Re: [pfSense Support] port 25

2009-08-12 Thread Simon Dick
2009/8/11 Fabien Germain fabien.germ...@gmail.com:
 Hi,

 On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kevin Kimani kevinkim...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Not going through dont understand how you are able to do that

 mail kevin # telnet mail.aphrc.org 25
 Trying 41.220.120.26...
 telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection timed out
 

 If you are behind a residential DSL line, your ISP is probably filtering
 outgoing smtp connections. It's often the case, to prevent spammers to use
 their cheap DSL line to flood the planet.

 From a non filtered network here in France, it works too :

Works from an unfiltered UK business connection (and BTW bethere don't
filter outbound SMTP, I use them at home and used to run my own mail
server there)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Multiwan - no loadbalance needed

2009-08-12 Thread Michel Servaes
Hi,


When reading several posts, I found much info about load balancing...
but this is something I don't need.
What I would like to have, is to route all internet traffic through
one interface (an PPPoE session), and some traffic (terminal server 
smtp) from the other interface (incoming).

If I read a bit further on, it seems that you best dedicate the WAN
interface to the actual traffic, to be able to use the most out of
packages...
And, that OPT1 is for the other interface to allow incoming traffic to
our terminal server and mail-server.

Currently I have one xDSL connection, that will be for all common
traffic, and I have one SDSL connection to allow my external
co-workers to join the terminal server. (the connection will be shared
for smtp traffic - for that I shall use QoS to allow my terminal
sessions to be the most priority).


To put it simple (I think), is that OPT1 should be treated as incoming
traffic, and WAN should only be used for outgoing traffic (eg.
internet, radio, downloading, ...)

Hope this makes sense... kind regards

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Multiwan - no loadbalance needed

2009-08-12 Thread Gary Buckmaster

Michel Servaes wrote:

Hi,


When reading several posts, I found much info about load balancing...
but this is something I don't need.
What I would like to have, is to route all internet traffic through
one interface (an PPPoE session), and some traffic (terminal server 
smtp) from the other interface (incoming).

If I read a bit further on, it seems that you best dedicate the WAN
interface to the actual traffic, to be able to use the most out of
packages...
And, that OPT1 is for the other interface to allow incoming traffic to
our terminal server and mail-server.

Currently I have one xDSL connection, that will be for all common
traffic, and I have one SDSL connection to allow my external
co-workers to join the terminal server. (the connection will be shared
for smtp traffic - for that I shall use QoS to allow my terminal
sessions to be the most priority).


To put it simple (I think), is that OPT1 should be treated as incoming
traffic, and WAN should only be used for outgoing traffic (eg.
internet, radio, downloading, ...)

Hope this makes sense... kind regards

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org

  
This is entirely do-able and we have a number of commercial support 
customers who run a setup very much like this.  You may also consider 
configuring your WAN to fail over to your OPT interface in the case of 
the WAN interface going down.  This will ensure mostly uninterrupted 
Internet access for your LAN clients. 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] VPN Connections behind pfSense NAT

2009-08-12 Thread apiase...@midatlanticbb.com

Having a problem with vpn setup wondering if anyone else is also??

The VPN software is Cisco.

This is the setup

VPN Client - Ethernet Switch - pfsense -  Internet - VPN Concentrator
A client behind a pfsense can use internet, email, everything else just 
fine, expect VPN.   When i run a packet capture on the client in 
question i see this. I can attach the packet capture if needed.


2256.726408131.44.120.12410.71.3.170ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode) (Message fragment 2 - last)
2356.727400131.44.120.12410.71.3.170ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode) (Reassembled + Message fragment 1)
2564.889357131.44.120.12410.71.3.170ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode) (Message fragment 2 - last)
2664.889361131.44.120.12410.71.3.170ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode) (Reassembled + Message fragment 1)
3166.86080610.71.3.170131.44.120.124ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode)
3566.90835610.71.3.170131.44.120.124ISAKMPIdentity 
Protection (Main Mode)


I've turned off Traffic Shaping, Scrubbing, Gave client a 1:1 NAT. 
Nothing seems to help.


