Re: Call volume
2009/4/13 B bburde...@comcast.net: What I was really wanting to know was whether anyone with a FR had their phone working at a reasonable call volume without having echo. Not necessarily how they did it, although that is good info, but whether this was possible at all using the FR hardware. I'm trying to decide whether to get another phone for day to day use, as my pre-FR phone is on its last legs. yes, lots have managed it. volume was fine with 2008.12, and there were no echoes in other regards, 2008.12 isn't so great... ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
The myth of missed phone calls (was: OM2008.12 - basic usage instructions?)
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:52:55 -0700 (PDT) halbtaxabo...@yahoo.com wrote: Sean Chadwell smchadw...@gmail.com wrote: Don't waste all your time there, we're expecting the new 2009 version of the Openmoko distribution to arrive (well, there was a promise to have something last month already) at some stage. I don't think that waiting for the next release is a good idea. I was at Sean Moss-Pulz' talk in Bern on April 2. In the QA, somebody said that his Freerunner missed incoming calls. Sean M-P replied that this would be fixed really soon. I asked, When? and Sean said, June. I have attended that talk as well and I also encountered (surprisingly) many opinions at the Openmoko community stand saying the same. I can only talk about my experience (I'm currently working on some dbus testing infrastructure to say for sure), but telephony has been pretty stable for me (using FSO and zhone) for about three months now. I'm quite reluctant to say more about this until I have test results other than none of my friends have asked me why I don't answer the phone any more, but I had to clearify that if there still are problems with incoming calls (which I honestly don't believe) then they are not immediately noticable. Regards, Daniel Willmann signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
Re: The myth of missed phone calls (was: OM2008.12 - basic usage instructions?)
A semi-pointless aside: I've gathered there are some quoting problems in these threads, but I didn't write what is attributed to me, here (actually, it's two different authors . . . my own small contribution was elsewhere in the thread). On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Daniel Willmann dan...@totalueberwachung.de wrote: On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:52:55 -0700 (PDT) halbtaxabo...@yahoo.com wrote: Sean Chadwell smchadw...@gmail.com wrote: Don't waste all your time there, we're expecting the new 2009 version of the Openmoko distribution to arrive (well, there was a promise to have something last month already) at some stage. I don't think that waiting for the next release is a good idea. I was at Sean Moss-Pulz' talk in Bern on April 2. In the QA, somebody said that his Freerunner missed incoming calls. Sean M-P replied that this would be fixed really soon. I asked, When? and Sean said, June. I have attended that talk as well and I also encountered (surprisingly) many opinions at the Openmoko community stand saying the same. I can only talk about my experience (I'm currently working on some dbus testing infrastructure to say for sure), but telephony has been pretty stable for me (using FSO and zhone) for about three months now. I'm quite reluctant to say more about this until I have test results other than none of my friends have asked me why I don't answer the phone any more, but I had to clearify that if there still are problems with incoming calls (which I honestly don't believe) then they are not immediately noticable. Regards, Daniel Willmann ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
[all] accelerometer data errors
hi, i recall a few months ago, there was a bug somewhere (possibly kernel), that screwed up the data from the accelerometers. assuming i didn't imagine this, has it been fixed yet? i had a look around the wiki, but found nothing about it on these pages: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Accelerometer_data_retrieval http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Accelerometer_Fundamentals cheers ___ support mailing list support@lists.openmoko.org https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support