[pfSense Support] pf tagging
Does pfSense 1.2 support pf's packet tagging? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
Re: [pfSense Support] pf tagging
Only 2.0 from the gui On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Matias Surdi matiassu...@gmail.com wrote: Does pfSense 1.2 support pf's packet tagging? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org -- Ermal - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
RE: [pfSense Support] network interface mismatch
I ran into the same thing but never resolved it. I just went out and bought two DLink $10 cards. I gave up on the 3Coms. -Original Message- From: Pete Boyd [mailto:petes-li...@thegoldenear.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:06 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] network interface mismatch When installing pfSense 1.2.2 from the Live CD, if I use 2 network cards of a similar type, for example 3Com 3C905B-TX or 3C905C-TX, I get Network interface mismatch -- Running interface assignment option and right after it only shows one 'xl0' interface. I've had this issue every time I install pfSense using various 1.2 series versions. I think I used to have it with IPCop too. I've tried the cards in various PCI slots. I normally work around it by using two differing 3Com 3C905 variants, or perhaps a 3C900 and a 3C905 I can't recall. Today I'm seeing it whilst using one 3C905B-TX and one 3C905C-TX (I can't remember if I've gotten this particular card combination to work previously). The machine is a HP Vectra VL800, part number P3629AV, has a Pentium 4 CPU. There's no BIOS update available from HP. I've tried installing with and without PCI bus master in BIOS setup for all PCI slots. What's going on here? Is there anything I can do to work around it whilst still using these cards as these types are all I have left in stock? Is there any more info you need in order to help me? Thanks -- Pete Boyd Open Plan IT - http://openplanit.co.uk The Golden Ear - http://thegoldenear.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] SNMP and NAT / Filtering
I have had an issue the past few years with PFSense I have never figured out. Im sure its something Ive setup wrong. I have a variety of PFSense firewalls/routers and have the same issue with ALL of them regardless of version or how many interfaces they have. In one example: LAN - 172.16.x.x CORE - 192.168.x.x WAN - X A workstation on the LAN can ping, http, telnet, ftp, ssh etc a device on 192.168.x.x network located on the CORE network. It cannot SNMPWalk or SNMPSet. If I take the same workstation, set its ip to 192.168.x.x and jack it into the CORE switch (so it bypasses any NAT/Routeing/Filtering) I can do anything with SNMP I want on the remote device. I do have SNMP enabled on the actual firewall so we can monitor it but I have tried turning it off to make sure there was not something getting mangled there. I have also setup a specific outbound NAT rule for the LAN to the CORE that sends the traffic out a different 192.168.x.x virtual IP on the firewall and it behaves the same way. It just times out. I have also went into the remote device and enabled read/write access for 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 192.168.0.0/16 in case it was an acces restriction and was seeing the traffic come in from a weird network.. I setup a POS Linksys router with a 172.x.x.x LAN and a 192.168.x.x WAN for giggles and It works fine setting a workstation behind the Linksys and connecting remotly to the 192 device. Any thoughts? Not much in the mailing lists for this so Im sure its end user stupidity. Thanks Tim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org
[pfSense Support] Wireless card recommendation
I would like to setup pfsense as an AP for home use, I have seen the hardware compatibility list, but I was wondering if anyone has a recommendation for not so expensive (Best buy /microcenter) card based on personal experience. Thanks Sam
RE: [pfSense Support] Attention Firebox X Series Users - Testing Needed
Currently, we have a couple of people (including myself just Monday) that were able to reproduce watchdog timeouts on these units, although they seem to be significantly reduced relative to previous builds. I am still working with Pyun to try and get the issue resolved. Of course, we won't know that it's fully resolved without people willing to beat these units up after patches make their way into builds, so the more people we have, the better. Folks interested in trying to narrow the remaining issues down should follow (and post) on the forum, here: http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,15669.0.html Thanks, Dimitri Rodis Integrita Systems LLC http://www.integritasystems.com -Original Message- From: Joshua Schmidlkofer [mailto:joshl...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:23 PM To: support@pfsense.com; j...@pax2cargo.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Attention Firebox X Series Users - Testing Needed On 4/18/09 11:17 AM, Dimitri Rodis wrote: Attention Firebox X500/700/1000 Users using pfSense: Watchdog timeouts getting' you down? Thinkin' about throwin' that old Firebox in to the fireplace? Don't do that just yet! J Thanks to the pfSense devs, along with Pyun YongHyeon, the maintainer for the FreeBSD Realtek network driver, it appears that we may have solved the issue with the watchdog timeouts on the Realtek 8139C+ chips that are used in these units. For the past couple of days, I have worked with Pyun, and yesterday Pyun sent me a patch, and that patch was committed to the 1.2.3 snapshot builds, as well as to the 2.0 alpha snapshot builds by the pfSense devs, and is part of any snapshot build as of yesterday (4/17) at 2pm Eastern time, or later. Snapshot builds can be downloaded from http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD7/RELENG_1_2/ or http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD7/HEAD/ I have been testing a build with this patch since yesterday, and have yet to see a single watchdog timeout on my interfaces-and no modifications to loader.conf have been made. This is a default install-no special options have been set anywhere. If at all possible, please try to install a recent snapshot build on your firebox units (those of you that have them) and test this patch. If you do still receive watchdog timeouts, please let me know either on this list, or off-list. Either way, please try to detail what you were doing when the watchdog timeout occurred so that we can try to reproduce it, and Pyun can fix it. Thanks to all that have helped, and thanks to those that are willing to test! Dimitri Rodis Integrita Systems LLC http://www.integritasystems.com http://www.integritasystems.com HOT! We are so looking into this. We have 5 watchguards which we can use for this project, and I hate the idea of them collecting dust. Count us IN! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
RE: [pfSense Support] Wireless card recommendation
I've been using a Wistron CM9 and it has been working great with my Alix board. It's a low power card but I added an 8db ceiling antenna and it covers the whole house from the basement. Richard rich...@bizsyscon.com _ From: k_o_l [mailto:k_...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:00 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense Support] Wireless card recommendation I would like to setup pfsense as an AP for home use, I have seen the hardware compatibility list, but I was wondering if anyone has a recommendation for not so expensive (Best buy /microcenter) card based on personal experience. Thanks Sam
