Re: [freenet-support] Darknet
Thanks Luke! Also, I think I have to modify the darknet port in freenet.ini. On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Luke771 luke771.li...@gmail.com wrote: 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: Can I use an old reference Darknet (file node-port) when I reinstall the node to avoid losing the connection with my friends? yes but you also need the file peers-port IIUC node-port is your node and peers-port is your darnet peers' info. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] 1210 performance
I install these plugins only: JSTUN XMLLibrarian KeyExplorer On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Juiceman juicema...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM, 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: I had no problem with version 1209. The machine has 2GB of RAM, it doesn't use the swap, and the node wasn't rebuilding or resizing. I tried reinstalling the node several times, I have the same problem after a few hours. When I restart the node, it is immediately slow. Finally, I tried BDB, and the problems have disappeared. Could you check your plugins and make sure you are not running the XML_spider? I had horrible performance on my node until I realized the spider was writing to a 1+ GB file on the disk the node was running on. - -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.5) iEYEARECAAYFAkoXL/wACgkQ4esu1mlKOs8aHQCgiwJKBY7GkCbSFDjq/uoRh3tt z8IAnA907pQqkVhRaYEjkJW091Y740Ak =kO5W -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] [freenet-dev] New java-based installers
It's OK on Linux, but the installer and the first time wizard don't ask if I want auto-start (and I don't want auto-start). On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: The java-based installer has been updated. Windows users already see the windows installer, this is for mac and linux users. The installer no longer asks about auto-start, plugins or auto-update (all but auto-start are asked in the first-time wizard), start on reboot support on OS/X should be fixed thanks to mrsteveman, and we are shipping the offline installer, with all the dependancies included, except for in the jnlp version used for mac's (this should probably be fixed soon). Both the wininstaller and the java installer are now being distributed via CoralCache, which can achieve good download speeds, but a file cannot be updated easily once it has been published. Because we are bundling all the dependancies in both the windows installer and the java installer, it will need to be rebuilt for every new stable build. If you have a mac, please test the installer. In particular, does Freenet successfully restart after a reboot (it should start up during login). If you don't have a mac, testing would still be helpful. ___ Devl mailing list d...@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
Re: [freenet-support] Auto-update key blown according to 1 peer(s)!
On Saturday 23 May 2009 00:13:44 Juiceman wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:25 PM, SmallSister development smallsis...@xs4all.nl wrote: One or more of your peers says that the auto-update key is blown! This means that an attacker may know the private key for the auto-update system and can therefore cause your node to run code of his choice (if you update)! The auto-update system has been disabled. It is also possible that your peers are deliberately lying about it. Your node has been unable to download the revocation certificate. Possible causes include an attack on your node to try to get you to update despite the key being blown, or your nodes lying about the key being blown. Please contact the developers or other Freenet users to sort out this mess. Is this serious, someone attempting a sick joke or a developer hitting some wrong keys on his keyboard? Peter. I would assume someone is running a rogue node that they edited the code to that is exploiting the node2node fast warning system. It was only a matter of time before someone tried this. If you see more than one or if your node sees it for itself then you might worry. Agreed, it's probably not a problem. I certainly haven't blown the key. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
