[freenet-support] Freenet with fedora core 2 ?
Hello, I try to use Freenet 5099 with Fedora Core 2 (2.6.8-1.521) but that seem not work. Who use this Fedora version? and with what java version, and what Freenet configuration? Thank's ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet with fedora core 2 ?
Eric JANTZEN wrote: Hello, I try to use Freenet 5099 with Fedora Core 2 (2.6.8-1.521) but that seem not work. Who use this Fedora version? and with what java version, and what Freenet configuration? Thank's ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] There's two ways to install Java and Freenet, the Quick and Dirty way, and the elegant way. Elegant way: I'm using Freenet with Fedora Core 2 and JPackage's Sun 1.5.0 JRE. Unfortunately, JPackage can't distribute binary RPMs of Sun's JREs, so you'll need to download the nosrc package from JPackage (www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=3089) and the jdk-1_5_0-linux-i586.bin file from Sun and rebuild the package manually. First, you'll need jpackage-utils. Insert the following lines to yum.conf: [jpackage15-generic] name=JPackage 1.5, generic baseurl=http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/jpackage/1.5/generic/free/ gpgcheck=0 [jpackage15-fc2] name=JPackage 1.5 for Fedora Core 2 baseurl=//http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/jpackage/1.5/fedora-2/free/ gpgcheck=0 Then install jpackage-utils with: yum install jpackage-utils To rebuild the JRE RPM, install the nosrc package (rpm -ivh java-1.5.0-1jpp.nosrc.rpm), put the dk-1_5_0-linux-i586.bin into /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/ and run the following command: rpmbuild -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/java-1.5.0-sun.spec After it's finished, install the JRE with: rpm -Uvh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0-2jpp.i386.rpm After that, it's relatively smooth sailing. Add the following lines to /etc/yum.conf: [freenet] name=Freenet baseurl=http://nightwatch.mine.nu/freenet/stable/ gpgcheck=0 Then, install the node with: yum install fred fred-jbigi fec-native set it to start automatically on reboot: chkconfig --level 345 fred on and start it with: service fred start Quick And Dirty: Or, if you prefer to do things the Sun way, download and install Sun's 1.5.0 JRE RPM, then add the JRE (the JRE directory should be in /usr/java) bin directory to the path (a proper place to do that is /etc/profile.d/java.sh). Remember to set the java.sh as executable (chmod +x java.sh) and logout and login for the changes to work. Extract http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.tgz to a suitable directory and run start-freenet.sh. -- Mika Hirvonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nightwatch.mine.nu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet with fedora core 2 ?
On 8 Nov 2004, at 10:59, Mika Hirvonen wrote: After that, it's relatively smooth sailing. Add the following lines to /etc/yum.conf: [freenet] name=Freenet baseurl=http://nightwatch.mine.nu/freenet/stable/ gpgcheck=0 I had no idea someone had done this - we should link to this from the main Freenet site as soon as I confirm that these are kept reasonably up-to-date. Ian. -- Founder, The Freenet Projecthttp://freenetproject.org/ CEO, Cematics Ltd http://cematics.com/ Personal Blog http://locut.us/~ian/blog/ ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet (5099 stable) tries to connect to IANA reserved IPs
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:04:28AM +0100, Klaus Eckhoff wrote: Hi I'm running freenet together with ProtoWall (http://www.buetack.co.uk) a software blocking connections to and from unwanted IP-ranges. From the ProtoWall log I can see, that freenet tries to connect to some strange IPs from time to time. So far I noticed connection attempts to: - 5.0.2.0 - 5.255.116.166 - 1.121.22.146 All these IPs are IANA reserved (and will be blocked by ProtoWall for that reason). I'm wondering why freenet tries to connect to this IPs, maybe it's a bug? Anybody else noticed such a behaviour? Because we don't filter for them. Perhaps we should. This is probably caused by people explicitly setting their addresses to these; I don't know why they would do that, but perhaps they misread ifconfig (for example, things like webcams sometimes use reserved addresses). It might be worth looking further into this, as I thought we DID filter them... -Klaus -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] TWCMs on 5099, was: Problem using freenet
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 04:38:25PM +0100, BlueStar88 wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://freenet.thing.net/gateways/ Hummm.. it seems that i'm not the only one with errors since 5099. Checked their logs. The nodes have some 'red' priority errors too. Mostly TWCMs and some Java IO exceptions. --- 12:33:57 Got a TWCM that was not finished!: (...) partSize=16384,result=0x (Unknown control byte),lastPacketLength=138, inPaddingMode=false --- Unknown control byte? That sounds not good to me.. That's just an inevitable by product of the TWCM arriving before it finishes.. the question is, how can it get scheduled if it's not finished? When I get around to it and when I can reproduce this locally I'll see if I can fix it.. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet (5099 stable) tries to connect toIANA reserved IPs
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 10:42:47PM -0500, Nicholas Sturm wrote: How about teaching us something since there are far more than a simple majority of us that became network administrators because we purchased a machine with Windows XP or Windows 2000 pre-installed and have that ducky error message devised by Microsoft that says consult your system administrator for any problems (paraphrased only slightly). Of course since I consider most politicians as likely members of the idiot class, being a moron is somewhat flattering. My Windows 2000 machine went flakey when I tried to download the last security patch so I'm now just XP entrapped because the Windows 2000 machine will not contact the Internet and my freenet node has been inactive for the last two or three months. Hmm, curious. You are talking about Windows 2000 Professional here, not Windows 2000 Millennium Edition? The former has run stably on several machines here for aaages... well, stable except when playing certain computer games :) Thanks for your help. the other Nick [Original Message] From: zb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 11/6/2004 5:48:41 PM Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet (5099 stable) tries to connect toIANAreserved IPs Klaus Eckhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: freenet tries to connect to some strange IPs from time to time. So far I noticed connection attempts to: - 5.0.2.0 - 5.255.116.166 - 1.121.22.146 All these IPs are IANA reserved (and will be blocked by ProtoWall for that reason). I'm wondering why freenet tries to connect to this IPs, maybe it's a bug? Anybody else noticed such a behaviour? I suspect that this is because some clueless network administrators have given machines on their LAN's these addresses. The computer that have these ip addresses will be behind NAT's so when they make outgoing connections it comes from a real ip allocated by the ISP they are connected through. Another classic one is morons who use 192.0.0.0/8 instead of 192.168.0.0/16 then wonder why they can't reach website like adobe.com at 192.150.14.120 zb ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Freenet under a chroot
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 05:05:23PM -0600, Eric Gillingham wrote: On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 10:34:05PM +0100, Frank v Waveren wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:59:40PM -0600, Eric Gillingham wrote: I do have a hostname as my ipAddress so it would have to resolve that however I did copy /etc/resolve.conf into the chroot and also libresolv so I am not sure what exactly the issue is. Any help with getting this working is appreciated. /etc/nsswitch.conf perhaps? No that wasnt it, I fooled with it some more and copied a few more libs and /etc/ files and got it working using chrootuid yesterday. However since then I ended up writing my own C wrapper to accomplish this, when I get some time I plan on doing a writeup somewhere and releasing documentation on what I did so others that might be interesting in doing it may do so. That would be useful. -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
