Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Thanks, I couldn't get the readme to open. I did however get the snapshot files downloaded earlier so I am good to go now. Thanks for the suggestion though. -- Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1800 288 7750 -- > From: Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:55:53 -0500 > To: > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > > On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a >> little leary about updating to the >> http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ >> >> I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look >> like they might be the update files. One is >> >> Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. >> >> Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of >> 2006. No updates have yet been applied. > > Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. > > --Bill > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Thanks, I will plan this for end of day then. I have a hdd install so I should be ok. Thanks again. -- Heath Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1800 288 7750 -- > From: Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:59:30 +0200 > To: > Conversation: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > > If you run off a hdd full installation upload the full update file at > system>firmware. It will apply the update and reboot after that. You won't > lose your configuration, just a downtime for the reboot. > > If you run from a cf-card and used the embedded image to start with you have > to reflash the card. The version you are running doesn't support updates. > Updates for embedded builds was introduced some versions ago. The new version > however will now be upgradable. Please note that the new image has a size of > 128 mb so you need at least a 128 mb cf-card. This was needed to support > updates for these platforms. If you run this kind of install the future > upgradeprocess will be the same like for the full install but you have to > upload the mini update file. > > Holger > >> -Original Message- >> From: Heath Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:44 PM >> To: support@pfsense.com >> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem >> >> >> This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, >> but I am a >> little leary about updating to the >> http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ >> >> I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files >> which look >> like they might be the update files. One is >> >> Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. >> >> Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 >> built Aug1 of >> 2006. No updates have yet been applied. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> -- >> Heath Henderson >> -- >> >> >>> From: Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Reply-To: >>> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:38:10 -0400 >>> To: >>> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem >>> >>> http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
You guys crack me up! :) Honestly, I'm surprised you have as much patience as you do! -Tim -Original Message- From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 9:46 AM To: support@pfsense.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. README?! What's that!? Shouldn't I just be asking questions and not READING!? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Heath Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Hmm, there is a README in the same directory that explains quite a bit. --Bill - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
If you run off a hdd full installation upload the full update file at system>firmware. It will apply the update and reboot after that. You won't lose your configuration, just a downtime for the reboot. If you run from a cf-card and used the embedded image to start with you have to reflash the card. The version you are running doesn't support updates. Updates for embedded builds was introduced some versions ago. The new version however will now be upgradable. Please note that the new image has a size of 128 mb so you need at least a 128 mb cf-card. This was needed to support updates for these platforms. If you run this kind of install the future upgradeprocess will be the same like for the full install but you have to upload the mini update file. Holger > -Original Message- > From: Heath Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 3:44 PM > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > > > This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, > but I am a > little leary about updating to the > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ > > I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files > which look > like they might be the update files. One is > > Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. > > Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 > built Aug1 of > 2006. No updates have yet been applied. > > Thanks > > > -- > Heath Henderson > -- > > > > From: Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: > > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:38:10 -0400 > > To: > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > > > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
This is probably a question which doesn't require an answer, but I am a little leary about updating to the http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ I was curious of how to go about the udpate. I see two files which look like they might be the update files. One is Pfsense.img and the other is fullupdate. Please advise. I haven't done any updates yet. We have RC2 built Aug1 of 2006. No updates have yet been applied. Thanks -- Heath Henderson -- > From: Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: > Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 01:38:10 -0400 > To: > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem > > http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: v.1 R.C.2 Catalin Please upgrade to http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/1.0-SNAPSHOT-09-18-06/ and see if this solves the problems. Thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
Scott Ullrich wrote: On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have settled the load balancer section to use 2 isp connections. For some reason the log looks like this: Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP And so on... I don't know why one of the internet connections seems to be down to pfSenese. And belive me, is not. Is there any chance to increase the timeout for the sevice check or the no. of retrays? Catalin What version? v.1 R.C.2 Catalin -- AkerBraila SA e-mail server This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
On 9/19/06, Catalin Epure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have settled the load balancer section to use 2 isp connections. For some reason the log looks like this: Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP And so on... I don't know why one of the internet connections seems to be down to pfSenese. And belive me, is not. Is there any chance to increase the timeout for the sevice check or the no. of retrays? Catalin -- AkerBraila SA e-mail server This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What version? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pfSense Support] Load balancer problem
I have settled the load balancer section to use 2 isp connections. For some reason the log looks like this: Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:13 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 19 03:10:08 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:38 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:52:33 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:47 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 23:39:42 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:39:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:51 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 21:25:46 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:16 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:48:11 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:59 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 20:20:54 slbd[297]: ICMP poll failed for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service DOWN Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: Service Balancer changed status, reloading filter policy Sep 18 19:27:07 slbd[297]: ICMP poll succeeded for IP.IP.IP.IP, marking service UP And so on... I don't know why one of the internet connections seems to be down to pfSenese. And belive me, is not. Is there any chance to increase the timeout for the sevice check or the no. of retrays? Catalin -- AkerBraila SA e-mail server This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender For more information please visit http://linux.bitdefender.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
