[pfSense Support] failover ipsec

2005-11-12 Thread alan walters








Enable  yes

Interface  (selected
public carp address that I want to use 192.168.5.100)

Failover ip (same
address as above 192.168.5.100)

Peerip  (used
the carp sync real ip address of the other carp in my array 192.168.10.2)

Shared key (used a 16
byte aes key)



This end is a mobile client. The other end is the tunnel. When
the tunnel establishes the moble client end shows the SAD correct.

But the tunnel end shows the error

DEBUG: get pfkey ADD message

ERROR: pfkey UPDATE failed: Invaild argument.



And there is no SAD at the tunnel end.








RE: [pfSense Support] failover ipsec

2005-11-12 Thread alan walters








On further review of this the issue seems
to lie in the fact that the tunnel end of the ipsec is running

A via padlock chipset. If I replace the
tunnel end with the same config.xml file and a wrap board the tunnel works
perfectly.















From: alan walters 
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005
10:47 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support]
failover ipsec





Enable
 yes

Interface
 (selected public
carp address that I want to use 192.168.5.100)

Failover
ip (same address as above
192.168.5.100)

Peerip
 (used the
carp sync real ip address of the other carp in my array 192.168.10.2)

Shared key (used a 16
byte aes key)



This end is a mobile client. The other end is the tunnel.
When the tunnel establishes the moble client end shows the SAD correct.

But the tunnel end shows the error

DEBUG: get pfkey ADD message

ERROR: pfkey UPDATE failed: Invaild argument.



And there is no SAD at the tunnel end.








[pfSense Support] failover ipsec

2005-10-13 Thread alan walters








Just a general question.



Would like to know if people think that this would work.







 Internet
real 

 |

 Datacentre
(IPSECEND)

 | 

  |

 |-- |

 | |

 | |

 | |

 Internet
1 
internet2

 | | 

--

 | |  |

 Wan  opt1 |

 IPSEC1__IPSECFAIL |

  |  | 

   |  | PFSENSE
BOX

 
Opt2  |

 Public
ip block  |

- 
















Re: [pfSense Support] failover ipsec

2005-10-13 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 10/13/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Just a general question.



 Would like to know if people think that this would work.







 Internet real

 |

 Datacentre (IPSECEND)

 |

 |

 |-- |

 |   |

 |   |

 |   |

 Internet 1   internet2

 |   |

 --

 |   |
 |

 Wan opt1  |

 IPSEC1__IPSECFAIL|

 |   |


 |   |
PFSENSE BOX

 Opt2
   |

 Public ip block   |

 -

Should work A-OK.  However SASYNCD is not completely finished so
failover time will be about 2 seconds from what I experience on my
home ipsec line.

Scott

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [pfSense Support] failover ipsec

2005-10-13 Thread alan walters
Cool you guys are great. This solves a long running problem. Time to get
testing I guess. thanks

 -Original Message-
 From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 13 October 2005 22:05
 To: support@pfsense.com
 Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] failover ipsec
 
 On 10/13/05, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
  Just a general question.
 
 
 
  Would like to know if people think that this would work.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Internet real
 
  |
 
  Datacentre (IPSECEND)
 
  |
 
  |
 
  |-- |
 
  |   |
 
  |   |
 
  |   |
 
  Internet 1   internet2
 
  |   |
 
 

 --
 
  |   |
  |
 
  Wan opt1  |
 
  IPSEC1__IPSECFAIL|
 
  |
 |
 
 
  |
 |
 PFSENSE BOX
 
  Opt2
|
 
  Public ip block   |
 
 

 -
 
 Should work A-OK.  However SASYNCD is not completely finished so
 failover time will be about 2 seconds from what I experience on my
 home ipsec line.
 
 Scott
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]