Re: [FSO] Wifi in M5 no longer functioning

2009-02-03 Thread Marcus Stong
I'm having the same problem.



Dylan Semler wrote:
 It seems that my prior FSO wifi configuration no longer works with M5. 

 r...@om-gta02:~# ifup eth0
 WPA: Configuring Interface
 ioctl[SIOCGIFFLAGS]: No such device
 Could not get interface 'eth0' flags
 ioctl[SIOCSIWPMKSA]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWMODE]: No such device
 Could not configure driver to use managed mode
 ioctl[SIOCGIWRANGE]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCGIFINDEX]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODE]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: No such device
 WEXT auth param 7 value 0x0 - Failed to disable WPA in the driver.
 ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: No such device
 WEXT auth param 5 value 0x0 - ioctl[SIOCSIWAUTH]: No such device
 WEXT auth param 4 value 0x0 - ioctl[SIOCSIWAP]: No such device
 ioctl[SIOCGIFFLAGS]: No such device
 wpa_supplicant: /usr/sbin/wpa_supplicant daemon failed to start
 FAILED
 ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device
 eth0  No such device

 ifconfig: SIOCGIFFLAGS: No such device



 I'm using WPA2 configured as follows:

 # cat /etc/wpa_supplicant/cat wpa_supplicant.conf
 ctrl_interface=/var/run/wpa_supplicant
 ctrl_interface_group=0
 eapol_version=1
 ap_scan=1
 fast_reauth=1
 # WPA2:
 network={
ssid=private
scan_ssid=1
proto=RSN
key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
pairwise=CCMP TKIP
group=TKIP CCMP
psk=private
priority=50
 }

 And I've added the line: wpa-conf 
 /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf beneith the line iface eth0 
 inet dhcp in /etc/network/interfaces.

 This configuration has worked for all other distributions thus far.  
 Is something different this time around?

 Dylan

 

 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support
   


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Zhone won't install - still relying on libpython2.5-1.0

2009-01-22 Thread Marcus Stong
I flashed the newest FSO testing image, which doesn't come with zhone
installed anymore. When I try to install zhone I get the error:
ERROR: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for zhone: libpython2.5-1.0
I have libpython2.6-1.0 installed, and trying to install the older version
just gives more dependency errors.
Any ideas? It would be nice to be able to install a phone on FSO.

Marcus
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Experiences with GTA02 and OM2008.12 (was part of the Brick thread)

2009-01-20 Thread Marcus Stong
You don't need to mess with uboot environment anymore. Download the 
kernel in the android forum at forum.koolu.org in the Android Pre-built 
image... thread, where the kernel is under 2M.
Android works well, but the phone is unusable still in my opinion. It's 
so quiet that you can't hear ANYTHING with any background noise such as 
in a car, on the street, with music in the background. This is being 
worked on, but if you're looking for a usable phone, this isn't it yet. 
Don't get me wrong, I love it, and actually feel quite motivated to help 
resolve this volume issue, because otherwise it's a great environment.

Gothnet wrote:

 Craig Woodward wrote:
   
 Funny you mention that... it's the last on my list, since I've tried most
 of the others but this one has failed to boot after several  attempts.  I
 got  a new uSD card just for this setup to see if thats what's preventing
 the boot.

 

 Two things I found that stop boots on android images I've used are - SD card
 partitions and uboot.

 If you're using uboot you must alter the uboot environment to be able to use
 a larger kernel. The default limit is 2MB. The way I did it was to grab the
 uboot env using dfu-util ... basically follow the instructions 
 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Bootloader#What_if_I_borked_my_bootloader_environment_and_don.27t_get_a_prompt_anymore.3F
 here  but edit the environment.in file to set a kernel partition size of 3
 or so MB. There's also a way to do it using the uboot command line but I'm
 not familiar with that.

 The SD card *must* be formatted with two partitions. The second one *must*
 be ext3. The first I usually format as FAT 16, though FAT 32 may work too.
 The first partition will appear to android as its SD card, the second will
 be used for its data/config store. I don't know what size to recommend, but
 it's worked with 2/6GB on my 8GB card.

 HTH.
   


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Call Volume on wired headset

2009-01-14 Thread Marcus Stong
I'm using the latest testing milestone of FSO, and am trying to get the
wired headset working better on zhone calls. The earbud volume is rather
weak. I've altered gsmheadset.state control.3 values to 1 (from 87). It's
turned up the volume a bit, but still not enough. I also changed the value
of control.6 to 1 as well.
Maybe I'm not getting how this works. I tried the maximum value of control.3
(120 or something), but that seemed to make it quieter.
Can someone guide me on how to make the wired headset louder. It's now a law
in Ontario that you have to use hands-free while driving, and right now, I
won't be able to hear anything with noise created driving on the highway.

