Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
Is the backoff related to the 100% / very high cpu usage that some people are reporting? Do they go together? On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 07:44:31PM -, Mr. Flibble wrote: So this is just an all peers are backed off frequently after the load limiting changes report? I have no idea :( Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being backed off? The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone else could have given their nodes more bandwidth? signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
So this is just an all peers are backed off frequently after the load limiting changes report? I have no idea :( Or is there a definite problem with nodes not connecting or even being backed off? The usual nodes seem to be reconnecting. In the last couple of days, I'm up to 3-4 nodes connected (with 4-8 backed off) which seems better. I haven't changed anything here, so maybe someone else could have given their nodes more bandwidth? ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 06:59:19PM +, Volodya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Possibly. But perhaps it's just backoff sucks. Several of the simulations seemed to suggest this! What do you mean here, please. Many of the simulations showed that throttling without backoff was superior to throttling with backoff. Backoff is intended to prevent throttling from throttling the whole network down to nothing because of a small number of very slow nodes causing lots of failures when too many requests are routed to them. - Volodya signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Houston, We have a problem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What is your input and output rate? 1011 runs fine for me, the node finally uses the allowed output capacity: # Output Rate: 12.2 KiBps (of 14.0 KiBps) # Input Rate: 15.8 KiBps (of 56.0 KiBps) Maybe your output rate is reaching 30K/s and thats just too much for your connection? Did you try to lower it? # Total Output: 21.6 MiB (2.65 KiBps) # Payload Output: 13.6 MiB (1.67 KiBps) (63%) # Total Input: 12.8 MiB (1.57 KiBps) # Output Rate: 125 Bps (of 5.0 KiBps) # Input Rate: 842 Bps (of 15.0 KiBps) - -- http://freedom.libsyn.com/ Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast http://freeselfdefence.info/ Self-defence wiki http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum None of us are free until all of us are free.~ Mihail Bakunin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFs78cuWy2EFICg+0RAilLAKCrKkDUO3mGr8AKnVJk+5lacTogUACgzA+U f4KD0gUO9mO0irlLF9M7iTI= =urRr -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
