing it's users away from the top posting habits. For more information, please see the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_posting -- Roger Oksanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +358 50 355 1990 CS Student at Helsinki UniversityPGP id 1B125A3E Homepage http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/raoksane/ pgpEbjUPyePPP.pgp Description: signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] 5091 not doing well?
Hi, I'm usually the last person to complain, but I'm a bit puzzled as to how my 5091 node is feeling atm. Symptoms: Very little content browseable outside what I suspect is in my local datastore, but some content is definitely coming in, albeit slowly. Frost: Nothing. No new posts. This one is what puzzles me the most. Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 159 (85/74/200) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 86 (38/48) Data waiting to be transferred 36 Bytes Total amount of data transferred4,327 MiB Uptime: 2 days, 3 hours, 41 minutes Current routingTime: 51ms. Pooled threads running jobs: 86 (43%) Pooled threads which are idle: 48 Current estimated load for rate limiting: 124.5%. Load due to thread limit = 42.5% Load due to routingTime = 5.1% = 51ms / 1000ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to messageSendTimeRequest = 15.9% = 79ms / 500ms <= overloadLow (100%) Load due to output bandwidth limiting = 124.5% because outputBytes(979339) limit (786432.012 ) = outLimitCutoff (0.8) * outputBandwidthLimit (16384) * 60 Load due to expected inbound transfers: 14.3% because: 3747.815059482813 req/hr * 0.0224529164599 (pTransfer) * 440356.0 bytes = 37055683 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxInputBytes/minute = 3932160 (output limit assumed smaller than input capacity) * 60 * 1.1 = 259522560 bytes/hr target Load due to expected outbound transfers: 40% because: 1339.59755877746 req/hr * 0.028(972 0s, 28 1s, 1000 total) (pTransfer) * 440356.0 bytes = 16517195 bytes/hr expected from current requests, but maxOutputBytes/minute = 688128 * 60 = 41287680 bytes/hr target Current estimated load for QueryRejecting: 43%. Estimated external pSearchFailed (based only on QueryRejections due to load): 0.0 Current estimated requests per hour: 1649.974073708626 Current global quota (requests per hour): 1577.4477016206645 Current global quota limit from bandwidth (requests per hour): 4465.339383780985 Highest seen bytes downloaded in one minute: 1819342 Current outgoing request rate 3693.494192374193 Current probability of a request succeeding by routing 7.9% Current probability of an inbound request causing a transfer outwards 3% Current target (best case single node) probability of a request succeeding 5.7% ... from the above I would say my node is doing pretty ok (although not as good as 5084 or thereabouts) - so is this strictly a problem of me accessing the node locally? regards, Troed -- http://troed.se - controversial views or common sense? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: My 5091 is dead (after 7 hours)
Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do you have a log message stating something like 'No addresses found!' > before those messages? > > Also try setting: > logLevelDetail=freenet.node.IPAddressDetector:debug > in the conf/ini file (dont forget to remove the leading %-sign if you use > the one already in there) > > Then tell me what the log says right before the first of those > NullPointerExceptions. > > cheers > /N > .x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x I changed debug to NORMAL. I changed logLevelDetail=freenet.node.IPAddressDetector:debug After 37 minutes of running at zero load, zero connections, I get 500 KB of log file, with no NullPointerException. Starting with line 11 in freenet.log, I get 177 lines that look like: Aug 13, 2004 6:26:19 AM (freenet.node.rt.NGRoutingTable, main, NORMAL): Rejecting reference tcp/68.78.234.194:8118, sessions=1, presentations=3, ID=DSA(05d6 2ebd ca27 f72a cc6a 8173 f729 efbf 7e40 4d4c), version=Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5085 - too old (Fred,0.5,STABLE-1.50,5085) in loadEstimators There are, coincidentally, 177 entries in my (edited) seednodes.ref Hopefully someone can point out something dumb I've done that can be easily undone. ... and in case I write again, how do I write on top of a previous post, instead of down here where it get's lost? Thanks. Sam .x.x.x.x.x.x.x.x ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet on FreeBSD
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:48:37 -0400 Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The binary on the server at the moment is a 1.3 vm. To get the 1.4 vm > working you have to download the source and some binaries from sun's > site, apply a patch from the bsd team, and then compile it. (all > because of sun's lisense) Sounds simple enough execpt compiling it > requires a java vm. > ~Paul Fuck that noise. If you can support Linux binary compatibility (try linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf), you can use the Linux binary version of Java instead of jumping through hoops to compile a native recent version on FreeBSD. # fetch "http://java.sun.com/webapps/download/AutoDL?BundleId=9719"; # mv AutoDL\?BundleId\=9719 j2re1.4.2_05 # chmod 755 j2re1.4.2_05 # ./j2re1.4.2_05 [press Enter a lot, then agree to the license] Finally, edit your start-freenet.sh to point to the copy of Java that you installed. This is how I run Freenet under FreeBSD ... with the Linux distribution. It's a shame that Dolphin is no longer participating here, he was a FreeBSD user who had managed to compile his own local native copy of Java. I could never get it to work, so I went with emulating the Linux version. -s ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