Thanks,
Marcus
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: [FSO] Re: Call Volume on wired headset

2009-01-14 Thread Marcus Stong
Hey Al,
Phone's gta02 with FSO milestone 4.1.
I changed the values back up to 127 and 7, and rebooted, and then made a
call, with no difference. I wonder does FSO or zhone not use the .state
files?
Just to be clear, I'm changing the gsmheadset.state file at
/usr/share/openmoko/scenarios

Marcus

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Al Johnson
openm...@mazikeen.demon.co.ukwrote:

 On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Marcus Stong wrote:
  I'm using the latest testing milestone of FSO

 Please quote the actual version number to avoid confusion. As I understand
 it 'latest milestone' is currently 4.1. It also helps to know whether you
 have gta01 or gta02 as the mixer channel numbers are apparently different.

  , and am trying to get the
  wired headset working better on zhone calls. The earbud volume is rather
  weak. I've altered gsmheadset.state control.3 values to 1 (from 87). It's
  turned up the volume a bit, but still not enough.

 That's odd - setting it to 1 should give almost no output, at least on a
 gta02. Mine is at 96 and maxmum is 127.

  I also changed the value of control.6 to 1 as well.

 From what? Mine is at 7 (maximum)

  Maybe I'm not getting how this works. I tried the maximum value of
  control.3 (120 or something), but that seemed to make it quieter.

 That's very strange. It seems as though you are editing the correct
 controls,
 and the differences should be obvious given the large level changes you
 seem
 to be making. I can't test it myself until I've resoldered my headset, but
 I've not had any problems with it in the past when changing audio settings.
 i
 haven't checked to see that FSO does actually use the gsmheadset.state when
 the headset is plugged in. I assume you are editing the file, saving the
 changes then starting a new phone call to test the settings.

  Can someone guide me on how to make the wired headset louder. It's now a
  law in Ontario that you have to use hands-free while driving, and right
  now, I won't be able to hear anything with noise created driving on the
  highway.


 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Once a whiner

2009-01-09 Thread Marcus Stong
I'd just like to say, for all the whiners using om 2008.x (I've been one
just recently, too), try FSO testing. I've been using it for a few days, and
everything seems to work like a charm compared to OM2008.x.
Suspend works great, battery life is killer, boot time is good, telephony
seems solid. Granted there's no UI for wifi and no bluetooth support, it's
still eons ahead of OM2008 as far as I can tell. Really, I think everyone
needs to get over om2008, including open moko, because it just doesn't work.
But I have renewed faith in my phone now that I've installed FSO. Great job
FSO team!
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Suspend in om2008.12

2008-12-24 Thread Marcus Stong
Isn't suspend one of the things that was suppose to be fixed in om2008.12,
or was this one of the things that never got fixed? It seems like the last
FDOM had a more stable suspend/resume than this.

Marcus

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Marc Bantle openm...@rcie.de wrote:

 Marcus Stong schrieb:
  Is it just me, or does suspend freeze on om2008.12. I flashed the
  latest stable images to my freerunner, but it won't wake up when in
  suspend. I've rebooted several times. Any suggestions?
 To me it seems that suspend as well as
 shutdown hang for a while and therefore
 a manual resume is not honored. If I give
 it the time to suspend (estimated 5 min.)
 it will resume properly.

 While suspend can be initiated by a short
 click on the power button, I need to press
 for 3 seconds or more to resume. I personally
 prefer resuming by a simple click of the
 power button as in  om-testing.

 Cheers,
 Marc



 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Suspend in om2008.12

2008-12-23 Thread Marcus Stong
Is it just me, or does suspend freeze on om2008.12. I flashed the latest
stable images to my freerunner, but it won't wake up when in suspend. I've
rebooted several times. Any suggestions?

Marcus
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Stable Upgrade Anytime Soon?

2008-12-15 Thread Marcus Stong
It's been over a month now that opkg upgrade has produced nothing
whatsoever. I know the back to basics are being worked on, but does anyone
know how long until something makes it to the stable feed? I know part of my
frustration relating to me venting on the whole sad story thread has been
partially because it really seems like nothing is happening. I realize
there's a testing feed, but I don't really have the time to go through all
the steps to make it work for a while.

I don't see why it's taking so long to pass anything to the stable feed.
It's not like it's really stable to begin with, so there isn't much to lose.
The dialer crashes, suspend freezes, and there's low call volume using FDOM
or OM2008.9. I really would like to see a carrot dangled in front of my
nose... that's always been the fun with this phone, and there haven't been
too many carrots lately.

