Re: [freenet-support] Re: Question re: accessing my Freenet node from another computer

2004-04-27 Thread Toad
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:15:16AM +, MonkeyOmen wrote:
> Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmmm.. That ought to do it.. If you spawn a standard apache on the linux
> > machine, can your 10.* machines access pages from it successfully?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > If not, then I think this is a TCP/IP routing issue... Do the test and
> > we'll talk more it this is the issue.
> > 
> > If they can.. Then I suggest that you crank up the loglevel on your
> > freenet server and track what really happens when your 10.* machines
> > tries to request something from http://192.168.1.10:/ 
> 
> I tried this but couldn't make any sense out of the *enormous* logfile 
> generated.  With logLevel set to Error nothing came up.  With it set to Debug, 
> it's 100,000+ lines in a short time.

:)

logLevel=debug is *not* recommended. Personally I use logLevel=minor and
use logLevelDetail to get debug logging on individual subsystems of
interest.
> 
> Can you tell me what should I search for in the logfile?
> 
> 
> A couple other things I tried.
> 
> Moving my laptop off the 10.* segment, plugging it into my hub, and assigning 
> 192.168.1.12 to it made no difference.  I take this to mean that my wireless 
> bridge isn't the problem.
> 
> 
> If I telnet to 192.168.1.10:80 from my 10.0.0.2 laptop, I can type in a 
> request and have it served by Apache.  Same with telneting to 192.168.1.10:22 -
>  the ssh server answers.
> 
> But if I telnet to 192.168.1.10: from 10.0.0.2 the connection times out - 
> ie, nobody answers.  (Of course if I telnet to  from 192.168.1.10 (my 
> Freenet server), Fred 0.5 answers as expected.)  I don't know if this means 
> anything.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your help.
-- 
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [freenet-support] Re: Question re: accessing my Freenet node fromanother computer

2004-04-27 Thread Niklas Bergh


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MonkeyOmen
> Sent: den 22 april 2004 04:15
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Question re: accessing my 
> Freenet node fromanother computer
> 
> 
> Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmmm.. That ought to do it.. If you spawn a standard apache on the 
> > linux machine, can your 10.* machines access pages from it 
> > successfully?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > If not, then I think this is a TCP/IP routing issue... Do 
> the test and 
> > we'll talk more it this is the issue.
> > 
> > If they can.. Then I suggest that you crank up the loglevel on your 
> > freenet server and track what really happens when your 10.* 
> machines 
> > tries to request something from http://192.168.1.10:/
> 
> I tried this but couldn't make any sense out of the 
> *enormous* logfile 
> generated.  With logLevel set to Error nothing came up.  With 
> it set to Debug, 
> it's 100,000+ lines in a short time.
> 
> Can you tell me what should I search for in the logfile?

Not straight ahead.. But you could try scanning the log file for the
address of the machine that is unable to connect you your freenet server
to see if there is anything obvious around there..


/N

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Question re: accessing my Freenet node from another computer

2004-04-27 Thread MonkeyOmen
Niklas Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm.. That ought to do it.. If you spawn a standard apache on the linux
> machine, can your 10.* machines access pages from it successfully?

Yes.

> If not, then I think this is a TCP/IP routing issue... Do the test and
> we'll talk more it this is the issue.
> 
> If they can.. Then I suggest that you crank up the loglevel on your
> freenet server and track what really happens when your 10.* machines
> tries to request something from http://192.168.1.10:/ 

I tried this but couldn't make any sense out of the *enormous* logfile 
generated.  With logLevel set to Error nothing came up.  With it set to Debug, 
it's 100,000+ lines in a short time.

Can you tell me what should I search for in the logfile?


A couple other things I tried.

Moving my laptop off the 10.* segment, plugging it into my hub, and assigning 
192.168.1.12 to it made no difference.  I take this to mean that my wireless 
bridge isn't the problem.


If I telnet to 192.168.1.10:80 from my 10.0.0.2 laptop, I can type in a 
request and have it served by Apache.  Same with telneting to 192.168.1.10:22 -
 the ssh server answers.

But if I telnet to 192.168.1.10: from 10.0.0.2 the connection times out - 
ie, nobody answers.  (Of course if I telnet to  from 192.168.1.10 (my 
Freenet server), Fred 0.5 answers as expected.)  I don't know if this means 
anything.


Thanks for your help.


___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


[freenet-support] Re: Question About Threads

2003-12-03 Thread Matt Weaver
Checkpoint: Connection opener 4
freenet.interfaces.LocalNIOInterfac$ConnectionShell  12
freenet.interfaces.PublicNIOInterface$ConnectionShell 2
freenet.node.states.data.DataStateInitiator  84
freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallBackMessage 44

But this is after a few hours of sitting still, with no local browswing going on, and 
I am still bouncing up against the queryreject situation, with 146 threads active... I 
guess it looks alot like what you reported your node at, but like I said, that seems 
like an awfull large amount of time to spend rejecting queries, just becase threads 
pile up so much... (Once again, I ain't a Rocket Scientist, so if you say it is 
normal, I will take your word for it, Toad)

-Matt
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support


[freenet-support] Re: Question

2003-11-13 Thread Martin Stone Davis
Edgar Friendly wrote:

Kyle Weigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


I run a server, and I donate space to freenet and all that fun stuff,
but I was wondering if I could post something on  MY donated
space.. and I know it's there, but give the link to people just like I
would link to anything else on Freenet.  I know one of the points is
that no one knows where data is, but I want to be able to have people
download/view from my server without them knowing where my server
resides.
Kyle Weigel

Sorry, freenet isn't the system you're looking for if you want
reliable hosting.  The network has to be able to put the data on the
nodes it'll look for it on.  If you have data on your node, and noone
knows about it, it's a waste of space.
Thelema.


Couldn't he just offer all the files using Frost?

-Martin

___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support