Re: [freenet-support] no locks available error
Thus spake Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [09/05/05 21:05]: : This doesn't happen when running a Freenet node logged on my machine as : root. Another clue. Likely permissions problem. Give the user you're trying to run Freenet as write permissions on the directory it's complaining about. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] capacity
Thus spake Matthew Toseland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03/05/05 11:02]: : Why can't you just reduce the bandwidth limit? (Of course, that can't be : done on the fly either..) Not via Freenet, but via system firewalls it can. ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] FreeBSD - seednodes?
Thus spake Brian T. Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01:58:46 11/12/03: : Why not just install JDK 1.4.1? It seems to work fine under FreeBSD 4.9; : surely it would work under 5.1 as well? I'm using JDK1.4 under 5-CURRENT, but can vouch that it works under 5.1-RELEASE just as well. Side note, you may not want to install -CURRENT right now, the tree's a little on the unstable side. I'm also using build 5031. The only issues thus far are excessive load, and I'm playing around with some settings. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] Fuqid keeps stalling out?
Thus spake Brian T. Schellenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [01:57:43 11/12/03: : Yeah, but the browser is irrelalvent; 'tis fproxy that handles the freenet : stuff for the browswer, and *it* knows about freenet. : : Not that it's likely to do better the fuqid . . . but it might be interesting : to give it a go. Take a look at ulimit, and the following options as defined in sys/i386/conf/LINT: MAXDSIZ=(256*1024*1024) MAXSSIZ=(256*1024*1024) DFLDSIZ=(256*1024*1024) In more than a couple of cases, I've upped this a bit higher. There's some notes right around that part of LINT that explain what each does. You're probably most interested in increasing MAXDSIZ and MAXSSIZ, to what depends on what else the machine is doing, and how much RAM you have available. (FWIW, to get the most out of a MySQL install, I've had these two as high as 1024*1024*1024 -- so a GB, as opposed to 256MB by default.) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] freenet load always 100%
Thus spake The Babbler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06:24:30 11/11/03: : I run FreeBSD, with JDK 1.4 (jdk-1.4.1p4_1) and 4.9-STABLE kernel. : : Free *is* very slow for me but I don't see loads 100%; in fact, the load : numbers always seem fairly plausible. Just a data point to tell you it's not : universal. Thanks! Anyone running under 5-CURRENT? It's good to see that it's working for someone, just wondering if perhaps all the threading changes have made a difference. Or maybe my node is just overloaded... ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: [freenet-support] freenet load always 100%
Thus spake [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [16:34:02 11/11/03: : Anyone running under 5-CURRENT? It's good to see that it's working for : someone, just wondering if perhaps all the threading changes have made : a difference. : : Or maybe my node is just overloaded... : : if you've got only thread problems, try this: : : - stop the node : - edit your freenet.ini or freenet.conf file with a text editor : - replace %maximumThreads=120 with maximumThreads=300 (note: the '%' is gone!) : - replace %threadFactory=Q with threadFactory=Y (note: no '%' anymore) : - restart the node : : this will replace the thread factory implementation and raises the limit of how many threads are allowed to run to 300 Thanks. I was hoping to avoid upping the number of threads, but I must admit, I have no idea what the different threadFactory's are. : you may reduce 300 to something lower if your machine experiences slowdown. for me the settings Y,300 worked even *better* than Q,120 Nope, I should be fine running at 300 or so. When I move this over to a dedicated machine, I'll probably drop it, as it's not as beefy as my current machine. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
[freenet-support] freenet load always 100%
I've been noticing some accessibility problems with my freenet install
over the past couple of weeks. Figuring that it was just a fresh node,
and I'd done a number of restarts, I didn't bother looking into it. But
sometime yesterday, since I'd been up for almost five days, I poked a bit
further and noticed that my load was floating between 120% and 180%.
I read the error message ('This happens sometimes, don't worry, be
happy') and didn't worry, and was happy.
Well, I checked again tonight, and I'm sitting 200% at this point. I
have no incoming connections, but *tons* of outbound connections. Even
though I haven't actually been /using/ my node, just letting it run.
Is this normal? The load as I just checked it is 300%, and is always
due to thread limit. I can't actually *do* anything with my node, as
everything takes ages to load (it's not entirely uncommon for, say,
YoYo to take 30m to come up).
FWIW, this is a FreeBSD-CURRENT system, with JDK1.4 installed. It
could be a problem with the JRE, as 1.4 is still considered beta quality.
I'm running Freenet build 5031.
Just wondering if anyone else has seen this, or has suggestions to fix.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