Marcus
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Sad Story

2008-12-12 Thread Marcus Stong
I agree with this whole thread of Openmoko's fatal mistake of moving on 
to GTA03 with GTA02 still being unstable and unusable as a primary 
phone. If GTA02 gets left behind in the dust without ever working 
properly, it doesn't say much for their company. If Openmoko feels the 
hardware of GTA02 is inadequate to even bother making it a stable phone, 
there should be some sort of recall and free replacement with a GTA03. 
$399 for a phone that never worked properly is pretty hard to swallow, 
and even harder to swallow when the company expects people to buy a new 
phone while blatantly ignoring that same community of users who have 
invested time and money in developing and testing their original phones.

- Marcus

Karthik Kumar wrote:
 I clearly don't blame the developers here myself. I blame Openmoko's
 selfish management (probably it's board of directors or C*Os) for
 this. I am sure that a developer who talks back against this will just
 get fired/have to face bad consequences.

 What would be the best way to 'convince' or 'force' the management to
 change their decisions? Does anyone know a lawyer?

 -Karthik

 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:23 PM, Paul pault...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 My experience, as I'm sure with many other people, with my freerunner
 has been frustrating most of the time.  To say, its all on the user is
 wrong.  Granted the community could be better, however, its hard to
 contribute when everything is so fragmented.

 For instance, about the echo problem, one of the developers for
 OpenMoko stated Since there are different hw versions out there (a5,
 a6, a7), it's impossible to provide one alsa state file that suits all
 models.  Wait a sec.  If the developers know the issues, What's
 preventing the if statement that would prevent hundreds of hours of
 tweaking, testing, and frustration for the community?

 Let's be honest here FIC is making a pretty penny off of OpenMoko,
 using very old hardware selling at a premium price (2.5g not even
 EDGE).  Yet we are OK with that.  What the community DOES expect is
 basic support, for starters a phone that makes calls without echoing,
 doesn't drop connection and sends and receives text messages reliably
 as the Number 1 priority.  If I'm not mistaken, the majority of the
 working code in OpenMoko is from Trolltech.  In addition FSO has a
 very nice distro and the Freerunner isn't even its main device.  Yet
 more than 1 year AFTER the release of the 1974, we still have MAJOR
 issues from a basic install of Om.  Then we read stuff like this.

 OM is moving more focus to gta03 now, so my current resource for
 qtopia is fairly limited.

 It becomes evident that FIC and Openmoko cares less about creating
 reliably working software then it does about moving products.  (not
 blaming the developers here, they get pressure) Follow the next link
 and I think I've made my case.

 http://www.cafepress.com/openmoko_inc

 Now with that said, I will be posting online my howtos including
 scripts to make a kinda stable variant of FDOM soon.  Been too busy
 reflashing my phone.

 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Karthik Kumar karthikku...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 You should have fixed the GTA02 months back, when you released it.
 Instead, you people are working on GTA03/Neo Whatever. It proves that
 you don't care about the community, You just care about the bunch of
 people who might want to buy your upcoming phones, who sponsor your own
 selfish causes and suffer while you are working on GTA04.
   
 --
 Paul
 Email - pault...@gmail.com

 There were moments when he looked on evil simply as a mode through
 which he could realize his conception of the beautiful.
 Oscar Wilde - The Picture of Dorian Gray

 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

 

 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

   


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Sad Story

2008-12-12 Thread Marcus Stong
A quick thought...if Openmoko feels the hardware of GTA02 is inadequate to
even bother making it a stable phone, should there not be some sort of
recall and free replacement with a GTA03.
$399 for a phone that never worked properly is pretty hard to swallow, and
even harder to swallow when the company expects people to buy a new phone
while somewhat ignoring that same community of users who have invested time
and money in developing and testing their original phones. Speaking from the
perspective of a web developer, if I make a piece of shit site that doesn't
work properly, my clients are going to demand that it works properly. If I
neglect to do that and move on to the next project, I would run out of
clients pretty fast...

- Marcus
___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Qtopia Extended GPS Application and Auto Rotate

2008-10-04 Thread Marcus Stong
I've installed Qtopia Extended, but can't seem to find any GPS app
anywhere, and the claims of Dynamic Screen Rotation leaves me
scratching my head as well. You can manually rotate in settings, but
it's far from Dynamic.
Can someone point me in the right direction?

___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Qtopia Extended GPS Application and Auto Rotate

2008-10-04 Thread Marcus Stong
Does mapping demo have any of the functionality of tangogps? I can't
even seem to zoom in or out or move around the map, let alone add POIs
or the sort. Does anyone know if there are any plans to port over
tangogps?

