Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Where would I go if I wanted to grab the source of the FreeRADIUS package
 and potentially add some features?

http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/

 I am looking to add some support for additional parameters to return to
 radius clients—for example, I am setting up a network for a couple of office
 buildings, and they purchased two HP 3500yl switches. I would like to be
 able to provision tenants for NATted internet access, or provision them for
 direct internet access based on the mac based authentication scheme that
 the hp switches have. It is possible to dynamically assign clients to a
 particular VLAN on those switches via a radius server based on the response
 from the radius server—so, since we are already using pfSense out there, I
 figure that maybe I can look into adding support for some of these
 additional radius user/client options in the FreeRADIUS package and
 contribute them back.

http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradius.inc
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradius.xml
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradiusclients.xml
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradiussettings.xml

Looking forward to seeing your updates,

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Dimitri Rodis
Where would I go if I wanted to grab the source of the FreeRADIUS
package and potentially add some features?

 

I am looking to add some support for additional parameters to return to
radius clients-for example, I am setting up a network for a couple of
office buildings, and they purchased two HP 3500yl switches. I would
like to be able to provision tenants for NATted internet access, or
provision them for direct internet access based on the mac based
authentication scheme that the hp switches have. It is possible to
dynamically assign clients to a particular VLAN on those switches via a
radius server based on the response from the radius server-so, since we
are already using pfSense out there, I figure that maybe I can look into
adding support for some of these additional radius user/client options
in the FreeRADIUS package and contribute them back.

 

Bill, I think you are the maintainer of that package?

 

Dimitri Rodis

Integrita Systems LLC 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

 



RE: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Dimitri Rodis
Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
using the dev iso?

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 

-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 2:38 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Where would I go if I wanted to grab the source of the FreeRADIUS
package
 and potentially add some features?

http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/

 I am looking to add some support for additional parameters to return
to
 radius clients-for example, I am setting up a network for a couple of
office
 buildings, and they purchased two HP 3500yl switches. I would like to
be
 able to provision tenants for NATted internet access, or provision
them for
 direct internet access based on the mac based authentication scheme
that
 the hp switches have. It is possible to dynamically assign clients to
a
 particular VLAN on those switches via a radius server based on the
response
 from the radius server-so, since we are already using pfSense out
there, I
 figure that maybe I can look into adding support for some of these
 additional radius user/client options in the FreeRADIUS package and
 contribute them back.

http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradius.inc
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradius.xml
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradiusclien
ts.xml
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/packages/freeradiussetti
ngs.xml

Looking forward to seeing your updates,

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SV: [pfSense Support] I need a friend in the USA or Canada...

2008-02-11 Thread Bill Marquette
On Feb 11, 2008 9:25 AM, Holger Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi Anders,

  This is no recommendation, just a FYI, but:
  Did you come across this website: http://www.myus.com/ - i never tried, but
 it might be a way. I know there are US based mail order companies willing to
 ship to such a address.

Hmmm...time to figure out what addresses they give out so I can
blacklist them in any future ebay auctions.  Apologies in advance to
all the people _legitimately_ using such companies.

--Bill


RE: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Dimitri Rodis
The FreeRadius log seems to be located at /var/log/radius.log. According to the 
current package, there is no logging set up in the package, so you basically 
have to ssh into pfSense to look at the log.

What's involved in web enabling the FreeRADIUS log? (looked in the forums, 
didn't find much.) Does it take something more than just adding a reference to 
the location of the log in the .xml file somewhere?

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 


-Original Message-
From: Dimitri Rodis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 4:29 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

Yep, got it figured out. I just ssh'd into the pfSense install and ftp'd the 
files out, made the changes, and ftp'd them back into /usr/local/pkg... I just 
made what I think are the appropriate mods to the files, just need to test them 
with the switches and make sure everything works as expected. Once they do, 
I'll send them up.

