Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
On 24/05/2011 13:36, Ant wrote: On 5/23/2011 4:44 PM PT, NoOp typed: Interesting. about:memory didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and later. Correct. http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/ What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1 Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by different parts of SeaMonkey. Now if we can figure out why memstat about:memory have such considerable differences I'd be happier. :-) I wonder if Windows and Mac OS X ports have different results too. If so, then is there a bug report about this? ;) Perhaps it's already fixed in Firefox 6.0a/SeaMonkey 2.future? See: http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2011/05/23/a-better-aboutmemory-stage-1-75/ Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: e'mail adresses getting munged...
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote: Mon, 23 May 2011 23:28:02 +0200, /Ray_Net/: So the correct auto-fill must be contactname@hotmail.com and not contactname@hotmail.com :-) I think the best would be to automatically trim trailing spaces as no quoted form exists for and no spaces are allowed in the domain part. :-) This is what an intelligent mail client program do :-) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Recovery from lost mail and newsgroup accounts question
We are running SM 2.0.14 on a Windows XP-SP3 system. My wife rather casually advised my this morning that all our mail accounts were gone. When I tried to start SM Mail, I got the New Account Setup Wizard panel rather than the normal display of all our mail and newsgroup accounts. I tried using Mozbackup to save a copy of the profile but it said the profile was corrupted. So I manually copied the profile to a new folder and then restored the profile from a copy made a few days ago during our normal backup run. I started SM Mail and all our accounts were back. Some emails since the backup were, of course, lost but we can retrieve them if we need to. I have no idea what corrupted the profile. Since 2.1 is coming out next week I don't think I'll try to file a Bugzilla report. My question is was the action I took the best way to recover from the problem or was there some other, maybe simpler, action I should have taken? Dick ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
SM Get Info discrepancy
I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
access Mozilla SeaMonkey aite
For some reason, I cannot access the seamonkey site, by way of the throbber, nor can I by Google, typing in www.mozilla.seamonkey - or any other permutations of the above. Can anyone help me? I want to download a version of SM. The one I now have is misnamed. (Long story). ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: access Mozilla SeaMonkey aite
Keith Whaley wrote: For some reason, I cannot access the seamonkey site, by way of the throbber, nor can I by Google, typing in www.mozilla.seamonkey - or any other permutations of the above. Can anyone help me? I want to download a version of SM. The one I now have is misnamed. (Long story). http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ H. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: access Mozilla SeaMonkey aite
Keith Whaley a écrit : For some reason, I cannot access the seamonkey site, by way of the throbber, nor can I by Google, typing in www.mozilla.seamonkey - or any other permutations of the above. www.seamonkey-project.org S. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?
On 05/24/2011 02:33 AM, Philip Chee wrote:
On 24/05/2011 13:36, Ant wrote:
On 5/23/2011 4:44 PM PT, NoOp typed:
Interesting. about:memory didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14
As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and
later.
Correct.
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/
What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1
Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by
different parts of SeaMonkey.
Now if we can figure out why memstat about:memory have such
considerable differences I'd be happier. :-)
I wonder if Windows and Mac OS X ports have different results too. If
so, then is there a bug report about this? ;)
Perhaps it's already fixed in Firefox 6.0a/SeaMonkey 2.future?
See:
http://blog.mozilla.com/nnethercote/2011/05/23/a-better-aboutmemory-stage-1-75/
Phil
Thanks for that.
Sorted:
$ memstat -w | grep seamonkey
795784k PID . (/seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin)
48908k PID . (/seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/plugin-container)
25780k( 22868k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libxul.so . . . .
6268k( 0k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/omni.jar .
3892k( 0k) /.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/XUL.mfasl .
1224k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/startupCache/startupCache.4.little .
868k(836k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libnss3.so . . . .
540k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/{8A6C82A1-F6C9-481a-AAE7-C96444C9A754}/chrome/prefbar.jar
.
536k(520k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libmozsqlite3.so . . . .
456k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/{d10d0bf8-f5b5-c8b4-a8b2-2b9879e08c5d}.xpi
.
352k(300k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libnssckbi.so .
344k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}.xpi
308k(300k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libfreebl3.so . . . .
240k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/sqlitemana...@mrinalkant.blogspot.com.xpi
.
228k(192k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103}/components/libcalbasecomps.so
.
200k(192k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libnspr4.so . . . .
200k(184k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libldap60.so . . . .
188k(180k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libsoftokn3.so . . . .
172k(156k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libssl3.so . . . .
