Re: [pfSense Support] User with limited privileges

2011-02-28 Thread Michel Servaes
To my belief there are no users to create in 1.2.3 !
This would only work on a 2.0 platform... unless there is a hidden way to
make this work ofcourse :)

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:25 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 05:53, Carlos Vicente cjpvice...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My question is: is there a way of creating a user, without elevated
  privileges, to give access only to the reports of LightSquid. I don't
 want
  any client to have access the others features of pfSense.

 No, not in pfSense 1.2.3.  Multi-user authentication and user-specific
 privileges were introduced in 2.0 and have worked quite well for
 nearly as long as the 2.0 development has been going on.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

 Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org




Re: [pfSense Support] User with limited privileges

2011-02-28 Thread Michel Servaes
oops, didn't see that the same response has been given already... sorry

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Michel Servaes mic...@mcmc.be wrote:

 To my belief there are no users to create in 1.2.3 !
 This would only work on a 2.0 platform... unless there is a hidden way to
 make this work ofcourse :)


 On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:25 PM, RB aoz@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 05:53, Carlos Vicente cjpvice...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  My question is: is there a way of creating a user, without elevated
  privileges, to give access only to the reports of LightSquid. I don't
 want
  any client to have access the others features of pfSense.

 No, not in pfSense 1.2.3.  Multi-user authentication and user-specific
 privileges were introduced in 2.0 and have worked quite well for
 nearly as long as the 2.0 development has been going on.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
 For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

 Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org





[pfSense Support] Traffic that is explicitly allowed occasionally blocked

2011-02-28 Thread Dimitri Rodis
2.0-BETA5 (i386) built on Mon Feb 21 15:43:32 EST 2011









I am seeing the above occur maybe once a day or once every other day, but the 
source IP address is in an alias that is a list of aliases (and that list 
contains my mail server aliases). Whenever I see this, I manually try to telnet 
to the same IP on port 25 and the traffic is passed, yet the mail server shows 
a failed connection attempt in the logs which coincides with the firewall log 
as above. I have a rule that explicitly allows port tcp/25 as a destination 
from my inbound mail servers alias group, and then there is a rule right 
beneath that rule that explicitly blocks outbound SMTP from all IP addresses on 
the subnet, and I have logging turned on for that rule. So, the rule beneath 
the one that should be triggered is being triggered instead.



Is there a Bug/Race condition in rule evaluation??



Dimitri Rodis

Integrita Systems LLC

http://www.integritasystems.com





inline: image001.png

Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic that is explicitly allowed occasionally blocked

2011-02-28 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Dimitri Rodis 
dimit...@integritasystems.com wrote:

  *2.0-BETA5 *(i386) built on Mon Feb 21 15:43:32 EST 2011







 I am seeing the above occur maybe once a day or once every other day, but
 the source IP address is in an alias that is a list of aliases (and that
 list contains my mail server aliases). Whenever I see this, I manually try
 to telnet to the same IP on port 25 and the traffic is passed, yet the mail
 server shows a failed connection attempt in the logs which coincides with
 the firewall log as above. I have a rule that explicitly allows port tcp/25
 as a destination from my inbound mail servers alias group, and then there is
 a rule right beneath that rule that explicitly blocks outbound SMTP from all
 IP addresses on the subnet, and I have logging turned on for that rule. So,
 the rule beneath the one that should be triggered is being triggered
 instead.



 Is there a Bug/Race condition in rule evaluation??


No, those are RSTs and FINs coming after the state is closed, expected
behavior.
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection,_why%3F

http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection,_why%3F
image001.png

RE: [pfSense Support] Traffic that is explicitly allowed occasionally blocked

2011-02-28 Thread Dimitri Rodis
No, those are RSTs and FINs coming after the state is closed, expected 
behavior.
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Logs_show_%22blocked%22_for_traffic_from_a_legitimate_connection,_why%3F

Ok, but unless I'm misunderstanding, I am not logging packets blocked by the 
default rule, so why would this be logged? And how do I know which rule was 
applied to this traffic like in the screenshot above?

[cid:image001.png@01CBD738.2C9B5970]
inline: image001.png

Re: [pfSense Support] OpenNTP

2011-02-28 Thread Chris Buechler
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
fabian.abplan...@bug.ch wrote:
 Sawadeekap

 Is it possible to connect a serial DCF or GPS clock to a pfSense box, or are
 the drivers missing in the OpenNTP package? Is it possible to set the
 parameters manually in a config File?


Haven't tried it, though we do have the PPSSYNC kernel bits so it should work.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org



[pfSense Support] restart command

2011-02-28 Thread Joseph Rotan
Hi,

i've been searching in the internet for a linux command that can send a
restart command to a windows PC, i'm not quite sure if this could be
achieved but i'm having a pfsense 1.2.3 box that is connected to 10 PC's in
a LAN and i'm just trying to build up a sequence here on how could each PC
on the LAN restart itself after ending their internet session.

Something similar to TCP/IP ports when the internet sesion is ended from
pfsense each TCP/IP port activate a command to tell the PC to restart.

I have been trying some batch file or DOS command process but could not
complete the requirements.

Has anyone ever tried this application before.

Appreciate any advise on how I could test it out.

Thanks

Joseph.


Re: [pfSense Support] restart command

2011-02-28 Thread Moshe Katz
This may help you a bit:
http://lifehacker.com/#!5275652/shut-down-your-windows-pc-remotely-from-linux

http://lifehacker.com/#!5275652/shut-down-your-windows-pc-remotely-from-linux
Moshe

--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732



On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Joseph Rotan joseph.ro...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 i've been searching in the internet for a linux command that can send a
 restart command to a windows PC, i'm not quite sure if this could be
 achieved but i'm having a pfsense 1.2.3 box that is connected to 10 PC's in
 a LAN and i'm just trying to build up a sequence here on how could each PC
 on the LAN restart itself after ending their internet session.

 Something similar to TCP/IP ports when the internet sesion is ended from
 pfsense each TCP/IP port activate a command to tell the PC to restart.

 I have been trying some batch file or DOS command process but could not
 complete the requirements.

 Has anyone ever tried this application before.

 Appreciate any advise on how I could test it out.

 Thanks

 Joseph.



[pfSense Support] 2.0-RC1 now available!

2011-02-28 Thread Chris Buechler
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=585

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com

Commercial support available - https://portal.pfsense.org