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Philippe Guillebert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Marcus Stong wrote:
 I've installed Qtopia Extended, but can't seem to find any GPS app
 anywhere, and the claims of Dynamic Screen Rotation leaves me
 scratching my head as well. You can manually rotate in settings, but
 it's far from Dynamic.
 Can someone point me in the right direction?

 Hi,

 I can answer the first part : in order to get the GPS application (named
 mapping demo) :
 - open the menu
 - open applications (the colored boxes)
 - in the list, you should have the mapping demo.

 Didn't tested it yet, since I'm indoors.

 I second you on the screen rotation part.

 But on the whole, Qt Extended 4.4 is really useable and fast (especially
 if you load the smart theme, and use the latest mwester kernel).

 Thank you Lorn for your excellent work !

 --
 Phyce


 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Mofi: Error with first_iface when connecting

2008-09-03 Thread Marcus Stong
I get an error when attempting to connect to my wifi network using
Mofi 0.3 beta:

connecting to foxrun
Auto-generating ~/.mofi_wpa_supplicant.conf
foxrun encryption: ['0x0', '0x0', '0x0', '0x8'] - WPA?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mofi/uiMofiPanel.py, line 97, in connect_ap
mofi_wap_autoconf.generate_wpa_supplicant([ssid])
File /usr/lib/mofi/mofi_wpa_autoconf.py, line 77, in generate_wpa_supplicant
print WPA Conf generated. Run wpa_supplicant -i%s -c%s -B to sue the
configuration%(first_iface, os.path.join(os.environ['HOME'],
'.mofi_wpa_supplicant.conf'))
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'first_iface' referenced before assignment

I'm using OM 2008.8 on a freerunner.

Any ideas how to fix this?

___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Zecke Repo

2008-08-29 Thread Marcus Stong
Does anyone know if the Zecke Repo was shut down?
When I opkg update using the testing.conf file I've been using, I get:

* Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/all/Packages.gz,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/all/Packages.sig,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/armv4t/Packages.gz,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/armv4t/Packages.sig,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/neo1973/Packages.gz,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/neo1973/Packages.sig,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/om-gta02/Packages.gz,
error 404
 * Failed to download
http://people.openmoko.org/~zecke/om2008.8-testing/om-gta02/Packages.sig,
error 404

It used to work fine. I reflashed the rootfs and kernel, but now can't
upgrade with the Zecke repo.

Marcus

___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Re: Mofi issue on 2008.8 stable

2008-08-27 Thread Marcus Stong
Edit the file /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py
On line 82 change:
init()
to
_init()

(add an underscore at the start)

That fixes the problem.

Marcus

Yorick Moko wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Tried to start Mofi (v2) and get this
 Traceback (most recent call last):
 ~  File /usr/lib/mofi/mofi_gui.py, line 30, in module
 ~import gtk
 ~  File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py, line
 82, in module
 ~init()
 NameError: name 'init' is not defined

 ~ Any ideas on how to fix this?
 ~ Thanks,
 ~   Lisa
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFItN6Z1sOMhsR36UsRAjOIAJ4y7o3jzAISwsRYQ+8Tuo2vwoQ+CACgmrgg
 KQaEvtHa7YYqHaMDuzbFetI=
 =2px+
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

 

 1 why not try mofi 0.3??
 2. it's a know error: in
 /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py, line 82,
 change init to _init.

 I don't know if a bug report is in order or not

 ___
 support mailing list
 support@lists.openmoko.org
 https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support

   


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support


Mofi: Error with first_iface when connecting

2008-08-27 Thread Marcus Stong
I get an error when attempting to connect to my wifi network using Mofi 
0.3 beta:

connecting to foxrun
Auto-generating ~/.mofi_wpa_supplicant.conf
foxrun encryption: ['0x0', '0x0', '0x0', '0x8'] - WPA?
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/mofi/uiMofiPanel.py, line 97, in connect_ap
mofi_wap_autoconf.generate_wpa_supplicant([ssid])
File /usr/lib/mofi/mofi_wpa_autoconf.py, line 77, in 
generate_wpa_supplicant
print WPA Conf generated. Run wpa_supplicant -i%s -c%s -B to sue the
configuration%(first_iface, os.path.join(os.environ['HOME'], 
'.mofi_wpa_supplicant.conf'))
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'first_iface' referenced before assignment

I'm using OM 2008.8, and have upgraded using the testing.conf

Any ideas how to fix this?


___
support mailing list
support@lists.openmoko.org
https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/support