128k(112k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libsmime3.so . . . .
124k(116k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libnssdbm3.so . . . .
116k(100k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/components/libsuite.so .
100k( 0k)
/.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/extensions/{3ed8cc52-86fc-4613-9026-c1ef969da4c3}/chrome/mboximport.jar
.
92k( 68k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libnssutil3.so . . . .
88k( 80k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/components/libnkgnomevfs.so .
88k( 80k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/components/libmozgnome.so .
76k( 72k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/components/libdbusservice.so .
48k( 44k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/plugin-container .
48k( 44k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin .
32k( 32k) /.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/cookies.sqlite-shm
.
32k( 32k) /.mozilla/seamonkey/user.default/places.sqlite-shm .
24k( 16k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libprldap60.so . . . .
20k( 12k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libplc4.so . . . .
20k( 12k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libxpcom.so . . . .
16k( 8k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libldif60.so . . . .
16k( 8k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libplds4.so . . . .
12k( 4k) /seamonkey2.1/seamonkey/libmozalloc.so . . . .
plugin-container (expected) and libxul.so (not expected) seem to take up
the largest chunks of memory. I say plugin-container is expected as that
is the backup/crash etc., area and is expected to grow/shrink can
actually be limited in about:config.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? In any case, you should update to SM 2.0.14, which will soon be replaced by SM 2.1. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
David E. Ross wrote: On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. Yes, I did. I didn't have a choice. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? Yessir. What else from a Mac guy? That means you're probably a PC guy. Macs have a couple ways to determine what release version an app is. One is Finder/File/Get Info. The other is to select the app to open it, and when it opens choose the menu bar's About Firefox or About SeaMonkey and you'll get the release info. In any case, you should update to SM 2.0.14, which will soon be replaced by SM 2.1. Not bloody likely, as with MY setup, that version breaks Widgets. I really don't like that. Why do you guys keep insisting I move up to a version that is less perfect than the version that preceded it? 2.0.14 IS less than problem free. Especially in areas of what I use frequently. No thanks. keith ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
On 5/24/11 4:12 PM, Keith Whaley wrote [in part]: I previously wrote [also in part]: On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. Yes, I did. I didn't have a choice. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? Yessir. What else from a Mac guy? That means you're probably a PC guy. Macs have a couple ways to determine what release version an app is. One is Finder/File/Get Info. The other is to select the app to open it, and when it opens choose the menu bar's About Firefox or About SeaMonkey and you'll get the release info. Aha. Finder/File/Get Info is a Mac feature similar to the Properties feature of Windows. I select a file, right-click, and select Properties from the pull-down context menu. Among the properties displayed for executable files is the version. In general, I would trust what you see from Finder/File/Get Info more than what you see from selecting [Help About SeaMonkey] on the SeaMonkey menu bar. That is because it is very easy to spoof a different version. However, I recall at least one instance of a new version of Mozilla Suite or SeaMonkey that was released to end users when the developers forgot to change the version number seen by Mac's Finder/File/Get Info and Windows' Properties. But I might be mistaken about that. -- David E. Ross http://www.rossde.com/ On occasion, I might filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam from that source. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Get Info discrepancy
Keith Whaley wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 5/23/11 7:20 PM, Keith Whaley wrote: I have what I thought was SM 1.1.13 in my applications folder. I select Get Info from the Finder, and it says it's v.1.1.13. But, if I double click on it and open it, and I choose SeaMonkey/About SeaMonkey, the revision says it's 1.1.14. Why is this? Has anyone else run across that? keith whaley You posted using SM 2.0.14. Yes, I did. I didn't have a choice. I don't know what you mean by Finder or Get Info. Are those Mac features? Yessir. What else from a Mac guy? That means you're probably a PC guy. Macs have a couple ways to determine what release version an app is. One is Finder/File/Get Info. The other is to select the app to open it, and when it opens choose the menu bar's About Firefox or About SeaMonkey and you'll get the release info. In any case, you should update to SM 2.0.14, which will soon be replaced by SM 2.1. Not bloody likely, as with MY setup, that version breaks Widgets. I really don't like that. Why do you guys keep insisting I move up to a version that is less perfect than the version that preceded it? 2.0.14 IS less than problem free. Especially in areas of what I use frequently. No thanks. keith That will/would be a deal breaker for me as well - I live on Widgets. If 2.0.14 is the end of days, then I guess I'll just have to live that way or start using Safari/Thunderbird in combination. -- - Rufus ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