Adam

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] IGMP packet out of WAN

2009-08-12 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Evgeny Yurchenkoevg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:

 cd /usr/ports/devel/git  make install

 -- Ends with
 ===  Configuring for git-1.6.4
 ===  Building for git-1.6.4
 GIT_VERSION = 1.6.4
 * new build flags or prefix
 ... many compilations here ...
 http-push.c:14:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory
 http-push.c:852: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before '*' token
 http-push.c: In function 'lock_remote':
 http-push.c:936: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:936: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
 http-push.c:936: error: for each function it appears in.)
 http-push.c:936: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:943: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:946: error: 'xml_cdata' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c: In function 'remote_ls':
 http-push.c:1179: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this
 function)
 http-push.c:1179: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:1186: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:1189: error: 'xml_cdata' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c: In function 'locking_available':
 http-push.c:1262: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this
 function)
 http-push.c:1262: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:1269: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 gmake: *** [http-push.o] Error 1
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.

 ***sigh*** -(((

Try this:

rm -rf /usr/ports  portsnap extract  cd /usr/ports/devel/git 
make install BATCH=yes

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Silly question, where the heck is the logout button?
jlc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] IGMP packet out of WAN

2009-08-12 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Scott Ullrichsullr...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Evgeny Yurchenkoevg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:

 cd /usr/ports/devel/git  make install

 -- Ends with
 ===  Configuring for git-1.6.4
 ===  Building for git-1.6.4
 GIT_VERSION = 1.6.4
     * new build flags or prefix
     ... many compilations here ...
 http-push.c:14:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory
 http-push.c:852: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before '*' token
 http-push.c: In function 'lock_remote':
 http-push.c:936: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:936: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
 http-push.c:936: error: for each function it appears in.)
 http-push.c:936: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:943: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:946: error: 'xml_cdata' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c: In function 'remote_ls':
 http-push.c:1179: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this
 function)
 http-push.c:1179: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:1186: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c:1189: error: 'xml_cdata' undeclared (first use in this function)
 http-push.c: In function 'locking_available':
 http-push.c:1262: error: 'XML_Parser' undeclared (first use in this
 function)
 http-push.c:1262: error: expected ';' before 'parser'
 http-push.c:1269: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
 gmake: *** [http-push.o] Error 1
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.
 *** Error code 1

 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.

 ***sigh*** -(((

 Try this:

 rm -rf /usr/ports  portsnap extract  cd /usr/ports/devel/git 
 make install BATCH=yes

OK -- I figured out what was the problem here.

Do this and you should be OK:

cd /usr/ports/textproc/expat2  make depends install
cd /usr/ports/devel/git  make depends install

Ignore what I sent earlier.

I have updated the DevWiki page to reflect these changes.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread RB
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:15, Joseph L.
Casalejcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
 Silly question, where the heck is the logout button?

There isn't one in the 1.2 series since it uses HTTP authentication.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
There isn't one in the 1.2 series since it uses HTTP authentication.

Argh, that means I have to close my browser:) I always have so much open
like Nagios etc in other tabs...

Thanks!
jlc


[pfSense Support] Re: 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Dave Warren
In message
abf9510930e1374ba4b4c61a01104fbda36...@monterossa.activenetwerx.local
Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com was claimed
to have wrote:

There isn't one in the 1.2 series since it uses HTTP authentication.

Argh, that means I have to close my browser:)

You could close your browser, or you could use a browser that implements
a method to forget HTTP authentication.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] Re: 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
You could close your browser, or you could use a browser that implements
a method to forget HTTP authentication.

I would be interested in a reco for an alternative browser then, sure.
I use ff only because its foot print is light and it works well, hell
I'd use ie on my windows workstation if it weren't such a pig.

Can ff be setup to do this?

jlc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Joseph L.
Casalejcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:

 Argh, that means I have to close my browser:) I always have so much open
 like Nagios etc in other tabs...

You could use a different browser for pfsense. It's an inconvenience,
but probably more convenient than closing all your tabs.

db

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] Re: 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread David Burgess
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Joseph L.
Casalejcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:

 Can ff be setup to do this?