Thanks--

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 

-Original Message-
From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

Or just replace the chenged files in your pfsense-install (using putty or 
WinSCP when using windows)

The files are mostly placed under /usr/local/xxx (have a look there)

Try your changes and fix all errors... then send your patches using diff-rub to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

:-)

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 00:26
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
 into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
 using the dev iso?

Look in the packages are on the forum where there is a good howto.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: SV: [pfSense Support] I need a friend in the USA or Canada...

2008-02-11 Thread Holger Goetz
Hi Anders,

This is no recommendation, just a FYI, but: 
Did you come across this website: http://www.myus.com/ - i never tried,
but it might be a way. I know there are US based mail order companies
willing to ship to such a address. 

Holger



On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 10:18 +0100, Anders Dahl wrote:

 Thanks RB  Holger Bauer
 
 But neither mini-box.com or linitx.com is offering exactly these items.
 Fortunately a Danish guy living in San Francisco, has contacted me, and is
 willing to help.
 
 Anders
 
 -Oprindelig meddelelse-
 Fra: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sendt: 10. februar 2008 01:28
 Til: support@pfsense.com
 Emne: RE: [pfSense Support] I need a friend in the USA or Canada...
 
 Also have a look at http://linitx.com/index.php . Linitx is also a
 recommended vendor and supporter of the pfSense project.
 
 Holger 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 10:44 PM
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] I need a friend in the USA or Canada...
 
 Have you considered mini-box.com directly?  They're the manufacturer of
 that PSU, but will also sell directly to the public.  Looks like they
 ship internationally, but no specific mention of where or what the rates
 are, only that they are higher.
 
 
 RB
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
 commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Adam Armstrong

Royce Mitchell III wrote:

Adam Armstrong wrote:
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into 
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.


You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would 
result in BGP flapping when the CARP switched.


adam.
Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant 
routers servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to 
handle a packet without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between 
them?
There are a number of mechanisms for doing this, generally you'll set 
the localpref high for prefixes coming from the peer you want to use, 
and set the MED low for prefixes being announced to that peer, that way 
your peer will send traffic to you on the correct link (lowest MED wins) 
and you'll send traffic out on the correct link (highest localpref wins).


However, if you're doing BGP solely to get redundant connectivity to the 
same ISP you should look again at CARP and ask what your ISP can do by 
way of HSRP/VRRP to present a single IP to you from two of their 
devices. VRRP/CARP/HSRP is generally a far better solution for that due 
to the slowlness of BGP convergence.


adam.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
 into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
 using the dev iso?

Look in the packages are on the forum where there is a good howto.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Royce Mitchell III
Adam Armstrong wrote: 
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into 
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.


You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would 
result in BGP flapping when the CARP switched.


adam.
Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant routers 
servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to handle a packet 
without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between them?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Adam Armstrong

Paul M wrote:

Royce Mitchell III wrote:
  

Is the BGP package for pfsense available, yet?

Also, does it play nice with CARP, or is CARP even necessary when you
have BGP?



I think CARP is a very different thing - BGP is a way of having multiple
circuits to different ISPs to get resilience internet connectivity. CARP
is a way of having two devices share an IP.

Or am I missing some clever use of BGP and CARP?
  
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into 
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.


You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would result 
in BGP flapping when the CARP switched.


adam.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] Allow UDP scan of pfSense LAN from remote IPSEC tunnels?

2008-02-11 Thread Gabe Green
I believe that is my PCAnywhere problem; I haven't allowed remote VPN 
tunnels to UDP scan the LAN for listening PCAW hosts.  Any insight 
here?  I am missing something trivial here.


Thanks guys,

Gabe

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] 1.2RC5 or release

2008-02-11 Thread Paul M
Hi,
given the a number of minor bug fixes, we will be seeing a 1.2RC5
variant sometime, or is the next step a full release?

thanks
Paul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Paul M
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
 Is the BGP package for pfsense available, yet?
 
