[pfSense Support] Embedded image

2005-12-10 Thread alan walters
Title: Embedded image







Seems that the embedded image is in the updates directory. I guess this is just a mistake. Or is this an update






RE: [pfSense Support] Features

2005-12-10 Thread Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\)
Multiple PPPoE outbounds?  ;)  (no need to reply)

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 12:40 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Features

It depends on what they are, etc.

Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the information.

Scott

On 12/9/05, John Cianfarani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Hey Scott,



 Not sure if you saw my email to you but I wanted to know if you guys 
 would develop features for cash donations?



 Thanks

 John

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Embedded image

2005-12-10 Thread Frimmel, Ivan \(ISS South Africa\)
Title: Embedded image



Some of the mirrors don't delete 
previous / pulled versions. the above.net mirrors are typically the most 
current.


From: alan walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 12:57 PMTo: 
support@pfsense.comSubject: [pfSense Support] Embedded 
image

Seems that the embedded image is in the updates 
directory. I guess this is just a mistake. Or is this an update 



RE: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling issues

2005-12-10 Thread Damien Dupertuis
Hello,

It has been working for two days and a half now and
I'm not banned , my adress is upgraded correctly so I
assume the bug is killed...

Thank you!!!

Damien



--- alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

 Yep should be fine. Check
 
 http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/timeline
 
 And see if the file is updated in releng branch if
 it is the update for you is fine. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Damien Dupertuis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 08 December 2005 15:52
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling
 issues
 
 Okay,
 
 to be honest I don't know what to answer to you...
 I'm not good enough!!! that's it!
 let me explain my problem again:
 
 I experienced dyndns issues because the client was
 trying to upgrade too often, a guy told me to do: 
 Update_file.sh /etc/crontab and reboot (on version
 95a) I done it and it works...
 Now I installed 95.4 and I just want to know if It's
 gonna work straight from the upgrade or not...
 
 anyway I'm currently testing it...so I'll keep you
 informed...
 okay?
 
 Thanks and regards
 
 Damien
 
 
 
   
 
   
   

___
 Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le
 nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version
 sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
 commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 







___ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] Traffic Shaper / IPSec

2005-12-10 Thread John Cianfarani








Trying to see if there would be some
solution to this problem without putting a second pfsense box behind to do the
shaping.



I took a read of the m0n0wall list where
this seemed to be discused and one idea seemed fairly plausible.

Create 2 IPSec tunnels 1 voice 1 data and
shape those independantly? 



Here are my thoughts:


 My
 central site has multiple static wan IPs so I could build the tunnels
 to different IPs. 
 On
 the remote pfsense I could create 2 rules/queues in the traffic shaper and
 shape based on the destination IP. (one tunnel having higher priority)
 Routing
 traffic properly over these two tunnels could get a bit tricky.
 The
 central side has a 192.168.1.0/24 block, I could pretend it was split it
 into 2x /25s and put 192.168.1.0/25 and 192.168.1.128/25 as the
 destinations lan for the remote tunnel.
 I
 could do something similar or some other ip trickery to make the wan side
 go back to the correct tunnels.




My only concern here is if ipsec traffic
as a whole could be shaped like this?





Sorry for keeping on this topic, 

John









From: John Cianfarani 
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005
10:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Traffic
Shaper / IPSec





If you build the traffic shaping rules for lan-wan will
it treat traffic destined to an IPsec tunnel as a part of that? Essentially
Im just looking to give priority to VoIP traffic anything else would be
below that. Even if it could be done on the LAN interface regardless of
destination.



Thanks

John










Re: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling issues

2005-12-10 Thread Ispánovits Imre
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:22:55 +0100 (CET)
Damien Dupertuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,
 
 It has been working for two days and a half now and
 I'm not banned , my adress is upgraded correctly so I
 assume the bug is killed...
 
 Thank you!!!
 
 Damien
 
Hi,

I can confirm as well. In v95.4 works fine. My ISP just now changed my ip
address and this event triggered DynDns-update correctly.

THX

Imre


-- 
This is Linux Land.
In silent nights you can hear the windows machines rebooting


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [pfSense Support] DynDns scheduling issues

2005-12-10 Thread Damien Dupertuis
No problem :-)

Believe me!!! we are also wery happy you finally
killed the nasty bug!!!

Thank you very much!!!

Regards

Damien


--- Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

 Thanks for the replies.
 
 I have to say that I am really glad this problem is
 solved.  I've lost
 many hair to grey due to these bugs.
 
 Scott
 
 On 12/10/05, Ispánovits Imre
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:22:55 +0100 (CET)
  Damien Dupertuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hello,
  
   It has been working for two days and a half now
 and
   I'm not banned , my adress is upgraded correctly
 so I
   assume the bug is killed...
  
   Thank you!!!
  
   Damien
  
  Hi,
 
  I can confirm as well. In v95.4 works fine. My ISP
 just now changed my ip
  address and this event triggered DynDns-update
 correctly.
 
  THX
 
  Imre
 
 
  --
  This is Linux Land.
  In silent nights you can hear the windows machines
 rebooting
 
 
 
 

-
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 







___ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]