In Windows FF3.5

ToolsClear Recent HistoryDetailsActive Logins

I believe that should do it.

db

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Scott Ullrich
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:10 PM, David Burgessapt@gmail.com wrote:
 You could use a different browser for pfsense. It's an inconvenience,
 but probably more convenient than closing all your tabs.

Install the Web Developer Toolbar for firefox and then select
Miscellaneous - Clear Private Data - HTTP Authentication

http://chrispederick.com/work/web-developer/

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



RE: [pfSense Support] Re: 1.2.3-RC1 Web gui logout

2009-08-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
 Can ff be setup to do this?

In Windows FF3.5

ToolsClear Recent HistoryDetailsActive Logins

I believe that should do it.

Fantastic, thanks!
jlc


[pfSense Support] ultrasurf

2009-08-12 Thread Zhu Sha Zang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hey, i'm using pfsense with transparent proxy (squid + squidGuard)
working well here.

But some users on my network are using ultrasurf that everything know
use port 443 to connect on proxyes around internet.

Isn't possible to block 443 port and open it selectively.

Then, how the better way to block ultrasurf in this situation?

thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqC+1sACgkQ35zeJy7JhCiZ/ACfbD6efbiLvJnIHOOYcBDF1A5E
YfkAmwVHMEY75oNGbMC1X7Vj3Mym5Fzj
=bCg4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] Importing SSL certs for Web GUI

2009-08-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Anyone know what is involved in setting up a cert when using a windows CA?

I can use OpenSSL on a Linux host to do the conversion from the format the
Windows CA outputs (I don't know if I can output it natively?). What do I
use for the RSA private key, or more to the effect, how do I get that out
of the Windows CA?

Thanks!
jlc

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN Connections behind pfSense NAT

2009-08-12 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:52 AM,
apiase...@midatlanticbb.comapiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
 Having a problem with vpn setup wondering if anyone else is also??

 The VPN software is Cisco.


The Cisco has to have NAT-T enabled.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] IGMP packet out of WAN

2009-08-12 Thread Evgeny Yurchenko




Scott Ullrich wrote:

  On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Scott Ullrichsullr...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Evgeny Yurchenkoevg.yu...@rogers.com wrote:


  http-push.c:1269: error: 'parser' undeclared (first use in this function)
gmake: *** [http-push.o] Error 1
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/devel/git.

***sigh*** -(((
  

Try this:

rm -rf /usr/ports  portsnap extract  cd /usr/ports/devel/git 
make install BATCH=yes

  
  
OK -- I figured out what was the problem here.

Do this and you should be OK:

cd /usr/ports/textproc/expat2  make depends install
cd /usr/ports/devel/git  make depends install

Ignore what I sent earlier.

I have updated the DevWiki page to reflect these changes.

Scott

  

Great! this problem solved.
Thanks.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] RE: Multiwan - no loadbalance needed

2009-08-12 Thread Michel Servaes
To put it simple (I think), is that OPT1 should be treated as incoming
traffic, and WAN should only be used for outgoing traffic (eg.
internet, radio, downloading, ...)

Hope this makes sense... kind regards


It was indeed a sanity check... and it would be the first time actually
implementing a multiwan... sure, it looks quite ordinary for people having
to implement this on a regular base, but for me it'll be the first time.

Guess it'll work out just fine... thanks for sharing your experiences with
me.

Regards,
Michel


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



Re: [pfSense Support] VPN Connections behind pfSense NAT

2009-08-12 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:55 PM,
apiase...@midatlanticbb.comapiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
 Chris Buechler wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:52 AM,
 apiase...@midatlanticbb.comapiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:


 Having a problem with vpn setup wondering if anyone else is also??

 The VPN software is Cisco.



 The Cisco has to have NAT-T enabled.


 Thanks, The bigger problem is that they are claiming they can go to other
 nternet connections and use the VPN just fine without any changes.


It probably does from some, but you're going to need NAT-T in this
case. Alternatively, static port may work around it.
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Static_Port

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org