[freenet-support] Freenet 0.7 build 1194
This problem is resolved for me. Thanks! On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 7:34 PM, wrote: > I still get this: > >* Probably a bug: please report: 2 peers forcibly disconnected due > to not acknowledging packets. >* Probably a bug: please report: 1 peers forcibly disconnected due > to not acknowledging packets. > > with > >* Freenet 0.7 Build #1194 r24387 >* Freenet-ext Build #26 r23771 > > after this > > nodeUptime: 1d21h > > > Merry Christmas > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 17:13, SmallSister development > wrote: > > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Freenet 0.7 build 1194 is now available. Please upgrade, this will be > >> mandatory on Friday. Some fairly substantial changes: > > > > It looks like the infamous "# peers forcibly disconnected" bug is gone > > in this release, thanks and congratulations! (I see far less package > > handling related messages in the logfiles.) > > > > While I'm at it: Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! > > > > Peter. > > ___ > > Support mailing list > > Support at freenetproject.org > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > > > > > > -- > __ > GnuPG key: (0x48DBFA8A) > Keyserver: pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de > Fingerprint: > 477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A > __ > ___ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081226/4d660f5f/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] Freenet and firewall
Thanks for your response. I like the principle "always jump a nation boundary on each hop" :) On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thursday 18 December 2008 22:03, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > My idea: > > Interpose at least one "foreign IP address" between sender and recipient > of > > a same country. > > The goal: isolate the sender and recipient. > > The "foreign IP address" is a "country" that cooperates little, or > doesn't > > cooperate. > > For example: > > USA --> Venezuela --> USA > > USA --> Russia --> Venezuela --> USA > > China --> USA --> China > > Etc. > > Friends are unnecessary. The authorities and lobbies artists are more > > difficult to trap users. > > > > What do you think? > > This has been proposed before. I believe there is a VPN-based network on > such > principles (always jump a nation boundary on each hop). I would point out > that the set of such antipathic relationships is quite small. On Freenet, > it > wouldn't help much IMHO (on opennet i.e. Strangers, it is possible to > attack > the network without compromising nodes) and would have a considerable > performance cost. There was a design decision taken that if you have > security > level NORMAL and therefore use opennet you want adequate (if not stellar) > performance; high security and opennet do not go together on Freenet's > architecture, so options that cost a lot of performance are disabled by > default on NORMAL; HIGH turns off opennet. However if somebody sends a > patch > and some mechanism to update the IP mappings, we would consider having it > as > an option. > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Luke771 wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:46 +0100 > > > "3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i" <3buib3s50i at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > > > > > I tried to block all traffic. Everything is blocked, except Freenet > and > > > > TOR. > > > > > > > > I wanted to allow only the IP ranges of some countries. And allow > > > connection > > > > to seednodes. This is an intermediate solution between darknet and > > > opennet. > > > > > > No, this is nonsense. > > > You can run darknet, opennet, or even both side by side, but there's no > > > such thing as an 'intermediate solution' The idea of blocking whole > > > countries (based on -what? biased information from the propaganda > machine?) > > > makes no sense at all. Please reconsider your position. > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20081226/f3917cab/attachment.html>
[freenet-support] JVM keeps hanging and crashing Freenet
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my wrapper will suddenly crash: "JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM." "JVM did not exit on request, terminated" "JVM received a signal SIGKILL (9)." "Reloading Wrapper configuration..." It's not a new problem. Does this happen to anyone else? Here is a 24h graph of the free memory on my computer, during my latest jvm crash. I have other things running, but most of the activity is probably due to freenet. The crash occurred around 7am, and you can see how just over 100M is freed up... though, this is barely half of what I alot to it (220M). So I don't think it's an out-of-memory problem. http://dennisn.dyndns.org/guest/pubstuff/freenetcrashes-freememory.png But what else could crash the jvm? Maybe it's a bug in the wrapper? System CPU activity is acceptably low and normal (~25% average usage)--I can't imagine how it could hang the jvm for a few minutes.
[freenet-support] JVM keeps hanging and crashing Freenet
After a day or so, with no problems mentioned in wrapper.log, my wrapper will suddenly crash: JVM appears hung: Timed out waiting for signal from JVM. JVM did not exit on request, terminated JVM received a signal SIGKILL (9). Reloading Wrapper configuration... It's not a new problem. Does this happen to anyone else? Here is a 24h graph of the free memory on my computer, during my latest jvm crash. I have other things running, but most of the activity is probably due to freenet. The crash occurred around 7am, and you can see how just over 100M is freed up... though, this is barely half of what I alot to it (220M). So I don't think it's an out-of-memory problem. http://dennisn.dyndns.org/guest/pubstuff/freenetcrashes-freememory.png But what else could crash the jvm? Maybe it's a bug in the wrapper? System CPU activity is acceptably low and normal (~25% average usage)--I can't imagine how it could hang the jvm for a few minutes. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