 Also, does it play nice with CARP, or is CARP even necessary when you
 have BGP?

I think CARP is a very different thing - BGP is a way of having multiple
circuits to different ISPs to get resilience internet connectivity. CARP
is a way of having two devices share an IP.

Or am I missing some clever use of BGP and CARP?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Dimitri Rodis
Yep, got it figured out. I just ssh'd into the pfSense install and ftp'd the 
files out, made the changes, and ftp'd them back into /usr/local/pkg... I just 
made what I think are the appropriate mods to the files, just need to test them 
with the switches and make sure everything works as expected. Once they do, 
I'll send them up.

Thanks--

Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC 

-Original Message-
From: Fuchs, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 3:52 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: AW: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

Or just replace the chenged files in your pfsense-install (using putty or 
WinSCP when using windows)

The files are mostly placed under /usr/local/xxx (have a look there)

Try your changes and fix all errors... then send your patches using diff-rub to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

:-)

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 00:26
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
 into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
 using the dev iso?

Look in the packages are on the forum where there is a good howto.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Royce Mitchell III

Adam Armstrong wrote:

Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant 
routers servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to 
handle a packet without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between 
them?
There are a number of mechanisms for doing this, generally you'll set 
the localpref high for prefixes coming from the peer you want to use, 
and set the MED low for prefixes being announced to that peer, that 
way your peer will send traffic to you on the correct link (lowest MED 
wins) and you'll send traffic out on the correct link (highest 
localpref wins).


However, if you're doing BGP solely to get redundant connectivity to 
the same ISP you should look again at CARP and ask what your ISP can 
do by way of HSRP/VRRP to present a single IP to you from two of their 
devices. VRRP/CARP/HSRP is generally a far better solution for that 
due to the slowlness of BGP convergence.


adam.
This client has two ISP's, and wants to setup BGP so he can reroute a 
/24, but he wants redundant routers to service the BGP so that if one 
goes down he still has both ISPs. So, both routers will respond to both 
legs of the of the BGP route.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



AW: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

2008-02-11 Thread Fuchs, Martin
Or just replace the chenged files in your pfsense-install (using putty or 
WinSCP when using windows)

The files are mostly placed under /usr/local/xxx (have a look there)

Try your changes and fix all errors... then send your patches using diff-rub to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

:-)

Martin

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 00:26
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: [pfSense Support] FreeRADIUS Package

On 2/11/08, Dimitri Rodis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Once I have changes made, how should I go about getting these changes
 into a pfSense install to test before I send any patches up? Should I be
 using the dev iso?

Look in the packages are on the forum where there is a good howto.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[pfSense Support] carp status page wish

2008-02-11 Thread Paul M
Hi,
would it be possible to have the carp status page also show the carp
description field, as as the moment it's not very informative.

AtDhVaAnNkCsE


Paul

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [pfSense Support] BGP status

2008-02-11 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Feb 11, 2008 8:12 AM, Royce Mitchell III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Okay, please forgive my ignorance, but if you have two redundant routers
 servicing your BGP, how will they decide who is going to handle a packet
 without some sort of CARP/VRRP communication between them?

OpenBSD does play well with CARP + BGP but since we do not have
CARPDEV yet, we will not have these features.

Stuff like[1]:

 -c  Force bgpd to do carp(4) demotion at startup when the demote
 functionality is used.  Normally, bgpd will only do demotion
 at startup when the demotion counter for the group in ques-
 tion is already greater than 0.  bgpd will start handling de-
 motion after all sessions with demotion configured for the
 given group have been successfully established.  At system
 startup, rc(8) has the demotion counter for the group carp
 increased until after bgpd is started, so this option should
 not be used in rc.conf(8).

Will hopefully be available some time in the future.  A patch is being
tested on 7.X right now.

Scott
[1] 
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=bgpdapropos=0sektion=0manpath=OpenBSD+Currentarch=i386format=html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]